Advertisement
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:24 am
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Sun Oct 13, 2019 5:32 am
by Salandriagado » Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:45 am
Greed and Death wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Is it that private schooling is better for educating the kids, or is it that private schooling allows clubs for the rich and nepotism to thrive? Evidence is against the former, so it suggests the latter is why they are thought to "work".
It seems more like a kind of class school segregation policy than legitimately "Paying for my kid to have better education", it's more "Paying for class segregation".
http://theconversation.com/gap-between- ... bias-30178
This says admission difference is down to grades and UCAS scores. Yes my child in private school is scoring better on the college entrance exam nepotism right?
by The New California Republic » Sun Oct 13, 2019 7:53 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Northern Ireland has not had a government for 1000 days
WOOOOOOOOO!
(Image)
Oh wait no its fucking depressing.
by Greed and Death » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:20 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Northern Ireland has not had a government for 1000 days
WOOOOOOOOO!
(Image)
Oh wait no its fucking depressing.
by Greed and Death » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:23 am
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:
Well that's me disenfranchised as I don't have any photo ID.
Hopefully MPs are going to vote against the Queen's Speech anyway.
by Vassenor » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:30 am
by The New California Republic » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:38 am
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:
Well that's me disenfranchised as I don't have any photo ID.
Hopefully MPs are going to vote against the Queen's Speech anyway.
by Vassenor » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:43 am
The New California Republic wrote:An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:
Well that's me disenfranchised as I don't have any photo ID.
Hopefully MPs are going to vote against the Queen's Speech anyway.
I have my passport, but is the issue of voter fraud really that serious here that we need to resort to this? I want to see some evidence from the government that this is actually a serious issue.
by The New California Republic » Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:56 am
Vassenor wrote:The New California Republic wrote:I have my passport, but is the issue of voter fraud really that serious here that we need to resort to this? I want to see some evidence from the government that this is actually a serious issue.
There was exactly one conviction for the sort of fraud that voter ID would prevent in 2017.
by Fartsniffage » Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:13 am
The New California Republic wrote:Vassenor wrote:
There was exactly one conviction for the sort of fraud that voter ID would prevent in 2017.
I'd maybe understand the measures if this was a country where the ballot boxes routinely get stuffed etc. If anything there would be more justification in cracking down on the so called "granny farming" using proxy votes, as proxy votes are arguably more open to abuse.
by The New California Republic » Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:15 am
Fartsniffage wrote:The New California Republic wrote:I'd maybe understand the measures if this was a country where the ballot boxes routinely get stuffed etc. If anything there would be more justification in cracking down on the so called "granny farming" using proxy votes, as proxy votes are arguably more open to abuse.
They're doing that too.
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Sun Oct 13, 2019 9:25 am
The New California Republic wrote:Vassenor wrote:
There was exactly one conviction for the sort of fraud that voter ID would prevent in 2017.
I'd maybe understand the measures if this was a country where the ballot boxes routinely get stuffed etc. If anything there would be more justification in cracking down on the so called "granny farming" using proxy votes, as proxy votes are arguably more open to abuse.
by Gormwood » Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:07 am
by Cupofchar » Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:44 am
by An Alan Smithee Nation » Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:46 am
Gormwood wrote:Some good news hopefully.
UK says diplomatic immunity for US suspect in teen's death 'no longer pertinent'
by Dooom35796821595 » Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:17 am
Gormwood wrote:Some good news hopefully.
UK says diplomatic immunity for US suspect in teen's death 'no longer pertinent'
by Greed and Death » Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:34 am
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:Gormwood wrote:Some good news hopefully.
UK says diplomatic immunity for US suspect in teen's death 'no longer pertinent'
I very much doubt that means she will be extradited.
by The New California Republic » Sun Oct 13, 2019 11:41 am
Greed and Death wrote:An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:
I very much doubt that means she will be extradited.
Under the current treaty the US has not denied a single UK extradition request.
https://uk.usembassy.gov/our-relationsh ... 20citizens.
by The Huskar Social Union » Sun Oct 13, 2019 12:19 pm
by Nimzonia » Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:39 pm
The New California Republic wrote:Greed and Death wrote:
Under the current treaty the US has not denied a single UK extradition request.
https://uk.usembassy.gov/our-relationsh ... 20citizens.
They may say no to this one though.
by Gormwood » Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:50 pm
by Dooom35796821595 » Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:52 pm
by The New California Republic » Sun Oct 13, 2019 2:54 pm
Dooom35796821595 wrote:Nimzonia wrote:
I'll be surprised if a formal extradition request is actually made. I suspect there are many cases where the UK simply doesn't bother asking because we know what the answer will be, and this will be one of them.
The fact she was recalled sort of shows the American position. The best hope now would be to get her to return due to her guilty conscience.
by Greed and Death » Sun Oct 13, 2019 3:04 pm
Gormwood wrote:Nimzonia wrote:
I'll be surprised if a formal extradition request is actually made. I suspect there are many cases where the UK simply doesn't bother asking because we know what the answer will be, and this will be one of them.
Ideally they should wait until a Democrat gets in the White House.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Azhdar, Kentish Realm, Likhinia, Nivosea, The Italian Socialist Union
Advertisement