NATION

PASSWORD

Right-Wing Discussion Thread XVII: The Snark Enlightenment

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Has Shinzo Abe's leadership been good for Japan?

Yes
37
31%
No
31
26%
Unsure
53
44%
 
Total votes : 121

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:14 am

Lower Nubia wrote:
Novus America wrote:
Well one can not predict the future, and sure things can change.
Yes it will put one such power at our door, it already has.


Things will change.

Novus America wrote:That is the struggle for this century, the US vs the PRC.
We might lose, but we should try our best not to,
https://asia.nikkei.com/Economy/US-and- ... ips-to-5th


The current estimations about India put them above the US in terms of GDP by 2050-2070. The reality is that economic power will be concentrated in South-East Asia, especially with the emergence of Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam too.

I also call into question the source who extrapolate that diminished population will hamper growth of the Chinese economy by 2060, however the Chinese will not be idle in promoting childbirth for further economic expansion. It seems shallow that they would not think to do such a thing

Novus America wrote:And you should hope so as well, a PRC victory is not to your advantage.


I don’t hope for China, if the EU continues to expand and then federalises, it will by one of the largest economies. We also have to remember the EU has far more potential for growth, especially seeing the least developed eastern states of the Union. It will put my country at a better position being part of one of the largest economies.

Novus America wrote:Until 2060 at least that will be the competition barring some revolutionary changes.
Beyond that who knows?


The competition involves all the countries I mentioned, GDP growth is tied to population, the US is not excelled in that department.

Novus America wrote:But until 2060 the US vs PRC is the name of the game. Even by then the other trees are small.


And India and more than likely the EU. India’s GDP growth is 6% with little sign of slowing down, while the EU will likely, by 2050, expand to include Turkey, The Balkan states, Ukraine, and maybe even Russia (in a far more distant future). It seems unlikely that the EU has reached peak power at the moment.

Novus America wrote:Of course we should continually reassess and make changes as necessary but we have pretty good data predictions up until that point.


China is already growing more rapidly than the US it certainly won’t be long before they outstrip the US in GDP - let alone 2060.

Novus America wrote:In terms of population the US is expected to remain number 3 until at least past mid century.
And population growth is rapidly slowing most places.


The US does not vastly outperform other countries in terms of population compared to GDP.

Novus America wrote:Actually demographically the US is doing better than most developed countries, though we should take actions to increase our birth rate, immigration and so on as well as seeing if we can incorporate some new states ideally. We can increase our population. Pretty much on demand via immigration.

Sure we absolutely may fall behind, and will not last forever. So we should seek to do what we can to ensure we remain competitive.


Of course, we wouldn’t want the US to lose its edge.


Well if we are alive we shall see.
But I think you grossly overestimate the EU (which you may not be part of) and grossly underestimate the middle income trap.

Most countries will not escape the trap. There is no reason to believe the PRC will.
And Indian economic growth is already slowly too.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Fahran
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22562
Founded: Nov 13, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Fahran » Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:27 am

Diopolis wrote:
Fahran wrote:You can't leave the South, not when it lives in your heart. :p

Please don't actually take that seriously.

It’s lodged in your heart, clogging it up.

I should put that in a country song that I'm totally not writing in the hopes of becoming a brunette Taylor Swift. Speaking of, I should look into how her political remarks are going. Country artists get pretty interesting reactions when they go political.
Last edited by Fahran on Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44957
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:27 am

Diopolis wrote:
Fahran wrote:You can't leave the South, not when it lives in your heart. :p

Please don't actually take that seriously.

It’s lodged in your heart, clogging it up.

That’s just the cooking.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.


Historian, of sorts.

Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 16673
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:33 am

Fahran wrote:
Greater Loegria wrote:To prevent it from ever posing a threat again. A united Germany is as for Britain. Militarily and economically.

So we should dismantle China and Russia? :p

Assist the descendants of the Ming dynasty in regaining their former throne and in return secure a promise from them to return to their historic policy of isolationism once they have been restored. About as achievable as partitioning China and much fairer to the Chinese.
"Classicist in literature, royalist in politics, and Anglo-Catholic in religion" (T.S. Eliot). Still, unaccountably, a NationStates Moderator.
"Have I done something for the general interest? Well then, I have had my reward. Let this always be present to thy mind, and never stop doing such good." - Marcus Aurelius, Meditations (Book XI, IV)
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
North German Realm
Senator
 
Posts: 4494
Founded: Jan 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby North German Realm » Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:35 am

Fahran wrote:
Greater Loegria wrote:To prevent it from ever posing a threat again. A united Germany is as for Britain. Militarily and economically.

So we should dismantle China and Russia? :p

Preferably. Especially on China (Russia's going towards that route itself, China requires a bit of pushing).
-----------------
-----------------
-----------------
North German Confederation
NationStates Flag Bracket II - 6th place!

Norddeutscher Bund
Homepage || Overview | Sovereign | Chancellor | Military | Legislature || The World
5 Nov, 2020
Die Morgenpost: "We will reconsider our relationship with Poland" Reichskanzler Lagenmauer says after Polish president protested North German ultimatum that made them restore reproductive freedom. | European Society votes not to persecute Hungary for atrocities committed against Serbs, "Giving a rogue state leave to commit genocide as it sees fit." North German delegate bemoans. | Negotiations still underway in Rome, delegates arguing over the extent of indemnities Turkey might be made to pay, lawful status of Turkish collaborators during occupation of Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Syria.

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:39 am

North German Realm wrote:
Fahran wrote:So we should dismantle China and Russia? :p

Preferably. Especially on China (Russia's going towards that route itself, China requires a bit of pushing).


Yes, Russia is annoying but not a peer competitor and it has a grim future.

The PRC is the real threat. It seeks to overthrow a and replace the west, it has no interest in peaceful coexistence. But we should give it the Soviet treatment.

Containment and work to undermine it politically both within and without.

Also demography. That is our real advantage. The PRC has horrible demographics.
We should use that to our advantage.
Last edited by Novus America on Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Totally Not OEP
Minister
 
Posts: 3023
Founded: Mar 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Totally Not OEP » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:11 am

The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:In other news, I'm moving into my dorm in about... two to three hours. It's a mildly jarring process, I must admit.

Also, I'd like to apologize for if my rhetoric yesterday was acrid/boorish/harsh/uncouth. I know I shouldn't apologize excessively, but I found this situation to necessitate one. In a way, I almost view it as my fault for starting the "Brit v. Yank" pissing match, given that I was the one who brought up the topic of monarchy.

So... yeah. That's all for now.


I'm moving into a house in about four hours; yah boi is living with three sorority girls this year lmao.
We shoot .223's
We'll take your life
We out with the gang
You know we gon' slide

User avatar
Totally Not OEP
Minister
 
Posts: 3023
Founded: Mar 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Totally Not OEP » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:12 am

Fahran wrote:
Kowani wrote:She says, despite the Great Migration being an effort to get away from the south.

You can't leave the South, not when it lives in your heart. :p

Please don't actually take that seriously.


If Dixie had won, we'd a have it made, as Willie once said.

Fahran wrote:
Greater Loegria wrote:To prevent it from ever posing a threat again. A united Germany is as for Britain. Militarily and economically.

So we should dismantle China and Russia? :p


Yes.
We shoot .223's
We'll take your life
We out with the gang
You know we gon' slide

User avatar
Bear Stearns
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11836
Founded: Dec 02, 2018
Capitalizt

Postby Bear Stearns » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:13 am

Totally Not OEP wrote:
Fahran wrote:You can't leave the South, not when it lives in your heart. :p

Please don't actually take that seriously.


If Dixie had won, we'd a have it made, as Willie once said.


If ya'll had won us Yankees might still find it safe to live in inner cities. Curse you Lincoln. I would have let the South go.
The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. is a New York-based global investment bank, securities trading and brokerage firm. Its main business areas are capital markets, investment banking, wealth management and global clearing services. Bear Stearns was founded as an equity trading house on May Day 1923 by Joseph Ainslie Bear, Robert B. Stearns and Harold C. Mayer with $500,000 in capital.
383 Madison Ave,
New York, NY 10017
Vince Vaughn

User avatar
Totally Not OEP
Minister
 
Posts: 3023
Founded: Mar 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Totally Not OEP » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:15 am

Bear Stearns wrote:
Totally Not OEP wrote:
If Dixie had won, we'd a have it made, as Willie once said.


If ya'll had won us Yankees might still find it safe to live in inner cities. Curse you Lincoln. I would have let the South go.


Ya'll probably would've nabbed West Canada as well, while we would've moved into Mexico. It'd have been interesting to have two powerful North American Republics going into the 20th Century.
We shoot .223's
We'll take your life
We out with the gang
You know we gon' slide

User avatar
Bear Stearns
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11836
Founded: Dec 02, 2018
Capitalizt

Postby Bear Stearns » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:23 am

Totally Not OEP wrote:
Bear Stearns wrote:
If ya'll had won us Yankees might still find it safe to live in inner cities. Curse you Lincoln. I would have let the South go.


Ya'll probably would've nabbed West Canada as well, while we would've moved into Mexico. It'd have been interesting to have two powerful North American Republics going into the 20th Century.


The Anschluss of Anglo-Canada and Yankeedom is a dream of mine.

I'd like to think we'd be very cordial allies, with free trade, continent-spanning sports leagues, and common defense pacts. Even if we're separate countries we'd still have common interests in engaging with the rest of the world.
The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. is a New York-based global investment bank, securities trading and brokerage firm. Its main business areas are capital markets, investment banking, wealth management and global clearing services. Bear Stearns was founded as an equity trading house on May Day 1923 by Joseph Ainslie Bear, Robert B. Stearns and Harold C. Mayer with $500,000 in capital.
383 Madison Ave,
New York, NY 10017
Vince Vaughn

User avatar
Totally Not OEP
Minister
 
Posts: 3023
Founded: Mar 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Totally Not OEP » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:26 am

Bear Stearns wrote:
Totally Not OEP wrote:
Ya'll probably would've nabbed West Canada as well, while we would've moved into Mexico. It'd have been interesting to have two powerful North American Republics going into the 20th Century.


The Anschluss of Anglo-Canada and Yankeedom is a dream of mine.

I'd like to think we'd be very cordial allies, with free trade, continent-spanning sports leagues, and common defense pacts. Even if we're separate countries we'd still have common interests in engaging with the rest of the world.


The Confederate leadership early in the war made it clear they'd allow free access to the Mississippi, so in that sense yes; there was plans for tariffs on Yankee products, however. I'd imagine the United States would focus on the Pacific, eschewing European ties in favor of becoming a power naval and trading state, while the Confederates would become a "Prussia-lite" due to the Gentry functioning like the Junkers in Germany; they'd move into Mexico and Cuba, favoring limited expansion. I could see a joint project to develop the Panama Canal, as that would benefit both.
We shoot .223's
We'll take your life
We out with the gang
You know we gon' slide

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:26 am

Totally Not OEP wrote:
Bear Stearns wrote:
If ya'll had won us Yankees might still find it safe to live in inner cities. Curse you Lincoln. I would have let the South go.


Ya'll probably would've nabbed West Canada as well, while we would've moved into Mexico. It'd have been interesting to have two powerful North American Republics going into the 20th Century.


Don't mind me, I'm just borrowing this idea for my alternate history worldbuilding project.
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

User avatar
Totally Not OEP
Minister
 
Posts: 3023
Founded: Mar 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Totally Not OEP » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:27 am

Totally Not OEP wrote:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:In other news, I'm moving into my dorm in about... two to three hours. It's a mildly jarring process, I must admit.

Also, I'd like to apologize for if my rhetoric yesterday was acrid/boorish/harsh/uncouth. I know I shouldn't apologize excessively, but I found this situation to necessitate one. In a way, I almost view it as my fault for starting the "Brit v. Yank" pissing match, given that I was the one who brought up the topic of monarchy.

So... yeah. That's all for now.


I'm moving into a house in about four hours; yah boi is living with three sorority girls this year lmao.


They've made 100 Jell-o shots for tonight and apparently installed a stripper pole; please pray for me and forgive me if I get on here drunk at 4 AM in advance.
We shoot .223's
We'll take your life
We out with the gang
You know we gon' slide

User avatar
Fahran
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 22562
Founded: Nov 13, 2017
Democratic Socialists

Postby Fahran » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:28 am

Totally Not OEP wrote:They've made 100 Jell-o shots for tonight and apparently installed a stripper pole; please pray for me and forgive me if I get on here drunk at 4 AM in advance.

I pray for you pretty much everyday because I know you need it. lol

User avatar
Bear Stearns
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11836
Founded: Dec 02, 2018
Capitalizt

Postby Bear Stearns » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:30 am

Totally Not OEP wrote:
Bear Stearns wrote:
The Anschluss of Anglo-Canada and Yankeedom is a dream of mine.

I'd like to think we'd be very cordial allies, with free trade, continent-spanning sports leagues, and common defense pacts. Even if we're separate countries we'd still have common interests in engaging with the rest of the world.


The Confederate leadership early in the war made it clear they'd allow free access to the Mississippi, so in that sense yes; there was plans for tariffs on Yankee products, however. I'd imagine the United States would focus on the Pacific, eschewing European ties in favor of becoming a power naval and trading state, while the Confederates would become a "Prussia-lite" due to the Gentry functioning like the Junkers in Germany; they'd move into Mexico and Cuba, favoring limited expansion. I could see a joint project to develop the Panama Canal, as that would benefit both.


Also, a Northern US whose national parties aren't going to be divided by having a Southern branch is going to have a much more cohesive and populist political culture.

It will go nativist and becoming a Germanic Protestant volkstaat :twisted:
The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. is a New York-based global investment bank, securities trading and brokerage firm. Its main business areas are capital markets, investment banking, wealth management and global clearing services. Bear Stearns was founded as an equity trading house on May Day 1923 by Joseph Ainslie Bear, Robert B. Stearns and Harold C. Mayer with $500,000 in capital.
383 Madison Ave,
New York, NY 10017
Vince Vaughn

User avatar
Totally Not OEP
Minister
 
Posts: 3023
Founded: Mar 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Totally Not OEP » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:31 am

The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
Totally Not OEP wrote:
Ya'll probably would've nabbed West Canada as well, while we would've moved into Mexico. It'd have been interesting to have two powerful North American Republics going into the 20th Century.


Don't mind me, I'm just borrowing this idea for my alternate history worldbuilding project.


I'm listening....
We shoot .223's
We'll take your life
We out with the gang
You know we gon' slide

User avatar
Totally Not OEP
Minister
 
Posts: 3023
Founded: Mar 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Totally Not OEP » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:32 am

Bear Stearns wrote:
Totally Not OEP wrote:
The Confederate leadership early in the war made it clear they'd allow free access to the Mississippi, so in that sense yes; there was plans for tariffs on Yankee products, however. I'd imagine the United States would focus on the Pacific, eschewing European ties in favor of becoming a power naval and trading state, while the Confederates would become a "Prussia-lite" due to the Gentry functioning like the Junkers in Germany; they'd move into Mexico and Cuba, favoring limited expansion. I could see a joint project to develop the Panama Canal, as that would benefit both.


Also, a Northern US whose national parties aren't going to be divided by having a Southern branch is going to have a much more cohesive and populist political culture.

It will go nativist and becoming a Germanic Protestant volkstaat :twisted:


I'd imagine an SDP type character but with British characteristics.
We shoot .223's
We'll take your life
We out with the gang
You know we gon' slide

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:37 am

Totally Not OEP wrote:
Totally Not OEP wrote:
I'm moving into a house in about four hours; yah boi is living with three sorority girls this year lmao.


They've made 100 Jell-o shots for tonight and apparently installed a stripper pole; please pray for me and forgive me if I get on here drunk at 4 AM in advance.

Legitimately degenerate.
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Bear Stearns
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11836
Founded: Dec 02, 2018
Capitalizt

Postby Bear Stearns » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:37 am

Totally Not OEP wrote:
Bear Stearns wrote:
Also, a Northern US whose national parties aren't going to be divided by having a Southern branch is going to have a much more cohesive and populist political culture.

It will go nativist and becoming a Germanic Protestant volkstaat :twisted:


I'd imagine an SDP type character but with British characteristics.


*Yankee characteristics.

We eat hot dogs with baked beans, we are all Presbyterian, Lutheran, or Episcopalian, we are addicted to coffee, we play baseball, and work six days a week. We are so proud when our son becomes a doctor or lawyer.

Sounds like heaven to me.

The question is, what do we do about the borderland areas? You guys can have Kentucky, but we will need to have hard and honest talks about Maryland and Missouri.
Last edited by Bear Stearns on Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. is a New York-based global investment bank, securities trading and brokerage firm. Its main business areas are capital markets, investment banking, wealth management and global clearing services. Bear Stearns was founded as an equity trading house on May Day 1923 by Joseph Ainslie Bear, Robert B. Stearns and Harold C. Mayer with $500,000 in capital.
383 Madison Ave,
New York, NY 10017
Vince Vaughn

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:38 am

Totally Not OEP wrote:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
Don't mind me, I'm just borrowing this idea for my alternate history worldbuilding project.


I'm listening....


It is the early 21st century, and North America stands on the brink of war. Two power blocs ("Dixie" and "Yankeedom" for lack of a better term) dominate continental affairs, locked in a bitter cold war that's turning hotter and hotter by the hour. As militaries begin preparations for what is to come, the story (or rather, stories) focuses on the residents of a small border town in the Appalachian mountains, and how their lives are changed by the ensuing War.
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

User avatar
Totally Not OEP
Minister
 
Posts: 3023
Founded: Mar 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Totally Not OEP » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:41 am

The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
Totally Not OEP wrote:
I'm listening....


It is the early 21st century, and North America stands on the brink of war. Two power blocs ("Dixie" and "Yankeedom" for lack of a better term) dominate continental affairs, locked in a bitter cold war that's turning hotter and hotter by the hour. As militaries begin preparations for what is to come, the story (or rather, stories) focuses on the residents of a small border town in the Appalachian mountains, and how their lives are changed by the ensuing War.


Basically Dixie-1 from GURPs.
We shoot .223's
We'll take your life
We out with the gang
You know we gon' slide

User avatar
Totally Not OEP
Minister
 
Posts: 3023
Founded: Mar 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Totally Not OEP » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:43 am

Bear Stearns wrote:
Totally Not OEP wrote:
I'd imagine an SDP type character but with British characteristics.


*Yankee characteristics.

We eat hot dogs with baked beans, we are all Presbyterian, Lutheran, or Episcopalian, we are addicted to coffee, we play baseball, and work six days a week. We are so proud when our son becomes a doctor or lawyer.

Sounds like heaven to me.

The question is, what do we do about the borderland areas? You guys can have Kentucky, but we will need to have hard and honest talks about Maryland and Missouri.


British in the sense of a strong navy, lots of trade and a Liberalism bent in outlook.

I'd imagine in everything but a Trent Affair gone hot, the Confederates would willingly or would be forced to concede their claims to Maryland and Missouri due to the military realities of the situation and likely mediation of the Anglo-French.
Last edited by Totally Not OEP on Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
We shoot .223's
We'll take your life
We out with the gang
You know we gon' slide

User avatar
Totally Not OEP
Minister
 
Posts: 3023
Founded: Mar 30, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Totally Not OEP » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:44 am

United Muscovite Nations wrote:
Totally Not OEP wrote:
They've made 100 Jell-o shots for tonight and apparently installed a stripper pole; please pray for me and forgive me if I get on here drunk at 4 AM in advance.

Legitimately degenerate.


Mood.
We shoot .223's
We'll take your life
We out with the gang
You know we gon' slide

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:44 am

Totally Not OEP wrote:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
It is the early 21st century, and North America stands on the brink of war. Two power blocs ("Dixie" and "Yankeedom" for lack of a better term) dominate continental affairs, locked in a bitter cold war that's turning hotter and hotter by the hour. As militaries begin preparations for what is to come, the story (or rather, stories) focuses on the residents of a small border town in the Appalachian mountains, and how their lives are changed by the ensuing War.


Basically Dixie-1 from GURPs.


Yep, pretty much. Tbh, I'm surprised that you're familiar with GURPS.
Last edited by The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord on Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Ethel mermania, Fartsniffage, Gorutimania, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Inner Albania, Novimor, Shenny, The Archregimancy, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads