Nouveau Yathrib wrote:Neko-koku wrote:I do wonder where different Indian groups fit on the spectrum. They are clearly barbarians by agricultural NE Asian standards and fellahin by Middle Eastern or Sub-Saharan African standards. However whether they are barbarian or fellahin by West European standards is more interesting. It depends on the exact group. Bengalis for example are fairly fellah while Punjabi Sikhs on the other hand aren't.
Is your barbarian-fellahin distinction based more on culture/demographics or physical appearance?
It is based on culture/demographics, not physical appearance. So it correlates with endogamous groups, not race.
For example Mongols are clearly more barbarian than even Russians even though Mongols are NE Asian and Russians are white. It is also possible that a few Middle Eastern groups are more fellah than typical white ones.
Australoids are the ultimate barbarians, followed by non-agricultural blacks and then agricultural ones. Ethiopians and Igbos are among the most fellah blacks in the world. However by non-black standards they are still on the barbarian side.








