Any March to the Sea?
Advertisement
by Jean-Paul Sartre » Sat Jul 27, 2019 10:59 am
by Ifreann » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:00 am
by Loben The 2nd » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:00 am
by Loben The 2nd » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:01 am
Ifreann wrote:If the students don't want this mural then I'd be inclined to defer to them.
by The New California Republic » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:03 am
by Communal concils » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:03 am
by Northern Syria » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:04 am
Other critics have raised concerns about whether the decision-making process truly made room for student voices. The board’s decree followed a similarly lopsided vote in February from an advisory panel convened to determine the fate of the murals. But an account of the controversy published in April by the New York Times found that multiple school employees had advised against covering Life of Washington, noting that their students were largely opposed to the drastic step being taken in their name.
Nora Pelizzari, a spokesman for the National Coalition Against Censorship, said that the adults in charge missed a chance to involve students in a more collaborative exercise in consensus-building.
“There’s an educational benefit to encouraging critical thinking and collaborative problem-solving,” she said. “The people arguing that students are being traumatized by this — we have yet to hear those students, and what that trauma is, and if they want the mural removed. I think we’re not giving students enough credit, and we’re not giving them the opportunity to impact their own environment. So for us, the next steps on this are to push for spaces for student voices to be heard on all sides.”
by Kowani » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:04 am
by Communal concils » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:06 am
by The New California Republic » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:07 am
Northern Syria wrote:Gagium wrote:Was it the students who were disturbed by the mural though?
From the article:Other critics have raised concerns about whether the decision-making process truly made room for student voices. The board’s decree followed a similarly lopsided vote in February from an advisory panel convened to determine the fate of the murals. But an account of the controversy published in April by the New York Times found that multiple school employees had advised against covering Life of Washington, noting that their students were largely opposed to the drastic step being taken in their name.
by Communal concils » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:08 am
by Kowani » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:09 am
Communal concils wrote:Loben The 2nd wrote:
Because Students always know best.
I feel like the generations of the 21st century( both the current and future ones) are being told a watered down version of history. It becomes simplistic or reductionist. Sometimes to the point of fantasies or little kid cartoons.
by Imperium of The Huron » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:09 am
by Gagium » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:09 am
Northern Syria wrote:Gagium wrote:Was it the students who were disturbed by the mural though?
From the article:Other critics have raised concerns about whether the decision-making process truly made room for student voices. The board’s decree followed a similarly lopsided vote in February from an advisory panel convened to determine the fate of the murals. But an account of the controversy published in April by the New York Times found that multiple school employees had advised against covering Life of Washington, noting that their students were largely opposed to the drastic step being taken in their name.
Nora Pelizzari, a spokesman for the National Coalition Against Censorship, said that the adults in charge missed a chance to involve students in a more collaborative exercise in consensus-building.
“There’s an educational benefit to encouraging critical thinking and collaborative problem-solving,” she said. “The people arguing that students are being traumatized by this — we have yet to hear those students, and what that trauma is, and if they want the mural removed. I think we’re not giving students enough credit, and we’re not giving them the opportunity to impact their own environment. So for us, the next steps on this are to push for spaces for student voices to be heard on all sides.”
by Communal concils » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:10 am
by The New California Republic » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:11 am
by Communal concils » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:13 am
Kowani wrote:Communal concils wrote:
I feel like the generations of the 21st century( both the current and future ones) are being told a watered down version of history. It becomes simplistic or reductionist. Sometimes to the point of fantasies or little kid cartoons.
Boy, I hope you never learn about how US History used to be taught.
by Thermodolia » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:13 am
by Scomagia » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:14 am
by The New California Republic » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:14 am
Thermodolia wrote:Makes me glad that Atlanta is placing plaques wherever there’s a confederate monument or street sign to give a historical context to the thing
by Northern Syria » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:14 am
by Thermodolia » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:15 am
by Scomagia » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:15 am
The New California Republic wrote:Communal concils wrote:
well, there was a few students to start the controversy.
which means that the minority rules over the majority, which makes me think that elitism has a big role in this.
It isn't even elitism, it's just a few people shouting louder than the rest...
by The New California Republic » Sat Jul 27, 2019 11:15 am
Scomagia wrote:Communal concils wrote:
well, there was a few students to start the controversy.
which means that the minority rules over the majority, which makes me think that elitism has a big role in this.
Wow. A vocal minority raised a fuss about something nobody else had an issue with and had something destroyed. Why does it feel like loud fringes dominate everything now?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, East Leaf Republic, Philjia, Singaporen Empire
Advertisement