NATION

PASSWORD

Should the Electoral College be abolished?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should the Electoral College be abolished?

Yes
221
60%
No (please explain)
148
40%
 
Total votes : 369

User avatar
Pacomia
Senator
 
Posts: 4811
Founded: May 23, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Pacomia » Wed Jul 31, 2019 10:23 pm

Alien Overlord wrote:The Electoral College should only be abolished if the US will also make the transition to a proportional system or Single Transferable Vote. You can't get rid of the EC and keep First Past the Post voting. It should be an all or nothing approach.

Agreed.
This nation is based on (a slightly more extreme version of) my IRL opinions, and I answer issues accordingly.
Current accidental policies: No Sex
Results of political various tests I took meme awesome
Progressive capitalism gang

GLORY TO CASCADIA, NUCLEAR ENERGY IS A GOOD THING!
This user is a male.

User avatar
Page
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16838
Founded: Jan 12, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Page » Wed Jul 31, 2019 10:24 pm

Alien Overlord wrote:The Electoral College should only be abolished if the US will also make the transition to a proportional system or Single Transferable Vote. You can't get rid of the EC and keep First Past the Post voting. It should be an all or nothing approach.


Proportional and STV are definitely better than FPTP, but even FPTP without the Electoral College is an improvement.
Anarcho-Communist Against: Bolsheviks, Fascists, TERFs, Putin, Autocrats, Conservatives, Ancaps, Bourgeoisie, Bigots, Liberals, Maoists

I don't believe in kink-shaming unless your kink is submitting to the state.

User avatar
Alien Overlord
Envoy
 
Posts: 338
Founded: Feb 10, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Alien Overlord » Wed Jul 31, 2019 10:31 pm

Page wrote:
Alien Overlord wrote:The Electoral College should only be abolished if the US will also make the transition to a proportional system or Single Transferable Vote. You can't get rid of the EC and keep First Past the Post voting. It should be an all or nothing approach.


Proportional and STV are definitely better than FPTP, but even FPTP without the Electoral College is an improvement.

My concern relates to the difficulty of passing constitutional amendments-making a small concession to get rid of the Electoral College without reforming from FPTP may lead to a situation where we go another 20-100 years before we finally do take that major step away from FPTP. Wouldn't you agree that it would be better to just get rid of both systems with a single, more radical amendment?
Walkerfort wrote:so...




Banning cars will lead to a clusterfuck of mininations everywhere and attempting to mash two Eras together miserably and 1984 style dictatorships


butterfly effect when give a butterfly cocaine


Ayissor wrote:
Alien Overlord wrote:You mean the proles living in tribes right? The ones who were also brainwashed 1984 style?

Yup, who else? Workers? Ha, as if we need them in our anarcho-primitivist-orwellian utopia dystopia federation.

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Wed Jul 31, 2019 10:46 pm

Borovan entered the region as he wrote:Yes. Electoral college dilutes the solid blues and red states and overepresents the swing states.

Swing states are in a constant state of political compromise and evolution of politics and policy and provide the best example at showing how to effectively rule the country without completely screwing over one side to the point that the country collapses.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159055
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu Aug 01, 2019 5:45 am

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:How?

I am aware.


Uh, by giving each state electors based upon the combined total of representatives and senators...

That doesn't increase the relative political power of rural votes. It increases the relative political power of votes in some states.


Grinning Dragon wrote:
San Lumen wrote:you just said off with democracy

The US isn't a democracy, it's a constitutional republic, in fact the word democracy doesn't appear anywhere in the Constitution.

The US is a democracy. You elect your federal legislators. You elect your state legislators. You elect your governors. You elect mayors. You elect local councils. You elect judges. You elect sheriffs. You elect attorneys general. You elect coroners. That you elect your president in a stupid and convoluted way doesn't make your country not a democracy.

User avatar
The Emerald Legion
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10695
Founded: Mar 18, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Emerald Legion » Thu Aug 01, 2019 8:45 am

Page wrote:
The Emerald Legion wrote:
Y'know the funny thing about this? Ok, so you want the 'popular vote' to matter because your side won it?

Why don't you, and all those extra people from whatever blue state you're in.... Move to a red state? Bam! Problem solved. If you really do outnumber by that wide a margin you should be able to just move a couple of hundred people. With the billions that are spent on election campaigns, I think it wouldn't be that hard to do. Not bussing them in mind, but legit moving to a new state.


The fact that election results could be changed by all the same people with the same vote moving to a different state is exactly why the Electoral College is bullshit.


Not really. If 51% of the country lived in Nebraska, and then used that power to constantly elect Nebraskans President, who then proceeded to malign literally every other states residents.... That would be a problem.

The Electoral college ensures that every state has a say. You having to move there and take the lumps you want to Dole out to them isn't messed up. It's Justice.
"23.The unwise man is awake all night, and ponders everything over; when morning comes he is weary in mind, and all is a burden as ever." - Havamal

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Aug 01, 2019 10:34 am

The Emerald Legion wrote:
Page wrote:
The fact that election results could be changed by all the same people with the same vote moving to a different state is exactly why the Electoral College is bullshit.


Not really. If 51% of the country lived in Nebraska, and then used that power to constantly elect Nebraskans President, who then proceeded to malign literally every other states residents.... That would be a problem.

The Electoral college ensures that every state has a say. You having to move there and take the lumps you want to Dole out to them isn't messed up. It's Justice.

That is not why it was created. Stop revising history to suit your narrative. It was created as a check on the people not to give dirt more votes then people

If the electoral college is so great why don’t we elect statewide offices not by how many votes they get but by how many counties they win?

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Thu Aug 01, 2019 10:58 am

The Emerald Legion wrote:Y'know the funny thing about this? Ok, so you want the 'popular vote' to matter because your side won it?

Why don't you, and all those extra people from whatever blue state you're in.... Move to a red state? Bam! Problem solved. If you really do outnumber by that wide a margin you should be able to just move a couple of hundred people. With the billions that are spent on election campaigns, I think it wouldn't be that hard to do. Not bussing them in mind, but legit moving to a new state.

What's funny is a bunch of people suggested that after 2016 in words that almost made it sound like they were Christian Missionaries going into 19th century Africa to bring civilization to the masses.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Bear Stearns
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11536
Founded: Dec 02, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Bear Stearns » Thu Aug 01, 2019 10:59 am

What SAT score do you need to get into Electoral College? How much do they give in scholarships? What conference is their football team in?
The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. is a New York-based global investment bank, securities trading and brokerage firm. Its main business areas are capital markets, investment banking, wealth management and global clearing services. Bear Stearns was founded as an equity trading house on May Day 1923 by Joseph Ainslie Bear, Robert B. Stearns and Harold C. Mayer with $500,000 in capital.
383 Madison Ave,
New York, NY 10017
Vince Vaughn

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44696
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Thu Aug 01, 2019 11:02 am

Bear Stearns wrote:What SAT score do you need to get into Electoral College? How much do they give in scholarships? What conference is their football team in?

You need a score of 0, they give scholarships more elusive than Kamala Harris’ healthcare plan, and their football team is in the Unopposed Conference.
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.




The triumph of the Democracy is essential to the struggle of popular liberty


Currently Rehabilitating: Martin Van Buren, Benjamin Harrison, and Woodrow Wilson
Currently Vilifying: George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, and Jimmy Carter

User avatar
Flaxxony
Diplomat
 
Posts: 789
Founded: Feb 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Flaxxony » Thu Aug 01, 2019 11:10 am

I don't think you can just dump the Electoral College in isolation. You need to get rid of the whole district system and first past the post crap. And decentralize the Federal Government and put it back in its place so you don't have people in small town America feeling like they're getting trampled.

The American Electoral College/FPTP etc. is like using a hammer to turn a screw. I can't tell you for certain whether you need a socket wrench, a screwdriver, an adjustable or a crescent wrench to screw in that screw. But I can sure tell you a hammer is the wrong tool, hands down. Almost anything is an improvement.

User avatar
The Emerald Legion
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10695
Founded: Mar 18, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Emerald Legion » Thu Aug 01, 2019 11:13 am

San Lumen wrote:
The Emerald Legion wrote:
Not really. If 51% of the country lived in Nebraska, and then used that power to constantly elect Nebraskans President, who then proceeded to malign literally every other states residents.... That would be a problem.

The Electoral college ensures that every state has a say. You having to move there and take the lumps you want to Dole out to them isn't messed up. It's Justice.

That is not why it was created. Stop revising history to suit your narrative. It was created as a check on the people not to give dirt more votes then people

If the electoral college is so great why don’t we elect statewide offices not by how many votes they get but by how many counties they win?


Great idea. We should do that. I would fucking love having an actual voice in how my state is run.
"23.The unwise man is awake all night, and ponders everything over; when morning comes he is weary in mind, and all is a burden as ever." - Havamal

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:21 pm

The Emerald Legion wrote:
San Lumen wrote:That is not why it was created. Stop revising history to suit your narrative. It was created as a check on the people not to give dirt more votes then people

If the electoral college is so great why don’t we elect statewide offices not by how many votes they get but by how many counties they win?


Great idea. We should do that. I would fucking love having an actual voice in how my state is run.

Dirt should matter more than votes?

it would be fair to you if the republican won this election despite only getting 36 percent of the vote? This is the Governor election in New York last year https://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail ... eID=810000

Or if the republican won this election in Nevada? The two counties the Democrat won are about 85 percent of the population of the state: https://www.ourcampaigns.com/RaceDetail ... eID=822591

Under such a system it would effectively be a rigged election with the minority always controlling statewide offices
Last edited by San Lumen on Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:52 pm

San Lumen wrote:Under such a system it would effectively be a rigged election with the minority always controlling statewide offices

Why, are you saying the Democrats are so incompetent that they'd be unable to to do anything to win over rural voters?
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Borovan entered the region as he
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1115
Founded: Dec 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Borovan entered the region as he » Thu Aug 01, 2019 12:54 pm

The Lone Alliance wrote:
Borovan entered the region as he wrote:Yes. Electoral college dilutes the solid blues and red states and overepresents the swing states.

Swing states are in a constant state of political compromise and evolution of politics and policy and provide the best example at showing how to effectively rule the country without completely screwing over one side to the point that the country collapses.

Well I still disagree with the electoral college. You can win narrowly in several swing states and effectively get all the electoral votes I'm more comfortable with popular vote

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Thu Aug 01, 2019 1:03 pm

Borovan entered the region as he wrote:
The Lone Alliance wrote:Swing states are in a constant state of political compromise and evolution of politics and policy and provide the best example at showing how to effectively rule the country without completely screwing over one side to the point that the country collapses.

Well I still disagree with the electoral college. You can win narrowly in several swing states and effectively get all the electoral votes I'm more comfortable with popular vote

And that'd lead to elections being on how to appeal only to the states with the highest population and not the politically moderate swing states, it'd lead to Presidents trying to run to be either the President of California or the President of Texas.

And I do not want to see the entire US turn into Texas or California.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12103
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Thu Aug 01, 2019 1:16 pm

The Lone Alliance wrote:
Borovan entered the region as he wrote:Well I still disagree with the electoral college. You can win narrowly in several swing states and effectively get all the electoral votes I'm more comfortable with popular vote

And that'd lead to elections being on how to appeal only to the states with the highest population and not the politically moderate swing states, it'd lead to Presidents trying to run to be either the President of California or the President of Texas.

And I do not want to see the entire US turn into Texas or California.

Funny how California and Texas don't have half the US population, and they still see 40% of their population voting for different parties from the majority, and they are somehow going to control the entire popular vote.

If we look at metropolitan areas we see it takes around the top 40 to hit 50% of the US population, and those include over half the states.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Thu Aug 01, 2019 1:28 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
The Lone Alliance wrote:And that'd lead to elections being on how to appeal only to the states with the highest population and not the politically moderate swing states, it'd lead to Presidents trying to run to be either the President of California or the President of Texas.

And I do not want to see the entire US turn into Texas or California.

Funny how California and Texas don't have half the US population, and they still see 40% of their population voting for different parties from the majority, and they are somehow going to control the entire popular vote.

They don't need to control the entire popular vote they just need enough to give them weight and they will have more weight under a popular vote.

Spirit of Hope wrote:If we look at metropolitan areas we see it takes around the top 40 to hit 50% of the US population, and those include over half the states.

And that goes back into the city versus Rural issues.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12103
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Thu Aug 01, 2019 1:38 pm

The Lone Alliance wrote:
Spirit of Hope wrote:Funny how California and Texas don't have half the US population, and they still see 40% of their population voting for different parties from the majority, and they are somehow going to control the entire popular vote.

They don't need to control the entire popular vote they just need enough to give them weight and they will have more weight under a popular vote.

Since they are under weighted currently, I don't see how them getting more weight is going to be the end of the US, or damage our political system in any meaningful way. California and Texas are the most powerful states by raw electoral college votes, however they are fixed in there party affiliation by first past the post. Under popular vote they would gain a little more power, but there party affiliation isn't going to change, most of California will vote Democrat, and most of Texas, Republican.

The Lone Alliance wrote:
Spirit of Hope wrote:If we look at metropolitan areas we see it takes around the top 40 to hit 50% of the US population, and those include over half the states.

And that goes back into the city versus Rural issues.

Which is a problem the electoral college doesn't deal with, so the current system is a wash there. Most of the US lives in metropolitan areas, so it should be no surprise that metropolitan areas have the most electoral power. Metropolitan areas also aren't all urban areas, there quite complex.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Thu Aug 01, 2019 1:40 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
The Lone Alliance wrote:They don't need to control the entire popular vote they just need enough to give them weight and they will have more weight under a popular vote.

Since they are under weighted currently, I don't see how them getting more weight is going to be the end of the US, or damage our political system in any meaningful way. California and Texas are the most powerful states by raw electoral college votes, however they are fixed in there party affiliation by first past the post. Under popular vote they would gain a little more power, but there party affiliation isn't going to change, most of California will vote Democrat, and most of Texas, Republican.

The Lone Alliance wrote:And that goes back into the city versus Rural issues.

Which is a problem the electoral college doesn't deal with, so the current system is a wash there. Most of the US lives in metropolitan areas, so it should be no surprise that metropolitan areas have the most electoral power. Metropolitan areas also aren't all urban areas, there quite complex.


So why do you continually reference their population?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12103
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Thu Aug 01, 2019 1:45 pm

Telconi wrote:
Spirit of Hope wrote:Since they are under weighted currently, I don't see how them getting more weight is going to be the end of the US, or damage our political system in any meaningful way. California and Texas are the most powerful states by raw electoral college votes, however they are fixed in there party affiliation by first past the post. Under popular vote they would gain a little more power, but there party affiliation isn't going to change, most of California will vote Democrat, and most of Texas, Republican.


Which is a problem the electoral college doesn't deal with, so the current system is a wash there. Most of the US lives in metropolitan areas, so it should be no surprise that metropolitan areas have the most electoral power. Metropolitan areas also aren't all urban areas, there quite complex.


So why do you continually reference their population?

Not sure what you are asking. Metropolitan areas are "a geographical region with a relatively high population density at its core and close economic ties throughout the area." Obviously portions of this area are going to be heavily urban, however parts of these areas could be suburban or even rural.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Thu Aug 01, 2019 1:49 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Telconi wrote:
So why do you continually reference their population?

Not sure what you are asking. Metropolitan areas are "a geographical region with a relatively high population density at its core and close economic ties throughout the area." Obviously portions of this area are going to be heavily urban, however parts of these areas could be suburban or even rural.


Indeed, and since nobody but you has mentioned metropolitan areas, why are they important?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Thu Aug 01, 2019 1:50 pm

Spirit of Hope wrote:
Telconi wrote:
So why do you continually reference their population?

Not sure what you are asking. Metropolitan areas are "a geographical region with a relatively high population density at its core and close economic ties throughout the area." Obviously portions of this area are going to be heavily urban, however parts of these areas could be suburban or even rural.

So you're saying that under the popular vote it'd all be about chasing the metro vote instead of the swing vote?

Sounds like my same point.
Last edited by The Lone Alliance on Thu Aug 01, 2019 2:03 pm, edited 4 times in total.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81235
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Aug 01, 2019 2:26 pm

The Lone Alliance wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Under such a system it would effectively be a rigged election with the minority always controlling statewide offices

Why, are you saying the Democrats are so incompetent that they'd be unable to to do anything to win over rural voters?

Why should ten percent of the population control statewide offices in a state like Nevada? How is that fair or democratic? Those counties are too red for any democrat to win

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Thu Aug 01, 2019 2:35 pm

San Lumen wrote:
The Lone Alliance wrote:Why, are you saying the Democrats are so incompetent that they'd be unable to to do anything to win over rural voters?

Why should ten percent of the population control statewide offices in a state like Nevada? How is that fair or democratic? Those counties are too red for any democrat to win


So why should the areas too blue for any Republican to win control statewide offices?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AADCO, Abserdia, Bienenhalde, Chernobyl and Pripyat, Kubra, Lysset, Nickel Empire, Port Caverton, South Northville, TheKeyToJoy, Uiiop, Vivida Vis Animi

Advertisement

Remove ads