Well it is both natural and awful. What I don't want is simply treating this as an anomaly when it is in fact basically regression.
Advertisement

by Neko-koku » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:53 pm

by Bienenhalde » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:56 pm
Bear Stearns wrote:Another symptom of diminished social capital in the West. We are becoming low-trust societies, neurotic, stranger-in-a-strange-land societies.

by Antityranicals » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:56 pm
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:Antityranicals wrote:1. Heroism can start by simply asking someone out.
2. Why does putting in extra work and thought mean stress? If towards a noble goal, I've found work eliminates stress. Sure, it will be taxing for men, but I don't think that it wouldn't affect a woman if she were to have a man who would be willing to weep with her, laugh with her, and just generally be there whenever she needs him. What better purpose could a man have to live for, anyway?
That’s not a hero, that’s a human who puts effort into dating. But women should put in the effort too. Men need support as well, especially in today’s society. Any human being should be empathetic to their SO. That’s just common sense.

by Jean-Paul Sartre » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:57 pm
Bienenhalde wrote:Bear Stearns wrote:Another symptom of diminished social capital in the West. We are becoming low-trust societies, neurotic, stranger-in-a-strange-land societies.
I think if more people went to church or were otherwise involved in organized religion this would be less of a problem. Organized religion has historically played a very important role in building community.

by Bienenhalde » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:58 pm
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:Bienenhalde wrote:
I think if more people went to church or were otherwise involved in organized religion this would be less of a problem. Organized religion has historically played a very important role in building community.
Christianity is part of the issue in the west. It encourages unhealthy expectations for relationships. I would encourage philosophy as a basis for relationships and community instead.

by New haven america » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:58 pm
Bear Stearns wrote:Christian Confederation wrote:Popular girls/ Chearledears- mostly white, most have a black athletic BF, with a few white athletic Bf's in the middle.
"Good" Christian kids- most act good around adults and are your generic drinking smoking teens, a few actually are good and stay out of trouble/ off the dateing scene or just went to Christian School.
Gays (very few)- stay to themselves, can be hostile to non Gays.
Blacks - mostly stick amongst themselves, some mixture.
Latinos- mostly stick to themselves with a few exceptions.
Racists- low in #'s stick to themselves.
Smart kids- stick to themselves with few exceptions.
* Im in the mid uper class popular crowd but we all dip into other sub groups.
lmao sounds like a late 90s teen comedy

by Rojava Free State » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:59 pm
Christian Confederation wrote:Popular girls/ Chearledears- mostly white, most have a black athletic BF, with a few white athletic Bf's in the middle.
"Good" Christian kids- most act good around adults and are your generic drinking smoking teens, a few actually are good and stay out of trouble/ off the dateing scene or just went to Christian School.
Gays (very few)- stay to themselves, can be hostile to non Gays.
Blacks - mostly stick amongst themselves, some mixture.
Latinos- mostly stick to themselves with a few exceptions.
Racists- low in #'s stick to themselves.
Smart kids- stick to themselves with few exceptions.
Musilums- 10-20 a few families, most run the local gas stations. (My buddy Osmond is crazy Rich thanks to gas and his dad's rice factory in pacastain.
* Im in the mid uper class popular crowd but we all dip into other sub groups.
South GA HS, Go hornets
Rojava Free State wrote:Listen yall. I'm only gonna say it once but I want you to remember it. This ain't a world fit for good men. It seems like you gotta be monstrous just to make it. Gotta have a little bit of darkness within you just to survive. You gotta stoop low everyday it seems like. Stoop all the way down to the devil in these times. And then one day you look in the mirror and you realize that you ain't you anymore. You're just another monster, and thanks to your actions, someone else will eventually become as warped and twisted as you. Never forget that the best of us are just the best of a bad lot. Being at the top of a pile of feces doesn't make you anything but shit like the rest. Never forget that.

by Jean-Paul Sartre » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:59 pm
Antityranicals wrote:Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:That’s not a hero, that’s a human who puts effort into dating. But women should put in the effort too. Men need support as well, especially in today’s society. Any human being should be empathetic to their SO. That’s just common sense.
Of course I have no problem with a woman being there for a man. I simply have a problem with a man not feeling obligated to comfort his girlfriend whenever she needs it. I also have a problem with the insidious double standard that if a woman has sex with multiple men, she's called a hoe, whereas if a man has sex with multiple women, people think of him as more of a man for it. I think that a man having sex with multiple women is a sign of great cowardice, in that he is afraid to fulfill his obligation towards one or all of these women, while a woman having sex with multiple men is often in our modern society simply in search of a man who will truly be a man, even if she doesn't say so.

by Antityranicals » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:59 pm
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:Bienenhalde wrote:
I think if more people went to church or were otherwise involved in organized religion this would be less of a problem. Organized religion has historically played a very important role in building community.
Christianity is part of the issue in the west. It encourages unhealthy expectations for relationships. I would encourage philosophy as a basis for relationships and community instead.

by Neko-koku » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:59 pm
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:Bienenhalde wrote:
I think if more people went to church or were otherwise involved in organized religion this would be less of a problem. Organized religion has historically played a very important role in building community.
Christianity is part of the issue in the west. It encourages unhealthy expectations for relationships. I would encourage philosophy as a basis for relationships and community instead.

by Ayytaly » Tue Aug 06, 2019 8:59 pm
odd way to spell "Greece"Christian Confederation wrote:Popular girls/ Chearledears- mostly white, most have a black athletic BF, with a few white athletic Bf's in the middle.
"Good" Christian kids- most act good around adults and are your generic drinking smoking teens, a few actually are good and stay out of trouble/ off the dateing scene or just went to Christian School.
Gays (very few)- stay to themselves, can be hostile to non Gays.
Blacks - mostly stick amongst themselves, some mixture.
Latinos- mostly stick to themselves with a few exceptions.
Racists- low in #'s stick to themselves.
Smart kids- stick to themselves with few exceptions.
Musilums- 10-20 a few families, most run the local gas stations. (My buddy Osmond is crazy Rich thanks to gas and his dad's rice factory in pacastain.
* Im in the mid uper class popular crowd but we all dip into other sub groups.
South GA HS, Go hornets

by Christian Confederation » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:00 pm
Bear Stearns wrote:Christian Confederation wrote:Popular girls/ Chearledears- mostly white, most have a black athletic BF, with a few white athletic Bf's in the middle.
"Good" Christian kids- most act good around adults and are your generic drinking smoking teens, a few actually are good and stay out of trouble/ off the dateing scene or just went to Christian School.
Gays (very few)- stay to themselves, can be hostile to non Gays.
Blacks - mostly stick amongst themselves, some mixture.
Latinos- mostly stick to themselves with a few exceptions.
Racists- low in #'s stick to themselves.
Smart kids- stick to themselves with few exceptions.
* Im in the mid uper class popular crowd but we all dip into other sub groups.
lmao sounds like a late 90s teen comedy

by Jean-Paul Sartre » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:00 pm

by The Greater Ohio Valley » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:01 pm
Bear Stearns wrote:The Greater Ohio Valley wrote:Which is kinda good IMO, social pressures tend to negate individual liberties a lot of times which is a huge no-no in my book.
Maybe alcohol but that’s about it, it’s not like they had a good amount of social safety nets back then.
Social pressures are good for reducing things like teen pregnancy, drunk driving, and licentiousness.
And no, people back in the 1950s had the option to move to large cities, where many counterculture lifestyles were moderately tolerated as long as things were discrete.
But that really didn't affect the vast majority of people.

by Bienenhalde » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:01 pm

by Neko-koku » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:01 pm
Ayytaly wrote:Neko-koku wrote:That's not right? That's how all humans used to live. Originally we were all from Africa.
odd way to spell "Greece"
Christian Confederation wrote:Popular girls/ Chearledears- mostly white, most have a black athletic BF, with a few white athletic Bf's in the middle.
"Good" Christian kids- most act good around adults and are your generic drinking smoking teens, a few actually are good and stay out of trouble/ off the dateing scene or just went to Christian School.
Gays (very few)- stay to themselves, can be hostile to non Gays.
Blacks - mostly stick amongst themselves, some mixture.
Latinos- mostly stick to themselves with a few exceptions.
Racists- low in #'s stick to themselves.
Smart kids- stick to themselves with few exceptions.
Musilums- 10-20 a few families, most run the local gas stations. (My buddy Osmond is crazy Rich thanks to gas and his dad's rice factory in pacastain.
* Im in the mid uper class popular crowd but we all dip into other sub groups.
South GA HS, Go hornets
Using cheerleaders as a bar standard for society shows how much we've fallen. Also, replace "black bf" with Latino, since that's how I saw it in suburban NYC.

by New haven america » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:01 pm
Antityranicals wrote:Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:That’s not a hero, that’s a human who puts effort into dating. But women should put in the effort too. Men need support as well, especially in today’s society. Any human being should be empathetic to their SO. That’s just common sense.
Of course I have no problem with a woman being there for a man. 1. I simply have a problem with a man not feeling obligated to comfort his girlfriend whenever she needs it. 2. I also have a problem with the insidious double standard that if a woman has sex with multiple men, she's called a hoe, whereas if a man has sex with multiple women, people think of him as more of a man for it. 3. I think that a man having sex with multiple women is a sign of great cowardice, in that he is afraid to fulfill his obligation towards one or all of these women, while a woman having sex with multiple men is often in our modern society simply in search of a man who will truly be a man, even if she doesn't say so.

by Rojava Free State » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:02 pm
Ayytaly wrote:Neko-koku wrote:That's not right? That's how all humans used to live. Originally we were all from Africa.
odd way to spell "Greece"
Christian Confederation wrote:Popular girls/ Chearledears- mostly white, most have a black athletic BF, with a few white athletic Bf's in the middle.
"Good" Christian kids- most act good around adults and are your generic drinking smoking teens, a few actually are good and stay out of trouble/ off the dateing scene or just went to Christian School.
Gays (very few)- stay to themselves, can be hostile to non Gays.
Blacks - mostly stick amongst themselves, some mixture.
Latinos- mostly stick to themselves with a few exceptions.
Racists- low in #'s stick to themselves.
Smart kids- stick to themselves with few exceptions.
Musilums- 10-20 a few families, most run the local gas stations. (My buddy Osmond is crazy Rich thanks to gas and his dad's rice factory in pacastain.
* Im in the mid uper class popular crowd but we all dip into other sub groups.
South GA HS, Go hornets
Using cheerleaders as a bar standard for society shows how much we've fallen. Also, replace "black bf" with Latino, since that's how I saw it in suburban NYC.
Rojava Free State wrote:Listen yall. I'm only gonna say it once but I want you to remember it. This ain't a world fit for good men. It seems like you gotta be monstrous just to make it. Gotta have a little bit of darkness within you just to survive. You gotta stoop low everyday it seems like. Stoop all the way down to the devil in these times. And then one day you look in the mirror and you realize that you ain't you anymore. You're just another monster, and thanks to your actions, someone else will eventually become as warped and twisted as you. Never forget that the best of us are just the best of a bad lot. Being at the top of a pile of feces doesn't make you anything but shit like the rest. Never forget that.

by Antityranicals » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:02 pm
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:Antityranicals wrote:Of course I have no problem with a woman being there for a man. I simply have a problem with a man not feeling obligated to comfort his girlfriend whenever she needs it. I also have a problem with the insidious double standard that if a woman has sex with multiple men, she's called a hoe, whereas if a man has sex with multiple women, people think of him as more of a man for it. I think that a man having sex with multiple women is a sign of great cowardice, in that he is afraid to fulfill his obligation towards one or all of these women, while a woman having sex with multiple men is often in our modern society simply in search of a man who will truly be a man, even if she doesn't say so.
Fair enough, I think this is just needlessly entangled in gendered expectations. Can we just say, “be loving to people you love”?

by Jean-Paul Sartre » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:02 pm
Neko-koku wrote:Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:Christianity is part of the issue in the west. It encourages unhealthy expectations for relationships. I would encourage philosophy as a basis for relationships and community instead.
You can't. Most people aren't intellectuals. Christianity has an extremely simplistic version fit for those who have no interest in reading the Bible and understanding theology. Philosophy doesn't.

by New haven america » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:04 pm
Antityranicals wrote:Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:Fair enough, I think this is just needlessly entangled in gendered expectations. Can we just say, “be loving to people you love”?
I suppose, but I still disparage any man who does not live up to the highest standards in how he treats any woman whom he dares call his own.

by Antityranicals » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:04 pm
New haven america wrote:Antityranicals wrote:Of course I have no problem with a woman being there for a man. 1. I simply have a problem with a man not feeling obligated to comfort his girlfriend whenever she needs it. 2. I also have a problem with the insidious double standard that if a woman has sex with multiple men, she's called a hoe, whereas if a man has sex with multiple women, people think of him as more of a man for it. 3. I think that a man having sex with multiple women is a sign of great cowardice, in that he is afraid to fulfill his obligation towards one or all of these women, while a woman having sex with multiple men is often in our modern society simply in search of a man who will truly be a man, even if she doesn't say so.
1. What if she did something shitty and pretends to be the victim?
2. I agree, but that belief stems from the double standard your pedaling that men have to be everything a woman wants while women just have to exist and be there.
3. This doesn't make what your claiming any less backwards or sexist, it just shows a different type of sexism.

by Neko-koku » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:05 pm
Rojava Free State wrote:Ayytaly wrote:odd way to spell "Greece"
Using cheerleaders as a bar standard for society shows how much we've fallen. Also, replace "black bf" with Latino, since that's how I saw it in suburban NYC.
Tbh latinos in NYC are basically black, even the ones who don't look black. I mean for starters Puerto Rican and Dominicans have a lot of African genes but beyond that a lot of Nuyoricans basically speak AAVE, listen to rap, play basketball and live in areas with a lot of black folks.

by Bienenhalde » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:05 pm

by New haven america » Tue Aug 06, 2019 9:06 pm
Antityranicals wrote:New haven america wrote:1. What if she did something shitty and pretends to be the victim?
2. I agree, but that belief stems from the double standard your pedaling that men have to be everything a woman wants while women just have to exist and be there.
3. This doesn't make what your claiming any less backwards or sexist, it just shows a different type of sexism.
If it's sexist to believe that a man has an obligation to treat his girlfriend better than she treats him, than I suppose I can't escape the label.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Democratic Poopland, East Islanamaritarite, Forsher, Kerwa, Northumbria and Scotland
Advertisement