NationStates

Torrocca wrote:Nice try, FBI.

Since your an anarchist, how many Starbucks have you liberated from the statist coffee owners.

Communal concils wrote:

Ifreann wrote:I don't know what's worse, that you're trying to impersonate a leftist with your shit ideas or that you're trying to impersonate a leftist with your shit comebacks.

Leftism is a ideological classification that advocates egalitarianism. The rejection of types of sexual indulgence does not make a person a non-leftist.

How can you say you support the workers if you want to stop them from looking at naked people doing lewd things?

Northern Jackaia wrote:When Marx and Lenin find out that there's a new person trying to be the figurehead of the extreme left
(Image)

Beautiful post

I applaud the out of the box thinking. I can also appreciate the thought put into this, it would be interesting to see this or something similar act as a strong counter to the right, it would be very interesting to see the two extremes fight eachother.

Communal concils wrote:

Torrocca wrote:Nice try, FBI.

Since your an anarchist, how many Starbucks have you liberated from the statist coffee owners.

Seven. I've seen it happen, she's terrifying.

Ifreann wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

Leftism is a ideological classification that advocates egalitarianism. The rejection of types of sexual indulgence does not make a person a non-leftist.

How can you say you support the workers if you want to stop them from looking at naked people doing lewd things?

He doesn't want people to be distracted from the cooperative hard work that he totally loves to do by free punjabi vagene movie 240p

Communal concils wrote:

Torrocca wrote:Nice try, FBI.

Since your an anarchist, how many Starbucks have you liberated from the statist coffee owners.

As much as I hate the anarchists, they don't deserve this for now.

Ifreann wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

Leftism is a ideological classification that advocates egalitarianism. The rejection of types of sexual indulgence does not make a person a non-leftist.

How can you say you support the workers if you want to stop them from looking at naked people doing lewd things?

That's assuming that we are talking about upper middle class kids that call themselves Troskyites, Leftcoms and anarcho-communist.

honestly, there are many people across the world that don't believe in sexual egotistical thoughts.

Communal concils wrote:

Ifreann wrote:How can you say you support the workers if you want to stop them from looking at naked people doing lewd things?

That's assuming that we are talking about upper middle class kids that call themselves Troskyites, Leftcoms and anarcho-communist.

honestly, there are many people across the world that don't believe in sexual egotistical thoughts.

In your pan-leftist alt-left wouldn't you have to include Anarchists and Trotskyists?

On the counter culture part,at least they tried to be opposite. This encourages being 2/3 as bad and evil.

Communal concils wrote:

Ifreann wrote:How can you say you support the workers if you want to stop them from looking at naked people doing lewd things?

That's assuming that we are talking about upper middle class kids that call themselves Troskyites, Leftcoms and anarcho-communist.

honestly, there are many people across the world that don't believe in sexual egotistical thoughts.

Yeah many people hate sex. Um... You. The incels. Mom Church Groups. Asexuals. Mormons.

Communal concils wrote:

Ifreann wrote:How can you say you support the workers if you want to stop them from looking at naked people doing lewd things?

That's assuming that we are talking about upper middle class kids that call themselves Troskyites, Leftcoms and anarcho-communist.

honestly, there are many people across the world that don't believe in sexual egotistical thoughts.

Yeah, they're called conservatives.

Khataiy wrote:

Communal concils wrote:



That's assuming that we are talking about upper middle class kids that call themselves Troskyites, Leftcoms and anarcho-communist.

honestly, there are many people across the world that don't believe in sexual egotistical thoughts.

In your pan-leftist alt-left wouldn't you have to include Anarchists and Trotskyists?

According to CC, "leftism" is only his particular ideology which I like to call Conservative Stalinism.

Khataiy wrote:I applaud the out of the box thinking. I can also appreciate the thought put into this, it would be interesting to see this or something similar act as a strong counter to the right, it would be very interesting to see the two extremes fight eachother.

Well, we can already see groups like this. There now only needs to be the unification of small groups.

At the moment, alt-left is used to describe a group that doesn't exist.

Communal concils wrote:

Khataiy wrote:I applaud the out of the box thinking. I can also appreciate the thought put into this, it would be interesting to see this or something similar act as a strong counter to the right, it would be very interesting to see the two extremes fight eachother.

Well, we can already see groups like this. There now only needs to be the unification of small groups.

At the moment, alt-left is used to describe a group that doesn't exist.

Yes, by the alt-right. And your big idea is to make their propaganda true. Very not suspicious of you, "comrade".

Heloin wrote:

Khataiy wrote:In your pan-leftist alt-left wouldn't you have to include Anarchists and Trotskyists?

According to CC, "leftism" is only his particular ideology which I like to call Conservative Stalinism.

I am not a conservative in any way. I want to restructure the family, economy, and state into a new form. I want a collective in which their isn't anything for people to divide over. Race, gender, culture and civilization should be reshaped into a new form. In am advocating for a type of cultural revolution.

Communal concils wrote:

Khataiy wrote:I applaud the out of the box thinking. I can also appreciate the thought put into this, it would be interesting to see this or something similar act as a strong counter to the right, it would be very interesting to see the two extremes fight eachother.

Well, we can already see groups like this. There now only needs to be the unification of small groups.

At the moment, alt-left is used to describe a group that doesn't exist.

Why should it exist? The Alt-right is just a bunch of extremists who didn't want the rightful baggage that comes along with terms like Neo-Nazi, White Supremacist, and Fascist.

Ifreann wrote:

Communal concils wrote:
Well, we can already see groups like this. There now only needs to be the unification of small groups.

At the moment, alt-left is used to describe a group that doesn't exist.

Yes, by the alt-right. And your big idea is to make their propaganda true. Very not suspicious of you, "comrade".

Well, do you know that people can appropriate words. Homosexuals have used words like queer and gay to describe themselves. In fact, it's common for counter-culture movements to turn insults into their official names.

Heloin wrote:

Communal concils wrote:
Well, we can already see groups like this. There now only needs to be the unification of small groups.

At the moment, alt-left is used to describe a group that doesn't exist.

Why should it exist? The Alt-right is just a bunch of extremists who didn't want the rightful baggage that comes along with terms like Neo-Nazi, White Supremacist, and Fascist.

It needs to exist, because it would confuse them. No longer will they complain about a weak and masculine left,and no longer will they be seen as alpha males. another reason is that rebranding leftism can appeal to people (if done correctly).

Communal concils wrote:

Heloin wrote:According to CC, "leftism" is only his particular ideology which I like to call Conservative Stalinism.

I am not a conservative in any way. I want to restructure the family, economy, and state into a new form. I want a collective in which their isn't anything for people to divide over. Race, gender, culture and civilization should be reshaped into a new form. In am advocating for a type of cultural revolution.

There was once a man who said many, if not every single thing you just said. To cut a long story short he killed between a quarter and half the people of Cambodia for his twisted dream to literally destroy the idea of the individual the idea of any difference between people. All would be one and all would be the same.

I’ve seen a lot of shit today-but what the actual fuck is this post?

Ifreann wrote:

Communal concils wrote:


Since your an anarchist, how many Starbucks have you liberated from the statist coffee owners.

Seven. I've seen it happen, she's terrifying.

Seven that you know of, of course. >:3

Communal concils wrote:

Ifreann wrote:Yes, by the alt-right. And your big idea is to make their propaganda true. Very not suspicious of you, "comrade".

Well, do you know that people can appropriate words. Homosexuals have used words like queer and gay to describe themselves. In fact, it's common for counter-culture movements to turn insults into their official names.

But alt-left isn't an insult. It's a red herring. A tu quoque. A whaboutism. You aren't appropriating an insult, you're trying to give truth to propaganda that was previously a lie. We see you, we see through you.

Communal concils wrote:

Ifreann wrote:I don't know what's worse, that you're trying to impersonate a leftist with your shit ideas or that you're trying to impersonate a leftist with your shit comebacks.

Leftism is a ideological classification that advocates egalitarianism. The rejection of types of sexual indulgence does not make a person a non-leftist.

TIL'd oppressing minorities = egalitarianism

Wow, 10/10, I can see the egalitarianism seeping from the pours of your leftism.

Heloin wrote:

Communal concils wrote:

I am not a conservative in any way. I want to restructure the family, economy, and state into a new form. I want a collective in which their isn't anything for people to divide over. Race, gender, culture and civilization should be reshaped into a new form. In am advocating for a type of cultural revolution.

There was once a man who said many, if not every single thing you just said. To cut a long story short he killed between a quarter and half the people of Cambodia for his twisted dream to literally destroy the idea of the individual the idea of any difference between people. All would be one and all would be the same.

I know who pol pot is . There are similarities, but there are big differences.

1. I want industrialization and massive production.

2. I embrace intellectualism.

3.I want complete and total centralization.

these differences will result in completely different results.