Charlottesville attacker gets life sentence

[Loben The 2nd]

Tbh that’s probably his best chance of not getting gang raped by the other prisoners.

Because that’s inevitably what happens.

Fascism is based on perpetual structural violence and has a mindset of winner takes all and that only the strong deserves to thrive. He may finally be able to live in his ideal fascist society within the walls of a prison.

I also hope nothing like what you suggest may happen to him. That would very unfortunate, indeed.

I can say without a doubt that some people would like to see that happen to him, privately at least.

[Gormwood]

As if the neonazis won't make him squeal like a pig.

I mean if that’s what peaks your interest, Petra....I don’t judge

Nobody brought up kinks other than you.

[-Ocelot-]

Fascism is based on perpetual structural violence and has a mindset of winner takes all and that only the strong deserves to thrive. He may finally be able to live in his ideal fascist society within the walls of a prison.

I also hope nothing like what you suggest may happen to him. That would very unfortunate, indeed.

I can say without a doubt that some people would like to see that happen to him, privately at least.

How would such an event be interpreted in a fascist society?

[Rojava Free State]

Fascism is based on perpetual structural violence and has a mindset of winner takes all and that only the strong deserves to thrive. He may finally be able to live in his ideal fascist society within the walls of a prison.

I also hope nothing like what you suggest may happen to him. That would very unfortunate, indeed.

I can say without a doubt that some people would like to see that happen to him, privately at least.

I'll laugh if this happens

[Pyta]

I mean [citation needed]

Oh, that clears that up. Thought you attempted to label me as a Nazi. I was quite miffed for a bit there, my apologies.

In what part requires clarification for you?

none of it requires clarification, that's not what a citation is. it's just that your entire story of a guy waving a rifle around and chasing him is more or less completely unsubstantiated.

The guy you're talking about, Dwayne Dixon, had an encounter with james fields about thirty minutes prior to the attack, where Fields was driving circles around the protest group (in retrospect, we know that Fields was looking for targets). Dwayne was open carrying an AR, but the idea that he was "waving it around" is an absolute fabrication. Further, there's phone telemetry that showed Dixon was nowhere near FIelds when he murdered Heyer, and the video pretty clearly indicates a deliberate attack. If that weren't enough, we could certainly go to the phone call from jail, where Fields said, about Heyer, “She is a communist, an anti-white, liberal. . . . It’s not up for questioning. She’s the enemy.”

[Anagonia]

Oh, that clears that up. Thought you attempted to label me as a Nazi. I was quite miffed for a bit there, my apologies.

In what part requires clarification for you?

none of it requires clarification, that's not what a citation is. it's just that your entire story of a guy waving a rifle around and chasing him is more or less completely unsubstantiated.

The guy you're talking about, Dwayne Dixon, had an encounter with james fields about thirty minutes prior to the attack, where Fields was driving circles around the protest group (in retrospect, we know that Fields was looking for targets). Dwayne was open carrying an AR, but the idea that he was "waving it around" is an absolute fabrication. Further, there's phone telemetry that showed Dixon was nowhere near FIelds when he murdered Heyer, and the video pretty clearly indicates a deliberate attack. If that weren't enough, we could certainly go to the phone call from jail, where Fields said, about Heyer, “She is a communist, an anti-white, liberal. . . . It’s not up for questioning. She’s the enemy.”

I have no interest in defending the attacker, my claim of lack of justice was not on his behalf. My claim was on the behalf of not equally treating the case pending the two instigators leading to the death. I was reading up on the individual, whom you've identified as Mr. Dixon, and his multitude of self-defense cases and dropped charges from previous protests. The story in question which resulted in my opinion of him antagonizing the driver seemed plausible.

If what you say is true, then my opinion is unjustified, and the full weight of justice has been served. Since I do not have the full answer to substantiate your claim - factual or otherwise - I will politely tip the hat and acknowledge your statement as superior.

[Ifreann]

As long as Trump doesn't pardon him then this would seem to be the most just possible outcome.

[Pyta]

none of it requires clarification, that's not what a citation is. it's just that your entire story of a guy waving a rifle around and chasing him is more or less completely unsubstantiated.

The guy you're talking about, Dwayne Dixon, had an encounter with james fields about thirty minutes prior to the attack, where Fields was driving circles around the protest group (in retrospect, we know that Fields was looking for targets). Dwayne was open carrying an AR, but the idea that he was "waving it around" is an absolute fabrication. Further, there's phone telemetry that showed Dixon was nowhere near FIelds when he murdered Heyer, and the video pretty clearly indicates a deliberate attack. If that weren't enough, we could certainly go to the phone call from jail, where Fields said, about Heyer, “She is a communist, an anti-white, liberal. . . . It’s not up for questioning. She’s the enemy.”

I have no interest in defending the attacker, my claim of lack of justice was not on his behalf. My claim was on the behalf of not equally treating the case pending the two instigators leading to the death. I was reading up on the individual, whom you've identified as Mr. Dixon, and his multitude of self-defense cases and dropped charges from previous protests. The story in question which resulted in my opinion of him antagonizing the driver seemed plausible.

If what you say is true, then my opinion is unjustified, and the full weight of justice has been served. Since I do not have the full answer to substantiate your claim - factual or otherwise - I will politely tip the hat and acknowledge your statement as superior.

And, in that case, I apologize. I've done this dance a lot and every other time I have seen the "He was scared and being attacked by armed antifa thugs" argument, it's been a precursor to me getting DM'ed something along the lines of "I'm going to gas your whole family, you n-word loving, f-word k-word." so I have a tendency to get real snippy about it.

[Ifreann]

I have no interest in defending the attacker, my claim of lack of justice was not on his behalf. My claim was on the behalf of not equally treating the case pending the two instigators leading to the death. I was reading up on the individual, whom you've identified as Mr. Dixon, and his multitude of self-defense cases and dropped charges from previous protests. The story in question which resulted in my opinion of him antagonizing the driver seemed plausible.

If what you say is true, then my opinion is unjustified, and the full weight of justice has been served. Since I do not have the full answer to substantiate your claim - factual or otherwise - I will politely tip the hat and acknowledge your statement as superior.

And, in that case, I apologize. I've done this dance a lot and every other time I have seen the "He was scared and being attacked by armed antifa thugs" argument, it's been a precursor to me getting DM'ed something along the lines of "I'm going to gas your whole family, you n-word loving, f-word k-word." so I have a tendency to get real snippy about it.

Warms the heart to see that conspiracy theory getting shut down.

[Saiwania]

where Fields said, about Heyer, “She is a communist, an anti-white, liberal. . . . It’s not up for questioning. She’s the enemy.”

I'm 100% in agreement with this assessment. I just think the more prudent action would've been to leave her be. Broadly speaking, I think I aim for there being fewer political freedoms but more civil rights, or fewer civil rights but more political freedoms, but not both.

There will be plenty of people you don't like, but you don't necessarily have grounds to act against them, provided the same is true that they can't act against you. This is whats fair.

[Uiiop]

As long as Trump doesn't pardon him then this would seem to be the most just possible outcome.

I hope you didn't just jinxed it then.

[LiberNovusAmericae]

As long as Trump doesn't pardon him then this would seem to be the most just possible outcome.

Trump ain't going to pardon him.

[Anagonia]

I have no interest in defending the attacker, my claim of lack of justice was not on his behalf. My claim was on the behalf of not equally treating the case pending the two instigators leading to the death. I was reading up on the individual, whom you've identified as Mr. Dixon, and his multitude of self-defense cases and dropped charges from previous protests. The story in question which resulted in my opinion of him antagonizing the driver seemed plausible.

If what you say is true, then my opinion is unjustified, and the full weight of justice has been served. Since I do not have the full answer to substantiate your claim - factual or otherwise - I will politely tip the hat and acknowledge your statement as superior.

And, in that case, I apologize. I've done this dance a lot and every other time I have seen the "He was scared and being attacked by armed antifa thugs" argument, it's been a precursor to me getting DM'ed something along the lines of "I'm going to gas your whole family, you n-word loving, f-word k-word." so I have a tendency to get real snippy about it.

I see no reason for you to apologize, I almost jumped the gun when I assumed wrongly I was being labeled as a hateful person. My entire line of thinking this entire time has been there were two culprits in the murder of that protestor, who herself had been blocked off by two other vehicles or whatnot. Multiple videos and eyewitnesses somehow managed to tell different stories, and I happened to come across one that seemed the more logical. At no time did I believe the driver innocent, the man was clearly intent to harm, but my prior impressions had been he had been intent on escaping from what had been assumed to be a threatening situation - notwithstanding his rhetoric as you have stated clearly.

I do appreciate you calmly offering a different perspective. Sometimes we simply are too open-minded and, perhaps, allow ourselves to think different things based on what we see. From what I have gathered in these preliminary stages, your account is right.

[Gormwood]

As long as Trump doesn't pardon him then this would seem to be the most just possible outcome.

I hope you didn't just jinxed it then.

It'll be amusing to watch the Republican Party and the whole of right-wing media twisting themselves like The Thing trying to justify, much less praise the pardoning. His base would swallow anything he did as owning the libs.

[Xmara]

As long as Trump doesn't pardon him then this would seem to be the most just possible outcome.

Trump is crazy, but he seems smart enough to know that such an act would be political suicide.

[Gormwood]

As long as Trump doesn't pardon him then this would seem to be the most just possible outcome.

Trump is crazy, but he seems smart enough to know that such an act would be political suicide.

Trump has an entire party that spoils him like a little baby to where he'd be praised for doing something that would destroy any other politician, much less a Democrat.

[Saiwania]

Trump is crazy, but he seems smart enough to know that such an act would be political suicide.

If Trump wanted to pardon him, the best time to do this is perhaps the last day he's in office. If he's a Lame Duck, it don't matter as much what he does.

[Cannot think of a name]

As long as Trump doesn't pardon him then this would seem to be the most just possible outcome.

Trump is crazy, but he seems smart enough to know that such an act would be political suicide.

So many things by now should have been political suicide for him. He's the Rasputin of political suicide. He keeps trying and yet keeps on living, apparently on pure spite.

[Xmara]

Trump is crazy, but he seems smart enough to know that such an act would be political suicide.

Trump has an entire party that spoils him like a little baby to where he'd be praised for doing something that would destroy any other politician, much less a Democrat.

Idk. I personally think that he would lose favor with even some of his most ardent supporters.

[Great Minarchistan]

Can we also ban leftist gatherings too?

If you want neoconservatives and neoliberals to be the dominant force unto eternity, sure.

god I hope so

[Gormwood]

Trump is crazy, but he seems smart enough to know that such an act would be political suicide.

So many things by now should have been political suicide for him. He's the Rasputin of political suicide. He keeps trying and yet keeps on living, apparently on pure spite.

He's powered by the desire of others to Own The Libs.

[Great Minarchistan]

So many things by now should have been political suicide for him. He's the Rasputin of political suicide. He keeps trying and yet keeps on living, apparently on pure spite.

He's powered by the desire of others to Own The Libs.

that, or you're actually obsessed with his actions via trump derangement syndrome

[Chernoslavia]

Trump is crazy, but he seems smart enough to know that such an act would be political suicide.

So many things by now should have been political suicide for him. He's the Rasputin of political suicide. He keeps trying and yet keeps on living, apparently on pure spite.

The left is pretty much to blame for that really.

[Chernoslavia]

He's powered by the desire of others to Own The Libs.

that, or you're actually obsessed with his actions via trump derangement syndrome

This tbh. I don't like the guy due to his two face stance on gun rights, but the guy can't even take a leak with out people getting offended by it.

[Fartsniffage]

Trump is crazy, but he seems smart enough to know that such an act would be political suicide.

So many things by now should have been political suicide for him. He's the Rasputin of political suicide. He keeps trying and yet keeps on living, apparently on pure spite.

Time to throw him in a river.