NATION

PASSWORD

California Offers Healthcare Benefits To Illegal Immigrants

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Emerald Legion
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10698
Founded: Mar 18, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Emerald Legion » Sat Jul 13, 2019 1:59 pm

Page wrote:
The Emerald Legion wrote:
Nonsense. You're always going to die. Whether you get Healthcare or not. That's not what a 'Right to Life' means. It means people won't deliberately kill you. Not that society is obligated to do everything in it's power to keep you alive.


We aren't talking about keeping brain dead people alive on bypass just for the sake of it, we're talking about people not dying years or decades before their time because they couldn't afford treatment they need to live.


Irrelevant. You are always going to die. Death is inescapable. Maybe you die in a car crash, have a heart attack, or accidentally shoot yourself. Maybe you just get some sort of horrible illness.

Whatever the reason, you are still dead. Your time is not set. You are not promised tomorrow. Again, your right to life means people won't deliberately kill you at any particular moment. It does not mean they have to provide you with whatever necessities you need to live.
"23.The unwise man is awake all night, and ponders everything over; when morning comes he is weary in mind, and all is a burden as ever." - Havamal

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Sat Jul 13, 2019 1:59 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
I don't care? Also, it's not a strawman.


When and where have you seen this? If it happens all the time you should be able to give an example easily.


No, because that then I would reveal some of my personal information. And like I said, I can care less if anyone believes me or not.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:00 pm

Kowani wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
Or you just need to take better care of yourself. Your own health is your problem and responsibility and not others. If someone makes poorer choices with regards to nutrition and lifestyle, that is their own fault.

As per usual, your views are fundamentally inaccurate.


How? He isn't wrong. Nobody has to baby you. This country is not a giant daycare center.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:01 pm

Page wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
Or you just need to take better care of yourself. Your own health is your problem and responsibility and not others. If someone makes poorer choices with regards to nutrition and lifestyle, that is their own fault.


100% of people would get cancer if they lived long enough, if nothing else kills you first you will get cancer regardless of your lifestyle choices. And that's just one of many diseases that people get regardless of what they do.


Absolute fucking bullshit.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44956
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:05 pm

Chernoslavia wrote:
Kowani wrote:As per usual, your views are fundamentally inaccurate.


How? He isn't wrong. Nobody has to baby you. This country is not a giant daycare center.

By ignoring the grand part of the population that is unable to make those choices because taking care of oneself is expensive. It is often said in capitalism that someone has to do the unpleasant jobs. This is true. And, even if, for a minute, we transformed every person in society into Einstein, or Salk, or Rockefeller, then they would still not be able to all get a good education. There are people who are poor for no fault of their own, and good living (not luxury living, but basic health) is expensive.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.



Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44956
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:07 pm

Chernoslavia wrote:
Page wrote:
100% of people would get cancer if they lived long enough, if nothing else kills you first you will get cancer regardless of your lifestyle choices. And that's just one of many diseases that people get regardless of what they do.


Absolute fucking bullshit.

There are diseases which will effect one, regardless of their lifestyle choice. Neurodegenerative ones come to mind, as do many genetic diseases. And in some people who are already genetically predisposed to it, exposure to carcinogens from the outside world would screw them over through no fault of their own.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.



Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:19 pm

Page wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
They sort of are when people are forced to pay for it.


So are you an ancap or a hypocrite? Either you think it's okay for some things like schools and police to be publicly funded and freely available to the people, in which case you're a hypocrite to say health care as a right is coercion while other things are not (by your logic, judges are oppressed because tax dollars pay their salaries and they can't become private sector judges), or you're an ancap. If you're an ancap, I can't really argue against that other than pointing out that if we had anarcho-capitalism, someone richer than you would hire mercenaries to take your stuff and kill you, and then health care wouldn't be a concern.


Neither, my argument is in response to you people calling this ''a right''. It is not, as Emerald pointed out, the right to life does not mean anyone has to provide you with whatever necessities you need to live. Also, the only law in an Ancap society is the non-aggression principal. So someone hiring mercs to kill me would be illegal.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:21 pm

The Emerald Legion wrote:
Page wrote:
We aren't talking about keeping brain dead people alive on bypass just for the sake of it, we're talking about people not dying years or decades before their time because they couldn't afford treatment they need to live.


Irrelevant. You are always going to die. Death is inescapable. Maybe you die in a car crash, have a heart attack, or accidentally shoot yourself. Maybe you just get some sort of horrible illness.

Whatever the reason, you are still dead. Your time is not set. You are not promised tomorrow. Again, your right to life means people won't deliberately kill you at any particular moment. It does not mean they have to provide you with whatever necessities you need to live.


Quitter.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163891
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:22 pm

The Emerald Legion wrote:
Page wrote:
If health care is not a right, then life is not a right; you need health care to not die.


Nonsense. You're always going to die...

Speak for yourself.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:26 pm

Chernoslavia wrote:
Page wrote:
100% of people would get cancer if they lived long enough, if nothing else kills you first you will get cancer regardless of your lifestyle choices. And that's just one of many diseases that people get regardless of what they do.


Absolute fucking bullshit.


In fact, the researchers go on to suggest that if people lived long enough then virtually everyone would eventually get cancer, providing they did not die of other causes first.


https://www.nice.org.uk/news/blog/1-in- ... get-cancer

There will always be a few who are immune, just like there are to every human disease. But taken as a whole, everyone will get cancer eventually, it a product of evolution.

User avatar
The Emerald Legion
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10698
Founded: Mar 18, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Emerald Legion » Sat Jul 13, 2019 2:49 pm

Ifreann wrote:
The Emerald Legion wrote:
Nonsense. You're always going to die...

Speak for yourself.


Vampire Illuminati Confirmed.
"23.The unwise man is awake all night, and ponders everything over; when morning comes he is weary in mind, and all is a burden as ever." - Havamal

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:08 pm

Kowani wrote:There are diseases which will effect one, regardless of their lifestyle choice. Neurodegenerative ones come to mind, as do many genetic diseases. And in some people who are already genetically predisposed to it, exposure to carcinogens from the outside world would screw them over through no fault of their own.


Life has never been fair and it is partially fate, but generally speaking- you still get presented with enough choices that either pay off or don't in the long term. Everything adds up. So you still decide for the most part, whether you have a good or bad outcome overall. There is no way of knowing whether your path is good or not, you only have yourself to provide your direction and decisions.

I find it more useful to carry the world on my shoulders and endure, than to whine that everything never turned out the way I wanted. I had no control over for example, that my parents were tobacco smokers early on. But they eventually quit and I feel I didn't get much damage secondhand, but I know that I did, just as life in general- has a tendency to give you damage or better health depending on what you do. It all builds up over time, and because no one is perfect- your health is usually blemished deep down anyways.

You aren't going to make it close to the maximum age of 120 unless you did most things right or are plain lucky or both.
Last edited by Saiwania on Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:17 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:20 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Kowani wrote:There are diseases which will effect one, regardless of their lifestyle choice. Neurodegenerative ones come to mind, as do many genetic diseases. And in some people who are already genetically predisposed to it, exposure to carcinogens from the outside world would screw them over through no fault of their own.


Life has never been fair and it is partially fate, but generally speaking- you still get presented with enough choices that either pay off or don't in the long term. Everything adds up. So you still decide for the most part, whether you have a good or bad outcome overall. There is no way of knowing whether your path is good or not, you only have yourself to provide your direction and decisions.

I find it more useful to carry the world on my shoulders and endure, than to whine that everything never turned out the way I wanted. I had no control over for example, that my parents were tobacco smokers early on. But they eventually quit and I feel I didn't get much damage secondhand, but I know that I did, just as life in general- has a tendency to give you damage or better health depending on what you do. It all builds up over time, and because no one is perfect- your health is usually blemished deep down anyways.

You aren't going to make it close to the maximum age of 120 unless you did most things right or are plain lucky or both.


Who the heck wants to be 120 anyway?
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Jul 13, 2019 4:47 pm

Tristainland wrote:Healthcare to illegals before healthcare to all Americans and legal immigrants. Such stupidity.

This is, in fact, a lie.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31342
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Sun Jul 14, 2019 3:39 pm

Liriena wrote:
Tristainland wrote:Healthcare to illegals before healthcare to all Americans and legal immigrants. Such stupidity.

This is, in fact, a lie.


Actually it's not. If you're a US Citizen & long term Cali resident over the age of 50, you're less likely to get healthcare in Cali, than if you are an illegal immigrant under the age of 18.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Great Minarchistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5953
Founded: Jan 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Minarchistan » Sun Jul 14, 2019 6:16 pm

Page wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
Or you just need to take better care of yourself. Your own health is your problem and responsibility and not others. If someone makes poorer choices with regards to nutrition and lifestyle, that is their own fault.


100% of people would get cancer if they lived long enough, if nothing else kills you first you will get cancer regardless of your lifestyle choices. And that's just one of many diseases that people get regardless of what they do.

Yeah, getting cancer doesn't equal death or reduced life quality though cf. stem cell treatments, targeted chemotherapy and general improvement in treatments. We're just digging deeper and deeper into disease treatment (as that's the natural byproduct of the improvement in material conditions anyway) and having our life expectancy getting constantly expanded as a result
Last edited by Great Minarchistan on Sun Jul 14, 2019 6:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Awarded for Best Capitalist in 2018 NSG Awards ;')
##############################
Fmr. libertarian, irredeemable bank shill and somewhere inbetween classical liberalism and neoliberalism // Political Compass: +8.75 Economic, -2.25 Social (May 2019)

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:09 am

Loben The 2nd wrote:Annnnd they are paying for this how?


Really easily, because providing preventative medicine for free makes the government a profit.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:10 am

Chernoslavia wrote:
Necroghastia wrote:
Literally no one in favor of universal healthcare is arguing that medical staff should work for free.


Yes they do actually. I see it all the time, not on NSG though and I suspect that's only to avoid coming off as authoritarian.


No, you're just lying.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:11 am

Chernoslavia wrote:
Page wrote:
Health care being a right does not mean anyone is forced to treat you.

Some people decide to become doctors. Those who do can work for the public just as librarians and police officers do. Their wages are paid by taxes. Those who don't want to can quit.

No doctor or nurse is being forced to treat anyone. They don't have a gun to their head, they can quit any time.


They sort of are when people are forced to pay for it.

And those who want to work for the private sector shouldn't be forced to choose between the two choices you mentioned. But nahh, private sector bad because ''muh ebul pharma.''


So which single-payer universal healthcare system bans private hospitals/insurance? I'll give you a hint: there aren't any.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:22 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
Yes they do actually. I see it all the time, not on NSG though and I suspect that's only to avoid coming off as authoritarian.


No, you're just lying.


No, you are.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:23 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
They sort of are when people are forced to pay for it.

And those who want to work for the private sector shouldn't be forced to choose between the two choices you mentioned. But nahh, private sector bad because ''muh ebul pharma.''


So which single-payer universal healthcare system bans private hospitals/insurance? I'll give you a hint: there aren't any.


Prove that I said they do.
Last edited by Chernoslavia on Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:26 am

Chernoslavia wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
So which single-payer universal healthcare system bans private hospitals/insurance? I'll give you a hint: there aren't any.


Prove where I said they do.


It's literally quoted, right in the fucking post.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:26 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
Prove where I said they do.


It's literally quoted, right in the fucking post.

Wrong again.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:28 am

Chernoslavia wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
It's literally quoted, right in the fucking post.

Wrong again.


So, tell me, what does this mean:

And those who want to work for the private sector shouldn't be forced to choose between the two choices you mentioned.


In the context that the two available options are "work for the government" and "stop being a doctor/nurse"?
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Chernoslavia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9890
Founded: Jun 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chernoslavia » Mon Jul 15, 2019 6:32 am

Salandriagado wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:Wrong again.


So, tell me, what does this mean:

And those who want to work for the private sector shouldn't be forced to choose between the two choices you mentioned.


In the context that the two available options are "work for the government" and "stop being a doctor/nurse"?


It doesn't mean that people are forced to do so, just that they shouldn't, pretty obvious really. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
What would things have been like if every security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive? Or if during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!

- Alexander Solzhenitsyn

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Bormiar, Cyptopir, Dimetrodon Empire, Hidrandia, Immoren, Keltionialang, Plan Neonie, Suriyanakhon, Uiiop

Advertisement

Remove ads