What if cheerleading became a solely male activity, like it was in the early 20th century?
Advertisement

by New haven america » Mon May 27, 2019 4:02 pm

by Scomagia » Mon May 27, 2019 4:04 pm

by Fartsniffage » Mon May 27, 2019 4:05 pm

by US-SSR » Mon May 27, 2019 4:05 pm

by Neutraligon » Mon May 27, 2019 4:06 pm
Scomagia wrote:Neutraligon wrote:You think performing sexualized dancing is not athletic in nature and thus requires the least amount of resistance necessary?
What that kid is doing? Not really. He could do it badly and no one would care because sexual arousal is the goal, not artistic or athletic expression. This is an example of embracing tolerance to a moronic degree. You're seriously comparing child abuse to art and sport.

by New haven america » Mon May 27, 2019 4:10 pm

by Scomagia » Mon May 27, 2019 4:14 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Scomagia wrote:What that kid is doing? Not really. He could do it badly and no one would care because sexual arousal is the goal, not artistic or athletic expression. This is an example of embracing tolerance to a moronic degree. You're seriously comparing child abuse to art and sport.
Nope, I never said whether I accept what the kid was doing. I am asking why you differentiate one activity that has a great deal of physical activity that requires freedom of motion from another that also requires a great deal of physical activity and freedom of motion. If this where not a kid, but rather an adult, would you say the same thing about it not being an activity that requires a great deal of freedom of motion, like every other dance?

by Scomagia » Mon May 27, 2019 4:15 pm
US-SSR wrote:Toddlers in makeup and ball gowns pushed out on a stage to be judged, good. 11-year-old drag performers, bad. Got it.

by Fartsniffage » Mon May 27, 2019 4:19 pm
New haven america wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
High school cheerleading uniforms are sexually titillating?
Depends on the area. Some are conservative, some are basically pieces of tissue paper held together with shoe laces. (Actually, my 2 high schools were like this, 1 had really conservative uniforms and the other... did not)

by Pope Joan » Mon May 27, 2019 4:20 pm

by Thermodolia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:04 pm

by Liriena » Mon May 27, 2019 5:11 pm
Scomagia wrote:Liriena wrote:If the kid chose to do drag and dance lewdly of his own volition, without being groomed or coerced, then the only issue I see is that those responsible for his safety and public life have done a terrible job of curating the kind of adults he interacts with.
This sounds a lot like pedophile apologism. A child should not be dancing lewdly for adults, period, regardless of the type of adult. What the fuck, dude?
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Nova Cyberia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:18 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Nova Cyberia wrote:I said that pedophiles have tried to weasel their way into the LGBT movement. I didn't say they were successful, nor did I say gay people are more likely to be pedophiles or anything of the sort.
Which I correctly framed as part of the long, long history to erroneously associate pedophilia with LGBT regardless of there being no correlation.
And then provided the historical context and how that association exists solely in the minds of people trying to stir up fear and derision towards LGBT.
We have yet to see any evidence for your claims, however.

by Nova Cyberia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:21 pm
Liriena wrote:Scomagia wrote:This sounds a lot like pedophile apologism. A child should not be dancing lewdly for adults, period, regardless of the type of adult. What the fuck, dude?
No, it's letting children express themselves and have fun apologia. If Desmond genuinely likes doing drag and dancing, without anyone's pressure, manipulation or coercion, I support him. I do not, however, support anyone exploiting him, sexually or otherwise, through his hobbies. If an adult acts inappropriately towards him, that adult won't get any excuses from me.
The lewd dancing is lewd and, yeah, ideally, a child wouldn't do it, but I'd argue that the problem would ultimately lie in whether we see that dancing, however "lewd" it might seem within our worldviews, as an invitation for inappropriate expressions or behavior from adults.
by Cannot think of a name » Mon May 27, 2019 5:23 pm
Nova Cyberia wrote:Cannot think of a name wrote:Which I correctly framed as part of the long, long history to erroneously associate pedophilia with LGBT regardless of there being no correlation.
No, you didn't. You've been fallaciously trying to strawman my argument from the beginning.And then provided the historical context and how that association exists solely in the minds of people trying to stir up fear and derision towards LGBT.
It is fascinating to see someone so mind-numbingly arrogant that they try and tell others what their views are.
Pathetic.We have yet to see any evidence for your claims, however.
You don't even seem to understand what my claims are. I could break out the crayons, but I doubt it would help you strawman less, dear.
Cannot think of a name wrote:Nova Cyberia wrote:Because pedophiles have been trying to weasel their way into the LGBT movement for quite some time. Now people read news article about a kid shaking his ass on stage and it seems to primarily be LGBT people and leftists who defend him.
That's why.
No, people have been trying to equate pedophiles with LGBT for quite some time now to the point that people buy into that association without thinking about it.

by Fartsniffage » Mon May 27, 2019 5:23 pm
Nova Cyberia wrote:Liriena wrote:No, it's letting children express themselves and have fun apologia. If Desmond genuinely likes doing drag and dancing, without anyone's pressure, manipulation or coercion, I support him. I do not, however, support anyone exploiting him, sexually or otherwise, through his hobbies. If an adult acts inappropriately towards him, that adult won't get any excuses from me.
The lewd dancing is lewd and, yeah, ideally, a child wouldn't do it, but I'd argue that the problem would ultimately lie in whether we see that dancing, however "lewd" it might seem within our worldviews, as an invitation for inappropriate expressions or behavior from adults.
You're suggesting the kid shaking his ass isn't a problem but the adults getting turned on by it is?
Why not both?

by Liriena » Mon May 27, 2019 5:25 pm
Nova Cyberia wrote:Liriena wrote:No, it's letting children express themselves and have fun apologia. If Desmond genuinely likes doing drag and dancing, without anyone's pressure, manipulation or coercion, I support him. I do not, however, support anyone exploiting him, sexually or otherwise, through his hobbies. If an adult acts inappropriately towards him, that adult won't get any excuses from me.
The lewd dancing is lewd and, yeah, ideally, a child wouldn't do it, but I'd argue that the problem would ultimately lie in whether we see that dancing, however "lewd" it might seem within our worldviews, as an invitation for inappropriate expressions or behavior from adults.
You're suggesting the kid shaking his ass isn't a problem but the adults getting turned on by it is?
Why not both?
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Jack Thomas Lang » Mon May 27, 2019 5:27 pm
Liriena wrote:Because ass shaking being seen as inherently sexual and inappropriate is not something divinely or naturally determined and we shouldn't just reflexively repress a boy if he's doing it for innocent fun just because we've internalized through our culture that ass shaking = slutty.

by Nova Cyberia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:27 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:Nova Cyberia wrote:No, you didn't. You've been fallaciously trying to strawman my argument from the beginning.
It is fascinating to see someone so mind-numbingly arrogant that they try and tell others what their views are.
Pathetic.
You don't even seem to understand what my claims are. I could break out the crayons, but I doubt it would help you strawman less, dear.Cannot think of a name wrote:No, people have been trying to equate pedophiles with LGBT for quite some time now to the point that people buy into that association without thinking about it.
Perhaps the issue is you don't know what the word 'equate' means.

by Liriena » Mon May 27, 2019 5:27 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Nova Cyberia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:28 pm
Liriena wrote:Nova Cyberia wrote:You're suggesting the kid shaking his ass isn't a problem but the adults getting turned on by it is?
Why not both?
Because ass shaking being seen as inherently sexual and inappropriate is not something divinely or naturally determined and we shouldn't just reflexively repress a boy if he's doing it for innocent fun just because we've internalized through our culture that ass shaking = slutty.

by Nova Cyberia » Mon May 27, 2019 5:29 pm

by Liriena » Mon May 27, 2019 5:30 pm
Jack Thomas Lang wrote:Liriena wrote:Because ass shaking being seen as inherently sexual and inappropriate is not something divinely or naturally determined and we shouldn't just reflexively repress a boy if he's doing it for innocent fun just because we've internalized through our culture that ass shaking = slutty.
I think there's a difference between ass shaking for fun, and ass shaking for a performance in front of adults at bars.
The first might be innocent fun, the second, hardly.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Fartsniffage » Mon May 27, 2019 5:32 pm

by Communist Zombie Horde » Mon May 27, 2019 5:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fartsniffage, Msaeachubaets, New Stonen, Ostroeuropa, Port Caverton, Rary, The Archregimancy, Wartime Wallowis
Advertisement