Highest Court in Brazil Rules Homophobia a Crime

[Nakena]

Yes, so I'd be delighted to hear how this somehow is equivalent to saying they should be shot?

So what would the end result of the black-bagging be?

Obviously the strong and masculine american chad marines need to put those sweet effeminate brazilian gays to the bottom place where they belong to be.

[Arayas]

Good on them, though I fear Bolsonaro will try to overturn this sooner or later.



Imagine being so afraid of gay people that you'd illegally invade a foreign country just to arrest the judges of their high court because they enacted a ruling meant to protect the marginalized LGBTQ+ community in that country.

But if we let gays be gay then...then...degeneracy!

Well we wouldn't have Desmond dancing for money in gay bars and being sponsored by sex shops and fetishwear companies.

[Vassenor]

But if we let gays be gay then...then...degeneracy!

Well we wouldn't have Desmond dancing for money in gay bars and being sponsored by sex shops and fetishwear companies.

Because how dare people make a living.

[Kannap]

Arrested for what?

Criminal support of gay rights.

judges on the Supreme Court doing their job? That's a paddlin'.

[Leonixion]

Ah, yes. Cultural spread wouldn’t have happened anyway. I don’t suppose you’re opposed to merchants spreading Christianity to pagan Europe?

Again strawman. Not Christian. If cultures want to retain their distinctions based on biological sex, why do you want to fight it?

[Arcturus Novus]

But if we let gays be gay then...then...degeneracy!

Well we wouldn't have Desmond dancing for money in gay bars and being sponsored by sex shops and fetishwear companies.

Bold of you to assume that we gays are all okay with that. No one should be profiting off child exploitation.

[Torrocca]

But if we let gays be gay then...then...degeneracy!

Well we wouldn't have Desmond dancing for money in gay bars and being sponsored by sex shops and fetishwear companies.

>TFW one kid being sexploited means the entire LGBTQ+ community is suddenly, unequivocally a-okay with sexualizing children for money

10/10

[Arayas]

Well we wouldn't have Desmond dancing for money in gay bars and being sponsored by sex shops and fetishwear companies.

Because how dare people make a living.

So sexual explotaion of children is just making a living?
Your really not helping your case here.

[Leonixion]

Bold of you to assume that we gays are all okay with that. No one should be profiting off child exploitation.

If your main concern is about the money and the child work and not the fact that he's in bars, twerking in front of grown ups, in an environment filled with drugs and abusers, I can't do anything for you.

[Vassenor]

Because how dare people make a living.

So sexual explotaion of children is just making a living?
Your really not helping your case here.

You never said anything about children.

[Leonixion]

>TFW one kid being sexploited means the entire LGBTQ+ community is suddenly, unequivocally a-okay with sexualizing children for money

10/10

Well, her mother hide her bullshit behind "gay rights" and "gender identity" and people are buying into that.

[Arcturus Novus]

Bold of you to assume that we gays are all okay with that. No one should be profiting off child exploitation.

If your main concern is about the money and the child work and not the fact that he's in bars, twerking in front of grown ups, in an environment filled with drugs and abusers, I can't do anything for you.

I didn't say that was my main concern. Child exploitation is always awful. The fact that people are making money off of it is even worse.

[Leonixion]

You never said anything about children.

Learn to read. They said Desmond.

[Arayas]

Well we wouldn't have Desmond dancing for money in gay bars and being sponsored by sex shops and fetishwear companies.

>TFW one kid being sexploited means the entire LGBTQ+ community is suddenly, unequivocally a-okay with sexualizing children for money

10/10

Doesn't matter, the "community" is the shield that's used to allow this behavior.
And I haven't seen any mass condemnation of it which is as good as endorsing it.

[Loben The 2nd]

Well we wouldn't have Desmond dancing for money in gay bars and being sponsored by sex shops and fetishwear companies.

Because how dare people make a living.

An underaged kid in a bar, stripping.

And people say the slippery slope is just a fallacy.

*honk*

[Vassenor]

You never said anything about children.

Learn to read. They said Desmond.

Devoid of context, that's just a given name.

[Vassenor]

Because how dare people make a living.

An underaged kid in a bar, stripping.

And people say the slippery slope is just a fallacy.

*honk*

None of which was mentioned in the original post. Put the goalposts back.

[Leonixion]

I didn't say that was my main concern. Child exploitation is always awful. The fact that people are making money off of it is even worse.

The money is probably the least important thing for me and on the other hand is probably the only valid (shitty) justification in my opinion.

[Loben The 2nd]

An underaged kid in a bar, stripping.

And people say the slippery slope is just a fallacy.

*honk*

None of which was mentioned in the original post. Put the goalposts back.

No.


Pretty sure when Desmond was mentioned everyone knows what’s implied.

[Leonixion]

Devoid of context, that's just a given name.

Then read about it.

[Torrocca]

>TFW one kid being sexploited means the entire LGBTQ+ community is suddenly, unequivocally a-okay with sexualizing children for money

10/10

Doesn't matter, the "community" is the shield that's used to allow this behavior.

Ah, yes, so because pedophiles use the LGBTQ+ community as a shield means that the LGBTQ+ community supports them. Right.

And I haven't seen any mass condemnation of it which is as good as endorsing it.

Because clearly everybody and their mother knows about this one specific thing. Right.

[Vassenor]

None of which was mentioned in the original post. Put the goalposts back.

No.


Pretty sure when Desmond was mentioned everyone knows what’s implied.

Use of a random given name can do that?

[Necroghastia]

None of which was mentioned in the original post. Put the goalposts back.

No.


Pretty sure when Desmond was mentioned everyone knows what’s implied.

I have no idea what you people are talking about, tbqh.

[Leonixion]

Doesn't matter, the "community" is the shield that's used to allow this behavior.

Ah, yes, so because pedophiles use the LGBTQ+ community as a shield means that the LGBTQ+ community supports them. Right.

And I haven't seen any mass condemnation of it which is as good as endorsing it.

Because clearly everybody and their mother knows about this one specific thing. Right.

Big drag queens made shows with him.

[Vassenor]

Devoid of context, that's just a given name.

Then read about it.

#notmyjobtoeducateyou

And I haven't seen any mass condemnation of it which is as good as endorsing it.

See, when I use the "lack of explicit condemnation is tacit endorsement" line, I'm being sarcastic.

I didn't think people would actually crack it out seriously.