NATION

PASSWORD

US military spending

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

US military spending

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:48 pm

Inspired by a tangent from another thread.

So it seems like everyone with a pet project justifies tax dollars spent on it by citing military spending as precedent.

Yet every time the conversation turns to actually cutting military spending, people act like the USA is the only thing holding Chinese hegemony back.

The whole premise strikes me as unfalsifiable. But that's not the only flaw. There's also the issue of whether or not military might is the best thing to make China think twice about what it does. What of trade boycotts? What if the first world as a whole did a co-ordinated boycott in response to something China did? (Like, let's say, what they're doing to Hong Kong right now?) Would that not make more sense than threatening them with a military we already hesitate to use? How does unused military equipment rotting in a field somewhere make China hesitate to take over the world?
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
-Ocelot-
Minister
 
Posts: 2260
Founded: Jun 14, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby -Ocelot- » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:54 pm

The USA is the only thing holding Chinese hegemony back.

User avatar
Surkiea
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 162
Founded: Aug 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Surkiea » Tue Aug 13, 2019 12:57 pm

The US should spend more, our enemies are stronger than ever and we need to display our military might that we're still a superpower.
Pro: America, Capitalism, NATO, FSA, South Korea, Pinochet, Conservatism, Christianity, Regan, McCain, Israel, Christian theocracy

Anti: Russia, Putin, Iran, Assad, Socialism, Communism, Bernie sanders, peace with Russia, North Korea, Fascism, Alt"right", "Palestine", Degenerate "rights", atheism, secularism


Proud bigot.

User avatar
Communist Crimean Republic
Secretary
 
Posts: 27
Founded: Jul 19, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Communist Crimean Republic » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:00 pm

I have no problem with this, nor do I see any reason to ever have a problem with a majority of the budget being in the military.

User avatar
Vivolkha
Diplomat
 
Posts: 836
Founded: Oct 15, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vivolkha » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:00 pm

Yeah, sure, throw sanctions to the biggest economy in the world because it would not be total economic suicide.

Sanctions will not work with Beijing.
Exclusively OOC nation | Prominent stat player as Aryax | Слава Україні! Героям слава!
Commentary about WA resolutions is posted on a personal capacity, and does not represent the opinion of 10000 Islands.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44956
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:02 pm

Reminder that conventional war is pretty much never gonna happen with any of the US’s major enemies, so it really doesn’t need an army that size. You can make a case for the Navy, but the Army? Even without getting into Pentagon waste, that could be fucking downsized.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.



Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Vivolkha
Diplomat
 
Posts: 836
Founded: Oct 15, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vivolkha » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:07 pm

Vivolkha wrote:Yeah, sure, throw sanctions to the biggest economy in the world because it would not be total economic suicide.

Sanctions will not work with Beijing.

Adding to my previous post, the way to go with the PRC is international diplomatic pressure and limiting its influence in international organizations (which is intentionally trying to corrupt, as is Russia to a lesser degree, by weakening human rights protection with several excuses).
Exclusively OOC nation | Prominent stat player as Aryax | Слава Україні! Героям слава!
Commentary about WA resolutions is posted on a personal capacity, and does not represent the opinion of 10000 Islands.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44956
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:09 pm

Surkiea wrote:The US should spend more, our enemies are stronger than ever and we need to display our military might that we're still a superpower.

Your enemies are stronger because you gave them strength while maintaining them as ideological and political enemies, all in the name of capitalism.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.



Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:11 pm

The US would benefit from bringing back the draft and integrating it into the civilian education system.
Our All Volunteer Force is becoming very expensive to maintain, a conscripted force would be much cheaper.

There's also the fact that with the number of technical jobs that are now in high demand both in the military and in the private sector having a large number of conscripts able to go through a military to private sector training pipeline would greatly help our economy.
Last edited by Genivaria on Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:28 pm

Ideally military spending should be reduced to encourage efficiency. I have no problem with the amount we spend per se but I don't like the amount of waste. When you throw too much money at a government agency or program the tendency is toward using that money instead of being frugal where possible.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:32 pm

Genivaria wrote:The US would benefit from bringing back the draft and integrating it into the civilian education system.
Our All Volunteer Force is becoming very expensive to maintain, a conscripted force would be much cheaper.

There's also the fact that with the number of technical jobs that are now in high demand both in the military and in the private sector having a large number of conscripts able to go through a military to private sector training pipeline would greatly help our economy.

Conscripts are arguably more expensive than volunteers. For one thing, volunteers likely have more experience with firearms which makes training to proficiency take less time. Volunteers also want to be in the military, obviously, so time and resources spent on molding them into soldiers is reduced. It's a big hassle to take someone who hasn't held a gun, is physically incompetent (most Americans), and doesn't want to be a soldier and turn them into an efficient soldier.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
LiberNovusAmericae
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6942
Founded: Mar 10, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby LiberNovusAmericae » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:36 pm

Surkiea wrote:The US should spend more, our enemies are stronger than ever and we need to display our military might that we're still a superpower.

Our budget is bigger than our enemies. I see no reason to increase it.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44956
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:36 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Genivaria wrote:The US would benefit from bringing back the draft and integrating it into the civilian education system.
Our All Volunteer Force is becoming very expensive to maintain, a conscripted force would be much cheaper.

There's also the fact that with the number of technical jobs that are now in high demand both in the military and in the private sector having a large number of conscripts able to go through a military to private sector training pipeline would greatly help our economy.

Conscripts are arguably more expensive than volunteers. For one thing, volunteers likely have more experience with firearms which makes training to proficiency take less time. Volunteers also want to be in the military, obviously, so time and resources spent on molding them into soldiers is reduced. It's a big hassle to take someone who hasn't held a gun, is physically incompetent (most Americans), and doesn't want to be a soldier and turn them into an efficient soldier.

To back you up, historically speaking, conscript based armies have fared poorly compared to volunteer ones.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.



Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Libertarians
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Apr 26, 2018
Anarchy

Postby Libertarians » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:48 pm

Current NATO structure of US fitting disproportionately large percentage of the bill for protecting the West made sense after WWII when Europe was wrecked, but makes no sense now. The European Union's GDP is in the same ball park as ours, we should be spending less and they should be spending more.

This is especially true seeing as the US has much greater social problems to get through than Europe. There's zero chance the US can sustain it's current level of spending long-term, so the ball is in Europe's court. I think that view seems to be growing pretty mainstream in both US Political parties, so hopefully the European's realize on that issue Trump is not a fluke.

User avatar
Kaztropol
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1067
Founded: Aug 30, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kaztropol » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:49 pm

Genivaria wrote:The US would benefit from bringing back the draft and integrating it into the civilian education system.
Our All Volunteer Force is becoming very expensive to maintain, a conscripted force would be much cheaper.
There's also the fact that with the number of technical jobs that are now in high demand both in the military and in the private sector having a large number of conscripts able to go through a military to private sector training pipeline would greatly help our economy.


A study recently, in 2017 or so, found that of America's 17-24yr olds, some 71% of them would be unfit for any military service, due to lack of education, medical issues, criminal records etc. And of the 29% that would be fit for service, only 17% would qualify for active duty. And only 13% would achieve a satisfactory score on the Armed Forces Qualification Test.

One in 8. more or less.

User avatar
Chestaan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6977
Founded: Sep 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chestaan » Tue Aug 13, 2019 1:57 pm

The idea of China as an existential threat is absurd and is purely propaganda used to justify the insanely high levels of military spending.
Council Communist
TG me if you want to chat, especially about economics, you can never have enough discussions on economics.Especially game theory :)
Economic Left/Right: -9.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.62

Getting the Guillotine

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:13 pm

Kaztropol wrote:
Genivaria wrote:The US would benefit from bringing back the draft and integrating it into the civilian education system.
Our All Volunteer Force is becoming very expensive to maintain, a conscripted force would be much cheaper.
There's also the fact that with the number of technical jobs that are now in high demand both in the military and in the private sector having a large number of conscripts able to go through a military to private sector training pipeline would greatly help our economy.


A study recently, in 2017 or so, found that of America's 17-24yr olds, some 71% of them would be unfit for any military service, due to lack of education, medical issues, criminal records etc. And of the 29% that would be fit for service, only 17% would qualify for active duty. And only 13% would achieve a satisfactory score on the Armed Forces Qualification Test.

One in 8. more or less.

Oh that I'm very much aware of and have posted about before, if anything I agree that our nations obesity epidemic constitutes a national security crisis.
I think we need to completely revitalize our schools PE programs.
Last edited by Genivaria on Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:20 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Kaztropol wrote:
A study recently, in 2017 or so, found that of America's 17-24yr olds, some 71% of them would be unfit for any military service, due to lack of education, medical issues, criminal records etc. And of the 29% that would be fit for service, only 17% would qualify for active duty. And only 13% would achieve a satisfactory score on the Armed Forces Qualification Test.

One in 8. more or less.

Oh that I'm very much aware of and have posted about before, if anything I agree that our nations obesity epidemic constitutes a national security crisis.
I think we need to completely revitalize our schools PE programs.

Before the draft, or after?

Anyway, I'd rather a "if you're so in favour of this war you serve in it" approach than a draft. It's bad enough governments can impose unjustified wars on people who signed up for a different war. If they can impose unjustified wars on everyone else, they've less incentive to resort to war more sparingly.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Tue Aug 13, 2019 2:34 pm

LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:
Genivaria wrote:Oh that I'm very much aware of and have posted about before, if anything I agree that our nations obesity epidemic constitutes a national security crisis.
I think we need to completely revitalize our schools PE programs.

Before the draft, or after?

Anyway, I'd rather a "if you're so in favour of this war you serve in it" approach than a draft. It's bad enough governments can impose unjustified wars on people who signed up for a different war. If they can impose unjustified wars on everyone else, they've less incentive to resort to war more sparingly.

I've always been in favor of making a declaration of war require a national referendum. :D
It's all about Proportional Response. If the Marines can get a job done within a short period of time then let the President and/or Congress sign off on it, but if we as a nation go to war then WE AS A NATION vote on it first.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78484
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Tue Aug 13, 2019 4:22 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Genivaria wrote:The US would benefit from bringing back the draft and integrating it into the civilian education system.
Our All Volunteer Force is becoming very expensive to maintain, a conscripted force would be much cheaper.

There's also the fact that with the number of technical jobs that are now in high demand both in the military and in the private sector having a large number of conscripts able to go through a military to private sector training pipeline would greatly help our economy.

Conscripts are arguably more expensive than volunteers. For one thing, volunteers likely have more experience with firearms which makes training to proficiency take less time. Volunteers also want to be in the military, obviously, so time and resources spent on molding them into soldiers is reduced. It's a big hassle to take someone who hasn't held a gun, is physically incompetent (most Americans), and doesn't want to be a soldier and turn them into an efficient soldier.

Actually those who have experience with guns already are harder to train than those who don’t. Mainly because it’s easier to train those to your way of doing things than to re-train someone who does things different.
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
GLDF
Envoy
 
Posts: 223
Founded: Aug 13, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby GLDF » Tue Aug 13, 2019 4:26 pm

As I've said, first examine where the money goes thoroughly and decide what could use less or more funding. Other NATO states should have to actively get their militaries prepared though.
Nova Cyberia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:What's infinity plus one?

4?

User avatar
Electic
Envoy
 
Posts: 337
Founded: Aug 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Electic » Tue Aug 13, 2019 4:28 pm

I don't think conscription is the answer. The current selective service does the job of allocating people in the case of an imminent and absolute danger to the state. I think having our allies take a little bit more of the burden would assist and allow us to scale down our military to something more manageable. The issue is thinking that the U.S. needs to do all the heavy lifting, all the time, is unrealistic and has done us no favors to our post-Cold War reputation.
I'm a proud member of the Dark Light Family

User avatar
Noshirtbigpants
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Mar 13, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Noshirtbigpants » Tue Aug 13, 2019 4:30 pm

Surkiea wrote:The US should spend more, our enemies are stronger than ever and we need to display our military might that we're still a superpower.

we are still a superpower

Just are president got issues

User avatar
Noshirtbigpants
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Mar 13, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Noshirtbigpants » Tue Aug 13, 2019 4:31 pm

Electic wrote:I don't think conscription is the answer. The current selective service does the job of allocating people in the case of an imminent and absolute danger to the state. I think having our allies take a little bit more of the burden would assist and allow us to scale down our military to something more manageable. The issue is thinking that the U.S. needs to do all the heavy lifting, all the time, is unrealistic and has done us no favors to our post-Cold War reputation.

Exactly we think our allies need us to help them out all the time. No other country does this much we fight other countries battles and get nothing in return but keeping that ally.

User avatar
Blanjiland
Attaché
 
Posts: 80
Founded: Sep 30, 2015
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Blanjiland » Tue Aug 13, 2019 4:40 pm

Genivaria wrote:The US would benefit from bringing back the draft and integrating it into the civilian education system.
Our All Volunteer Force is becoming very expensive to maintain, a conscripted force would be much cheaper.



Sorry to burst your bubble, but a draft in the US is never going to happen again unless we face a literal Red Alert C&C scenario. Last time the draft was tried (Vietnam), it nearly caused a civil war and only made the entire situation, both at home and on the field, a hell of a lot worse.
An Oligarchic state where the ultra-rich govern a nation of entrepreneurs and innovators. Just as corrupt, hedonistic and materialistic as you think, despite its progressive policies and emphasis on quality of life.

Factbook
Tirole wins third term | BAF ends all operations outside Bangkok | Tirole approves investigation into alleged atrocities committed by BAF | Recession aftermath hits Northern France | Death Penalty for suicide overturned, “[The Law] seemed kind of silly” Lower Parliament says | National Vaccination Campaign in full force | Blanji Man steals 57 cats in broad daylight

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Google [Bot], Ioudaia, Nlarhyalo, Ors Might, Pale Dawn, Sariuthran, Tarsonis, Tungstan, Welskerland, Zetaopalatopia

Advertisement

Remove ads