'Manspreading chair' and men's boundaries

[EastKekistan]

We can have ladies' cars in trains. That's what's done in Japan.

That's done because of all the molestation, I believe.

Yes but this can also be done if feminists are very concerned about "manspreading".

[Geneviev]

Okay. You can sit on the roof of the train. Watch out for the low bridges.

Or introduce gender segregated seating or better yet non mixed public transit.

Non mixed public transportation can be very inconvenient to people who want to travel together.

[Scomagia]

Women are considered impure in Islam so touching them, specially if they're on their period, is looked down upon.

Touching women nothing to do with purity most of the time, women also have to do ablution if they touch a man.

Oh man, I'm pretty fucking impure, then. Oh no, what shall I ever do!

[Dumb Ideologies]

Okay. You can sit on the roof of the train. Watch out for the low bridges.

Or introduce gender segregated seating or better yet non mixed public transit.

I'd rather take the higher chance of a seat in a mixed carriage than get stuck in a bitch carriage with all the requisite femspreading of shopping bags across multiple seats.

No, you'll go on the roof and you will thank us for it.

[Nakena]

Or introduce gender segregated seating or better yet non mixed public transit.

I'd rather take the higher change of a seat than being stuck in a bitch carriage with all the femspreading of shopping bags.

No, you'll go on the roof and you will thank us for it.

It's not unheared in India.

[Al Mumtahanah]

Touching women nothing to do with purity most of the time, women also have to do ablution if they touch a man.

Is it also a respect thing?

Yes, it is considered very disrespectful for a man to even look a woman in the eyes if she isn't spouse or family.

[EastKekistan]

Or introduce gender segregated seating or better yet non mixed public transit.

Non mixed public transportation can be very inconvenient to people who want to travel together.

Right. So have a ladies section and a mixed section. If a lady does not want manspreading she can go to the ladies section. Problem solved.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

I'd rather take the higher change of a seat than being stuck in a bitch carriage with all the femspreading of shopping bags.

No, you'll go on the roof and you will thank us for it.

It's not unheared in India.

Riding the roof of a train? Yes.

[Al Mumtahanah]

Or introduce gender segregated seating or better yet non mixed public transit.

Non mixed public transportation can be very inconvenient to people who want to travel together.

That is true, mixed is obviously required for families

[The Free Joy State]

Non mixed public transportation can be very inconvenient to people who want to travel together.

Right. So have a ladies section and a mixed section.

Or... let's not.

There's no good reason for a women's only section on public transport.

[Dumb Ideologies]

Is it also a respect thing?

Yes, it is considered very disrespectful for a man to even look a woman in the eyes if she isn't spouse or family.

I consider it very disrespectful for you to not be on the roof. You wouldn't want to be disrespectful, would you?

[Walkerfort]

It's not unheared in India.

Riding the roof of a train? Yes.

taking over an entire train car for yourself and mates and letting no one else in?

FUCKING GENIUS

[Al Mumtahanah]

Or introduce gender segregated seating or better yet non mixed public transit.

I'd rather take the higher change of a seat in a mixed carriage than get stuck in a bitch carriage with all the requisite femspreading of shopping bags across multiple seats.

No, you'll go on the roof and you will thank us for it.

I can just drive

[Geneviev]

Non mixed public transportation can be very inconvenient to people who want to travel together.

Right. So have a ladies section and a mixed section. If a lady does not want manspreading she can go to the ladies section. Problem solved.

That would definitely solve the problem. It shouldn't be a problem at all, though.

[Scomagia]

That's done because of all the molestation, I believe.

Yes but this can also be done if feminists are very concerned about "manspreading".

Or it could not be done.

I like that. Let us do nothing.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Riding the roof of a train? Yes.

taking over an entire train car for yourself and mates and letting no one else in?

FUCKING GENIUS

Well, not exactly. They just climb on the roofs of trains because the trains can get pretty crowded. And free rides.

[Al Mumtahanah]

Yes, it is considered very disrespectful for a man to even look a woman in the eyes if she isn't spouse or family.

I consider it very disrespectful for you to not be on the roof. You wouldn't want to be disrespectful, would you?

No, of course not, but that sounds more like an idiosyncracy than a cultural norms.

[Nakena]

In Japan they have separate sections in some subways for females.

To protect the males from the woman, that is. (at least so I got told)

[Great Minarchistan]

I'd rather take the higher change of a seat in a mixed carriage than get stuck in a bitch carriage with all the requisite femspreading of shopping bags across multiple seats.

No, you'll go on the roof and you will thank us for it.

I can just drive

by 2030 you'll be accused for crimes against the climate humanity if you keep up with this reckless behavior

[EastKekistan]

Yes, it is considered very disrespectful for a man to even look a woman in the eyes if she isn't spouse or family.

I consider it very disrespectful for you to not be on the roof. You wouldn't want to be disrespectful, would you?

I consider it very disrespectful for you to exist and not be a cat. You wouldn't want to be disrespectful, would you?

To be serious "disrespectful" is arbitrary tabooing and if enough people collectively taboo something it will be at least partly banned.

[Geneviev]

Non mixed public transportation can be very inconvenient to people who want to travel together.

That is true, mixed is obviously required for families

That would be a compromise, but it would be better to just not change anything.

[EastKekistan]

I consider it very disrespectful for you to not be on the roof. You wouldn't want to be disrespectful, would you?

No, of course not, but that sounds more like an idiosyncracy than a cultural norms.

That's because there isn't a major tribe that has such norms.

[The Free Joy State]

Yes but this can also be done if feminists are very concerned about "manspreading".

Or it could not be done.

I like that. Let us do nothing.

Best idea I've heard: let's do nothing.

Or, let's ask men not to spread their legs and women not to spread their bags excessively.

How does that grab people as an option?

[Scomagia]

Is it also a respect thing?

Yes, it is considered very disrespectful for a man to even look a woman in the eyes if she isn't spouse or family.

I look people in the eyes when having a conversation. It shows I'm listening and makes them pay attention to me. I'll just go ahead and keep doing that.

[EastKekistan]

Or it could not be done.

I like that. Let us do nothing.

Best idea I've heard: let's do nothing.

Or, let's ask men not to spread their legs and women not to spread their bags excessively.

How does that grab people as an option?

Not a good idea. I say..let's have a ladies section and a mixed section..maybe a dude section too.