Advertisement
by Hatterleigh » Sat Aug 10, 2019 1:59 pm
National News Network: William Botrum entering last days in office - President-elect Rood preparing or term
Overview of Hatterleigh | William Botrum, Hatterleigh's President | Hatterlese Embassy Program | I don't use NS stats.by Cannot think of a name » Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:04 pm
Hatterleigh wrote:Pretty obvi he was killed. Died on suicide watch (Or some have said they took him off suicide watch just before he died, not exactly a much better scenario), the cameras suppoedly malfunctioned, a ton of really strange stuff. There was a guy who said a bunch of stuff about how Epstein was dead and they framed it as a suicide like an hour before the news was released to the public too
by Diopolis » Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:07 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Hatterleigh wrote:Pretty obvi he was killed. Died on suicide watch (Or some have said they took him off suicide watch just before he died, not exactly a much better scenario), the cameras suppoedly malfunctioned, a ton of really strange stuff. There was a guy who said a bunch of stuff about how Epstein was dead and they framed it as a suicide like an hour before the news was released to the public too
This is going to sum up a lot of what's going to pass for evidence on the internet for a while...
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:07 pm
by Page » Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:15 pm
by LiberNovusAmericae » Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:25 pm
Page wrote:Scomagia wrote:It's entirely conceivable for a leftist to defend a centrist and still be leftist.
If someone says "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't remember Mundungus Fletcher", that's gatekeeping. But if they say "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't know who Ron Weasley is", well that is an accurate statement.
Leftists might "defend" Clinton in such a sense as "The Clintons don't have their enemies assassinated" as I have, though I don't consider that much of a defense, it's more so debunking conspiracies.
So let's say leftists don't defend Bill Clinton's policy decisions.
But anyway, to get back to the topic at hand, if one's reaction to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect the Clintons, that person is very deep into far-right conspiracy theory.
by Cannot think of a name » Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:26 pm
by Scomagia » Sat Aug 10, 2019 2:29 pm
Page wrote:Scomagia wrote:It's entirely conceivable for a leftist to defend a centrist and still be leftist.
If someone says "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't remember Mundungus Fletcher", that's gatekeeping. But if they say "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't know who Ron Weasley is", well that is an accurate statement.
Leftists might "defend" Clinton in such a sense as "The Clintons don't have their enemies assassinated" as I have, though I don't consider that much of a defense, it's more so debunking conspiracies.
So let's say leftists don't defend Bill Clinton's policy decisions.
But anyway, to get back to the topic at hand, if one's reaction to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect the Clintons, that person is very deep into far-right conspiracy theory.
by Ethel mermania » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:03 pm
Scomagia wrote:Page wrote:
If someone says "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't remember Mundungus Fletcher", that's gatekeeping. But if they say "You're not a real Harry Potter fan if you don't know who Ron Weasley is", well that is an accurate statement.
Leftists might "defend" Clinton in such a sense as "The Clintons don't have their enemies assassinated" as I have, though I don't consider that much of a defense, it's more so debunking conspiracies.
So let's say leftists don't defend Bill Clinton's policy decisions.
But anyway, to get back to the topic at hand, if one's reaction to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect the Clintons, that person is very deep into far-right conspiracy theory.
No, it is not an accurate statement. Not remembering who Ron Weasley is doesn't mean you aren't a fan, it means you don't remember who Ron Weasley is. There are conceivable reasons why a fan may not remember Ron Weasley just as there are conceivable reasons you may be a leftist who defends Bill Clinton.
But yes, back on topic. If one's response to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect a conspiracy at all then one is being irrational.
by Jean-Paul Sartre » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:12 pm
by Scomagia » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:15 pm
Ethel mermania wrote:Scomagia wrote:No, it is not an accurate statement. Not remembering who Ron Weasley is doesn't mean you aren't a fan, it means you don't remember who Ron Weasley is. There are conceivable reasons why a fan may not remember Ron Weasley just as there are conceivable reasons you may be a leftist who defends Bill Clinton.
But yes, back on topic. If one's response to Epstein's death is to immediately suspect a conspiracy at all then one is being irrational.
Now now, I am not claiming it was bill, I am not claiming it was donald, I am not claiming it was prince Andrew, i am not claiming it was bill Richardson, I am not claiming it was someone who hates pedophiles, I am not claiming jamie dimon.
What I am claiming is this stinks, it is a pungent odor, it is strong and full of excrement, and that is not just the smell of the MCC which is a shithole to it's own self. I dont know who, I dont know exactly why, but i do not believe that this was an unassisted suicide.
by Ethel mermania » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:18 pm
Scomagia wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:Now now, I am not claiming it was bill, I am not claiming it was donald, I am not claiming it was prince Andrew, i am not claiming it was bill Richardson, I am not claiming it was someone who hates pedophiles, I am not claiming jamie dimon.
What I am claiming is this stinks, it is a pungent odor, it is strong and full of excrement, and that is not just the smell of the MCC which is a shithole to it's own self. I dont know who, I dont know exactly why, but i do not believe that this was an unassisted suicide.
What specifically makes suicide seem implausible to you?
by Diopolis » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:26 pm
Nakena wrote:Even AOC is demanding answers now
by Jean-Paul Sartre » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:29 pm
by Ethel mermania » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:31 pm
by Diopolis » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:33 pm
by Nakena » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:33 pm
by Scomagia » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:37 pm
by Diopolis » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:39 pm
Scomagia wrote:Diopolis wrote:Isn't it rather unusual for a shrink to take someone off suicide watch where it might be even the slightest bit risky?
No, otherwise there'd be no end to suicide watch for a lot of prisoners. The shrink probably met with him a few times, maybe prescribed medication, and was satisfied that Epstein was no longer actively suicidal. That would not be unusual.
by Nakena » Sat Aug 10, 2019 3:40 pm
Scomagia wrote:Diopolis wrote:Isn't it rather unusual for a shrink to take someone off suicide watch where it might be even the slightest bit risky?
No, otherwise there'd be no end to suicide watch for a lot of prisoners. The shrink probably met with him a few times, maybe prescribed medication, and was satisfied that Epstein was no longer actively suicidal. That would not be unusual.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Bovad, Gnark, Great Eddy, Lunayria, Repreteop, Statesburg
Advertisement