NATION

PASSWORD

Should pit bulls be regulated or banned?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Crockerland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5456
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Crockerland » Wed Jul 10, 2019 5:46 am

Costa Fierro wrote:Replace the word "pitbull" with "African Americans" and we can see how asinine this argument is.

What's going on big guy? You just compared black people to animals that people own, I saw you do it.
Image
Free Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Tibet.
Gay not Queer / Why Abortion is Genocide / End Gay Erasure
PROUD SUPPORTER OF:
National Liberalism, Nuclear & Geothermal Power, GMOs, Vaccines, Biodiesel, LGBTIA equality, Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, Constitutional Carry, Emotional Support Twinks, Right to Life


User avatar
Rojava Free State
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19428
Founded: Feb 06, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Rojava Free State » Wed Jul 10, 2019 5:48 am

Caracasus wrote:
Rojava Free State wrote:You know why pitbulls tend to be responsible for more attacks? Because their owners raise them to act that way. Most pitbulls I've met were very nice dogs like any other dog. Once again the actions of a few bad apples are blamed on a whole breed of pooches who didn't even choose to be pitbulls. They just were born pitbulls. So no, it isn't time to ban any dog, because no entire breed should be blamed for dog attacks, which happen in all breeds and are really based on how the owner raises their dog


Pretty much yeah. When I was a kid it was alsations. Had the absolute worst rep as dangerous, evil dogs second only to hellhounds.

It was bollocks then and it's bollocks now. Barring a few outliers, dogs are like people. Their environment tends to shape their personality.

As you said, if pitbulls were outlawed, people who wanted aggressive dogs would soon find another breed.


I owned a dog named nadia for nine years along with her sister izzy. Their entire family line was aggressive as hell and they were pure blood collies, which are supposedly very nice dogs. I was bitten four times by Nadia and her one sister who I didn't own actually gutted another dog a few years back. Izzy was fine but her son blue who I had for a few months before I gave him to someone else was very territorial and crazy as a loon. When people talk about how a dog breed acts, it's bullshit. Dogs are dogs. They all tend to do pretty similar stuff and a lot of their behavior is related to how they're trained and brought up. I could raise a great Dane to be a heartless killer and I could raise a poodle to herd animals for me. Dogs are individuals like people
Rojava Free State wrote:Listen yall. I'm only gonna say it once but I want you to remember it. This ain't a world fit for good men. It seems like you gotta be monstrous just to make it. Gotta have a little bit of darkness within you just to survive. You gotta stoop low everyday it seems like. Stoop all the way down to the devil in these times. And then one day you look in the mirror and you realize that you ain't you anymore. You're just another monster, and thanks to your actions, someone else will eventually become as warped and twisted as you. Never forget that the best of us are just the best of a bad lot. Being at the top of a pile of feces doesn't make you anything but shit like the rest. Never forget that.

User avatar
Grotesque Spore Creatures
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 53
Founded: May 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Grotesque Spore Creatures » Wed Jul 10, 2019 5:50 am

NO. The answer to violence is not "ban, ban, ban".
Last edited by Grotesque Spore Creatures on Wed Jul 10, 2019 5:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
IC name: LAETHIAN SWARM
Originally a friendly peaceful hivemind like thing turned Zerg. (Queen Van Daele is the Queen of Blades of this universe)
WORK IN PROGRESS, INFINITELY - Art (gonna finally actually post something there maybe idk)
[CURRENT YEAR - (4550 AD)]

User avatar
Bluelight-R006
Senator
 
Posts: 4317
Founded: Mar 31, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bluelight-R006 » Wed Jul 10, 2019 5:53 am

Grotesque spore creatures wrote:NO. The answer to violence is not "ban, ban, ban".

Yes. Humanity has always made compromises that have led to an ease of the violence. I’d say pitbulls be given to responsible and trusted owners in record. Surely, just an amateur owner can handle a pitbull.

User avatar
-Ocelot-
Minister
 
Posts: 2260
Founded: Jun 14, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby -Ocelot- » Wed Jul 10, 2019 6:03 am

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:Ugh, has anti-pit bull bias spread to NSG now? No thanks. Next thread.


NSG is basically /pol/ and /pol/ has anti-pit bull threads all the time. They called them "the n-word of dog breeds".

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Wed Jul 10, 2019 6:08 am

An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:


One of the most stupid unenforceable pieces of knee jerk legislation ever.

But it is enforced though. Almost 5,000 dogs were seized in a three year period on suspicion that they were a banned breed.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
San Carlos Islands
Diplomat
 
Posts: 536
Founded: Jun 28, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby San Carlos Islands » Wed Jul 10, 2019 6:14 am

-Ocelot- wrote:
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:Ugh, has anti-pit bull bias spread to NSG now? No thanks. Next thread.


NSG is basically /pol/ and /pol/ has anti-pit bull threads all the time. They called them "the n-word of dog breeds".


>NSG is basically /pol/

NSG is nothing like /pol/

t. someone who spends more time than they should posting on 4chan /pol/ and lurking on 8chan /pol/
Last edited by San Carlos Islands on Wed Jul 10, 2019 6:14 am, edited 2 times in total.
Foreign Affairs Director for the League of Conservative Nations

WA Ambassador: Trinity Ryan
WA Information: wa.mission.gov.sci

User avatar
An Alan Smithee Nation
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7623
Founded: Apr 18, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby An Alan Smithee Nation » Wed Jul 10, 2019 6:15 am

The New California Republic wrote:
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:
One of the most stupid unenforceable pieces of knee jerk legislation ever.

But it is enforced though. Almost 5,000 dogs were seized in a three year period on suspicion that they were a banned breed.


Yet I see people walking around with pit bulls all the time.
Everything is intertwinkled

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Wed Jul 10, 2019 6:41 am

Sale should be restricted.

-Ocelot- wrote:
Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:Ugh, has anti-pit bull bias spread to NSG now? No thanks. Next thread.


NSG is basically /pol/ and /pol/ has anti-pit bull threads all the time. They called them "the n-word of dog breeds".


I can't tell if you are serious or memeing.
Last edited by Nakena on Wed Jul 10, 2019 6:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Wed Jul 10, 2019 6:53 am

https://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/us_8112394

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10 ... 17.1387550
Another source of inaccuracy about breed is the breed identification itself, such as when presumed breed is self-reported by bite victims or their family, friends, or others. For example, Kasbekar et al. (2013 Kasbekar, A. V., Garfit, H., Duncan, C., Mehta, B., Davies, K., Narasimham, G., & Donne, A. J. (2013). Dog bites to the head and neck in children; an increasing problem in the UK. Clinical Otolaryngology, 38(3), 259–262. doi:10.1111/coa.12094
[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], , [Google Scholar]
) identified breeds by relying on the child’s guardian or reports from the child’s doctor, and Lang and Klassen (2005 Lang, M. E., & Klassen, T. (2005). Dog bites in Canadian children: A five-year review of severity and emergency department management. Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(5), 309–314.
[Google Scholar]
) could not report the source of breed identifications but thought they “probably” came from victims’ families except in cases where the dog was unknown to the victim. One study compiled breed data not based on the dog that inflicted the bite but by showing a series of pictures of dogs to bite victims and asking which picture resembled the dog they believed had bitten them (Jarrett, 1991 Jarrett, P. (1991). Which dogs bite? Archives of Emergency Medicine, 8(1), 33–35. doi:10.1136/emj.8.1.33
[Crossref], [PubMed], , [Google Scholar]
).

Data relating to presumed breed may also be unreliable when obtained either from news accounts or hospital records, where the authors assume that whatever is written is reliable evidence (e.g., Chiam, Solanki, Lodge, Higgins, & Sparnon, 2014 Chiam, S. C., Solanki, N. S., Lodge, M., Higgins, M., & Sparnon, A. L. (2014). Retrospective review of dog bite injuries in children presenting to a South Australian tertiary children’s hospital emergency department. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 50(10), 791–794. doi:10.1111/jpc.12642
[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], , [Google Scholar]
; Sacks, Sinclair, Gilchrist, Golab, & Lockwood, 2000 Sacks, J. J., Sinclair, L., Gilchrist, J., Golab, G. C., & Lockwood, R. (2000). Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 217(6), 836–840. doi:10.2460/javma.2000.217.issue-6
[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], , [Google Scholar]
) and fail to integrate into their data analysis the difficulty of accurate breed identification, a problem long recognized and demonstrated even now among dog professionals (Olson et al., 2015 Olson, K. R., Levy, J. K., Norby, B., Crandall, M. M., Broadhurst, J. E., Jacks, S., & Zimmerman, M. S. (2015). Inconsistent identification of pit bull-type dogs by shelter staff. The Veterinary Journal, 206(2), 197–202. doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.07.019
[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], , [Google Scholar]
; Voith, Ingram, Mitsouras, & Irizarry, 2009 Voith, V. L., Ingram, E., Mitsouras, K., & Irizarry, K. (2009). Comparison of adoption agency breed identification and DNA breed identification of dogs. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 12(3), 253–262. doi:10.1080/10888700902956151
[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], , [Google Scholar]
; Voith et al., 2013 Voith, V. L., Trevejo, R., Dowling-Guyer, S., Chadik, C., Marder, A., Johnson, V., & Irizarry, K. (2013). Comparison of visual and DNA breed identification of dogs and inter-observer reliability. American Journal of Sociological Research, 3(2), 17–29. doi:10.5923/j.sociology.20130302.02
[Crossref], , [Google Scholar]
). Nor did these studies attempt to address the problem through pedigree documentation.

Based on a population of about 72 million dogs in the United States and conservatively assuming that each bite represented a different dog, this would mean that more than 93% of dogs did not bite anyone. Further, the same ICARIS data estimated that only 19% of those responding positively to the question reported seeking medical treatment of any kind (Gilchrist et al., 2008 Gilchrist, J., Sacks, J. J., White, D., & Kresnow, M. J. (2008). Dog bites: Still a problem? Injury Prevention, 14(5), 296–301. doi:10.1136/ip.2007.016220
[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], , [Google Scholar]
), implying that the percentage of dogs not inflicting an injury for which a person sought medical treatment is greater than 98%.

Anti-pit hysteria is stupid, as is dog bite hysteria in general. The articles written about dog attacks are full of all kinds of yellow-journalism bullshit, unsurprisingly.
Last edited by Scomagia on Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:07 am, edited 2 times in total.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Hirota
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7528
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Wed Jul 10, 2019 6:57 am

This is a case of blaming the dog for how they were nurtured. It's the owners and breeders who should be punished, not the animals.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
South Acren
Minister
 
Posts: 2084
Founded: Dec 19, 2017
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby South Acren » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:00 am

Wow your actually serious. I though this was a late April Fools joke. My opinion? Hell no. As an owner of a bull mastiff pit mix, this is the most bs I've heard since "Should America become a monarchy" its the way they were raised not the pit themselfs. If you treat a dog horribly, its not going to be nice and cuddly. My dog is a mix of one of the supposed "dangerous dogs in the us" and yet all she is, is an overgrown lap dog. Maybe next time think before you seriously consider something like this, just think about it for a moment.
Last edited by South Acren on Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Gott Mit Uns!"
.....begin transmission

Be not afraid. We now acknowledge your existence. You are now under protection of The Eternal Empire. We will guard you with our lives forevermore. Pray you never give us a reason to revoke it.
Imperium Aeterna, Empire Eternal

User avatar
Trollgaard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9934
Founded: Mar 01, 2007
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Trollgaard » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:05 am

Umm, no?

I've worked in the animal welfare environment for 11 years...I've been bitten by a goldendoodle and a lab. Never a pit bull.

Pit bulls are a very energetic breed, however, and many have what is called High Arousal- meaning when they get worked up its hard for them to calm down, essentially. Owners need to know how to handle their dogs, and know what situations to avoid with dogs.

However, OP.

You make it sound like there is damned epidemic of dog attacks in the country. There isn't. Do dogs kill people from time to time? Yes. Is it any significant number that people should actually think of banning dogs? No.

User avatar
East African Unitary State
Attaché
 
Posts: 88
Founded: Jun 23, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby East African Unitary State » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:06 am

Mr. Worldwide should never be banned. How will we know how to count in Spanish if we ban him?
East African Unitary State
Nchi ya Umoja wa Afrika Mashariki

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87313
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:09 am

no we should not ban any dog breeds. vicious dogs and biting come from poor training. it is not inherent to a breed

User avatar
Securmalia
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 3
Founded: Jun 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Pitbulls shouldn't be banned.

Postby Securmalia » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:11 am

My family has a pitbull, and he is a total WIMP! He's afraid of THUNDERSTORMS and lets our Maltese-Yorkie (Morkie?) boss him around! Pitbulls should not be banned!

User avatar
Bluelight-R006
Senator
 
Posts: 4317
Founded: Mar 31, 2017
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Bluelight-R006 » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:14 am

Hirota wrote:This is a case of blaming the dog for how they were nurtured. It's the owners and breeders who should be punished, not the animals.

Precisely. The owners decided to keep it, so they have the utmost responsibility. And yet there still are good owners out there, so it won’t be fair to others.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:14 am

No. You don't have to ban an entire breed of dog. You need to deal with stupid, dickhead owners who don't know how to raise them and keep them in check.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:15 am

Liriena wrote:No. You don't have to ban an entire breed of dog. You need to deal with stupid, dickhead owners who don't know how to raise them and keep them in check.

But also, ban breeders. The continued commercialization of dog breeds is more trouble than it's worth.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:16 am

Nakena wrote:Sale should be restricted.

-Ocelot- wrote:
NSG is basically /pol/ and /pol/ has anti-pit bull threads all the time. They called them "the n-word of dog breeds".


I can't tell if you are serious or memeing.

Nope. There's zero reason to restrict sales.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:19 am

Liriena wrote:No. You don't have to ban an entire breed of dog. You need to deal with stupid, dickhead owners who don't know how to raise them and keep them in check.

It's also worth pointing out that a lot of bites on humans aren't caused by some wandering Cujo impersonator but, rather, by the human intervening in a dog fight. I've been bit twice this year for this very reason.
Last edited by Scomagia on Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Memenferno
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Jan 24, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Memenferno » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:19 am

Nope, let dog companions reap the risks and rewards of having a pit bull.
This dummy nation's main goal is to sell and gift cards.
J U S T K E E P O N B U Y I N G C A R D S.
I dare you to not check out my cards for sale!
My NERVUN card is not for sale!

User avatar
Crockerland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5456
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Crockerland » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:37 am

Memenferno wrote:Nope, let dog companions reap the risks and rewards of having a pit bull.

Well the problem is that when a demonic dogsitter lets her pitbulls kill a cat in front of its owner and laughs about it in front of them, and the dogs get to stay with their owners rather than being destroyed, that is a situation where the "dog companions" are not the ones reaping the risks.
Free Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Tibet.
Gay not Queer / Why Abortion is Genocide / End Gay Erasure
PROUD SUPPORTER OF:
National Liberalism, Nuclear & Geothermal Power, GMOs, Vaccines, Biodiesel, LGBTIA equality, Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, Constitutional Carry, Emotional Support Twinks, Right to Life


User avatar
Imperial Esplanade
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12055
Founded: Dec 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperial Esplanade » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:46 am

Cool, I guess we're drawing conclusions based on extreme circumstances when Pit Bulls are, statistically, actually one of the safest and most stable of "breeds" of dog out there?

https://atts.org/breed-statistics/statistics-page1/
https://www.theatlantic.com/science/arc ... as/500558/

Goes to show you don't really know what you're talking about here, in spite of the clear amount of research you've put into peddling this nonsense.
Last edited by Imperial Esplanade on Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Busy, but I check TGs often.
Imperial Esplanadian Constitution [WIP]

New Orleans, Louisiana.
Nation Weebly/Wiki - Coming Soon
The Land of the Free - Admin Assist.

But the Lord stood by me, and gave me strength. (2 Timothy 4:17)
One of the keys to happiness is a bad memory. (Rita Mae Brown)
SAINTS | PELICANS | TIGERS | PRIVATEERS

User avatar
Memenferno
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Jan 24, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Memenferno » Wed Jul 10, 2019 7:48 am

Crockerland wrote:
Memenferno wrote:Nope, let dog companions reap the risks and rewards of having a pit bull.

Well the problem is that when a demonic dogsitter lets her pitbulls kill a cat in front of its owner and laughs about it in front of them, and the dogs get to stay with their owners rather than being destroyed, that is a situation where the "dog companions" are not the ones reaping the risks.

Demonic? Quite a strong adjective.

I'd still blame the dog owner. Dogs have no sense of what's right or wrong, right? The dog companions must answer for their negligence, thus they incur risks.
This dummy nation's main goal is to sell and gift cards.
J U S T K E E P O N B U Y I N G C A R D S.
I dare you to not check out my cards for sale!
My NERVUN card is not for sale!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ethel mermania, Ineva, Likhinia, Plan Neonie, Saiwana, Shrillland, Statesburg, Tiami, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads