Advertisement
by Diopolis » Mon May 20, 2019 4:06 pm
by Scomagia » Mon May 20, 2019 4:06 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Aureumterra wrote:Iran: Screams “Death to America” in government
Pacifists: Iran means no harm, now Saudi is the REAL problem
sounds legit
I’m no pacifist yet I realize that KSA is a real problem, one that’s bigger than Iran. Iran might scream “death to America” but the KSA actually finds it
by Scomagia » Mon May 20, 2019 4:07 pm
Diopolis wrote:For the life of me, I’ve never been able to understand why the US has such a compelling interest in a desert on the other side of the world that we already invaded two countries.
I certainly don’t see any reason to invade a third.
by Diopolis » Mon May 20, 2019 4:09 pm
Scomagia wrote:Diopolis wrote:For the life of me, I’ve never been able to understand why the US has such a compelling interest in a desert on the other side of the world that we already invaded two countries.
I certainly don’t see any reason to invade a third.
If they attack us like they've been threatening, that seems like reason enough.
by Scomagia » Mon May 20, 2019 4:13 pm
by Kowani » Mon May 20, 2019 4:14 pm
Scomagia wrote:Diopolis wrote:Yes, but see, they haven’t done that.
And we aren't at war. See how simple that is? They threaten, we threaten, and it goes on like that until they actually start some shit. I love the America haters pretending like we're just going to go fuck up Iran without provocation or something. It's so silly.
by Aclion » Mon May 20, 2019 4:15 pm
Scomagia wrote:Diopolis wrote:Yes, but see, they haven’t done that.
And we aren't at war. See how simple that is? They threaten, we threaten, and it goes on like that until they actually start some shit. I love the America haters pretending like we're just going to go fuck up Iran without provocation or something. It's so silly.
by Thermodolia » Mon May 20, 2019 4:18 pm
by Thermodolia » Mon May 20, 2019 4:20 pm
Scomagia wrote:Diopolis wrote:For the life of me, I’ve never been able to understand why the US has such a compelling interest in a desert on the other side of the world that we already invaded two countries.
I certainly don’t see any reason to invade a third.
If they attack us like they've been threatening, that seems like reason enough.
by Zhivotnoye » Mon May 20, 2019 4:23 pm
Badb Catha wrote:The Iranian people are largely disapproving of their government and have always been. Those who overthrew Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi were a weak minority then and still are a weak minority to this day. I believe pressing the Iranian people into action will be much more effective and much less destabilizing for the country - Iranians know their country and government better, and with foreign backing can easily overthrow their unloved government. They may very well be able to do so legally and without violence, which is ultimately the preferred outcome and certainly not something an invading army can accomplish. If they succeed they may very well be able to return to the prosperous times they enjoyed under the reign of the Pahlavi Dynasty or perhaps even greater.
by Thermodolia » Mon May 20, 2019 4:23 pm
Aclion wrote:Scomagia wrote:And we aren't at war. See how simple that is? They threaten, we threaten, and it goes on like that until they actually start some shit. I love the America haters pretending like we're just going to go fuck up Iran without provocation or something. It's so silly.
Well a major war is the only way the can hope to avoid a pounding in the next election.
by Aclion » Mon May 20, 2019 4:24 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Aclion wrote:Well a major war is the only way the can hope to avoid a pounding in the next election.
The backslash against Trump would be massive if he tried that. 20,000 Americans are projected to die in the first months of the war, in that same time frame we are expected to lose an entire carrier group.
The protests this thing would cause would make Vietnam protests look like a fucking picnic
by Nakena » Mon May 20, 2019 4:26 pm
Zhivotnoye wrote:snip
by Thermodolia » Mon May 20, 2019 4:27 pm
Aclion wrote:Thermodolia wrote:The backslash against Trump would be massive if he tried that. 20,000 Americans are projected to die in the first months of the war, in that same time frame we are expected to lose an entire carrier group.
The protests this thing would cause would make Vietnam protests look like a fucking picnic
No I mean a major war is the only way the democrats can avoid a pounding.
by The Montana Enclave » Mon May 20, 2019 4:30 pm
Upper Saust Latiegebestica wrote:Heloin wrote:Iran does a lot of shit, but Saudi Arabia does the exact same thing in spades. Theocratic states run mostly by extremists who believe America is the greatest threat to their exact version of Islam, and who fund terrorist groups around the world.
The 2 greatest US allies in the Middle East.
1. Israel, the only true democracy in the Middle East
2. Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is a different Islam than Iran (I forgot whether it was sunni or shia and don't want to offend the muslims almos certain to weigh in) And we used to get a lot of our oil from them until Trump came along.
by Zhivotnoye » Mon May 20, 2019 4:36 pm
by Badb Catha » Mon May 20, 2019 4:43 pm
Zhivotnoye wrote:Badb Catha wrote:The Iranian people are largely disapproving of their government and have always been. Those who overthrew Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi were a weak minority then and still are a weak minority to this day. I believe pressing the Iranian people into action will be much more effective and much less destabilizing for the country - Iranians know their country and government better, and with foreign backing can easily overthrow their unloved government. They may very well be able to do so legally and without violence, which is ultimately the preferred outcome and certainly not something an invading army can accomplish. If they succeed they may very well be able to return to the prosperous times they enjoyed under the reign of the Pahlavi Dynasty or perhaps even greater.
I truely wonder where you get this nonsense from.
by Badb Catha » Mon May 20, 2019 4:57 pm
by Sidesh0w B0b » Mon May 20, 2019 4:58 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Crockerland wrote:The Dalai Lama: If somebody is shooting at you, it makes sense to shoot back
Le ebin western "pacifists": Umm sweetie I follow buddha's teachings and if the Iranians want to blow you up with nuclear bombs you should just let them , read the bible
There are other ways to stop Iran from gaining nuclear weapons than killing 20,000 Americans and wiping out an entire fleet
by Scomagia » Mon May 20, 2019 5:09 pm
Kowani wrote:Scomagia wrote:And we aren't at war. See how simple that is? They threaten, we threaten, and it goes on like that until they actually start some shit. I love the America haters pretending like we're just going to go fuck up Iran without provocation or something. It's so silly.
To be fair, America’s done that before.
by Scomagia » Mon May 20, 2019 5:11 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Scomagia wrote:If they attack us like they've been threatening, that seems like reason enough.
They’ve threatened us for the last 30+ years. They aren’t going to do shit. It’s a move to keep themselves in power because the idea is that they can focus anger at a foreign target instead of themselves
by Scomagia » Mon May 20, 2019 5:11 pm
Aclion wrote:Thermodolia wrote:The backslash against Trump would be massive if he tried that. 20,000 Americans are projected to die in the first months of the war, in that same time frame we are expected to lose an entire carrier group.
The protests this thing would cause would make Vietnam protests look like a fucking picnic
No I mean a major war is the only way the democrats can avoid a pounding.
by Kowani » Mon May 20, 2019 5:13 pm
by Zhivotnoye » Mon May 20, 2019 5:30 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aelyria, Ancientania, Cyptopir, Ethel mermania, Foxyshire, Keltionialang, Kostane, Ors Might, Shrillland, The Jamesian Republic, Tiami, Tungstan, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement