NATION

PASSWORD

woman shot in the stomach, charged with death of fetus

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Gormwood
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14727
Founded: Mar 25, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Gormwood » Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:24 pm

Godular wrote:
Galloism wrote:Ok, that's retarded.


Okay, on that front I've got to agree. Negligent Homicide, maybe. But 'intentionally' carries the implication that the fetus' death was the objective of her actions.

Trying to convict the woman of intentional manslaughter of a fetus is Alabama trying to set a precedent that allows them to literally criminalize abortion.
Bloodthirsty savages who call for violence against the Right while simultaneously being unarmed defenseless sissies who will get slaughtered by the gun-toting Right in a civil war.
Breath So Bad, It Actually Drives People Mad

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159013
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:33 pm

Gormwood wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Yes, holding women criminally liable for miscarriages is probably the goal.

Until taking a morning after pill becomes capital murder.

Until pregnant women spend nine months at home, in bed, fearing to exert themselves in any way lest they miscarry and go to prison.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:33 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Just out of curiosity, do you oppose legal penalties for women who regularly drink during pregnancy and later give birth to a child with FAS?

To an extent I'd think that'd be fair.
Of course the key word there is 'child'.

I also am receiving input from my gf who has a friend who was born with FAS.
Her words are ''Tentatively yes, but we should only punish the mother if they knew the risks of drinking while pregnant. I would advocate for doctors being required to educate the mother of this when they inform the mother that they're pregnant."

The bottle itself educates you about the risks. There's even usually little pictures showing that pregnant women shouldn't drink, just in case the person holding the bottle is illiterate.

But, in any case, you wouldn't consider it a crime unless the fetus is born?
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Nova Cyberia
Senator
 
Posts: 4456
Founded: May 06, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Cyberia » Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:35 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Genivaria wrote:To an extent I'd think that'd be fair.
Of course the key word there is 'child'.

I also am receiving input from my gf who has a friend who was born with FAS.
Her words are ''Tentatively yes, but we should only punish the mother if they knew the risks of drinking while pregnant. I would advocate for doctors being required to educate the mother of this when they inform the mother that they're pregnant."

The bottle itself educates you about the risks. There's even usually little pictures showing that pregnant women shouldn't drink, just in case the person holding the bottle is illiterate.

But, in any case, you wouldn't consider it a crime unless the fetus is born?

You kind of have to be in the negative IQ area to not realize that drinking while pregnant is harmful.
Yes, yes, I get it. I'm racist and fascist because I disagree with you. Can we skip that part? I've heard it a million times before and I guarantee it won't be any different when you do it
##############
American Nationalist
Third Positionist Gang

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:36 pm

Hanafuridake wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Just out of curiosity, do you oppose legal penalties for women who regularly drink during pregnancy and later give birth to a child with FAS?


Is this drawing parallels between that and this?

I don't think that they're comparable. One is a miscarriage the other is consciously choosing to continue a pregnancy to term, in which case there's a child.

No, it was meant as an aside.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:47 pm

Xmara wrote:I’m pro-life, but come on Alabama. It wasn’t the pregnant woman’s fault that she lost her child. She was the victim! The woman who shot her should be the one charged. What’s next? Charging women who suffer miscarriages with murder?


The shooter had charges brought before the grand jury, the grand jury refused to indict.
Last edited by Tekania on Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:52 pm

Tekania wrote:
Xmara wrote:I’m pro-life, but come on Alabama. It wasn’t the pregnant woman’s fault that she lost her child. She was the victim! The woman who shot her should be the one charged. What’s next? Charging women who suffer miscarriages with murder?


The shooter had charges brought before the grand jury, the grand jury refused to indict.

And rightly so.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66763
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:53 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Tekania wrote:
The shooter had charges brought before the grand jury, the grand jury refused to indict.

And rightly so.


Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Proctopeo
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12369
Founded: Sep 26, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Proctopeo » Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:53 pm

Gormwood wrote:
Galloism wrote:Ok, that's retarded.

Welcome to Alabama Gilead.

You really should get new material. At least go back to the Harry Potter references, that was an actually good series, with more than one possible tenuous connection to modern politics you could make.

As for this, twenty years is pretty excessive, but starting a fight when pregnant is just fucking stupid. Ideally, she'd get told off for being less mentally capable than a chewed crayon and the shooter would get off with just a "maybe be less trigger happy" suggestion.
Arachno-anarchism || NO GODS NO MASTERS || Free NSG Odreria

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Fri Jun 28, 2019 1:56 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Scomagia wrote:And rightly so.


Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?

Shooting someone who showed up with a crew and assaulted you is acceptable, yes.

It's entirely reasonable to use lethal force when a member of a group begins attacking you because chances are good that the rest of the group isn't there to just twiddle their thumbs and watch, they're going to jump in too. If you didn't know, death is a likely outcome of a group jumping.
Last edited by Scomagia on Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:14 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:00 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Scomagia wrote:And rightly so.


Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?


FYI the only place supposed shooting is stated as being five times is in a post by an abortion rights group seeking donations. The contents of that post's shot five times claim is not substantiated anywhere else by any other witness statements or reports.
Last edited by Tekania on Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126456
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:08 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Scomagia wrote:And rightly so.


Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?


1. You seemed to have missed it the last time you said 5, the 5 was withdrawn, they are only claiming one shot.

2. If the other person started it, and you are being assaulted while trying to leave the site, yes it is ok to shoot someone in self defense.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72165
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:36 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Scomagia wrote:And rightly so.


Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?

Btw, I haven't found an actual credible source for the "five times". Police didn't say that in the local reports, just a pro-abortion group. Does anyone have any evidence it was 5 times?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
The Emerald Legion
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10695
Founded: Mar 18, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Emerald Legion » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:39 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Scomagia wrote:And rightly so.


Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?


Yes.
"23.The unwise man is awake all night, and ponders everything over; when morning comes he is weary in mind, and all is a burden as ever." - Havamal

User avatar
Loben The 2nd
Senator
 
Posts: 4410
Founded: Apr 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben The 2nd » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:40 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Scomagia wrote:And rightly so.


Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?

Depends.

Sometimes it takes more then one bullet.
no quarter.
Satisfaction guaranteed.

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67203
Founded: May 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kannap » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:40 pm

Galloism wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?

Btw, I haven't found an actual credible source for the "five times". Police didn't say that in the local reports, just a pro-abortion group. Does anyone have any evidence it was 5 times?


Double down, all or nothing. I see your 5 shots and raise you 10 shots.
25 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
RYM || Political test results
.::The List of National Sports::.

User avatar
Andsed
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13083
Founded: Aug 24, 2017
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Andsed » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:41 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Scomagia wrote:And rightly so.


Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?

Kind of depends on the situation. If the person is straight up attacking you like what happened here than yeah I would say firing a weapon is appropriate. Also where are you getting the 5 shots from?
I do be tired


LOVEWHOYOUARE~

User avatar
Loben The 2nd
Senator
 
Posts: 4410
Founded: Apr 29, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Loben The 2nd » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:43 pm

Kannap wrote:
Galloism wrote:Btw, I haven't found an actual credible source for the "five times". Police didn't say that in the local reports, just a pro-abortion group. Does anyone have any evidence it was 5 times?


Double down, all or nothing. I see your 5 shots and raise you 10 shots.


Shit depending on the pistol that means he must’ve reloaded.
no quarter.
Satisfaction guaranteed.

User avatar
Rojava Free State
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19428
Founded: Feb 06, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Rojava Free State » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:45 pm

The Emerald Legion wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?


Yes.


It's alabama. Abortion, being a Mexican or muslim and being gay are the only unacceptable things in that state. Everything else, including and especially violence is acceptable
Rojava Free State wrote:Listen yall. I'm only gonna say it once but I want you to remember it. This ain't a world fit for good men. It seems like you gotta be monstrous just to make it. Gotta have a little bit of darkness within you just to survive. You gotta stoop low everyday it seems like. Stoop all the way down to the devil in these times. And then one day you look in the mirror and you realize that you ain't you anymore. You're just another monster, and thanks to your actions, someone else will eventually become as warped and twisted as you. Never forget that the best of us are just the best of a bad lot. Being at the top of a pile of feces doesn't make you anything but shit like the rest. Never forget that.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66763
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:46 pm

Galloism wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Shooting someone five times in the gut over a dispute is acceptable now?

Btw, I haven't found an actual credible source for the "five times". Police didn't say that in the local reports, just a pro-abortion group. Does anyone have any evidence it was 5 times?


So what makes the shooting in any way acceptable?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:46 pm

Rojava Free State wrote:
The Emerald Legion wrote:
Yes.


It's alabama. Abortion, being a Mexican or muslim and being gay are the only unacceptable things in that state. Everything else, including and especially violence is acceptable

Violence to preserve yourself is always acceptable.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67203
Founded: May 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kannap » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:47 pm

Loben The 2nd wrote:
Kannap wrote:
Double down, all or nothing. I see your 5 shots and raise you 10 shots.


Shit depending on the pistol that means he must’ve reloaded.


Self defense is a commitment.
25 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
RYM || Political test results
.::The List of National Sports::.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:48 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Galloism wrote:Btw, I haven't found an actual credible source for the "five times". Police didn't say that in the local reports, just a pro-abortion group. Does anyone have any evidence it was 5 times?


So what makes the shooting in any way acceptable?

You mean aside from the prego chick assaulting her and having her crew there to probably do the same?
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Kannap
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 67203
Founded: May 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kannap » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:48 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Galloism wrote:Btw, I haven't found an actual credible source for the "five times". Police didn't say that in the local reports, just a pro-abortion group. Does anyone have any evidence it was 5 times?


So what makes the shooting in any way acceptable?


When somebody is attacked - and, presumably, fears harm or worse - they're allowed to act in self defense. Guns are a tool of self defense.
25 years old, gay demisexual, they/them agnostic, North Carolinian. Pumpkin Spice everything.
TET's resident red panda
Red Panda Network
Luna Amore wrote:Please remember to attend the ritualistic burning of Kannap for heresy
T H E M O U N T A I N S A R E C A L L I N G A N D I M U S T G O
G A Y S I N C E 1 9 9 7
RYM || Political test results
.::The List of National Sports::.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66763
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Jun 28, 2019 2:48 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
So what makes the shooting in any way acceptable?

You mean aside from the prego chick assaulting her and having her crew there to probably do the same?


So what did she do that constitutes assault?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bovad, Cyber Duotona, Elejamie, Greater Marine, Hidrandia, Hrofguard, Luna Amore, New Texas Republic, Old Tyrannia, Querria, Raskana, Saint Norm, Szaki, The United Penguin Commonwealth

Advertisement

Remove ads