Diopolis wrote:The differences between us in both of these two points are pretty simple- I am a collectivist, you are an individualist.
No doubt. Though I think it's more efficient if people are allowed to find their own role in society, rather than having it be determined by their sex. If women are predisposed towards nurturing roles, and men are predisposed towards more dangerous, assertive, competitive roles, then in a egalitarian society, they will naturally gravitate towards those roles. No social engineering necessary.
I am opposed to women's suffrage on general principle, except perhaps in limited circumstances for widows. As for men's suffrage, I'm not a pro-universal suffrage sort, but I'm not universally against suffrage. Maybe some combination of household voting and a requirement for national service?
I don't quite understand. Which men do you think should be able to vote, if any? And which women do you think should be able to vote, if any?