NationStates

Did anyone hear KSI say "you did all that bullshit then, but now it's time for you to face the music Dej" when they read the headline? Just me?

Nova Cyberia wrote:

Ethel mermania wrote:Read better. I am calling it a Judicially ordered sexual assault.

Question.

If a man forced a woman to sit there while he injected his sperm into her vagina so she could get pregnant what would you call it?

A miserable way to spend a Tuesday afternoon.

If he does have a kid with her, be it with IVF or the more fun sexy route, he'll be paying for the kid for the next 18 years. Yes, of course she can reproduce, but she should do it with someone who wants it.

This is when you just pack up and leave. Go to some non extradition country and start over.

Aclion wrote:

(Image)

Ignoring the bizarre text, who the hell drew this monstrosity of the uncanny valley? Do they legitimately think humans look like that?

Vallermoore wrote:If he does have a kid with her, be it with IVF or the more fun sexy route, he'll be paying for the kid for the next 18 years. Yes, of course she can reproduce, but she should do it with someone who wants it.

Rape is not a "fun sexy route."

Cekoviu wrote:

Aclion wrote:

(Image)

Ignoring the bizarre text, who the hell drew this monstrosity of the uncanny valley? Do they legitimately think humans look like that?

Front butt. Front butt. Like, for real? I’m calling this a day. Done.

My front butt can’t take it anymore.

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:

Cekoviu wrote:Ignoring the bizarre text, who the hell drew this monstrosity of the uncanny valley? Do they legitimately think humans look like that?

Front butt. Front butt. Like, for real? I’m calling this a day. Done.

My front butt can’t take it anymore.

This has indeed been quite the day for NSG. That may be for the best.
I'm in too deep at this point, though.

Nova Cyberia wrote:

Ethel mermania wrote:Read better. I am calling it a Judicially ordered sexual assault.

Question.

If a man forced a woman to sit there while he injected his sperm into her vagina so she could get pregnant what would you call it?

A boring life, injection is painful (if you meant it literally).

This world continues to make less sense with every passing moment. I hope the woman in this case doesn't get what she wants.

What has happened to the nation of Sanjay Gandhi?

Cappuccina wrote:This world continues to make less sense with every passing moment.

Not surprised — also, don’t forget how India is overpopulated and is experiencing water shortage and an energy crisis.

Bluelight-R006 wrote:

Cappuccina wrote:This world continues to make less sense with every passing moment.

Not surprised — also, don’t forget how India is overpopulated and is experiencing water shortage and an energy crisis.

So much so they used to have castration as government policy. See above post for joke about that.

Pim Fortuyn wrote:

Bluelight-R006 wrote:Not surprised — also, don’t forget how India is overpopulated and is experiencing water shortage and an energy crisis.

So much so they used to have castration as government policy. See above post for joke about that.

For the sake of entire India, I’d rather castration than impregnate my wife.

Bluelight-R006 wrote:

Pim Fortuyn wrote:So much so they used to have castration as government policy. See above post for joke about that.

For the sake of entire India, I’d rather castration than impregnate my wife.

You are young yet.

Ethel mermania wrote:

Bluelight-R006 wrote:For the sake of entire India, I’d rather castration than impregnate my wife.

You are young yet.

If I was a woman and I governed India, I’d have said that. Since I have no idea.

As a young teenager, I’ll go for the ‘rape.’

This is the biggest woke brain take I've ever seen, and it's coming from a judge.

Bluelight-R006 wrote:

Ethel mermania wrote:You are young yet.

If I was a woman and I governed India, I’d have said that. Since I have no idea.

As a young teenager, I’ll go for the ‘rape.’

Why?

Ethel mermania wrote:

Bluelight-R006 wrote:If I was a woman and I governed India, I’d have said that. Since I have no idea.

As a young teenager, I’ll go for the ‘rape.’

Why?

Because I don’t want to spend money on castration. Plus it would be weird that you have one part of your body removed.

Bluelight-R006 wrote:

Ethel mermania wrote:Why?

Because I don’t want to spend money on castration. Plus it would be weird that you have one part of your body removed.

I misunderstood what you were saying. I though you said you would prefer castration. Thanks for clearing it up.

Ethel mermania wrote:

Bluelight-R006 wrote:Because I don’t want to spend money on castration. Plus it would be weird that you have one part of your body removed.

I misunderstood what you were saying. I though you said you would prefer castration. Thanks for clearing it up.

Very much welcomed. It in fact, needed to be cleared up.

Costa Fierro wrote:

Araraukar wrote:Whether it's rape or not is not the issue as far as I care about it, but the point is that "reproductive rights" also includes "the right not to reproduce". That's why women can (in civilized societies) choose to have an abortion, if they do not want a child (if you're anti-choice, let's say she was actually violently raped by a stranger and is a minor).

Men have absolutely zero reproductive rights.

Normally (as in, general life, not this particular weird case) men have every right and in certain cases are required to (such as if the other person is below age of consent or is incapable of consenting) not to squirt their sperm somewhere that it can meet an ovum, if they don't want kids. That's the whole point of "right not to reproduce". The judge in this case is out of their mind if they think it's okay to try to overrule that right. Especially given the man was trying to get a divorce to begin with.

Also, like, don't people re-marry in India?

Araraukar wrote:

Costa Fierro wrote:Men have absolutely zero reproductive rights.

Normally (as in, general life, not this particular weird case) men have every right and in certain cases are required to (such as if the other person is below age of consent or is incapable of consenting) not to squirt their sperm somewhere that it can meet an ovum, if they don't want kids. That's the whole point of "right not to reproduce". The judge in this case is out of their mind if they think it's okay to try to overrule that right. Especially given the man was trying to get a divorce to begin with.

Also, like, don't people re-marry in India?

I mean, men don’t generally have that right in the West in the practical sense, except to the extent they can defend themselves, as despite rape of men being almost as common as the reverse (among adults), police look the other way and even threaten the men with charges for trying to report.

I’ve walked a number of young men through this process, and have taken to encouraging them to take a witness or lawyer with them when they go, just so there’s someone witness to the aftermath. They get better results too.

But in this particular case, we can see how this judge (and plenty of others, imo) truly think - women have rights, and men must accommodate them.

I don't know why, but India has this bizarre tendency to solve all of their problems by taking the route that will ensure maximum possible conflict and resentment.