NATION

PASSWORD

Oregon Republicans facing arrest

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:23 pm

Necroghastia wrote:
Scomagia wrote:This. Very. Fucking. Bill. Is. An. Example.


Fucking. How. Question. Mark.

Read the bill. I trust you can do that without my help.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72259
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:24 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Work together for the rural folks to get raped by the interests of Salem and Portland, you mean.

Yeah how dare those people be allowed to vote or have representation relative to their population

It's not 1:1 and such, but looking at the presidential vote totals in Oregon:

2016 41.1% 742,506 (R) 51.7% 934,631 (D)

If we assume the vote totals for the state legislature were the same (which may not be true, but for these purposes we will accept), we would assign 52% of legislators to D, 41% to R, and 7% to "other".

The senate has 30 members. That would be 16 members for the democrats (15.6 rounding up), and 12 for the republicans (12.3 rounding down), with 2 assigned to "other". In fact, 18 members are democrats, and 12 are republican. Republicans are about fairly represented by vote share - democrats are overrepresented. Other is also underrepresented.

The house has 60 members. Applying the same ratios, 31 would be democrats (31.2 rounding down), 25 would be republicans (24.6 rounding up), and 4 would be "other". In fact, 38 are democrat and 22 are republican. Democrats are overrepresented and republicans are under represented. Other is also underrepresented.

As I recall, you had a problem with this in the past. Do you still?

San Lumen wrote:
Galloism wrote:Um, yes they did.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Un ... _elections

Republicans got 49.1% of the vote, democrats got 48%, and other parties got 2.9%.

Republicans got 57.4% of the seats. The winner got the majority of the seats. Kosher?


No. They would have gotten far less seats if gerrymandering was illegal. I dont support proportional representation as I like having districts. You can't have that with proportional representation or can you?

How would you decide who gets what seat? If we are going have proportional representation than I would support MMP.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53352
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:24 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Don't you know? There's less of us so we should just accept the ignorant whims of Portland and Salem, regardless of what happens to us.

Yeah we should give them less representation or rig the election so their votes matter less. Or the minority should shut down the government because they dont get their way.

Again since they can stop the legislature from functioning with this stunt why bother showing up at all just run for election and say ill protect your interests by not doing anything and those evil people in Portland and the coast can't oppress you.


Actually this is a very good idea.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Necroghastia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9635
Founded: May 11, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Necroghastia » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:24 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Necroghastia wrote:
Fucking. How. Question. Mark.

Read the bill. I trust you can do that without my help.

I did.
The Land of Spooky Scary Skeletons!

Pronouns: she/her

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:24 pm

Necroghastia wrote:
Scomagia wrote:This. Very. Fucking. Bill. Is. An. Example.


Fucking. How. Question. Mark.

This bill will cost jobs in the timber industry, and already has. Stimson Lumber laid off 40% of its workforce in anticipation of this bill, along with the upcoming tax increases.

https://www.capitalpress.com/state/oregon/timber-families-take-last-stand-against-climate-bills-at-oregon/article_6bdab3c0-92ae-11e9-be21-1b22ccd24c90.html

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81270
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:25 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Its real simple. They get less representation and their votes dont count more for statewide elections therefore they are being oppressed


You do understand it's possible to hold the majority of the legislature and not be scum right?

There is a fine line between scum and implementing things you were elected to do. In Albany democrats have the majority but work with the other side so they get things they want. The agriculture chair in the assembly and senate comes from rural districts.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81270
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:25 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Yeah we should give them less representation or rig the election so their votes matter less. Or the minority should shut down the government because they dont get their way.

Again since they can stop the legislature from functioning with this stunt why bother showing up at all just run for election and say ill protect your interests by not doing anything and those evil people in Portland and the coast can't oppress you.


Actually this is a very good idea.

why don't they do it then?

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53352
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:26 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Actually this is a very good idea.

why don't they do it then?


I hope they will going forward, not just in Oregon too.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:26 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
You do understand it's possible to hold the majority of the legislature and not be scum right?

There is a fine line between scum and implementing things you were elected to do. In Albany democrats have the majority but work with the other side so they get things they want. The agriculture chair in the assembly and senate comes from rural districts.


Not if the things they're elected to do are scummy there isn't.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81270
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:27 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
San Lumen wrote:why don't they do it then?


I hope they will going forward, not just in Oregon too.


Maybe Republicans in your state aren't as petty.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81270
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:27 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:There is a fine line between scum and implementing things you were elected to do. In Albany democrats have the majority but work with the other side so they get things they want. The agriculture chair in the assembly and senate comes from rural districts.


Not if the things they're elected to do are scummy there isn't.

Just because you disagree doesnt make it scummy or does someone not have a right to disagree with you?

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:28 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
San Lumen wrote:why don't they do it then?


I hope they will going forward, not just in Oregon too.


Honestly this. The optics of bringing Republicans in on handcuffs so that you can override all of their objections is totally good for the idea of representative democracy.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:28 pm

Necroghastia wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Read the bill. I trust you can do that without my help.

I did.

I'm sorry you can't comprehend what you read and it's effects on rural Oregon, then.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81270
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:28 pm

Telconi wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
I hope they will going forward, not just in Oregon too.


Honestly this. The optics of bringing Republicans in on handcuffs so that you can override all of their objections is totally good for the idea of representative democracy.

I hope they do it in California. it will go over real big.

User avatar
Necroghastia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9635
Founded: May 11, 2019
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Necroghastia » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:28 pm

Arlenton wrote:
Necroghastia wrote:
Fucking. How. Question. Mark.

This bill will cost jobs in the timber industry, and already has. Stimson Lumber laid off 40% of its workforce in anticipation of this bill, along with the upcoming tax increases.

https://www.capitalpress.com/state/oregon/timber-families-take-last-stand-against-climate-bills-at-oregon/article_6bdab3c0-92ae-11e9-be21-1b22ccd24c90.html


Thank you. Sincerely. Thanks for actually explaining and linking to a source.
The Land of Spooky Scary Skeletons!

Pronouns: she/her

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:28 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Not if the things they're elected to do are scummy there isn't.

Just because you disagree doesnt make it scummy or does someone not have a right to disagree with you?


You don't think that scummy ideas exist? Or you agree with them all?
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53352
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:29 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
I hope they will going forward, not just in Oregon too.


Maybe Republicans in your state aren't as petty.


Given how Republican areas are just flatly starting to ignore everything Seattle and co. try to impose on them I'd say they're even worse.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:29 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Honestly this. The optics of bringing Republicans in on handcuffs so that you can override all of their objections is totally good for the idea of representative democracy.

I hope they do it in California. it will go over real big.


See, we agree on something.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81270
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:29 pm

Telconi wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Just because you disagree doesnt make it scummy or does someone not have a right to disagree with you?


You don't think that scummy ideas exist? Or you agree with them all?


What a stupid statement. You love to dodge instead of giving answers.

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:29 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Nevermind that. How would you feel if it ever happened?

Answer the question and stop dodging it. Otherwise I’m going to assume you’d be pissed and you don’t want to answer the hypothetical because you realize that it would destroy your current position

I respect the outcome of elections

Lets say you live in a red state. The GOP won the last election in this state in a landslide. The state legislature is about to pass laws making abortion illegal and revoke the marriage licenses of same sex couples (lets say Trump replaces Ginsburg with Barrett). The vast majority of the state is conservative and supports this. But if the few Democrats were to leave the state to prevent these votes from happening, would you oppose them?
Last edited by Arlenton on Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81270
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:30 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
Maybe Republicans in your state aren't as petty.


Given how Republican areas are just flatly starting to ignore everything Seattle and co. try to impose on them I'd say they're even worse.


They should be prosecuted for violating the law.

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:30 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
Honestly this. The optics of bringing Republicans in on handcuffs so that you can override all of their objections is totally good for the idea of representative democracy.

I hope they do it in California. it will go over real big.

It will. California is more than SoCal.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Telconi
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34903
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Telconi » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:30 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Telconi wrote:
You don't think that scummy ideas exist? Or you agree with them all?


What a stupid statement. You love to dodge instead of giving answers.


Well apparently disagreement and scumminess ar emutually exclusive.
-2.25 LEFT
-3.23 LIBERTARIAN

PRO:
-Weapons Rights
-Gender Equality
-LGBTQ Rights
-Racial Equality
-Religious Freedom
-Freedom of Speech
-Freedom of Association
-Life
-Limited Government
-Non Interventionism
-Labor Unions
-Environmental Protections
ANTI:
-Racism
-Sexism
-Bigotry In All Forms
-Government Overreach
-Government Surveillance
-Freedom For Security Social Transactions
-Unnecessary Taxes
-Excessively Specific Government Programs
-Foreign Entanglements
-Religious Extremism
-Fascists Masquerading as "Social Justice Warriors"

"The Constitution is NOT an instrument for the government to restrain the people,it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government-- lest it come to dominate our lives and interests." ~ Patrick Henry

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81270
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:30 pm

Arlenton wrote:
San Lumen wrote:I respect the outcome of elections

Lets say you live in a red state. The state legislature is about to pass laws making abortion illegal and revoke the marriage licenses of same sex couples (lets say Trump replaces Ginsburg with Barrett). The vast majority of the state is conservative and supports this. But if the few Democrats were to leave the state to prevent these votes from happening, would you oppose them?

I would respect the outcome of the election as disappointed and angry as I would be.
Last edited by San Lumen on Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Arlenton
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10238
Founded: Dec 16, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Arlenton » Fri Jun 21, 2019 5:31 pm

San Lumen wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Given how Republican areas are just flatly starting to ignore everything Seattle and co. try to impose on them I'd say they're even worse.


They should be prosecuted for violating the law.

The question is, should unjust laws be obeyed?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arikea, Democratic Poopland, Google [Bot], Gravlen, Riviere Renard, Southeast Iraq

Advertisement

Remove ads