Jeffrey Epstein dead by """""suicide"""""

[Hatterleigh]

Pretty obvi he was killed. Died on suicide watch (Or some have said they took him off suicide watch just before he died, not exactly a much better scenario), the cameras suppoedly malfunctioned, a ton of really strange stuff. There was a guy who said a bunch of stuff about how Epstein was dead and they framed it as a suicide like an hour before the news was released to the public too

[Cannot think of a name]

Pretty obvi he was killed. Died on suicide watch (Or some have said they took him off suicide watch just before he died, not exactly a much better scenario), the cameras suppoedly malfunctioned, a ton of really strange stuff. There was a guy who said a bunch of stuff about how Epstein was dead and they framed it as a suicide like an hour before the news was released to the public too

This is going to sum up a lot of what's going to pass for evidence on the internet for a while...

[Diopolis]

Pretty obvi he was killed. Died on suicide watch (Or some have said they took him off suicide watch just before he died, not exactly a much better scenario), the cameras suppoedly malfunctioned, a ton of really strange stuff. There was a guy who said a bunch of stuff about how Epstein was dead and they framed it as a suicide like an hour before the news was released to the public too

This is going to sum up a lot of what's going to pass for evidence on the internet for a while...

But Clinton/Trump killed him! I dislike one of the two, so it must be true!

[Trollzyn the Infinite]

Of course he did, now he can't rat out his pedo buddies.

How fucking convenient.

[Page]

I mean it's not like the Clintons explicitly called themselves centrists...

It's entirely conceivable for a leftist to defend a centrist and still be leftist.

If someone says "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't remember Mundungus Fletcher", that's gatekeeping. But if they say "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't know who Ron Weasley is", well that is an accurate statement.

Leftists might "defend" Clinton in such a sense as "The Clintons don't have their enemies assassinated" as I have, though I don't consider that much of a defense, it's more so debunking conspiracies.

So let's say leftists don't defend Bill Clinton's policy decisions.

But anyway, to get back to the topic at hand, if one's reaction to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect the Clintons, that person is very deep into far-right conspiracy theory.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

It's entirely conceivable for a leftist to defend a centrist and still be leftist.

If someone says "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't remember Mundungus Fletcher", that's gatekeeping. But if they say "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't know who Ron Weasley is", well that is an accurate statement.

Leftists might "defend" Clinton in such a sense as "The Clintons don't have their enemies assassinated" as I have, though I don't consider that much of a defense, it's more so debunking conspiracies.

So let's say leftists don't defend Bill Clinton's policy decisions.

But anyway, to get back to the topic at hand, if one's reaction to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect the Clintons, that person is very deep into far-right conspiracy theory.

Assuming he was assassinated (not saying he actually was), it could have easily been Trump or someone else who ordered the hit, as Trump as well as several others also had deep connections to this guy.

[Cannot think of a name]

This is going to sum up a lot of what's going to pass for evidence on the internet for a while...

But Clinton/Trump killed him! I dislike one of the two, so it must be true!

For what it's worth, even the most ardent anti-Trump people in this thread have been giving the idea that Trump did anything at best a passing glance with most I've seen (and you can show me I'm wrong) not believing either of them were involved. I can't speak for twitter though.

[Scomagia]

It's entirely conceivable for a leftist to defend a centrist and still be leftist.

If someone says "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't remember Mundungus Fletcher", that's gatekeeping. But if they say "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't know who Ron Weasley is", well that is an accurate statement.

Leftists might "defend" Clinton in such a sense as "The Clintons don't have their enemies assassinated" as I have, though I don't consider that much of a defense, it's more so debunking conspiracies.

So let's say leftists don't defend Bill Clinton's policy decisions.

But anyway, to get back to the topic at hand, if one's reaction to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect the Clintons, that person is very deep into far-right conspiracy theory.

No, it is not an accurate statement. Not remembering who Ron Weasley is doesn't mean you aren't a fan, it means you don't remember who Ron Weasley is. There are conceivable reasons why a fan may not remember Ron Weasley just as there are conceivable reasons you may be a leftist who defends Bill Clinton.

But yes, back on topic. If one's response to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect a conspiracy at all then one is being irrational.

[Nakena]

Even AOC is demanding answers now

[Ethel mermania]

If someone says "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't remember Mundungus Fletcher", that's gatekeeping. But if they say "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't know who Ron Weasley is", well that is an accurate statement.

Leftists might "defend" Clinton in such a sense as "The Clintons don't have their enemies assassinated" as I have, though I don't consider that much of a defense, it's more so debunking conspiracies.

So let's say leftists don't defend Bill Clinton's policy decisions.

But anyway, to get back to the topic at hand, if one's reaction to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect the Clintons, that person is very deep into far-right conspiracy theory.

No, it is not an accurate statement. Not remembering who Ron Weasley is doesn't mean you aren't a fan, it means you don't remember who Ron Weasley is. There are conceivable reasons why a fan may not remember Ron Weasley just as there are conceivable reasons you may be a leftist who defends Bill Clinton.

But yes, back on topic. If one's response to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect a conspiracy at all then one is being irrational.

Now now, I am not claiming it was bill, I am not claiming it was donald, I am not claiming it was prince Andrew, i am not claiming it was bill Richardson, I am not claiming it was someone who hates pedophiles, I am not claiming jamie dimon.

What I am claiming is this stinks, it is a pungent odor, it is strong and full of excrement, and that is not just the smell of the MCC which is a shithole to it's own self. I dont know who, I dont know exactly why, but i do not believe that this was an unassisted suicide.

[Jean-Paul Sartre]

This is going to sum up a lot of what's going to pass for evidence on the internet for a while...

But Clinton/Trump killed him! I dislike one of the two, so it must be true!

He had dirt on powerful people who let him get arrested without possibility of bail. Of course they did him in.

[Scomagia]

No, it is not an accurate statement. Not remembering who Ron Weasley is doesn't mean you aren't a fan, it means you don't remember who Ron Weasley is. There are conceivable reasons why a fan may not remember Ron Weasley just as there are conceivable reasons you may be a leftist who defends Bill Clinton.

But yes, back on topic. If one's response to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect a conspiracy at all then one is being irrational.

Now now, I am not claiming it was bill, I am not claiming it was donald, I am not claiming it was prince Andrew, i am not claiming it was bill Richardson, I am not claiming it was someone who hates pedophiles, I am not claiming jamie dimon.

What I am claiming is this stinks, it is a pungent odor, it is strong and full of excrement, and that is not just the smell of the MCC which is a shithole to it's own self. I dont know who, I dont know exactly why, but i do not believe that this was an unassisted suicide.

What specifically makes suicide seem implausible to you?

[Ethel mermania]

Now now, I am not claiming it was bill, I am not claiming it was donald, I am not claiming it was prince Andrew, i am not claiming it was bill Richardson, I am not claiming it was someone who hates pedophiles, I am not claiming jamie dimon.

What I am claiming is this stinks, it is a pungent odor, it is strong and full of excrement, and that is not just the smell of the MCC which is a shithole to it's own self. I dont know who, I dont know exactly why, but i do not believe that this was an unassisted suicide.

What specifically makes suicide seem implausible to you?

When he came back from the hospital the first time, the Papers said he was on suicide watch. When and why was it turned off, to start.

[Loftegen 2]

Suicide, LOL!

[Diopolis]

Even AOC is demanding answers now

Well AOC is a fool, so it makes sense that she'd do that.

[Scomagia]

What specifically makes suicide seem implausible to you?

When he came back from the hospital the first time, the Papers said he was on suicide watch. When and why was it turned off, to start.

A shrink cleared him to be off of suicide watch, if I understand correctly.

[Jean-Paul Sartre]

When he came back from the hospital the first time, the Papers said he was on suicide watch. When and why was it turned off, to start.

A shrink cleared him to be off of suicide watch, if I understand correctly.

Wonder if he was threatened with former patients filing malpractice suits? Or just paid off?

[Ethel mermania]

When he came back from the hospital the first time, the Papers said he was on suicide watch. When and why was it turned off, to start.

A shrink cleared him to be off of suicide watch, if I understand correctly.

We can chat with him of her to begin, review hallway video, and investigate.

[Scomagia]

A shrink cleared him to be off of suicide watch, if I understand correctly.

Wonder if he was threatened with former patients filing malpractice suits? Or just paid off?

Or he thought Epstein was no longer at risk of suicide. Or the wacky conspiracy things, I guess.

[Scomagia]

A shrink cleared him to be off of suicide watch, if I understand correctly.

We can chat with him of her to begin, review hallway video, and investigate.

We should investigate, yes, but only because any prison suicide should be subject to rigorous investigation.

[Diopolis]

Wonder if he was threatened with former patients filing malpractice suits? Or just paid off?

Or he thought Epstein was no longer at risk of suicide. Or the wacky conspiracy things, I guess.

Isn't it rather unusual for a shrink to take someone off suicide watch where it might be even the slightest bit risky?

[Nakena]

A shrink cleared him to be off of suicide watch, if I understand correctly.

Wonder if he was threatened with former patients filing malpractice suits? Or just paid off?

Epstein would have been considered to be at least highly endangered and high importance prisoner. So he'd must be of course be placed on suicide watch and, or special surveillance and his cell being observed 24/7 with personal assigned to him,.

[Scomagia]

Or he thought Epstein was no longer at risk of suicide. Or the wacky conspiracy things, I guess.

Isn't it rather unusual for a shrink to take someone off suicide watch where it might be even the slightest bit risky?

No, otherwise there'd be no end to suicide watch for a lot of prisoners. The shrink probably met with him a few times, maybe prescribed medication, and was satisfied that Epstein was no longer actively suicidal. That would not be unusual.

[Diopolis]

Isn't it rather unusual for a shrink to take someone off suicide watch where it might be even the slightest bit risky?

No, otherwise there'd be no end to suicide watch for a lot of prisoners. The shrink probably met with him a few times, maybe prescribed medication, and was satisfied that Epstein was no longer actively suicidal. That would not be unusual.

OK. My impression was misleading.

[Nakena]

Isn't it rather unusual for a shrink to take someone off suicide watch where it might be even the slightest bit risky?

No, otherwise there'd be no end to suicide watch for a lot of prisoners. The shrink probably met with him a few times, maybe prescribed medication, and was satisfied that Epstein was no longer actively suicidal. That would not be unusual.

That would the usual in another situation, here however we have an very unusual and endangered patient whose survivial is in grave danger. Normal or usual metrics cannot be applied here.