Advertisement
by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Oct 16, 2019 3:25 am
by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Oct 16, 2019 3:26 am
by The New California Republic » Wed Oct 16, 2019 3:37 am
by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Oct 16, 2019 3:41 am
The New California Republic wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:People can be unconcerned.
People unconcerned about tit for tat killings, RPG rounds fired at public buildings, and bombs being planted as a daily occurrence? I refuse to believe that even you with your "maximum chaos" and deep-seated malevolence towards others could seriously believe that.
by Vassenor » Wed Oct 16, 2019 3:47 am
by Andsed » Wed Oct 16, 2019 4:42 am
The New California Republic wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:People can be unconcerned.
People unconcerned about tit for tat killings, RPG rounds fired at public buildings, and bombs being planted as a daily occurrence? I refuse to believe that even you with your "maximum chaos" and deep-seated malevolence towards others could seriously believe that.
by Fartsniffage » Wed Oct 16, 2019 5:35 am
by Greater vakolicci haven » Wed Oct 16, 2019 6:17 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:The New California Republic wrote:People unconcerned about tit for tat killings, RPG rounds fired at public buildings, and bombs being planted as a daily occurrence? I refuse to believe that even you with your "maximum chaos" and deep-seated malevolence towards others could seriously believe that.
He literally argued why dont we build a wall and put an underground tunnel for trade.
He knows fuck all about this place, or what its like here, and is continuing with his edgy societal destruction bollocks.
by Ifreann » Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:18 am
by The New California Republic » Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:21 am
Ifreann wrote:The Salvation Army, and other groups, are helping the Home Office deport vulnerable homeless people. People are lured in to "immigration surgeries" in churches and community centres with promises of help with their immigration status and assurances that this is not part of an enforcement approach, but in fact this is an initiative of the Home Office's immigration enforcement unit.
by Definitely Not Trumptonium » Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:35 am
by The Huskar Social Union » Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:36 am
THE DUP has defended its leader's decision to meet loyalist paramilitaries to discuss the implications of a mooted Brexit deal that could see a so-called border in the Irish Sea.
Arlene Foster and other senior party figures are reported to have held talks in recent days with high-ranking figures from the UVF and UDA - including south Belfast's Jackie McDonald.
The meetings follow weekend reports of potential loyalist protests if the Northern Ireland's status in the UK is "diluted" after the UK leaves the EU.
A spokesman for the DUP said: "The party engages with a range of stakeholders about a range of matters on an ongoing basis in the interests of moving Northern Ireland forward."
by Ifreann » Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:45 am
The New California Republic wrote:Ifreann wrote:The Salvation Army, and other groups, are helping the Home Office deport vulnerable homeless people. People are lured in to "immigration surgeries" in churches and community centres with promises of help with their immigration status and assurances that this is not part of an enforcement approach, but in fact this is an initiative of the Home Office's immigration enforcement unit.
For fuck's sake. I would have thought that the Salvie knew better, but clearly not.
by Philjia » Wed Oct 16, 2019 7:55 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:So are the DUP bum mates with loyalist paramilitaries? Are they letting paramilitaries voices and opinions inform their actions and policies for the future?
The answer, wont shock you.
Also lol at sf calling them out on this.
by Vassenor » Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:26 am
by The New California Republic » Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:30 am
by Ifreann » Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:47 am
The New California Republic wrote:
Good. The entire plan was unworkable. The government was repeatedly told it was unworkable, but they pressed ahead anyway; but it shouldn't surprise me that it took them until now to realise what everybody else already knew.
by Philjia » Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:47 am
The New California Republic wrote:
Good. The entire plan was unworkable. The government was repeatedly told it was unworkable, but they pressed ahead anyway; but it shouldn't surprise me that it took them until now to realise what everybody else already knew.
by Dooom35796821595 » Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:52 am
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Wed Oct 16, 2019 8:54 am
Philjia wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Good. The entire plan was unworkable. The government was repeatedly told it was unworkable, but they pressed ahead anyway; but it shouldn't surprise me that it took them until now to realise what everybody else already knew.
This is so sad Alexa play Entry of the Gladiators. I'd love to know how much public money was wasted on this terrible idea.
by Definitely Not Trumptonium » Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:02 am
by Vassenor » Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:35 am
Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:Vassenor wrote:
It also shows majority support for abandoning Brexit entirely.
Which graph are you reading?
Simplified for you:
Graph 1:
46% Some kind of leave in general
34% Revoke/Ref2
Graph 2:
40% Some kind of leave on 31 Oct
9% Extension
18% Ref 2
22% Revoke
Graph 3:
67% of Remain voters in 2016 want to Revoke Brexit
27% of Remain voters in 2016 want some kind of Brexit
----
6% of Leave voters in 2016 want to Revoke Brexit
82% of Leave voters in 2016 want some kind of Brexit
For each 2016 Leave voter who now wants to Remain or have a second referendum (caveat: some Leave voters might want 2nd ref but vote Leave again anyway), there is a 2016 Remain voter who wants No deal at the end of this month, and that's not even counting double that number of Remainers who want another extension or May's deal.
Please tell me which one shows majority support for staying in the EU and kindly explain the mental gymnastics used to reach said conclusion.
by Definitely Not Trumptonium » Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:58 am
Vassenor wrote:Definitely Not Trumptonium wrote:
Which graph are you reading?
Simplified for you:
Graph 1:
46% Some kind of leave in general
34% Revoke/Ref2
Graph 2:
40% Some kind of leave on 31 Oct
9% Extension
18% Ref 2
22% Revoke
Graph 3:
67% of Remain voters in 2016 want to Revoke Brexit
27% of Remain voters in 2016 want some kind of Brexit
----
6% of Leave voters in 2016 want to Revoke Brexit
82% of Leave voters in 2016 want some kind of Brexit
For each 2016 Leave voter who now wants to Remain or have a second referendum (caveat: some Leave voters might want 2nd ref but vote Leave again anyway), there is a 2016 Remain voter who wants No deal at the end of this month, and that's not even counting double that number of Remainers who want another extension or May's deal.
Please tell me which one shows majority support for staying in the EU and kindly explain the mental gymnastics used to reach said conclusion.
Says the person who can't be bothered accounting for split opposition voting.
by Vassenor » Wed Oct 16, 2019 10:02 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arevala, Big Eyed Animation, Cerespasia, Dazchan, Diarcesia, Godular, Ineva, Kaumudeen, Kostane, La Paz de Los Ricos, Lysset, Soul Reapers, THe cHadS, The Wealthy Gods
Advertisement