Page 5 of 24

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:48 pm
by Gormwood
Fartsniffage wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:So many things by now should have been political suicide for him. He's the Rasputin of political suicide. He keeps trying and yet keeps on living, apparently on pure spite.


Time to throw him in a river. :)

Or just throw an attractive woman named River at him.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:50 pm
by Gormwood
Chernoslavia wrote:
Great Minarchistan wrote:that, or you're actually obsessed with his actions via trump derangement syndrome


This tbh. I don't like the guy due to his two face stance on gun rights, but the guy can't even take a leak with out people getting offended by it.

Did he wear a tan suit or put dijon mustard on a hamburger? It's adorable how criticising Trump has to be framed as mental illness by his supporters.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:52 pm
by Great Minarchistan
Gormwood wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
This tbh. I don't like the guy due to his two face stance on gun rights, but the guy can't even take a leak with out people getting offended by it.

Did he wear a tan suit or put dijon mustard on a hamburger? It's adorable how criticising Trump has to be framed as mental illness by his supporters.

I wouldn't be surprised if you actually called out his goofy behavior if he wore an orange suit around the white house, but I digress.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:52 pm
by Chernoslavia
Gormwood wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
This tbh. I don't like the guy due to his two face stance on gun rights, but the guy can't even take a leak with out people getting offended by it.

Did he wear a tan suit or put dijon mustard on a hamburger? It's adorable how criticising Trump has to be framed as mental illness by his supporters.


Nice strawman. Can I put a hat on him?

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:52 pm
by Trinitarium
Reminds me of the show-trials of communist Russia. What a day for "liberty," when a man is nearly sentenced to death for speeding forward after being attacked by "anti-fascist" thugs. This had nothing to do with Nazism and everything to do with sending a political message.

Radical ideology does not necessitate violence, nor is it inherently violent. Any other perspective is obscenely prejudice.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:53 pm
by Torrocca
Well, this made today way better.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:53 pm
by Restoration of Eastern Kaiserreich
Good

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:54 pm
by Gormwood
Chernoslavia wrote:
Gormwood wrote:Did he wear a tan suit or put dijon mustard on a hamburger? It's adorable how criticising Trump has to be framed as mental illness by his supporters.


Nice strawman. Can I put a hat on him?

Great Minarchistan wrote:that, or you're actually obsessed with his actions via trump derangement syndrome

Pretty solid for straw.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:55 pm
by Great Minarchistan
Gormwood wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
Nice strawman. Can I put a hat on him?

Great Minarchistan wrote:that, or you're actually obsessed with his actions via trump derangement syndrome

Pretty solid for straw.

it was a hypothesis, I don't see it as a strawman unless if you're really taking it for granted

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:55 pm
by Cannot think of a name
Chernoslavia wrote:
Gormwood wrote:Did he wear a tan suit or put dijon mustard on a hamburger? It's adorable how criticising Trump has to be framed as mental illness by his supporters.


Nice strawman. Can I put a hat on him?

Image

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:56 pm
by The Galactic Liberal Democracy
Very good.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 4:57 pm
by Chernoslavia
Gormwood wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
Nice strawman. Can I put a hat on him?

Great Minarchistan wrote:that, or you're actually obsessed with his actions via trump derangement syndrome

Pretty solid for straw.


How is his a straw though?

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:00 pm
by Chernoslavia
Cannot think of a name wrote:
Chernoslavia wrote:
Nice strawman. Can I put a hat on him?

Image

Merriam Webster Inc. would disagree.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:02 pm
by Cerinda
Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if he gets killed in prison.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:03 pm
by Pyta
Trinitarium wrote:Reminds me of the show-trials of communist Russia. What a day for "liberty," when a man is nearly sentenced to death for speeding forward after being attacked by "anti-fascist" thugs. This had nothing to do with Nazism and everything to do with sending a political message.

Radical ideology does not necessitate violence, nor is it inherently violent. Any other perspective is obscenely prejudice.


you're late to the party we already went over this

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:03 pm
by Nakena
What was the 30th charge that would have carried capital punishment?

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:04 pm
by Ostroeuropa
Cekoviu wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:
Life sentences as a criminal penalty is not unlibertarian, especially when we are dealing with a terrorist/criminal like this.

Yeah, but they should be reserved for extreme cases. While this incident of domestic terrorism was significant, I wouldn't necessarily consider it to be enough to warrant a life sentence (on the order of decades with possibility of parole seems more appropriate). Life sentences, particularly without parole, should mainly be if someone has no way to recover. OTOH, a lot of terrorists can be deradicalized if given appropriate care.

I do want to make it abundantly clear that what he did was absolutely abhorrent and does deserve a significant sentence, and I'm in no way trying to defend him.


I agree with this, but i'm comfortable with a life sentence being handed out in this case provided there is the possibility of parole given the nature of the crime. I think releasing him before he can satisfy a parole board poses a risk to the public given the motivation of the crimes, especially if he is not deradicalized and receives a heros welcome back to society from Nazi groups which could influence others to emulate his acts. I think the indiscriminate nature of the attack and intent to kill, alongside the motive, warrants life imprisonment with parole.

It's true there are more vicious and violent people who would not receive that sentence, but there are other factors in play.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:05 pm
by Jolthig
Excellent though I'd prefer a death sentence.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:09 pm
by Cappuccina
Jolthig wrote:Excellent though I'd prefer a death sentence.

^this

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:12 pm
by Cerinda
Trinitarium wrote:Reminds me of the show-trials of communist Russia. What a day for "liberty," when a man is nearly sentenced to death for speeding forward after being attacked by "anti-fascist" thugs. This had nothing to do with Nazism and everything to do with sending a political message.

Radical ideology does not necessitate violence, nor is it inherently violent. Any other perspective is obscenely prejudice.

Found the terrorist apologist.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:13 pm
by Trinitarium
Rojava Free State wrote:
Anagonia wrote:Shame, the guy who antagonized the incident with a loaded weapon didn't get arrested at all. Used as a political stunt in my opinion. Sad day for justice.


Anyone who saw the video saw fields run down a group of protesters before anyone attacked him. I'm not even surprised any more though that someone is defending a fascistic killer who took an innocent life, because this is 2019 America and no ideology is too disgusting to have


Wrong. He's braking down 4th Street and it's only after the protester smashes the back of his car that he then accelerates. One can only imagine the trauma of having a gun pointed at you, and being confused all around, that manifested in this tragic car accident.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:16 pm
by Pyta
Also these are just the federal hate crime charges that he plead out.

He's still got the state charges that he was found guilty for that haven't been sentenced yet. That happens in two weeks. It would be extremely odd if he didn't get the full Life + 419 years that the jury suggested.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:17 pm
by Cannot think of a name
Trinitarium wrote:
Rojava Free State wrote:
Anyone who saw the video saw fields run down a group of protesters before anyone attacked him. I'm not even surprised any more though that someone is defending a fascistic killer who took an innocent life, because this is 2019 America and no ideology is too disgusting to have


Wrong. He's braking down 4th Street and it's only after the protester smashes the back of his car that he then accelerates. One can only imagine the trauma of having a gun pointed at you, and being confused all around, that manifested in this tragic car accident.

I didn't know there were still people trying to sell this snake oil.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:18 pm
by Pyta
Trinitarium wrote:
Rojava Free State wrote:
Anyone who saw the video saw fields run down a group of protesters before anyone attacked him. I'm not even surprised any more though that someone is defending a fascistic killer who took an innocent life, because this is 2019 America and no ideology is too disgusting to have


Wrong. He's braking down 4th Street and it's only after the protester smashes the back of his car that he then accelerates. One can only imagine the trauma of having a gun pointed at you, and being confused all around, that manifested in this tragic car accident.


Again we've already gone over this, you're late to the party.

PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2019 5:19 pm
by Trinitarium
Cerinda wrote:
Trinitarium wrote:Reminds me of the show-trials of communist Russia. What a day for "liberty," when a man is nearly sentenced to death for speeding forward after being attacked by "anti-fascist" thugs. This had nothing to do with Nazism and everything to do with sending a political message.

Radical ideology does not necessitate violence, nor is it inherently violent. Any other perspective is obscenely prejudice.

Found the terrorist apologist.


Defaming me is not an argument.