Washington Resistance Army wrote:Another huge problem with the IQ argument for things like this is how drastically it changes in accordance with quality of education and other things, which would not be the case if it was genetic. In 1940's Britain the average IQ from todays tests would be about 86. For comparison Uganda today is 84, almost the exact same as 1940's Britain. This is literally the worst argument for racialists to use cuz there's no basis for it lol.
You're gonna have to archive.org that cuz I'm not subscribing to read it.
Phenotypical IQ can change rapidly. Not genotypical IQ. So for example if malnutrition is eliminated in India we may get an average phenotypical IQ of 95-105. It does not make IQ invalid as a measure of intelligence.