Why is that a good enough excuse to assault someone?
Advertisement
by Nova Cyberia » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:41 am
by Fahran » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:41 am
Torrocca wrote:Careful now, Fah, if you advocate for self-defense then you're advocating for violence, and that's rule-breaking behavior.
by Torrocca » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:41 am
by Torrocca » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:42 am
Fahran wrote:Torrocca wrote:Careful now, Fah, if you advocate for self-defense then you're advocating for violence, and that's rule-breaking behavior.
NS is filled with city-slickers though. Ergo no one here has the right to ever use violence in any context.
As a rural lady, I possess the sole right to decide when someone requires a proper beating and I say that's never.
by Gormwood » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:42 am
by Nova Cyberia » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:43 am
Torrocca wrote:Nova Cyberia wrote:I was unaware it's literally fascism, but thanks for letting me know.
You have about the same degree of nuance when it comes to ideology as Torra does.
It's almost universally seen as Fascism in the field of political science, but you do you in pretending you're not a Fascist, champ.
by EastKekistan » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:43 am
by Conservative New America » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:43 am
EastKekistan wrote:It's funny that my claim that neither side is terroristic is completely ignored.
by Page » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:43 am
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:43 am
EastKekistan wrote:Instead of going after "domestic terrorists" of whatever side FBI and the police should go after urban violence. If there is domestic terrorism then this is real domestic terrorism.
by Fahran » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:43 am
Torrocca wrote:Kinda hard to regulate something that's a social movement and not an actual organization, to be fair.
by EastKekistan » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:44 am
by Nova Cyberia » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:44 am
Page wrote:Nova Cyberia wrote:Why is that a good enough excuse to assault someone?
I didn't say it is, but in any political demonstration I afford at least some benefit of the doubt that an altercation involved self-defense, in the same way that others afford such benefit of the doubt to police officers who shoot unarmed people.
by ElCKuT » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:44 am
EastKekistan wrote:Instead of going after "domestic terrorists" of whatever side FBI and the police should go after urban violence. If there is domestic terrorism then this is real domestic terrorism, not Proud Boys or Antifa.
by Torrocca » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:45 am
Fahran wrote:Torrocca wrote:Kinda hard to regulate something that's a social movement and not an actual organization, to be fair.
Fair, but there is organization at the local level in most cases. Hence how some groups have been able to implement riot tactics and whatnot. A simple "don't hit anyone unless they hit you" approach could do a lot to curtail violence and it'd only take posting it on a Facebook group to do it.
by Holy Tedalonia » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:46 am
Page wrote:Nova Cyberia wrote:Why is that a good enough excuse to assault someone?
I didn't say it is, but in any political demonstration I afford at least some benefit of the doubt that an altercation involved self-defense, in the same way that others afford such benefit of the doubt to police officers who shoot unarmed people.
by Fahran » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:46 am
Torrocca wrote:It's almost universally seen as Fascism in the field of political science, but you do you in pretending you're not a Fascist, champ.
by Washington Resistance Army » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:46 am
by Torrocca » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:46 am
by Nova Cyberia » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:47 am
Fahran wrote:Torrocca wrote:It's almost universally seen as Fascism in the field of political science, but you do you in pretending you're not a Fascist, champ.
I've flirted with non-capitalist, non-socialist ideologies in the past. Distributism, Georgism, etc. have been characterized as third positions, so I'd be a bit more nuanced about it, especially given that half of us on NS are nonconformist goofballs.
by Holy Tedalonia » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:47 am
by Nova Cyberia » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:47 am
by Torrocca » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:48 am
Fahran wrote:Torrocca wrote:It's almost universally seen as Fascism in the field of political science, but you do you in pretending you're not a Fascist, champ.
I've flirted with non-capitalist, non-socialist ideologies in the past. Distributism, Georgism, etc. have been characterized as third positions, so I'd be a bit more nuanced about it, especially given that half of us on NS are nonconformist goofballs.
by Fahran » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:48 am
Torrocca wrote:That's fair, and in that regard, they could easily do that. At that point, though, blame falls more on the locality than AntiFA as a whole.
by EastKekistan » Mon Jul 22, 2019 11:49 am
Conservative New America wrote:EastKekistan wrote:It's funny that my claim that neither side is terroristic is completely ignored.
We're having people hit with bats/bike locks and now at least one side has indirectly created an atmosphere in which a molotov was thrown and shots fired at law enforcement.
It's getting close if it's not there.
I'd rather no one be radicalized and return to centrism but certain people disagree.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: CM and OM, Ferelith, Gudoc, Kerwa, Rodents, The Xenopolis Confederation, Zetaopalatopia
Advertisement