NationStates

Torrocca wrote:

Pasong Tirad wrote:This image isn't even from Rojava - nor is it about Rojava Kurds. It's from a protest in France by Turkish Kurds demanding the release of Abdullah Öcalan. Do better, OP.

But they're not following OP's brand of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Stalinism-Hoxhaism-Anti-LGBTQ+ism-Whateverism, so that's clearly a bad thing!

Communal concils wrote:

Torrocca wrote:
But they're not following OP's brand of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Stalinism-Hoxhaism-Anti-LGBTQ+ism-Whateverism, so that's clearly a bad thing!

I did it to show that rojava is beloved by some westerners. Nothing more, nothingness.

Also, Your joke is not true. Clearly a foolish attempt of anarchist comedy, which is very childish . I identify as a Democratic socialist, that is because I believe that socialism is best achieve through a ballot.

Communal concils wrote:

Pasong Tirad wrote:This. Rojava beat the shit out of ISIS and will oppose to the death the Sultan in Ankara. That alone, in my view, has earned Rojava its right to statehood or, at the very least, a greater level of autonomy from Assad, which will be possible if the much-discussed federalization of Syria continues.

Well, I would support the very ideal of federalization. Though, the kurds should not depend on the US. They might be able to come to a conclusion with Assad.

We just have to see until Idlib is retaken, and hopefully Rojava might reject Neocon imperialism. Though, I wouldn't be angry if unification was achieve with military conquest.

Communal concils wrote:

Torrocca wrote:
But they're not following OP's brand of Marxism-Leninism-Maoism-Stalinism-Hoxhaism-Anti-LGBTQ+ism-Whateverism, so that's clearly a bad thing!

I did it to show that rojava is beloved by some westerners. Nothing more, nothingness.

Also, Your joke is not true. Clearly a foolish attempt of anarchist comedy, which is very childish . I identify as a Democratic socialist, that is because I believe that socialism is best achieve through a ballot.

Pasong Tirad wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

I know . That was to show that Rojava does have popularity in the west.

...how? How is it supposed "to show that Rojava is popular in the West" when it isn't even about Rojava?

Communal concils wrote:

Pasong Tirad wrote:...how? How is it supposed "to show that Rojava is popular in the West" when it isn't even about Rojava?

Abdullah Ocalan is a inspiration of the YPG and Rojava, and they are using symbols of rojava. I am honestly showing that there are leftist that support the country.

Highever wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

I did it to show that rojava is beloved by some westerners. Nothing more, nothingness.

Also, Your joke is not true. Clearly a foolish attempt of anarchist comedy, which is very childish . I identify as a Democratic socialist, that is because I believe that socialism is best achieve through a ballot.

Back to trying to pretend you care about democracy and peoples free will I see.

Torrocca wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

I did it to show that rojava is beloved by some westerners. Nothing more, nothingness.

Also, Your joke is not true. Clearly a foolish attempt of anarchist comedy, which is very childish . I identify as a Democratic socialist, that is because I believe that socialism is best achieve through a ballot.

>Self-identifies as a "democratic-socialist"
>Has absolutely no issue whatsoever in using hyper-authoritarian means to suppress minorities like the LGBTQ+ community

Do you have any other jokes you could tell us, OP?

Heloin wrote:

Highever wrote:Back to trying to pretend you care about democracy and peoples free will I see.

Democracy and free will matter, so long as they fall perfectly in line with what Communal believes.

Highever wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

I did it to show that rojava is beloved by some westerners. Nothing more, nothingness.

Also, Your joke is not true. Clearly a foolish attempt of anarchist comedy, which is very childish . I identify as a Democratic socialist, that is because I believe that socialism is best achieve through a ballot.

Back to trying to pretend you care about democracy and peoples free will I see.

Communal concils wrote:

Heloin wrote:Democracy and free will matter, so long as they fall perfectly in line with what Communal believes.

nearly everyone thinks that, including libertarian leftist.

Communal concils wrote:

Torrocca wrote:
>Self-identifies as a "democratic-socialist"
>Has absolutely no issue whatsoever in using hyper-authoritarian means to suppress minorities like the LGBTQ+ community

Do you have any other jokes you could tell us, OP?

I didn't support suppressing minorities, stop making up false claims.

Torrocca wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

I didn't support suppressing minorities, stop making up false claims.

So this statement's a fucking lie:

"people aren't allowed to have Non-reproductive sex."

Unless you want to explain to us how suppressing LGBTQ+ rights isn't actually suppressing minorities, of course.

Torrocca wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

I didn't support suppressing minorities, stop making up false claims.

So this statement's a fucking lie:

"people aren't allowed to have Non-reproductive sex."

Unless you want to explain to us how suppressing LGBTQ+ rights isn't actually suppressing minorities, of course.

Highever wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

nearly everyone thinks that, including libertarian leftist.

Except no. Considering I dont think people who think different or act different than what I want or do should be persecuted. Unlike some.

Communal concils wrote:

Highever wrote:Except no. Considering I dont think people who think different or act different than what I want or do should be persecuted. Unlike some.

That is just your claim. doesn't mean it's true.

Highever wrote:

Torrocca wrote:
So this statement's a fucking lie:

"people aren't allowed to have Non-reproductive sex."

Unless you want to explain to us how suppressing LGBTQ+ rights isn't actually suppressing minorities, of course.

Oh god I really dont want to get sucked into that tripe again....

Heloin wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

That is just your claim. doesn't mean it's true.

And that somehow makes your claim true?

Communal concils wrote:

Heloin wrote:And that somehow makes your claim true?

what if your claim isn't true.

Communal concils wrote:

Highever wrote:Oh god I really dont want to get sucked into that tripe again....

Torrocca is depending on red herrings. I don't like this attempt of elitism.

Communal concils wrote:

Highever wrote:Except no. Considering I dont think people who think different or act different than what I want or do should be persecuted. Unlike some.

That is just your claim. doesn't mean it's true.

Communal concils wrote:

Torrocca wrote:
So this statement's a fucking lie:

"people aren't allowed to have Non-reproductive sex."

Unless you want to explain to us how suppressing LGBTQ+ rights isn't actually suppressing minorities, of course.

stop diverging the thread from the main topic. Your strategy will not work

Highever wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

Torrocca is depending on red herrings. I don't like this attempt of elitism.

Its not a red herring. You made the claim you dont advocate oppression and support freedom and she* is using your own statements to prove that is completely false.

You're also the last person that can grandstand about elitism. I don't even know how this qualifies as elitist.

Heloin wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

what if your claim isn't true.

You're argument is seriously "no u".

Highever wrote:

Communal concils wrote:
That is just your claim. doesn't mean it's true.

No im....pretty sure I know how I feel and what my sentiments are.

Torrocca wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

stop diverging the thread from the main topic. Your strategy will not work

You're the one who claimed you don't support suppressing minorities, chief. I'm just making sure everyone knows who the liar here is. :3

Highever wrote:Its not a red herring. You made the claim you dont advocate oppression and support freedom and she* is using your own statements to prove that is completely false.

You're also the last person that can grandstand about elitism. I don't even know how this qualifies as elitist.

FTFY, by the way. :3