Advertisement

by The New California Republic » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:16 am

by Juristonia » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:17 am
Saiwania wrote:Now this is a good argument as to why I might be in the wrong on this. But arguably, the poorest in our societies don't have much purchasing power anyways. Minimum wage gives enough for just food and some other things, but certainly not enough for rent (without lots of roommates). But in a lot of places, there is a limit on how many people are allowed to rent any one residence or room.
I'd think that the amount of unfree labor relative to free labor wouldn't grow but would remain mostly static. The effect of unfree labor would perhaps mean lower prices for certain goods. But I'd think automation can produce faster and better than any human labor force (paid or unpaid). But not everything can be automated.
Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.
Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.
And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

by Kannap » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:18 am
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy

by The New California Republic » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:20 am

by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:21 am
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Aclion » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:22 am
Saiwania wrote:Internationalist Bastard wrote:A chunk of the population that just can’t buy consumer goods. Also I remember reading something about the plantations in the south just using slave labor for everything, becoming too self sufficient to really contribute to the local economy
Now this is a good argument as to why I might be in the wrong on this. But arguably, the poorest in our societies don't have much purchasing power anyways. Minimum wage gives enough for just food and some other things, but certainly not enough for rent (without lots of roommates). But in a lot of places, there is a limit on how many people are allowed to rent any one residence or room.
I'd think that the amount of unfree labor relative to free labor wouldn't grow but would remain mostly static. The effect of unfree labor would perhaps mean lower prices for certain goods. But I'd think automation can produce faster and better than any human labor force (paid or unpaid). But not everything can be automated.

by The Huskar Social Union » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:23 am

by Saiwania » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:24 am

by Hakons » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:25 am

by Heloin » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:26 am
Saiwania wrote:I voted that unfree labor is neither inherently good or bad. I'm running this thread partially as a thought experiment from looking to the past for inspiration. It is true that unfree labor is largely seen as immoral and obsolete. But if it still happens on occasion, I do wonder if the reality is actually that it isn't fully obsolete and could have a place in today's world under the right circumstances?

by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:26 am
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Bluelight-R006 » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:26 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Saiwania wrote:
I did. I said something to the effect that if I were a slave, I'd benefit from free housing and food, etc- but the trade off would be that I have to do whatever work is assigned to me by my owner. I can't guarantee that this lifestyle wouldn't get old over time, but I'm open minded enough to consider that some people might want to sell themselves off on this basis. With indentured servitude, it could be thought of as temporary instead of permanent slavery. In both cases, you don't get paid for any labor done.
You will also be subjected to beatings, brandings, emotional and psychological abuse on top of all the physical shit, forced to degrade yourself and hey another thing that can happen to you, is you will be raped. Constantly, any time your owners want to rape you.
And you can do nothing about it without marking yourself for death.
"Lifestyle would get old over time", jesus fucking christ

by Caprinia » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:28 am

by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:29 am
Bluelight-R006 wrote:The Huskar Social Union wrote:You will also be subjected to beatings, brandings, emotional and psychological abuse on top of all the physical shit, forced to degrade yourself and hey another thing that can happen to you, is you will be raped. Constantly, any time your owners want to rape you.
And you can do nothing about it without marking yourself for death.
"Lifestyle would get old over time", jesus fucking christ
And not all good ‘owners’ will last long too. It’s rare enough to find a gentle heart, but for some unfortunate circumstances, the ‘slave’ may have to be taken to another ‘owner’ where there’s more psychological abuse.
You can always put too much trust in humans. I’d say we would be dumb to put trust that we are caring and respectful in general; because we’ve seen from humans, ourselves, that they are not capable of maintaining decency and morality to someone who they might think ought to give all their lives, devoting themselves to absolute care for their ‘owner.’ After all, they are their slaves.
We’ve also seen that many people cannot control their urge and desire to simply throw their ‘slave’ around like trash. Sure, there are laws on human rights, but can we really expect everyone to comply with those? Don’t even get started on rape.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Ghost Land » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:29 am
Saiwania wrote:I voted that unfree labor is neither inherently good or bad. I'm running this thread partially as a thought experiment from looking to the past for inspiration. It is true that unfree labor is largely seen as immoral and obsolete. But if it still happens on occasion, I do wonder if the reality is actually that it isn't fully obsolete and could have a place in today's world under the right circumstances?

by An Alan Smithee Nation » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:30 am

by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:31 am
An Alan Smithee Nation wrote:Why don't you stop posting nazi horses*it and just sort out your family's backyard?
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Bluelight-R006 » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:32 am
Saiwania wrote:I voted that unfree labor is neither inherently good or bad.
Saiwania wrote:I'm running this thread partially as a thought experiment from looking to the past for inspiration.
Saiwania wrote:It is true that unfree labor is largely seen as immoral and obsolete. But if it still happens on occasion, I do wonder if the reality is actually that it isn't fully obsolete and could have a place in today's world under the right circumstances?

by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:33 am
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Bluelight-R006 » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:33 am
El-Amin Caliphate wrote:Bluelight-R006 wrote:And not all good ‘owners’ will last long too. It’s rare enough to find a gentle heart, but for some unfortunate circumstances, the ‘slave’ may have to be taken to another ‘owner’ where there’s more psychological abuse.
You can always put too much trust in humans. I’d say we would be dumb to put trust that we are caring and respectful in general; because we’ve seen from humans, ourselves, that they are not capable of maintaining decency and morality to someone who they might think ought to give all their lives, devoting themselves to absolute care for their ‘owner.’ After all, they are their slaves.
We’ve also seen that many people cannot control their urge and desire to simply throw their ‘slave’ around like trash. Sure, there are laws on human rights, but can we really expect everyone to comply with those? Don’t even get started on rape.
What you're saying can apply to employees as well. I don't see much difference in your argument if you just replace "slave" with "employee".

by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:35 am
Bluelight-R006 wrote:Saiwania wrote:I voted that unfree labor is neither inherently good or bad.
The fact you show exclusive praise and honor to unfree labor shows you vote that it is inherently good for the economy and society.Saiwania wrote:I'm running this thread partially as a thought experiment from looking to the past for inspiration.
There is a reason why the past isn’t the present no more. We’ve moved on from the past to advance. Rarely do we look into the past for inspiration. ‘If the past was ‘so good’? Why isn’t it present anymore?’ They always say. So if slavery was so good? Why isn’t it present anymore? Because we have established common ground for morals and decency, for human rights, that slavery isn’t and doesn’t have a right to be allowed.Saiwania wrote:It is true that unfree labor is largely seen as immoral and obsolete. But if it still happens on occasion, I do wonder if the reality is actually that it isn't fully obsolete and could have a place in today's world under the right circumstances?
There’s a reason many NSGers here vote no in your question, ‘Is slavery good?’ Usually, we’d be in a dispute. But a majority tells me something: That the fact all people share the same opinion, and that it’s likely to the outside world, tells me that slavery is bad is not an opinion or a perspective, but a fact. And it’s really true. Do we need to remind you of the psychological abuse faced by the slaves in the 1800s?
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by El-Amin Caliphate » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:35 am
Bluelight-R006 wrote:El-Amin Caliphate wrote:What you're saying can apply to employees as well. I don't see much difference in your argument if you just replace "slave" with "employee".
Bosses don’t physically harm their employees, don’t they? If they did, we’d be seeing news of it. And there are. Like the female boss in China forcing the employees to crawl. It’s not really the same, but it can be applied that way too.
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

by Caracasus » Mon Jul 08, 2019 7:35 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Avstrikland, Christian Confederation, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Eternal Algerstonia, Fractalnavel, Greater Miami Shores 3, Gun Manufacturers, New Stonen, Rary, The Crimson Isles, The Two Jerseys, Tinhampton, Tiptoptopia, Valyxias, Vivida Vis Animi
Advertisement