NATION

PASSWORD

How do we manage the incel epidemic?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Crockerland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5456
Founded: Oct 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Crockerland » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:15 am

Kaztropol wrote:But to manage it, there's not a lot that's possible to do, except maybe change the storylines and casting for "romantic comedies" and Disney films. Afaik, the only Disney animation with a butt-ugly male protagonist was The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and afaik, Quasimodo there was just misshapen, rather than actually ugly, with bad skin etc. And he didn't get the girl that he fell in love with either.

Maybe he didn't respect women enough??
Free Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Tibet.
Gay not Queer / Why Abortion is Genocide / End Gay Erasure
PROUD SUPPORTER OF:
National Liberalism, Nuclear & Geothermal Power, GMOs, Vaccines, Biodiesel, LGBTIA equality, Universal Healthcare, Universal Basic Income, Constitutional Carry, Emotional Support Twinks, Right to Life


User avatar
Special Aromas
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 191
Founded: Sep 11, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Special Aromas » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:22 am

Manage the incel epidemic by considering those unlucky outsiders on the Tinder wheel to lower their expectations and pursue an older age demographic instead where their odds might improve. The ratio of women to men improves until it's almost 2:1 by the time you reach your mid-60's. Instead of struggling to come to terms with the realization that you may not be the last word in male physique, romantic persona and/or compatible lifestyle, go down a weight class and score some knockout blows!

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26091
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heloin » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:34 am

Kaztropol wrote:But to manage it, there's not a lot that's possible to do, except maybe change the storylines and casting for "romantic comedies" and Disney films. Afaik, the only Disney animation with a butt-ugly male protagonist was The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and afaik, Quasimodo there was just misshapen, rather than actually ugly, with bad skin etc. And he didn't get the girl that he fell in love with either.

Why should getting the girl in the end be considered the goal?

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126482
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:38 am

Heloin wrote:
Kaztropol wrote:But to manage it, there's not a lot that's possible to do, except maybe change the storylines and casting for "romantic comedies" and Disney films. Afaik, the only Disney animation with a butt-ugly male protagonist was The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and afaik, Quasimodo there was just misshapen, rather than actually ugly, with bad skin etc. And he didn't get the girl that he fell in love with either.

Why should getting the girl in the end be considered the goal?

Its better than getting the sheep.


No offense intended Blaatshapen
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:42 am

Ethel mermania wrote:
Heloin wrote:Why should getting the girl in the end be considered the goal?

Its better than getting the sheep.


No offense intended Blaatshapen


And now when the girl gets the sheep.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:46 am

Heloin wrote:
Kaztropol wrote:But to manage it, there's not a lot that's possible to do, except maybe change the storylines and casting for "romantic comedies" and Disney films. Afaik, the only Disney animation with a butt-ugly male protagonist was The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and afaik, Quasimodo there was just misshapen, rather than actually ugly, with bad skin etc. And he didn't get the girl that he fell in love with either.

Why should getting the girl in the end be considered the goal?


because disney princesses are powerful

they have always been

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26091
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heloin » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:48 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Heloin wrote:Why should getting the girl in the end be considered the goal?


because disney princesses are powerful

they have always been

Esmeralda isn't a princess.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38837
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:50 am

Heloin wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
because disney princesses are powerful

they have always been

Esmeralda isn't a princess.


you make a good point here...

However, Disney princesses (and female characters in general) are powerful players shaping future generations

at the leaning centre I work at for example, close to literally every 3rd little girl or so is obsessed with Elsa, princess Jasmine, Aurora etc

In fact, there is talk about the spillover effect of Frozen 2 when it gets released (it is expected that close to every girl will dress up as Elsa)

this is a huge, powerful shaping of norms I tell you...

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26091
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heloin » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:52 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Heloin wrote:Esmeralda isn't a princess.


you make a good point here...

However, Disney princesses (and female characters in general) are powerful players shaping future generations

at the leaning centre I work at for example, close to literally every 3rd little girl or so is obsessed with Elsa, princess Jasmine, Aurora etc

In fact, there is talk about the spillover effect of Frozen 2 when it gets released (it is expected that close to every girl will dress up as Elsa)

this is a huge, powerful shaping of norms I tell you...

And this has to do with treating getting the girl as a prize in films how?

User avatar
Kaztropol
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1056
Founded: Aug 30, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kaztropol » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:55 am

Heloin wrote:
Kaztropol wrote:But to manage it, there's not a lot that's possible to do, except maybe change the storylines and casting for "romantic comedies" and Disney films. Afaik, the only Disney animation with a butt-ugly male protagonist was The Hunchback of Notre Dame, and afaik, Quasimodo there was just misshapen, rather than actually ugly, with bad skin etc. And he didn't get the girl that he fell in love with either.

Why should getting the girl in the end be considered the goal?


That's part of the problem with the plots of these films and animations. The girl is the object/goal, rather than a person in their own right with their own aspirations. Seen as a puzzle to unlock with the proper method.

Compare the "romance" quests in videogames. Do this, do that, do this other thing, and character X will fall in love with the protagonist.

If you persist, and try different approaches, you will beat the puzzle and unlock the genitalia of the objective. That's the message that those films & animations send.

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sun Jun 23, 2019 6:55 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Heloin wrote:Why should getting the girl in the end be considered the goal?


because disney princesses are powerful

they have always been


Good princesses get into Heaven. Evil witches and evil queens get in everywhere.

User avatar
The Liberated Territories
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11858
Founded: Dec 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Liberated Territories » Sun Jun 23, 2019 7:12 am

Great Minarchistan wrote:
The Liberated Territories wrote:
This assumes that chad isn't fucking a larger proportion of them relative to the number.

It is, but the cohort "n" of chads within the market isn't large enough to constitute an actual threat


Maybe not, but that assumes strict monogamy, which isn't true. Humans are naturally hypergamous and polygamous.
Last edited by The Liberated Territories on Sun Jun 23, 2019 7:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig."
—Robert Heinlein

a libertarian, which means i want poor babies to die or smth

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:09 am

-Ocelot- wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:Why am I nauseous all of a sudden?


New to NationStates? You'll get used to such opinions don't worry.

Given that I've been here for two years, I'm not sure that I will.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:10 am

Kaztropol wrote:A lot of romantic comedies, and disney films, have a male character seek a romantic/sexual relationship with a female character, and the plot is contrived such that the male is persistent in their advances, until eventually the object of their affections finally gives in/realises something. Their persistence 'proves' them as a suitable mate or something.
But ofc, nobody wants to see some ugly dude in a film, so the characters are always played by attractive actors, occasionally uglied up with makeup etc. Heroes are good looking. Villains are ugly.

Beauty and the Beast.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:10 am

Cekoviu wrote:
-Ocelot- wrote:

New to NationStates? You'll get used to such opinions don't worry.

Given that I've been here for two years, I'm not sure that I will.


Supposedly once upon a time it was a liberal Hugbox.

Now the people from back then saying its a fascist Hugbox.

Makes you really think. Doesn't it?

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:16 am

Nakena wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:Given that I've been here for two years, I'm not sure that I will.


Supposedly once upon a time it was a liberal Hugbox.

Now the people from back then saying its a fascist Hugbox.

Makes you really think. Doesn't it?

It's more just a roach motel for extreme ideologues, I'd say.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Heloin
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26091
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Heloin » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:20 am

Cekoviu wrote:
Kaztropol wrote:A lot of romantic comedies, and disney films, have a male character seek a romantic/sexual relationship with a female character, and the plot is contrived such that the male is persistent in their advances, until eventually the object of their affections finally gives in/realises something. Their persistence 'proves' them as a suitable mate or something.
But ofc, nobody wants to see some ugly dude in a film, so the characters are always played by attractive actors, occasionally uglied up with makeup etc. Heroes are good looking. Villains are ugly.

Beauty and the Beast.

No one's a Chad like Gaston.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:22 am

Heloin wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:Beauty and the Beast.

No one's a Chad like Gaston.


All Disney heroes and villains are Chads. Except Scar. Scar was an incel.
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 62658
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:22 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Heloin wrote:No one's a Chad like Gaston.


All Disney heroes and villains are Chads. Except Scar. Scar was an incel.


How can someone be an incel when they have the voice of Jeremy Irons? :blush:
1. The Last Tech Modling
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. Size matters. Bigger is forbidden and won't give the mods pleasure.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202536
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:23 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
All Disney heroes and villains are Chads. Except Scar. Scar was an incel.


How can someone be an incel when they have the voice of Jeremy Irons? :blush:


It’s all in the forehead. *runs away*
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:25 am

Cekoviu wrote:
Nakena wrote:
Supposedly once upon a time it was a liberal Hugbox.

Now the people from back then saying its a fascist Hugbox.

Makes you really think. Doesn't it?

It's more just a roach motel for extreme ideologues, I'd say.


More for ideologized people. But generally I do not perceive it as an motel for extreme ideologues. It could be far worse. I also disagree with the notion that we're anywhere close to a /pol/ lite for a number of reasons. The alt-right and similar crowds never managed to gain a foothold here for very long.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:29 am

Nakena wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:It's more just a roach motel for extreme ideologues, I'd say.


More for ideologized people. But generally I do not perceive it as an motel for extreme ideologues. It could be far worse. I also disagree with the notion that we're anywhere close to a /pol/ lite for a number of reasons. The alt-right and similar crowds never managed to gain a foothold here for very long.

We do, however, have a disproportionate amount of fascists, anarchists, assorted sexists, and authoritarian communists.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Kaztropol
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1056
Founded: Aug 30, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kaztropol » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:37 am

Cekoviu wrote:
Kaztropol wrote:A lot of romantic comedies, and disney films, have a male character seek a romantic/sexual relationship with a female character, and the plot is contrived such that the male is persistent in their advances, until eventually the object of their affections finally gives in/realises something. Their persistence 'proves' them as a suitable mate or something.
But ofc, nobody wants to see some ugly dude in a film, so the characters are always played by attractive actors, occasionally uglied up with makeup etc. Heroes are good looking. Villains are ugly.

Beauty and the Beast.


Neither the animation or the live-action Disney film, have the Beast portrayed as a particularly monstrous individual. He appears as a well-groomed non-human individual. Not as a monster.

And the whole Beauty & the Beast tale is a bit creepy - the original versions were aimed at preparing young women for arranged marriages, while the Disney versions have Beauty agreeing to be the Beast's companion under duress, to save her father. And a bunch of other weird acts occurring under duress.

A relationship born out of duress and violent/dangerous situations is hardly ideal.

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17601
Founded: May 15, 2012
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Diopolis » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:38 am

Nakena wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:Given that I've been here for two years, I'm not sure that I will.


Supposedly once upon a time it was a liberal Hugbox.

Now the people from back then saying its a fascist Hugbox.

Makes you really think. Doesn't it?

I remember those days. It's not a fascist hugbox, but it is noticeably to the right of where it was.
Texas nationalist, 3rd positionist, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sun Jun 23, 2019 10:40 am

Kaztropol wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:Beauty and the Beast.


Neither the animation or the live-action Disney film, have the Beast portrayed as a particularly monstrous individual. He appears as a well-groomed non-human individual. Not as a monster.

And the whole Beauty & the Beast tale is a bit creepy - the original versions were aimed at preparing young women for arranged marriages, while the Disney versions have Beauty agreeing to be the Beast's companion under duress, to save her father. And a bunch of other weird acts occurring under duress.

A relationship born out of duress and violent/dangerous situations is hardly ideal.

Oh, absolutely, it's fucked up. But it is an example of a story where the man is not unambiguously a villain in the Disney version and is also ugly.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arvenia, Dimetrodon Empire, Ifreann, Marimaia, Picairn, Port Caverton, The Jamesian Republic

Advertisement

Remove ads