NATION

PASSWORD

Desmond Napoles or how gender 'liberation' can lead to abuse

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43454
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
All dance is essentially an athletic performance. It's why the people good at it are so incredibly fit.

What's your opinion on cheerleading?

In principle, cheerleading is fine. In practice, it's inappropriately sexualized.

What if cheerleading became a solely male activity, like it was in the early 20th century?
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Mon May 27, 2019 4:04 pm

New haven america wrote:
Scomagia wrote:In principle, cheerleading is fine. In practice, it's inappropriately sexualized.

What if cheerleading became a solely male activity, like it was in the early 20th century?

Provided the uniforms weren't designed to be sexually titillating beyond the needs of function, I think it'd be a fine activity.

Other middle and high school sports are also inappropriately sexualised, as well. My wife quit volleyball in high school, for example, because they began requiring the girls to wear uniforms that were inappropriately revealing but conveyed no athletic purpose.That is not something that should happen.
Last edited by Scomagia on Mon May 27, 2019 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41248
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Mon May 27, 2019 4:05 pm

Scomagia wrote:
New haven america wrote:What if cheerleading became a solely male activity, like it was in the early 20th century?

Provided the uniforms weren't designed to be sexually titillating beyond the needs of function, I think it'd be a fine activity.


High school cheerleading uniforms are sexually titillating?

User avatar
US-SSR
Minister
 
Posts: 2313
Founded: Aug 02, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby US-SSR » Mon May 27, 2019 4:05 pm

Toddlers in makeup and ball gowns pushed out on a stage to be judged, good. 11-year-old drag performers, bad. Got it.
8:46

We're not going to control the pandemic!

It is a slaughter and not just a political dispute.

"The scraps of narcissism, the rotten remnants of conspiracy theories, the offal of sour grievance, the half-eaten bits of resentment flow by. They do not cohere. But they move in the same, insistent current of self, self, self."

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40525
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon May 27, 2019 4:06 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:You think performing sexualized dancing is not athletic in nature and thus requires the least amount of resistance necessary?

What that kid is doing? Not really. He could do it badly and no one would care because sexual arousal is the goal, not artistic or athletic expression. This is an example of embracing tolerance to a moronic degree. You're seriously comparing child abuse to art and sport.

Nope, I never said whether I accept what the kid was doing. I am asking why you differentiate one activity that has a great deal of physical activity that requires freedom of motion from another that also requires a great deal of physical activity and freedom of motion. If this where not a kid, but rather an adult, would you say the same thing about it not being an activity that requires a great deal of freedom of motion, like every other dance?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43454
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Mon May 27, 2019 4:10 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Scomagia wrote:Provided the uniforms weren't designed to be sexually titillating beyond the needs of function, I think it'd be a fine activity.


High school cheerleading uniforms are sexually titillating?

Depends on the area. Some are conservative, some are basically pieces of tissue paper held together with shoe laces. (Actually, my 2 high schools were like this, 1 had really conservative uniforms and the other... did not)
Last edited by New haven america on Mon May 27, 2019 4:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Mon May 27, 2019 4:14 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Scomagia wrote:What that kid is doing? Not really. He could do it badly and no one would care because sexual arousal is the goal, not artistic or athletic expression. This is an example of embracing tolerance to a moronic degree. You're seriously comparing child abuse to art and sport.

Nope, I never said whether I accept what the kid was doing. I am asking why you differentiate one activity that has a great deal of physical activity that requires freedom of motion from another that also requires a great deal of physical activity and freedom of motion. If this where not a kid, but rather an adult, would you say the same thing about it not being an activity that requires a great deal of freedom of motion, like every other dance?

Well, there are plenty of strippers who are mediocre at best athletically but aren't really hurting for tips. But hey, I'll concede the point. To a degree, both require a minimum of athletic ability.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Scomagia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18703
Founded: Apr 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Scomagia » Mon May 27, 2019 4:15 pm

US-SSR wrote:Toddlers in makeup and ball gowns pushed out on a stage to be judged, good. 11-year-old drag performers, bad. Got it.

....Who are you talking to? I don't think OP or anyone else has said that.
Insert trite farewell here

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41248
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Mon May 27, 2019 4:19 pm

New haven america wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
High school cheerleading uniforms are sexually titillating?

Depends on the area. Some are conservative, some are basically pieces of tissue paper held together with shoe laces. (Actually, my 2 high schools were like this, 1 had really conservative uniforms and the other... did not)


As long as they're more covered than what they would wear for the beach then I have trouble finding a way to get bothered by it.

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Mon May 27, 2019 4:20 pm

New haven america wrote:
Scomagia wrote:In principle, cheerleading is fine. In practice, it's inappropriately sexualized.

What if cheerleading became a solely male activity, like it was in the early 20th century?


George W Bush was a cheerleader.

But unlike this kid, he was not exploited.

What happens when this little darling is no longer young and cute? It will be worse than McCauley Culkin
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76268
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:04 pm

Hasn’t this been done to death before?
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Mon May 27, 2019 5:11 pm

Scomagia wrote:
Liriena wrote:If the kid chose to do drag and dance lewdly of his own volition, without being groomed or coerced, then the only issue I see is that those responsible for his safety and public life have done a terrible job of curating the kind of adults he interacts with.

This sounds a lot like pedophile apologism. A child should not be dancing lewdly for adults, period, regardless of the type of adult. What the fuck, dude?

No, it's letting children express themselves and have fun apologia. If Desmond genuinely likes doing drag and dancing, without anyone's pressure, manipulation or coercion, I support him. I do not, however, support anyone exploiting him, sexually or otherwise, through his hobbies. If an adult acts inappropriately towards him, that adult won't get any excuses from me.

The lewd dancing is lewd and, yeah, ideally, a child wouldn't do it, but I'd argue that the problem would ultimately lie in whether we see that dancing, however "lewd" it might seem within our worldviews, as an invitation for inappropriate expressions or behavior from adults.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Nova Cyberia
Senator
 
Posts: 4456
Founded: May 06, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Cyberia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:18 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Nova Cyberia wrote:I said that pedophiles have tried to weasel their way into the LGBT movement. I didn't say they were successful, nor did I say gay people are more likely to be pedophiles or anything of the sort.

Which I correctly framed as part of the long, long history to erroneously associate pedophilia with LGBT regardless of there being no correlation.

No, you didn't. You've been fallaciously trying to strawman my argument from the beginning.

And then provided the historical context and how that association exists solely in the minds of people trying to stir up fear and derision towards LGBT.

It is fascinating to see someone so mind-numbingly arrogant that they try and tell others what their views are.

Pathetic.

We have yet to see any evidence for your claims, however.

You don't even seem to understand what my claims are. I could break out the crayons, but I doubt it would help you strawman less, dear.
Last edited by Nova Cyberia on Mon May 27, 2019 5:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yes, yes, I get it. I'm racist and fascist because I disagree with you. Can we skip that part? I've heard it a million times before and I guarantee it won't be any different when you do it
##############
American Nationalist
Third Positionist Gang

User avatar
Nova Cyberia
Senator
 
Posts: 4456
Founded: May 06, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Cyberia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:21 pm

Liriena wrote:
Scomagia wrote:This sounds a lot like pedophile apologism. A child should not be dancing lewdly for adults, period, regardless of the type of adult. What the fuck, dude?

No, it's letting children express themselves and have fun apologia. If Desmond genuinely likes doing drag and dancing, without anyone's pressure, manipulation or coercion, I support him. I do not, however, support anyone exploiting him, sexually or otherwise, through his hobbies. If an adult acts inappropriately towards him, that adult won't get any excuses from me.

The lewd dancing is lewd and, yeah, ideally, a child wouldn't do it, but I'd argue that the problem would ultimately lie in whether we see that dancing, however "lewd" it might seem within our worldviews, as an invitation for inappropriate expressions or behavior from adults.

You're suggesting the kid shaking his ass isn't a problem but the adults getting turned on by it is?

Why not both?
Yes, yes, I get it. I'm racist and fascist because I disagree with you. Can we skip that part? I've heard it a million times before and I guarantee it won't be any different when you do it
##############
American Nationalist
Third Positionist Gang

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41616
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Mon May 27, 2019 5:23 pm

Nova Cyberia wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Which I correctly framed as part of the long, long history to erroneously associate pedophilia with LGBT regardless of there being no correlation.

No, you didn't. You've been fallaciously trying to strawman my argument from the beginning.

And then provided the historical context and how that association exists solely in the minds of people trying to stir up fear and derision towards LGBT.

It is fascinating to see someone so mind-numbingly arrogant that they try and tell others what their views are.

Pathetic.

We have yet to see any evidence for your claims, however.

You don't even seem to understand what my claims are. I could break out the crayons, but I doubt it would help you strawman less, dear.
Cannot think of a name wrote:
Nova Cyberia wrote:Because pedophiles have been trying to weasel their way into the LGBT movement for quite some time. Now people read news article about a kid shaking his ass on stage and it seems to primarily be LGBT people and leftists who defend him.

That's why.

No, people have been trying to equate pedophiles with LGBT for quite some time now to the point that people buy into that association without thinking about it.

Perhaps the issue is you don't know what the word 'equate' means.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41248
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Mon May 27, 2019 5:23 pm

Nova Cyberia wrote:
Liriena wrote:No, it's letting children express themselves and have fun apologia. If Desmond genuinely likes doing drag and dancing, without anyone's pressure, manipulation or coercion, I support him. I do not, however, support anyone exploiting him, sexually or otherwise, through his hobbies. If an adult acts inappropriately towards him, that adult won't get any excuses from me.

The lewd dancing is lewd and, yeah, ideally, a child wouldn't do it, but I'd argue that the problem would ultimately lie in whether we see that dancing, however "lewd" it might seem within our worldviews, as an invitation for inappropriate expressions or behavior from adults.

You're suggesting the kid shaking his ass isn't a problem but the adults getting turned on by it is?

Why not both?


Kids copy what they see. To stop them doing it we'd have to basically ban music videos.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Mon May 27, 2019 5:25 pm

Nova Cyberia wrote:
Liriena wrote:No, it's letting children express themselves and have fun apologia. If Desmond genuinely likes doing drag and dancing, without anyone's pressure, manipulation or coercion, I support him. I do not, however, support anyone exploiting him, sexually or otherwise, through his hobbies. If an adult acts inappropriately towards him, that adult won't get any excuses from me.

The lewd dancing is lewd and, yeah, ideally, a child wouldn't do it, but I'd argue that the problem would ultimately lie in whether we see that dancing, however "lewd" it might seem within our worldviews, as an invitation for inappropriate expressions or behavior from adults.

You're suggesting the kid shaking his ass isn't a problem but the adults getting turned on by it is?

Why not both?

Because ass shaking being seen as inherently sexual and inappropriate is not something divinely or naturally determined and we shouldn't just reflexively repress a boy if he's doing it for innocent fun just because we've internalized through our culture that ass shaking = slutty.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Jack Thomas Lang
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1856
Founded: Apr 18, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Jack Thomas Lang » Mon May 27, 2019 5:27 pm

Liriena wrote:Because ass shaking being seen as inherently sexual and inappropriate is not something divinely or naturally determined and we shouldn't just reflexively repress a boy if he's doing it for innocent fun just because we've internalized through our culture that ass shaking = slutty.

I think there's a difference between ass shaking for fun, and ass shaking for a performance in front of adults at bars.

The first might be innocent fun, the second, hardly.

User avatar
Nova Cyberia
Senator
 
Posts: 4456
Founded: May 06, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Cyberia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:27 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Nova Cyberia wrote:No, you didn't. You've been fallaciously trying to strawman my argument from the beginning.


It is fascinating to see someone so mind-numbingly arrogant that they try and tell others what their views are.

Pathetic.


You don't even seem to understand what my claims are. I could break out the crayons, but I doubt it would help you strawman less, dear.
Cannot think of a name wrote:No, people have been trying to equate pedophiles with LGBT for quite some time now to the point that people buy into that association without thinking about it.

Perhaps the issue is you don't know what the word 'equate' means.

Perhaps the issue is that your incapable of understanding that recognizing that pedophiles have attempted to weasel their way into the LGBT movement doesn't really mean that you also thinking that gay people are prone to raping kids.

You can have one without the other. But of course this is a fairly simple concept so you probably won't understand it.
Last edited by Nova Cyberia on Mon May 27, 2019 5:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Yes, yes, I get it. I'm racist and fascist because I disagree with you. Can we skip that part? I've heard it a million times before and I guarantee it won't be any different when you do it
##############
American Nationalist
Third Positionist Gang

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Mon May 27, 2019 5:27 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Nova Cyberia wrote:You're suggesting the kid shaking his ass isn't a problem but the adults getting turned on by it is?

Why not both?


Kids copy what they see. To stop them doing it we'd have to basically ban music videos.

And double entendres in kid's movies.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Nova Cyberia
Senator
 
Posts: 4456
Founded: May 06, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Cyberia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:28 pm

Liriena wrote:
Nova Cyberia wrote:You're suggesting the kid shaking his ass isn't a problem but the adults getting turned on by it is?

Why not both?

Because ass shaking being seen as inherently sexual and inappropriate is not something divinely or naturally determined and we shouldn't just reflexively repress a boy if he's doing it for innocent fun just because we've internalized through our culture that ass shaking = slutty.

This might come as something of a shock but people do sometimes have a natural sexual attraction to butts, much in the same way people sometimes have a natural sexual attraction to breasts.

Next you're gonna tell me that fingering yourself isn't inherently sexual.
Yes, yes, I get it. I'm racist and fascist because I disagree with you. Can we skip that part? I've heard it a million times before and I guarantee it won't be any different when you do it
##############
American Nationalist
Third Positionist Gang

User avatar
Nova Cyberia
Senator
 
Posts: 4456
Founded: May 06, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Cyberia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:29 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Nova Cyberia wrote:You're suggesting the kid shaking his ass isn't a problem but the adults getting turned on by it is?

Why not both?


Kids copy what they see. To stop them doing it we'd have to basically ban music videos.

Or parents could just teach their kids not to shake their asses tor adults. But hey, maybe that's just too difficult.
Yes, yes, I get it. I'm racist and fascist because I disagree with you. Can we skip that part? I've heard it a million times before and I guarantee it won't be any different when you do it
##############
American Nationalist
Third Positionist Gang

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Mon May 27, 2019 5:30 pm

Jack Thomas Lang wrote:
Liriena wrote:Because ass shaking being seen as inherently sexual and inappropriate is not something divinely or naturally determined and we shouldn't just reflexively repress a boy if he's doing it for innocent fun just because we've internalized through our culture that ass shaking = slutty.

I think there's a difference between ass shaking for fun, and ass shaking for a performance in front of adults at bars.

The first might be innocent fun, the second, hardly.

The thing is... even in the latter case, the meaning of it is social. We interpret it as inappropriate because (not without reason) we associate bars in general, and gay bars in particular, with inappropriate behavior.

Buuuuuuut that's not really a given, although it is commonly true, partially because of the self-fulfilling prophecy of societal expectations.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41248
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Fartsniffage » Mon May 27, 2019 5:32 pm

Nova Cyberia wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Kids copy what they see. To stop them doing it we'd have to basically ban music videos.

Or parents could just teach their kids not to shake their asses tor adults. But hey, maybe that's just too difficult.


And we're back to whether you want to ban dance recitals for kids?

User avatar
Communist Zombie Horde
Diplomat
 
Posts: 942
Founded: Jan 04, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Communist Zombie Horde » Mon May 27, 2019 5:32 pm

It is a problem that these bars exist. There should be police raids finding pedophilic activities.
NS Parliament: Arnold Delbert; National People's Party

This nation is not entirely representative of my views. I've had some fun with the stats and I want to keep them that way.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fartsniffage, Msaeachubaets, New Stonen, Ostroeuropa, Port Caverton, Rary, The Archregimancy, Wartime Wallowis

Advertisement

Remove ads