Nova Cyberia wrote:Liriena wrote:Direct action tends to get the goods as a general rule of thumb, but I will agree that the "direct action" we're talking about here... uh... kinda doesn't get the goods.
They aren't, but they are the most immediately widespread and dangerous ones in the Anglosphere right now. So the fact that the Trump administration is diverting resources away from federal agencies and non-governmental organizations dedicated to them, and towards Islamic extremism (which, while certainly a problem still, is not the most dangerous one domestically) makes no practical sense and could easily be argued (imho) to be purely ideological.
Has it been proven that this has hindered the ability of the government to deal with white supremacists?
Depends on what you mean by "dealing" with white supremacists, I'd guess.