NATION

PASSWORD

Oregon Republicans facing arrest

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The Emerald Legion
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10695
Founded: Mar 18, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Emerald Legion » Thu Jul 04, 2019 9:45 am

San Lumen wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Why would they do that when they can do this instead? Why go for the explicitly least possible route when it isn’t necessary?

Then why not prevent the majority from passing almost anything or confirming any nominations from the governor


I mean, there's a difference between throwing a fit and knocking the cook over to stop what he's doing when he's putting a cake of a flavor you dislike in the oven, and throwing a fit and knocking the cook over to stop what he's doing when he's putting a child in the oven.

In both cases you are preventing someone from putting something in the oven. But the context of WHAT that is is relevant.
"23.The unwise man is awake all night, and ponders everything over; when morning comes he is weary in mind, and all is a burden as ever." - Havamal

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81208
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Jul 04, 2019 9:58 am

Thermodolia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:and that would likely violate the Voting Rights Act as its unlikely in some states people of certain ethnic groups would get elected.

That’s an extremely racist statement. You do realize that in a PR system the parties come up with party lists which have the entire list of the people who would be the legislators if they win.

And if you seriously believe that the democrats wouldn’t have minorities on their electoral lists then we have some serious problems

Many people dont know this but Oregon has a long history of racism. It was founded as a white state and specifically prohibited non whites from moving to the state with a law beginning in 1844. In 1857 it was enshrined into the constitution. The Black exclusion laws were repealed via referendum in 1926 with 62 percent voting in favor.

Dude up until 1865 slavery was fucking legal. It’s really no surprise that they banned non-whites in 1857. The fact that they repealed it in 1926 further destroys your argument

even today Oregon remains a a very white state compared to rest of the west coast and most immigration to the state is largely white. Portland in fact contains over two thirds of states African American population.

And? Do you really think that the democrats wouldn’t have minorities on their electoral lists? Also is New Mexico full of racists because there aren’t any blacks in New Mexico?

What racist about it? What’s to say the party would chose people from Portland? How would someone from Lincoln City know the issues in Portland? This is why I favor mmp

Oregon as far I as I know was the only state to ever explicitly ban a whole race from settling in the state.

I never said New Mexico was full of racists. Some states don’t have a large population of certain groups
Last edited by San Lumen on Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17599
Founded: May 15, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Diopolis » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:03 am

San Lumen wrote:
The Emerald Legion wrote:
Hardly. You're assertion is that the Oregon Republicans are not performing their duty by using the procedural rules of their office in order to get their constituents what they want, and should instead have simply voted no and allowed the measure to pass.

Either methods beyond simple voting are ok, in which case what the Oregon Republicans do is acceptable, which is directly contrary to your present argument, or it is not, and the veritable ocean of Frivolous lawsuits and judicial activism that have hamstrung the executives branches acting out the plans of the Duly Elected president are also unacceptable.

Either legal tricks are acceptable or not. Choose one.

Again since they are outvoted why not do this on almost every bill? Legal tricks are not acceptable. Do the job you were elected to do or resign

They don't do this on every bill because not every bill will destroy their constituent's livelihoods.
Texas nationalist, 3rd positionist, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66751
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:04 am

Diopolis wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Again since they are outvoted why not do this on almost every bill? Legal tricks are not acceptable. Do the job you were elected to do or resign

They don't do this on every bill because not every bill will destroy their constituent's livelihoods.


I forget, did anyone actually provide evidence that it would?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81208
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:06 am

Diopolis wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Again since they are outvoted why not do this on almost every bill? Legal tricks are not acceptable. Do the job you were elected to do or resign

They don't do this on every bill because not every bill will destroy their constituent's livelihoods.

Run better candidates. Elections have consequences

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17599
Founded: May 15, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Diopolis » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:07 am

Vassenor wrote:
Diopolis wrote:They don't do this on every bill because not every bill will destroy their constituent's livelihoods.


I forget, did anyone actually provide evidence that it would?

I forget too, but that is their claim and it looks like they believe it. Honestly I don't know enough about the specifics of the logging industry in Oregon.
Texas nationalist, 3rd positionist, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:12 am

San Lumen wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:That’s an extremely racist statement. You do realize that in a PR system the parties come up with party lists which have the entire list of the people who would be the legislators if they win.

And if you seriously believe that the democrats wouldn’t have minorities on their electoral lists then we have some serious problems


Dude up until 1865 slavery was fucking legal. It’s really no surprise that they banned non-whites in 1857. The fact that they repealed it in 1926 further destroys your argument


And? Do you really think that the democrats wouldn’t have minorities on their electoral lists? Also is New Mexico full of racists because there aren’t any blacks in New Mexico?

What racist about it?

Because you are basing things on people’s race. Claiming that without the VRA black people are nothing. I find that horribly racist

What’s to say the party would chose people from Portland?

They’d probably cease to be a state party then. Still doesn’t mean that not having districts will mean that no minorities are in office

How would someone from Lincoln City know the issues in Portland?

What is local government? The states job is to focus on issues that effect the entire state. Local issues are best left up too the local government. That’s why we have a federal system instead of a unitary system like the UK or France.

Also you can have a bicameral system in which the senate is elected by districts overlapping with the counties.

Oregon as far I as I know was the only state to ever explicitly ban a whole race from settling in the state.

Yet they got rid of those laws at the height of the Jim Crow laws. And furthermore it happened over 100 years ago. Oregon today isn’t gonna ban black people because you remove the voting rights act.

I never said New Mexico was full of racists. Some states don’t have a large population of certain groups

I never said you did that why I asked you the fucking question. You implied that Oregon was racist because it didn’t have a lot of blacks living in it. Therefore it can be assumed that you think other states like New Mexico are also racist because they don’t have a lot of blacks living in it.
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:14 am

San Lumen wrote:
Diopolis wrote:They don't do this on every bill because not every bill will destroy their constituent's livelihoods.

Run better candidates. Elections have consequences

I’m sure you wouldn’t be saying this if the democrats got wiped out of power in Albany or if Nazis got elected
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7766
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:14 am

Vassenor wrote:
Diopolis wrote:They don't do this on every bill because not every bill will destroy their constituent's livelihoods.


I forget, did anyone actually provide evidence that it would?

Looking at the bill and the industry’s reaction to the possibility of it passing, it’s likely that it would fuck up at least a fair few of their constituents. Fearing that they’d lose a lot of money over the thirty year period, at least one company began laying people off.

Using that as an example, we can safely say that at least a fair number of their constituents would royally fucked by this bill.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17599
Founded: May 15, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Diopolis » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:16 am

San Lumen wrote:
Diopolis wrote:They don't do this on every bill because not every bill will destroy their constituent's livelihoods.

Run better candidates. Elections have consequences

You haven't been listening to anything anyone else in this thread has been saying, have you?
Texas nationalist, 3rd positionist, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:17 am

Diopolis wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Run better candidates. Elections have consequences

You haven't been listening to anything anyone else in this thread has been saying, have you?

Why would they do that? Republicans don’t matter
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7766
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:17 am

San Lumen wrote:
Diopolis wrote:They don't do this on every bill because not every bill will destroy their constituent's livelihoods.

Run better candidates. Elections have consequences

Consequences like representatives being chosen that’ll use tactics like this.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17599
Founded: May 15, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Diopolis » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:18 am

Thermodolia wrote:
Diopolis wrote:You haven't been listening to anything anyone else in this thread has been saying, have you?

Why would they do that? Republicans don’t matter

Silly me, I forgot.
Texas nationalist, 3rd positionist, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
The Two Jerseys
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19604
Founded: Jun 07, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Two Jerseys » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:20 am

Thermodolia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Run better candidates. Elections have consequences

I’m sure you wouldn’t be saying this if the democrats got wiped out of power in Albany or if Nazis got elected

Considering Lumen spent a month begging the Electoral College to be faithless and not vote for Donald trump...
"The Duke of Texas" is too formal for regular use. Just call me "Your Grace".
"If I would like to watch goodness, sanity, God and logic being fucked I would watch Japanese porn." -Nightkill the Emperor
"This thread makes me wish I was a moron so that I wouldn't have to comprehend how stupid the topic is." -The Empire of Pretantia
Head of State: HM King Louis
Head of Government: The Rt. Hon. James O'Dell MP, Prime Minister
Ambassador to the World Assembly: HE Sir John Ross "J.R." Ewing II, Bt.
Join Excalibur Squadron. We're Commandos who fly Spitfires. Chicks dig Commandos who fly Spitfires.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:21 am

The Two Jerseys wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:I’m sure you wouldn’t be saying this if the democrats got wiped out of power in Albany or if Nazis got elected

Considering Lumen spent a month begging the Electoral College to be faithless and not vote for Donald trump...

Maybe the democrats just should have run better candidates. Elections have consequences ya know
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12989
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:25 am

Thermodolia wrote:
The Two Jerseys wrote:Considering Lumen spent a month begging the Electoral College to be faithless and not vote for Donald trump...

Maybe the democrats just should have run better candidates. Elections have consequences ya know


Trump 2020: Make America Salty Again?

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
Mallorea and Riva should resign
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44696
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:50 am

The of Japan wrote:
Kowani wrote:
“Free and fair elections”

The Abraham Lincoln administration was voted in both in 1860 and 1864.

Sigh
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.




The triumph of the Democracy is essential to the struggle of popular liberty


Currently Rehabilitating: Martin Van Buren, Benjamin Harrison, and Woodrow Wilson
Currently Vilifying: George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, and Jimmy Carter

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:52 am

Kowani wrote:
The of Japan wrote:The Abraham Lincoln administration was voted in both in 1860 and 1864.

Sigh

It’s ok I understood what you meant
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81208
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Jul 04, 2019 10:58 am

Thermodolia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:Run better candidates. Elections have consequences

I’m sure you wouldn’t be saying this if the democrats got wiped out of power in Albany or if Nazis got elected

If they won a free and fair election I would

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44696
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:20 am

Ors Might wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
I forget, did anyone actually provide evidence that it would?

Looking at the bill and the industry’s reaction to the possibility of it passing, it’s likely that it would fuck up at least a fair few of their constituents. Fearing that they’d lose a lot of money over the thirty year period, at least one company began laying people off.

Using that as an example, we can safely say that at least a fair number of their constituents would royally fucked by this bill.

Image
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.




The triumph of the Democracy is essential to the struggle of popular liberty


Currently Rehabilitating: Martin Van Buren, Benjamin Harrison, and Woodrow Wilson
Currently Vilifying: George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, and Jimmy Carter

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:27 am

San Lumen wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:I’m sure you wouldn’t be saying this if the democrats got wiped out of power in Albany or if Nazis got elected

If they won a free and fair election I would

Bullshit. Press x to doubt
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Ors Might
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7766
Founded: Nov 01, 2016
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Ors Might » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:28 am

Kowani wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Looking at the bill and the industry’s reaction to the possibility of it passing, it’s likely that it would fuck up at least a fair few of their constituents. Fearing that they’d lose a lot of money over the thirty year period, at least one company began laying people off.

Using that as an example, we can safely say that at least a fair number of their constituents would royally fucked by this bill.

Image

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say with this? Regardless of whether or not its corporate whining, it’s a fact that a bill that would lead to mass lay offs would be harmful to those people losing their jobs.
https://youtu.be/gvjOG5gboFU Best diss track of all time

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76228
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:28 am

Kowani wrote:
Ors Might wrote:Looking at the bill and the industry’s reaction to the possibility of it passing, it’s likely that it would fuck up at least a fair few of their constituents. Fearing that they’d lose a lot of money over the thirty year period, at least one company began laying people off.

Using that as an example, we can safely say that at least a fair number of their constituents would royally fucked by this bill.

Image

That’s not the same thing and you know it
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44696
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Thu Jul 04, 2019 11:48 am

Ors Might wrote:
Kowani wrote:Image

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say with this? Regardless of whether or not its corporate whining, it’s a fact that a bill that would lead to mass lay offs would be harmful to those people losing their jobs.

Perhaps the idea that industry’s reaction is not always the greatest guide to how the bill would effect them.

Thermodolia wrote:
Kowani wrote:Image

That’s not the same thing and you know it

It is the principle that I speak of.
Abolitionism in the North has leagued itself with Radical Democracy, and so the Slave Power was forced to ally itself with the Money Power; that is the great fact of the age.




The triumph of the Democracy is essential to the struggle of popular liberty


Currently Rehabilitating: Martin Van Buren, Benjamin Harrison, and Woodrow Wilson
Currently Vilifying: George Washington, Theodore Roosevelt, and Jimmy Carter

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 81208
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Jul 04, 2019 1:31 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:What racist about it?

Because you are basing things on people’s race. Claiming that without the VRA black people are nothing. I find that horribly racist

What’s to say the party would chose people from Portland?

They’d probably cease to be a state party then. Still doesn’t mean that not having districts will mean that no minorities are in office

How would someone from Lincoln City know the issues in Portland?

What is local government? The states job is to focus on issues that effect the entire state. Local issues are best left up too the local government. That’s why we have a federal system instead of a unitary system like the UK or France.

Also you can have a bicameral system in which the senate is elected by districts overlapping with the counties.

Oregon as far I as I know was the only state to ever explicitly ban a whole race from settling in the state.

Yet they got rid of those laws at the height of the Jim Crow laws. And furthermore it happened over 100 years ago. Oregon today isn’t gonna ban black people because you remove the voting rights act.

I never said New Mexico was full of racists. Some states don’t have a large population of certain groups

I never said you did that why I asked you the fucking question. You implied that Oregon was racist because it didn’t have a lot of blacks living in it. Therefore it can be assumed that you think other states like New Mexico are also racist because they don’t have a lot of blacks living in it.

I never said African Americans are nothing without the VRA. In Southern States I very doubt you'd see much non whites being chosen for the list as they would pick people who could win statewide Its doubtful you'd see as many elected as its no longer district based.

Some issues may seem local but are in fact not.

What do you mean by districts overlapping the counties? We have already established many times that electing by counties in inherently unfair as rural counties are unfairly favored.

I didnt say Oregon would ban blacks if your repealed the VRA. You know it does more than require certain districts? It ensures everyone has a right to vote in theory. Nor did I say the state was racist. I love your mischaracterizations.
Thermodolia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:If they won a free and fair election I would

Bullshit. Press x to doubt

Doubt all you want. I respect free and fair elections and the peaceful transfer of power. If Republicans somehow won full control in Albany however unlikely I would respect that result as angry and upset as I would be.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Commonwealth of Adirondack, Dimetrodon Empire, Everett Levermann, Floofybit, Ifreann, Kyoto Noku, La Cocina del Bodhi, Necroghastia, Neu California, Ors Might, Port Caverton, Senkaku, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, Tarsonis, Terra dei Cittadini, Terran American State, The Acolyte Confederacy, The Black Forrest, The Crimson Isles, The Pirateariat, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Thermodolia, Trump Almighty, Washington Resistance Army, Xenti

Advertisement

Remove ads