MAGAThread XVI: Raising the Barr

[Bear Stearns]

What about a right-wing reactionary coup that offs Trump for not going far enough?

Can you name one?

Pence, Session, Tillerson, Bannon, and the Boys

[Hurtful Thoughts]

Can you name one?

Pence, Session, Tillerson, Bannon, and the Boys

If Pence could have, he'd have been so on board with impeaching Trump that it've happened already.

And I don;t think the BSA is going to take-up an armed junta against the POTUS... ever.

And the others are for the most part reitred Supreme Court Justices. I don't figure any of them are in any condition to perch out with a sniper-rifle on the South Lawn to flip Trump's off-switch.

[Bear Stearns]

Make America Great Again

[Vassenor]

(Image)

Make America Great Again

So when did America stop being Great, and why?

[Bear Stearns]

(Image)

Make America Great Again

So when did America stop being Great, and why?

Jk, the decline started before them. 1965 did it in for us.

If Nixon had won in 1960 and not that thug shanty Irish alcoholic, we would have never gotten the '65 immigration act.

[Vassenor]

So when did America stop being Great, and why?

Jk, the decline started before them. 1965 did it in for us.

If Nixon had won in 1960 and not that thug shanty Irish alcoholic, we would have never gotten the '65 immigration act.

...So how did the abolition of immigration quotas ruin America?

[Tobleste]

It's almost as if Northern Davincia and Proctopeo are looking for reasons to not care...

Say what you will about alt right types but at least they'll be honest in their contempt for women.

Your meager attempt at libel has been noted.

I don't think you know what libel is.

[Tobleste]

It's almost as if Northern Davincia and Proctopeo are looking for reasons to not care...

Say what you will about alt right types but at least they'll be honest in their contempt for women.

>alt-right
As if you even know what that is.

I like that you take issue with my use of a political label to describe other people and not the part where I say I think you look like you're looking for excuses to ignore assault allegations.

[Tobleste]

Jk, the decline started before them. 1965 did it in for us.

If Nixon had won in 1960 and not that thug shanty Irish alcoholic, we would have never gotten the '65 immigration act.

...So how did the abolition of immigration quotas ruin America?

Given that he used the phrase "thug Irish shanty alcoholic", I can guess.

Wrt America not being great, it's just a vague phrase that speaks to republicans reactionary, elderly base. There's no specific issue being addressed. America never had a wall and Clintin was never in prison which is what most animates Trump. At most, the phrase refers to punishing certain oppressed groups that are 'out of line' (e.g. feminists, minorities, LGBT). More than likely it doesn't mean anything specifically though.

[Hurtful Thoughts]

...So how did the abolition of immigration quotas ruin America?

Given that he used the phrase "thug Irish shanty alcoholic", I can guess.

Wrt America not being great, it's just a vague phrase that speaks to republicans reactionary, elderly base. There's no specific issue being addressed. America never had a wall and Clintin was never in prison which is what most animates Trump. At most, the phrase refers to punishing certain oppressed groups that are 'out of line' (e.g. feminists, minorities, LGBT). More than likely it doesn't mean anything specifically though.

I'm not sure about that... doling out punishment sounds like work... maybe we can.. like... cut back on punishing people just in the hope to make less fortunate people feel less shitty about themselves?

Mindblow: Doing less is better than doing more.

I mean, if someone wants to build a statue in honor of Ted Bundy Hitler [it must always be hitler]... why not?

[Proctopeo]

Your meager attempt at libel has been noted.

I don't think you know what libel is.

You don't, clearly, but I do.

[Proctopeo]

You don't, clearly, but I do.

What did he post that was untrue?

Should be obvious, tbh. I don't feel the need to defend myself from blind attacks on my character.

[Gravlen]

Is it shortly after February 2017? You know, when he held his first campaign rally for his reelection campaign?

They need to make one of those wheel charts so that women know when the appropriate time to bring up sexual assault allegations is. It's so tricky.

February 29th, between 4 and 6. AM or PM? Well, if you have to ask you're surely not serious about your allegations.

---

Given that Ms. Carroll is an avowed liberal who hates the president and who has written several articles on how awful men are, it's hard to take her seriously here.

Because the veracity of criminal complaints are so often determined by the political positions of the accuser...

[Tobleste]

What did he post that was untrue?

Should be obvious, tbh. I don't feel the need to defend myself from blind attacks on my character.

It wasn't blind. It was based on your own words and I didn't imply anything worse than what you were implying.

Also, I think you're exaggerating the value of the reputation of your username. I'm pretty sure something only counts as libel if it causes real harm. I'll leave it there though. You're obviously an expert on law as well as the minds of people making sexual assault allegations so why question your wisdom?

[Northern Davincia]

>alt-right
As if you even know what that is.

I like that you take issue with my use of a political label to describe other people and not the part where I say I think you look like you're looking for excuses to ignore assault allegations.

I take issue with both, but it's much harder to have an honest discussion on a serious topic with someone who flagrantly mischaracterizes me.

Is it shortly after February 2017? You know, when he held his first campaign rally for his reelection campaign?

No.

[Gravlen]

I like that you take issue with my use of a political label to describe other people and not the part where I say I think you look like you're looking for excuses to ignore assault allegations.

I take issue with both, but it's much harder to have an honest discussion on a serious topic with someone who flagrantly mischaracterizes me.

Is it shortly after February 2017? You know, when he held his first campaign rally for his reelection campaign?

No.

"No" what? As your link says:

Trump filed formal notice of his re-election committee with the Federal Election Commission on the day of his inauguration, Jan. 20, 2017, and he already has held campaign events in the battleground states of Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin.

The man has been actively campaigning for over two years. So "no" what?

[Kowani]

(Image)

Make America Great Again

If we wanted to do that, we’d go back in time and make Reagan lose.

[Hurtful Thoughts]

(Image)

Make America Great Again

If we wanted to do that, we’d go back in time and make Reagan lose.

Or put him up for a 3rd term.

Depending on who you ask.

[Gormwood]

If we wanted to do that, we’d go back in time and make Reagan lose.

Or put him up for a 3rd term.

Depending on who you ask.

Right with the onset of Alzheimer's.

[Telconi]

Or put him up for a 3rd term.

Depending on who you ask.

Right with the onset of Alzheimer's.

Even forgetful Ronny Ray would be better than any option currently available.

[Ngelmish]

Right with the onset of Alzheimer's.

Even forgetful Ronny Ray would be better than any option currently available.

Wouldn't his support of various gun control measures be disqualifying?

[Telconi]

Even forgetful Ronny Ray would be better than any option currently available.

Wouldn't his support of various gun control measures be disqualifying?

Comparisons are hard.

[Ngelmish]

Wouldn't his support of various gun control measures be disqualifying?

Comparisons are hard.

Is that a "no?"

[Telconi]

Comparisons are hard.

Is that a "no?"

That should be obvious.

[Ngelmish]

Is that a "no?"

That should be obvious.

Not really. You could have been insinuating that comparisons are hard for me, in which case it would have been a dismissive and contemptuous "no" by implication without actually saying "no." Of course, it also could have been a concession that, because comparisons are "hard" or, inexact, that that would yes, have been a concern.

I can't, of course, imagine why you wouldn't want to give a plain answer to a question that highlights a certain inconsistency on your part, but whatever.