ElCKuT wrote:Vassenor wrote:
So let's see it then.
https://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality/
https://www.bu.edu/articles/2010/nature ... -sexuality
Old sources.
Advertisement
by Springfeal » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:05 am
ElCKuT wrote:Vassenor wrote:
So let's see it then.
https://allpsych.com/journal/homosexuality/
https://www.bu.edu/articles/2010/nature ... -sexuality
by Nakena » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:06 am
Springfeal wrote:Araraukar wrote:Surprise, surprise, LGBT people are people. In other news, water is wet!
EDIT: Also, 5% of humans are completely straight, 5% are completely gay, about 5% (or was it 3%?) are asexual, and the rest belong on the bisexual continuum in between.
Bisexual implies almost equal attraction to both sexes. The terms heteroflexible and homoflexibile are used to refer to people that lean more one way.
by ElCKuT » Tue Jul 23, 2019 2:07 am
by The New California Republic » Tue Jul 23, 2019 3:00 am
by Telconi » Tue Jul 23, 2019 4:39 am
by Aozora Blu Sky » Tue Jul 23, 2019 12:25 pm
Telconi wrote:People believe stupid shit. I was told, with a detailed explanation, that it was impossible for a bisexual to engage in a monogamous relationship.
by Scomagia » Tue Jul 23, 2019 12:38 pm
Telconi wrote:People believe stupid shit. I was told, with a detailed explanation, that it was impossible for a bisexual to engage in a monogamous relationship.
by Kannap » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:25 pm
Springfeal wrote:Araraukar wrote:Surprise, surprise, LGBT people are people. In other news, water is wet!
EDIT: Also, 5% of humans are completely straight, 5% are completely gay, about 5% (or was it 3%?) are asexual, and the rest belong on the bisexual continuum in between.
Bisexual implies almost equal attraction to both sexes. The terms heteroflexible and homoflexibile are used to refer to people that lean more one way.
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by The New California Republic » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:26 pm
Telconi wrote:People believe stupid shit. I was told, with a detailed explanation, that it was impossible for a bisexual to engage in a monogamous relationship.
by Kannap » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:31 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Risastorstein » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:32 pm
by Scomagia » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:33 pm
Kannap wrote:Scomagia wrote:That's how I have always used it.
Hetero-flexible or whatever just sounds like so much more unnecessary labeling bullshit. Fuck that noise.
Pretty much, if you're sexually attracted to both men and women, regardless of if its 50/50 (it's rarely 50/50), or 40/60, or 5/95, or 99/1, or 75/25, then you're bisexual.
by Risastorstein » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:34 pm
Scomagia wrote:Indeed. Anything else seems to just be making labels and categories for the sake of making labels and categories.
by Sapientia Et Bellum » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:35 pm
"We are fascists, the heirs of fascism, the fascism of the year 2000" - Il Duce Gianfranco Fini
by Kannap » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:36 pm
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Risastorstein » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:38 pm
Eternal Lotharia wrote:What if you think some men have attractive faces but could never date or be sexually attracted to them(beyond the face of course)?
by Kannap » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:39 pm
Eternal Lotharia wrote:Kannap wrote:
Pretty much, if you're sexually attracted to both men and women, regardless of if its 50/50 (it's rarely 50/50), or 40/60, or 5/95, or 99/1, or 75/25, then you're bisexual.
What if you think some men have attractive faces but could never date or be sexually attracted to them(beyond the face of course)?
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Scomagia » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:39 pm
Sapientia Et Bellum wrote:Its good that some homosexuals are not buying into the nonsense that is transgenderism... Shows that some in the homosexual community do not follow the blind lead of neo liberal politicians... Sex change is not a cure, its mutilation
by Risastorstein » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:40 pm
Kannap wrote:My understanding is that pansexuality extends sexual attraction of men and women to trans men and trans women as well, whereas bisexuals may or may not be attracted to transgender people.
Kannap wrote:But looks like you're here to make noise, why am I bothering to explain?
by Eastern Denmark » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:41 pm
Eternal Lotharia wrote:Kannap wrote:
Pretty much, if you're sexually attracted to both men and women, regardless of if its 50/50 (it's rarely 50/50), or 40/60, or 5/95, or 99/1, or 75/25, then you're bisexual.
What if you think some men have attractive faces but could never date or be sexually attracted to them(beyond the face of course)?
by Sapientia Et Bellum » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:42 pm
Scomagia wrote:Sapientia Et Bellum wrote:Its good that some homosexuals are not buying into the nonsense that is transgenderism... Shows that some in the homosexual community do not follow the blind lead of neo liberal politicians... Sex change is not a cure, its mutilation
This is about bisexuals, not trans.
This illustrates a problem, though. Bisexuals often get shoved out of the conversation and ignored in favor of other parts of LGBT (god, I hate that stupid acronym).
"We are fascists, the heirs of fascism, the fascism of the year 2000" - Il Duce Gianfranco Fini
by Kannap » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:42 pm
Scomagia wrote:Sapientia Et Bellum wrote:Its good that some homosexuals are not buying into the nonsense that is transgenderism... Shows that some in the homosexual community do not follow the blind lead of neo liberal politicians... Sex change is not a cure, its mutilation
This is about bisexuals, not trans.
This illustrates a problem, though. Bisexuals often get shoved out of the conversation and ignored in favor of other parts of LGBT (god, I hate that stupid acronym).
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
by Scomagia » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:43 pm
Eastern Denmark wrote:Eternal Lotharia wrote:What if you think some men have attractive faces but could never date or be sexually attracted to them(beyond the face of course)?
That is aesthetic attraction, where you arent romantically or sexually attracted, but just recognize is pretty. not bisexual
On the topic, most biphobes in the lgbt community are often members of the same small group who support trump and/or show hatred to all other members of LGBTQA (pansexuality, trans, asexual, etc)
by The New California Republic » Tue Jul 23, 2019 1:44 pm
Eternal Lotharia wrote:Kannap wrote:
Pretty much, if you're sexually attracted to both men and women, regardless of if its 50/50 (it's rarely 50/50), or 40/60, or 5/95, or 99/1, or 75/25, then you're bisexual.
What if you think some men have attractive faces but could never date or be sexually attracted to them(beyond the face of course)?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Click Ests Vimgalevytopia, Elwher, Ifreann, Plan Neonie, Repreteop, Rio Cana, Talibanada, The Vooperian Union, Tiami, Tungstan, Uiiop, Valentine Z, Zancostan
Advertisement