MAGAThread XVI: Raising the Barr

[Telconi]

I'd want a Democrat removed from office for being in the office whilst a Democrat.

In other words only those I like should be allowed to hold office. Thanks for once again confirming you want a one party state that can never lose power

Isn't that the point of impeachment, to remove people from office if they do bad things?

[Necroghastia]

In other words only those I like should be allowed to hold office. Thanks for once again confirming you want a one party state that can never lose power

Isn't that the point of impeachment, to remove people from office if they do bad things?

So all Democrats are criminals, is what you're saying.

[Chernoslavia]

Ah, so you support the repeal of the First Amendment.

The only Amendment that matters to him is the Second. You can come to a conclusion from there.

The 2nd Amendment matters the most. No second amendment, no 1st 3rd or any other bill of right.

[Telconi]

Quite a leap you've made there.

I don't see how.

Well there's the part where nobody mentioned the amendment, much less it's repeal. There's the part where someone is not entitled to be President under the 1st amendment. And there's the part where you're just pulling nonsense out of your ass for no apparent reason.

[Gormwood]

Ya'll fallin' for bait.

~Shrimp boats Shitposts are a comin'...~

[Telconi]

Isn't that the point of impeachment, to remove people from office if they do bad things?

So all Democrats are criminals, is what you're saying.

Criminality is not a requirement for impeachment.

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

I'd want a Democrat Catholic removed from office for being in the office whilst a Democrat Catholic.

Oops there went JFK's chances for Presidency.

[Telconi]

I'd want a Democrat Catholic removed from office for being in the office whilst a Democrat Catholic.

Oops there went JFK's chances for Presidency.

Well he's dead, so he doesn't presently have a chance.

[Necroghastia]

I don't see how.

Well there's the part where nobody mentioned the amendment, much less it's repeal. There's the part where someone is not entitled to be President under the 1st amendment. And there's the part where you're just pulling nonsense out of your ass for no apparent reason.

A person being removed from office solely due to political views is something that could only be accomplished by repealing the 1A. Don't pretend you didn't realize that.

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

Oops there went JFK's chances for Presidency.

Well he's dead, so he doesn't presently have a chance.

Notice the "went". I've emphasised the word for you.

[Telconi]

Well there's the part where nobody mentioned the amendment, much less it's repeal. There's the part where someone is not entitled to be President under the 1st amendment. And there's the part where you're just pulling nonsense out of your ass for no apparent reason.

A person being removed from office solely due to political views is something that could only be accomplished by repealing the 1A. Don't pretend you didn't realize that.

I'm sorry, I don't have weird precognition for people's nonsense.

[Telconi]

Well he's dead, so he doesn't presently have a chance.

Notice the "went". I've emphasised the word for you.

He didn't have a chance prior to my post, or your nonsensical editing of it.

[San Lumen]

So all Democrats are criminals, is what you're saying.

Criminality is not a requirement for impeachment.

I dont think many would take kindly to removing someone from office simply because the opposite party doesnt like that they won. What your saying is if one party wins every statewide office and the legislature is the opposite party they should remove every statewide official in the line of succession until someone of the their party takes the helm. That's the equivalent of a coup and saying we dont respect the outcome of elections

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

Today's MAGAThread: "Advocacy for fifth columnism is fine if you are against Democrats."

[Telconi]

Criminality is not a requirement for impeachment.

I dont think many would take kindly to removing someone from office simply because the opposite party doesnt like that they won. What your saying is if one party wins every statewide office and the legislature is the opposite party they should remove every statewide official in the line of succession until someone of the their party takes the helm. That's the equivalent of a coup and saying we dont respect the outcome of elections

I don't respect the outcome of elections that Democrats win. So. Yes.

[Telconi]

Today's MAGAThread: "Advocacy for fifth columnism is fine if you are against Democrats."

Fifth columnist is the sabotage of your own group to benefit enemies. This proposal is distinctly the opposite.

[Austria-Bohemia-Hungary]

Today's MAGAThread: "Advocacy for fifth columnism is fine if you are against Democrats."

Fifth columnist is the sabotage of your own group to benefit enemies. This proposal is distinctly the opposite.

I think we have different definitions on what constitutes an enemy to the United States. <.>

[San Lumen]

I dont think many would take kindly to removing someone from office simply because the opposite party doesnt like that they won. What your saying is if one party wins every statewide office and the legislature is the opposite party they should remove every statewide official in the line of succession until someone of the their party takes the helm. That's the equivalent of a coup and saying we dont respect the outcome of elections

I don't respect the outcome of elections that Democrats win. So. Yes.

yeah how dare anyone who has a different opinion be allowed to vote but you've made that position quite clear over the years.

[Telconi]

Fifth columnist is the sabotage of your own group to benefit enemies. This proposal is distinctly the opposite.

I think we have different definitions on what constitutes an enemy to the United States. <.>

I think so.

[Gormwood]

To bring back the thread from the baiting...

Lindsey Graham dishes on Trump in hoax calls with Russians

The substance of Graham’s conversation with Stolyarov, who was posing as Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar, is newly relevant in light of the South Carolina senator’s push for sanctions on Turkey as punishment for their offensive against the Kurds in northern Syria. Graham labeled the Kurds a “threat” to Turkey in the call, seemingly contradicting what he has said publicly in recent days.

Graham also mentions Trump’s personal interest in a “Turkish bank case” in the call that appears to refer to a U.S. case involving Reza Zarrab, an Iranian-Turkish gold trader and client of Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani. Bloomberg reported on Wednesday that Trump had asked then-Secretary of State Rex Tillerson in 2017 to help persuade the Justice Department to drop the Zarrab case.

So it looks like the assfucking of the Kurds may have a bit to do with trying to butter up Reggie.

[Telconi]

I don't respect the outcome of elections that Democrats win. So. Yes.

yeah how dare anyone who has a different opinion be allowed to vote but you've made that position quite clear over the years.

Nothing wrong with having a different opinion. There are plenty of people whom I disagree with who are still decent human beings.

[Gig em Aggies]

yeah how dare anyone who has a different opinion be allowed to vote but you've made that position quite clear over the years.

Nothing wrong with having a different opinion. There are plenty of people whom I disagree with who are still decent human beings.

even though it has nothing to do with Trump I think this is how Hollywood and the DNC as well as the GOP should look like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQriDfZkhmg

[The Black Forrest]

Ya'll fallin' for bait.

Hey! Watch where you point that!

[Salandriagado]

The only Amendment that matters to him is the Second. You can come to a conclusion from there.

The 2nd Amendment matters the most. No second amendment, no 1st 3rd or any other bill of right.

*Looks at Europe* Wrong again.

[Little St James Island]

Isn't that the point of impeachment, to remove people from office if they do bad things?

So all Democrats are criminals, is what you're saying.

That reminds me, how is Mr. Trump doing today? Has he caused any wars to start up lately? Hmmmmmmmm?

yeah how dare anyone who has a different opinion be allowed to vote but you've made that position quite clear over the years.

Nothing wrong with having a different opinion. There are plenty of people whom I disagree with who are still decent human beings.

Attaboy!