Right-Wing Discussion Thread XVI: Making Things Right Again

[Cappuccina]

It's accelerated in the past 15 years or so. When the Revolution comes, Zuckerberg will be the first to hang.

I disagree with starting a revolution, but yes, it accelerated.

Eh, revolution may be a good idea tbh. Not my first option though.

Both the Parties are hypercapitalist, they're politicians for God's (swt) sake.

Hypercapitalism refers to deregulation and unrestricted as possible free market enterprise. Which, does not characterize the Dems, although there are always exceptions.

So you meant pro-laissez faire?

[Bear Stearns]

Lamenting a change in moral standards =/= violent Islamist terrorist

Nice to see that you jump immediately to terrorism when I say Islamism.

But Dominionists have a history of terrorism too, so even that's a weak retort.

Because that's what it is.

And I'm not too familiar with Dominionism other than that it strongly Reformist.

[Conserative Morality]

Yeah, I've advocated for Shariah, and I later apologized for the way I brought it up. Especially to UMN. That doesn't mean, I can't say the modesty of our society has gone downhill.

It's not about 'the way' you brought it up, it's that it was brought up at all.

It's all an expression of the same disease, in the end.

[Jolthig]

I disagree with starting a revolution, but yes, it accelerated.

Eh, revolution may be a good idea tbh. Not my first option though.

Hypercapitalism refers to deregulation and unrestricted as possible free market enterprise. Which, does not characterize the Dems, although there are always exceptions.

So you meant pro-laissez faire?

The problem with a revolution is that it would lead to instability or the country between competing factions as what happened during the Russian Civil War and then the civil wars we have now in the middle east.

[Jolthig]

Yeah, I've advocated for Shariah, and I later apologized for the way I brought it up. Especially to UMN. That doesn't mean, I can't say the modesty of our society has gone downhill.

It's not about 'the way' you brought it up, it's that it was brought up at all.

It's all an expression of the same disease, in the end.

And it doesn't refute what I said.

[Conserative Morality]

And it doesn't refute what I said.

I wasn't trying to refute it. I was making an observation.

[Jolthig]

And it doesn't refute what I said.

I wasn't trying to refute it. I was making an observation.

A terrible one at best as it was a huge strawman. A totalitarian? Ridiculous.

[Kowani]

A point on the welfare reform. Republican Bill, Republican Congress. Same with the repeal of Glass-Steagall.

And Clinton signed both, with Glass Steagall occuring when the Dems had made gains in 1996 and 1998 to control both Houses again. Hell, before Monicagate Clinton was moving to privatize Social Security with Gingrich.

Glass-Steagall was repealed by pretty substantial majorities. House, Even if every single Dem had voted no, they’d still have lost.Senate.
Same thing here.
I’ll believe the Social Security thing, though.

[Bear Stearns]

CM, I actually looked up what Dominionism. If the poster you addressed is indeed a Dominionist, then the comparison to Islamism might have some merit. But I do not believe that is the case. Nobody serious has been a Dominionist since the 80s.

[Kowani]

I disagree with starting a revolution, but yes, it accelerated.

Eh, revolution may be a good idea tbh. Not my first option though.

Hypercapitalism refers to deregulation and unrestricted as possible free market enterprise. Which, does not characterize the Dems, although there are always exceptions.

So you meant pro-laissez faire?

Yeah.

[Al Mumtahanah]

I agree. The modesty of our society has really gone downhill the past century.

Sometimes it astounds me how similar Islamists and Dominionists are.

I suppose, in the end, there's not much difference between totalitarians.

Ahmadis are about as Islamist as Jehovah's Witnesses are Dominionist. It's fundamentally against their doctrines.

[Conserative Morality]

CM, I actually looked up what Dominionism. If the poster you addressed is indeed a Dominionist, then the comparison to Islamism might have some merit. But I do not believe that is the case.

Yeah, we're just sitting around the table, passing the ol' Biblical Law around, fantasizing about how the world would be so much better if husbands could hang their wives as is written in OT.

Are you fucking kidding me?

Nobody serious has been a Dominionist since the 80s.

Fucking lol.

[Cappuccina]

I wasn't trying to refute it. I was making an observation.

A terrible one at best as it was a huge strawman. A totalitarian? Ridiculous.

Remember religion with any actual moral relevance equals big bad!

CM, I actually looked up what Dominionism. If the poster you addressed is indeed a Dominionist, then the comparison to Islamism might have some merit. But I do not believe that is the case. Nobody serious has been a Dominionist since the 80s.

I've read about Dominionism and found it very intriguing from my perspective as a Muslim.

[Totally Not OEP]

And Clinton signed both, with Glass Steagall occuring when the Dems had made gains in 1996 and 1998 to control both Houses again. Hell, before Monicagate Clinton was moving to privatize Social Security with Gingrich.

Glass-Steagall was repealed by pretty substantial majorities. House, Even if every single Dem had voted no, they’d still have lost.Senate.
Same thing here.
I’ll believe the Social Security thing, though.

Presidential Veto requires two thirds, it would've been dead has Clinton done anything.

[Al Mumtahanah]

A terrible one at best as it was a huge strawman. A totalitarian? Ridiculous.

Remember religion with any actual moral relevance equals big bad!

CM, I actually looked up what Dominionism. If the poster you addressed is indeed a Dominionist, then the comparison to Islamism might have some merit. But I do not believe that is the case. Nobody serious has been a Dominionist since the 80s.

I've read about Dominionism and found in very intriguing from my perspective as a Muslim.

Dominionism for Christians is advocated in Islam.

[Jolthig]

A terrible one at best as it was a huge strawman. A totalitarian? Ridiculous.

Remember religion with any actual moral relevance equals big bad!

CM, I actually looked up what Dominionism. If the poster you addressed is indeed a Dominionist, then the comparison to Islamism might have some merit. But I do not believe that is the case. Nobody serious has been a Dominionist since the 80s.

I've read about Dominionism and found in very intriguing from my perspective as a Muslim.

Yep.

I don't hide the fact Shariah should come if the majority becomes Muslim and choses to have Shariah. However, given the present environment, that's impossible.

[Bear Stearns]

Eh, revolution may be a good idea tbh. Not my first option though.


So you meant pro-laissez faire?

Yeah.

Not to use a libertarian talking point, but multinational conglomerates are also a function of the state. They'd have a much more difficult time existing in a pure laissez-faire environment because they wouldn't be able to pass their costs of scaling onto tax payers.

A company like J.P. Morgan would not exist in a pure laissez-faire setting.

[Hanafuridake]

Nice to see that you jump immediately to terrorism when I say Islamism.

But Dominionists have a history of terrorism too, so even that's a weak retort.

Why are you even still here?

I ask myself this question all the time.

[Nakena]

Why are you even still here?

I ask myself this question all the time.

Likewise.

[Jolthig]

I ask myself this question all the time.

Likewise.

Because this thread is great for history buffing.

[Nakena]

Likewise.

Because this thread is great for history buffing.

It should be renamed into History Discussion Thread.

[Jolthig]

Because this thread is great for history buffing.

It should be renamed into History Discussion Thread.

True, and I attempted a thread with that name back in december but it got locked because it would mix with other threads.

So that's why I love hanging in here.

[Al Mumtahanah]

CM, I actually looked up what Dominionism. If the poster you addressed is indeed a Dominionist, then the comparison to Islamism might have some merit. But I do not believe that is the case.

Yeah, we're just sitting around the table, passing the ol' Biblical Law around, fantasizing about how the world would be so much better if husbands could hang their wives as is written in OT.

Are you fucking kidding me?

Nobody serious has been a Dominionist since the 80s.

Fucking lol.

Why would you hang your wife? You are supposed to love her.

[Hanafuridake]

Because this thread is great for history buffing.

It should be renamed into History Discussion Thread.

And Religious Debate Thread.

[Jolthig]

It should be renamed into History Discussion Thread.

And Religious Debate Thread.

I wish we had that too but that would also mix with other threads.