Page 2 of 16

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:36 pm
by Marquisal
Old Tyrannia wrote:
Santa Regada wrote:90% sure those spamming "Deus Vult" is are puppets lol.

You're not entirely wrong.
Marquisal wrote:Finally, a bit of decency.
The people will end this horrifying battle against itself, and it will end with it's victory!

DEUS VULT

Extreme Sweden wrote:When churches are burned with people inside praying and they say nothing, but when a mosque is softly vandalised during night with no victims, they call it a masaccre.
How can somebody be so hypocritical?

#DeusVult!

Marquisal/Extreme Sweden: *** Warned for puppetspam and trolling. ***
Christenmark wrote:DEUS VULT

Christenmark: *** Warned for flaming. ***

I apologise for locking the thread; I didn't want it to get filled up by further "deus vult" spam whilst I was writing this.


I apologise for my way of expressing my feelings, it was not the right way.
Sorry.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:38 pm
by Highever
-Astoria wrote:
Extreme Sweden wrote:When churches are burned with people inside praying and they say nothing, but when a mosque is softly vandalised during night with no victims, they call it a masaccre.
How can somebody be so hypocritical?

#DeusVult!

Christenmark wrote:DEUS VULT

:eyebrow: Please tell me you're joking.

Incredibly ironic that folks are shouting praise to god in a foreign language in celebration of intolerance when these same people would flip their lid if it was done in another language and by another group.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:39 pm
by Old Tyrannia
EastKekistan wrote:
Greater Cesnica wrote:We are Ahmadi Muslims. We preach peace and love, not hatred. Why should we play into their (the attackers') rhetoric? The extremists who committed this act did do out of fear of the Muslim community. So we should just retaliate and prove their fears to be founded?

If you practice peace and love you deserve to be killed and tortured in this amoral universe.

I missed this.

EastKekistan: *** Given your history, one week ban for trolling. ***

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:40 pm
by Nakena
Greater Cesnica wrote:
Santa Regada wrote:Retaliation is a must.

We are Ahmadi Muslims. We preach peace and love, not hatred. Why should we play into their (the attackers') rhetoric? The extremists who committed this act did do out of fear of the Muslim community. So we should just retaliate and prove their fears to be founded?


I am afraid it might be, as so every often, an opportunity target attack. And it also shows how the people behind it are unable or unwilling to differentiate.

Eternal Lotharia wrote:In the world of people who represent the Antichrist and hate, who claim to be Christians but are really Satanic.


Maybe Satan isn't the bad guy in the end. Metaphorically speaking.

Sometimes the world is weird.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:41 pm
by Marquisal
Highever wrote:
Extreme Sweden wrote:When churches are burned with people inside praying and they say nothing, but when a mosque is softly vandalised during night with no victims, they call it a masaccre.
How can somebody be so hypocritical?

#DeusVult!

Feel free to prove this by showing that this even occured and that there was no outcry and mourning.


Here you have a bit of it :hug:

https://leohohmann.com/2018/07/09/media ... the-world/

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:42 pm
by Jolthig
Greater Cesnica wrote:
Santa Regada wrote:Retaliation is a must.

We are Ahmadi Muslims. We preach peace and love, not hatred. Why should we play into their (the attackers') rhetoric? The extremists who committed this act did do out of fear of the Muslim community. So we should just retaliate and prove their fears to be founded?

This

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:46 pm
by -Astoria
Highever wrote:Incredibly ironic that folks are shouting praise to god in a foreign language in celebration of intolerance when these same people would flip their lid if it was done in another language and by another group.

[citation needed]

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:47 pm
by Nakena
-Astoria wrote:
Highever wrote:Incredibly ironic that folks are shouting praise to god in a foreign language in celebration of intolerance when these same people would flip their lid if it was done in another language and by another group.

[citation needed]


I believe it was in reference to the Deus Vult memes.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:47 pm
by Highever
Marquisal wrote:
Highever wrote:Feel free to prove this by showing that this even occured and that there was no outcry and mourning.


Here you have a bit of it :hug:

https://leohohmann.com/2018/07/09/media ... the-world/

You mean something that is not happening in the west is not as widely reported on in western media? How truly incomprehensible. Also, it is completely false. Just a basic search of "Nigerian Christians" on google brings up this and this and this.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:47 pm
by Necroghastia
How absolutely appalling, both the crime itself and that some are celebrating it.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:49 pm
by Bear Stearns
Santa Regada wrote:
Extreme Sweden wrote:When churches are burned with people inside praying and they say nothing, but when a mosque is softly vandalised during night with no victims, they call it a masaccre.
How can somebody be so hypocritical?

#DeusVult!

I'm pretty sure church burning gets condemned too..?


They're "isolated incidents".

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:50 pm
by Marquisal
Highever wrote:
-Astoria wrote:
:eyebrow: Please tell me you're joking.

Incredibly ironic that folks are shouting praise to god in a foreign language in celebration of intolerance when these same people would flip their lid if it was done in another language and by another group.


I call it "an eye for an eye"
Our people, The Christian People, have suffered long years while their identity has been destroyed in one way or another. Governments do condemn terrorism, but some of them act as if they were in favour of it, by exporting weapons to countries such as Saudi Arabia or Iran, that provide weapons, asylum and money to islamic terrorist groups, and by silenciating the media of the christian persecution and intensify the feeling that we need to protect islam. I do not see violence as necessary, I regret the use of it. But there has not been violence in this attack, no muslim has been hurted. Most mosques are built without the permission of the native people, while if you try to build a church in an islamic country you could even be sentenced to death. This is not fair, and this makes the people, The Christian People, to start the demolition of the buildings of the invader faith, which has never, and will never be, accepted in many territories.
This so called "vandals" are not saying to muslims "Do not follow your religion, do not praise to your leader" they are saying "I will not accept you building mosques with the money of my people, in the territory of my people, and, most importantly, without the permission of my people" That is not intollerance, but instead what happens when popular soveraignty has been destroyed to the benefict of those who will bring money to the corrupt polliticians.

This is what I think, said propperly without all that "Deus Vult" shouting. I hope that you can understand this, and if not, I will be willing to talk with you calmly about this topic.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:50 pm
by Duhon
Marquisal wrote:Finally, a bit of decency.
The people will end this horrifying battle against itself, and it will end with it's victory!

DEUS VULT


Then, from one decent guy to another, heed my word:

This is wrong. This is wrong! THIS IS WRONG THIS IS WRONG THIS IS WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG

YOU DO NOT BURN SHIT DOWN
YOU DO NOT CHEER ON WHEN SHIT BURNS DOWN
YOU DO NOT CHASE AFTER PEOPLE WHO HAVE DONE NOTHING TO YOU
YOU DO NOT MAIM THEM
YOU DO NOT KILL THEM
IF YOU KNOW DECENCY YOU WOULD KNOW THAT
WHY ARE YOU ALL SO FUCKING DIFFICULT
WHY DO YOU INSIST ON BEING FUCKING STUPID
YOU ARE NOT FUCKING STUPID
YOU ARE NOT
YOU ARE NOT
STOP IT

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:50 pm
by Agarntrop
Necroghastia wrote:How absolutely appalling, both the crime itself and that some are celebrating it.

Not really a genuine celebration, just a trollish "lMaO mUsLuMs GoT rEkT lEtS sPaM dEuS vUlT lOl" kinda thing.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:53 pm
by Nouveau Quebecois
Agarntrop wrote:
Necroghastia wrote:How absolutely appalling, both the crime itself and that some are celebrating it.

Not really a genuine celebration, just a trollish "lMaO mUsLuMs GoT rEkT lEtS sPaM dEuS vUlT lOl" kinda thing.

yeah, you tell 'em, atta put them in their place with scattered capitals.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:53 pm
by -Astoria
Highever wrote:

You mean something that is not happening in the west is not as widely reported on in western media? How truly incomprehensible. Also, it is completely false. Just a basic search of "Nigerian Christians" on google brings up this and this and this.

Alright, now you've done it:

The kidnappings here are not exclusive to Christians only, and neither have the Boko Haram attacks.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:55 pm
by Santa Regada
Bear Stearns wrote:
Santa Regada wrote:I'm pretty sure church burning gets condemned too..?


They're "isolated incidents".

I mean attacks on Mosques are also pretty isolated (in the Western world) are they not? More times than not most Mosque attacks happen in Muslim countries committed by other Muslims.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:55 pm
by Highever
Marquisal wrote:
Highever wrote:Incredibly ironic that folks are shouting praise to god in a foreign language in celebration of intolerance when these same people would flip their lid if it was done in another language and by another group.


I call it "an eye for an eye"
Our people, The Christian People, have suffered long years while their identity has been destroyed in one way or another. Governments do condemn terrorism, but some of them act as if they were in favour of it, by exporting weapons to countries such as Saudi Arabia or Iran, that provide weapons, asylum and money to islamic terrorist groups, and by silenciating the media of the christian persecution and intensify the feeling that we need to protect islam. I do not see violence as necessary, I regret the use of it. But there has not been violence in this attack, no muslim has been hurted. Most mosques are built without the permission of the native people, while if you try to build a church in an islamic country you could even be sentenced to death. This is not fair, and this makes the people, The Christian People, to start the demolition of the buildings of the invader faith, which has never, and will never be, accepted in many territories.
This so called "vandals" are not saying to muslims "Do not follow your religion, do not praise to your leader" they are saying "I will not accept you building mosques with the money of my people, in the territory of my people, and, most importantly, without the permission of my people" That is not intollerance, but instead what happens when popular soveraignty has been destroyed to the benefict of those who will bring money to the corrupt polliticians.

This is what I think, said propperly without all that "Deus Vult" shouting. I hope that you can understand this, and if not, I will be willing to talk with you calmly about this topic.

This is alot of nonsense all at once.

First of all the shattering of a window and other vandalism is indeed violence. Just because no one was "hurted" does not somehow make it not violent in nature.

Since when do people need to approve of every single building that is constructed in some sort of democratic process?

Your attempts to try and downplay this into some sort of civil and well spoken peaceful protest that has nothing to do with animosity with Islam and its practitioners being in the country instead of a clear act of violence with religious motivations is really falling flat.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:56 pm
by Agarntrop
Marquisal wrote:
Highever wrote:Incredibly ironic that folks are shouting praise to god in a foreign language in celebration of intolerance when these same people would flip their lid if it was done in another language and by another group.


I call it "an eye for an eye"
Our people, The Christian People, have suffered long years while their identity has been destroyed in one way or another. Governments do condemn terrorism, but some of them act as if they were in favour of it, by exporting weapons to countries such as Saudi Arabia or Iran, that provide weapons, asylum and money to islamic terrorist groups, and by silenciating the media of the christian persecution and intensify the feeling that we need to protect islam. I do not see violence as necessary, I regret the use of it. But there has not been violence in this attack, no muslim has been hurted. Most mosques are built without the permission of the native people, while if you try to build a church in an islamic country you could even be sentenced to death. This is not fair, and this makes the people, The Christian People, to start the demolition of the buildings of the invader faith, which has never, and will never be, accepted in many territories.
This so called "vandals" are not saying to muslims "Do not follow your religion, do not praise to your leader" they are saying "I will not accept you building mosques with the money of my people, in the territory of my people, and, most importantly, without the permission of my people" That is not intollerance, but instead what happens when popular soveraignty has been destroyed to the benefict of those who will bring money to the corrupt polliticians.

This is what I think, said propperly without all that "Deus Vult" shouting. I hope that you can understand this, and if not, I will be willing to talk with you calmly about this topic.

Ah yes, violence against Christians by Arabic regimes warrants violence against unrelated Irish Muslims.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:57 pm
by Highever
-Astoria wrote:
Highever wrote:You mean something that is not happening in the west is not as widely reported on in western media? How truly incomprehensible. Also, it is completely false. Just a basic search of "Nigerian Christians" on google brings up this and this and this.

Alright, now you've done it:

The kidnappings here are not exclusive to Christians only, and neither have the Boko Haram attacks.

I think you are entirely misunderstanding the point I am making here. I am doing nothing other than disproving his claim that the media does not cover persecution of Christians by showing three easily found articles that are on the topic.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:57 pm
by Nouveau Quebecois
Eternal Lotharia wrote:This attack is relatively minor but symbolic of a systemic issue. This emphasized the need for classes on Islam in Western Countries, for tolerance.

How is this attack symbolic of a systemic issue?

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:57 pm
by Nanatsu no Tsuki
This is truly unfortunate. This Muslim community didn't deserve to be attacked and more so in their place of worship.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:58 pm
by Marquisal
-Astoria wrote:
Highever wrote:You mean something that is not happening in the west is not as widely reported on in western media? How truly incomprehensible. Also, it is completely false. Just a basic search of "Nigerian Christians" on google brings up this and this and this.

Alright, now you've done it:

The kidnappings here are not exclusive to Christians only, and neither have the Boko Haram attacks.


I know that many people can be very extremist, but this are aislated incidents. They are not true Christians because they are not following God's orders, neither the words from Jesus Christ. But now, before you tell me the same thing about muslims, I will say that Muhammad encouraged it in the Sharia Law. (Just a little anticipation)

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:58 pm
by Nouveau Quebecois
Agarntrop wrote:Ah yes, violence against Christians by Arabic regimes warrants violence against unrelated Irish Muslims.

That all depends on how you look at it.

PostPosted: Mon Jul 29, 2019 1:58 pm
by -Astoria
Highever wrote:
-Astoria wrote:Alright, now you've done it:

The kidnappings here are not exclusive to Christians only, and neither have the Boko Haram attacks.

I think you are entirely misunderstanding the point I am making here. I am doing nothing other than disproving his claim that the media does not cover persecution of Christians by showing three easily found articles that are on the topic.

If so, my apologies.