They didn't have guns back then tho
Advertisement
by The Liberated Territories » Sun Jul 21, 2019 6:56 pm
by Free Arabian Nation » Sun Jul 21, 2019 6:56 pm
by Jeoloba » Sun Jul 21, 2019 6:59 pm
GrEaT ALgErStOnIa wrote:I find this to be irrelevant, as I do not believe in God, so in that case there wouldn’t really be anyone to approve of guns. I have never been given any sort of reason to believe in a God, and there is no evidence towards the existance of a God.
by Novus America » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:00 pm
Otira wrote:Old Testament God also tells the Hebrews to kill a lot of people, so maybe the "Thou Shall Not Kill" bit relates only to non-religious killings?
by Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:00 pm
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.” -Matthew 10:34
by Kowani » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:01 pm
by Great Algerstonia » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:01 pm
Jeoloba wrote:GrEaT ALgErStOnIa wrote:I find this to be irrelevant, as I do not believe in God, so in that case there wouldn’t really be anyone to approve of guns. I have never been given any sort of reason to believe in a God, and there is no evidence towards the existance of a God.
It's a hypothetical question, I my self do not believe in religion either. If he was real do you think he would approve of guns?
Resilient Acceleration wrote:After a period of letting this discussion run its course without my involvement due to sheer laziness and a new related NS project, I have returned with an answer and that answer is Israel.
by Jeoloba » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:02 pm
Otira wrote:Old Testament God also tells the Hebrews to kill a lot of people, so maybe the "Thou Shall Not Kill" bit relates only to non-religious killings?
by Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:03 pm
GrEaT ALgErStOnIa wrote:Jeoloba wrote:It's a hypothetical question, I my self do not believe in religion either. If he was real do you think he would approve of guns?
Would God approve of guns? Probably not. However, he isn’t in any sort of power to act on it. Last I checked, God does not have any say in national politics, if he exists.
by Hatterleigh » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:04 pm
National News Network: William Botrum entering last days in office - President-elect Rood preparing or term
Overview of Hatterleigh | William Botrum, Hatterleigh's President | Hatterlese Embassy Program | I don't use NS stats.by Jeoloba » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:04 pm
Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio wrote:No. It is merely a tool designed to inflict sever physical harm.
Also,Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:“Do not suppose that I have come to bring peace to the earth. I did not come to bring peace, but a sword.” -Matthew 10:34
The context makes the interpretation that there peace symbolized unity, and sword division (merely that resulting from differing religious views) appear quite valid. This is also supported by the next two verses stating the family members going against one another.
by Hatterleigh » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:05 pm
National News Network: William Botrum entering last days in office - President-elect Rood preparing or term
Overview of Hatterleigh | William Botrum, Hatterleigh's President | Hatterlese Embassy Program | I don't use NS stats.by Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:13 pm
by Novus America » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:18 pm
by Jeoloba » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:19 pm
Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio wrote:Also, because the language/wording is often at least somewhat open to interpretation, people will tend to interpret everything however they desire. This would not be possible if the original language were in legalese Lojban, or had a dictionary in which every use of every word were unambiguously defined with references to its use, with the words used in all definitions defined similarly.
by The Two Jerseys » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:20 pm
by Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:23 pm
by Highever » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:24 pm
Jolthig wrote:Use Soresu and not Juyo.
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:25 pm
Jeoloba wrote:Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio wrote:Also, because the language/wording is often at least somewhat open to interpretation, people will tend to interpret everything however they desire. This would not be possible if the original language were in legalese Lojban, or had a dictionary in which every use of every word were unambiguously defined with references to its use, with the words used in all definitions defined similarly.
Agreed, that's why everyone has different answers to the above question. A holy book should never be opened for interpretation and crystal clear just like any other book. It's a shame a lot of laws are written in the same way as the bible, open to interpretation.
by Kombinita Socialisma Demokratio » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:29 pm
by Nolo gap » Sun Jul 21, 2019 7:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Britain Modern RP, Cheroa, Eurocom, Foxyshire, Fractalnavel, Gaybeans, Neu California, The Notorious Mad Jack
Advertisement