The numbers are quite small and they're usually to be found among the more esoteric and obscure corners of the political scene and the movement but they do exist. Even here on NSG. And some even convert.
Advertisement
by Nakena » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:06 am
by Bear Stearns » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:06 am
by Bear Stearns » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:07 am
Nakena wrote:Bear Stearns wrote:
Our immigration policy used to pretty sensible, and we'd ban people most likely to cause trouble. This included:
-Communists
-Anarchists
-Criminals
-Alcoholics
-Drug addicts
-Crippled
-Diseased
-Mental cases
-Anti-social people
-The lazy
The point of Ellis Island was to screen for these people.
I believe its entirely reasonable that a sovereign nation is choosing and setting it's criterias in regards to immigration.
by The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:08 am
Bear Stearns wrote:The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
Define "mental cases", if you don't mind of course.
People with mental illness. I believe at the time it was enforced, it mostly referred to autism, Down Syndrome, low IQ, or an inability to follow instructions.
Immigration officers would administer tests to them to see how everyone stacked up.
by Kowani » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:09 am
by Al Mumtahanah » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:11 am
Kowani wrote:
Since Allah isn’t about to send down an army of Angels, and no Muslim State has an army worth shit, if you want to spread to other countries, you have to convince people. You can’t do that if you admit from the start that you wish to eradicate every other religion.
by Bear Stearns » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:12 am
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:Bear Stearns wrote:
People with mental illness. I believe at the time it was enforced, it mostly referred to autism, Down Syndrome, low IQ, or an inability to follow instructions.
Immigration officers would administer tests to them to see how everyone stacked up.
If I may, I must dissent; I find that banning individuals on the autism spectrum from entering the country to be (in layman's terms) not very cash money of the government.
by Al Mumtahanah » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:13 am
by Hanafuridake » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:13 am
Cappuccina wrote:I disagree with Al Mumtahanah, "religious freedom" is a western secular (aka atheist) concept which is alien to and non-existent in Islam (as it should be).
A Muslim state has no need for 'religious freedom" and Muslim relationships with unbelievers is governed by scripture. God (swt) had already layed out for us how to govern and how to behave, musings of unbelievers are irrelevant.
Suriyanakhon's alt, finally found my old account's password李贽 wrote:There is nothing difficult about becoming a sage, and nothing false about transcending the world of appearances.
by Kowani » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:14 am
Al Mumtahanah wrote:Kowani wrote:Since Allah isn’t about to send down an army of Angels, and no Muslim State has an army worth shit, if you want to spread to other countries, you have to convince people. You can’t do that if you admit from the start that you wish to eradicate every other religion.
Where did he say that?
by Nakena » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:15 am
Bear Stearns wrote:It is perfectly rational. Why shouldn't we be picky?
by Al Mumtahanah » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:18 am
Hanafuridake wrote:Cappuccina wrote:I disagree with Al Mumtahanah, "religious freedom" is a western secular (aka atheist) concept which is alien to and non-existent in Islam (as it should be).
A Muslim state has no need for 'religious freedom" and Muslim relationships with unbelievers is governed by scripture. God (swt) had already layed out for us how to govern and how to behave, musings of unbelievers are irrelevant.
Charming, but considering you've stated in the past that you're LGBTQ+, I can look forward to seeing you headless in the afterlife like me in the event that your ideal state is achieved.
by Nakena » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:18 am
Hanafuridake wrote:Cappuccina wrote:I disagree with Al Mumtahanah, "religious freedom" is a western secular (aka atheist) concept which is alien to and non-existent in Islam (as it should be).
A Muslim state has no need for 'religious freedom" and Muslim relationships with unbelievers is governed by scripture. God (swt) had already layed out for us how to govern and how to behave, musings of unbelievers are irrelevant.
Charming, but considering you've stated in the past that you're LGBTQ+, I can look forward to seeing you headless in the afterlife like me in the event that your ideal state is achieved.
by Bear Stearns » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:18 am
Nakena wrote:Bear Stearns wrote:It is perfectly rational. Why shouldn't we be picky?
It is entirely rational. Ultimatively it does depends on decisions of the political leadership based on what kind of immigration is desireable and what objectives, policies and limitations are to set accordingly.
Given that theres a backlog of over 800.000 immigration/asylum(?) cases pending in the court it would make, for example, sense to reject further applications until that number has been worked down. That would be entirely reasonable and rational too.
by Al Mumtahanah » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:20 am
by Cappuccina » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:21 am
Kowani wrote:
Since Allah isn’t about to send down an army of Angels, and no Muslim State has an army worth shit, if you want to spread to other countries, you have to convince people. You can’t do that if you admit from the start that you wish to eradicate every other religion.
by Kowani » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:22 am
by North German Realm » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:22 am
Nakena wrote:Hanafuridake wrote:
Charming, but considering you've stated in the past that you're LGBTQ+, I can look forward to seeing you headless in the afterlife like me in the event that your ideal state is achieved.
Which really makes me think why some people choose Islam. Literally the worst option there as we have learned in the past weeks.
5 Nov, 2020
Die Morgenpost: "We will reconsider our relationship with Poland" Reichskanzler Lagenmauer says after Polish president protested North German ultimatum that made them restore reproductive freedom. | European Society votes not to persecute Hungary for atrocities committed against Serbs, "Giving a rogue state leave to commit genocide as it sees fit." North German delegate bemoans. | Negotiations still underway in Rome, delegates arguing over the extent of indemnities Turkey might be made to pay, lawful status of Turkish collaborators during occupation of Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Syria.
by Al Mumtahanah » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:24 am
Cappuccina wrote:Kowani wrote:Since Allah isn’t about to send down an army of Angels, and no Muslim State has an army worth shit, if you want to spread to other countries, you have to convince people. You can’t do that if you admit from the start that you wish to eradicate every other religion.
When did I say anything about "spreading to other countries"?!?
Convincing people to become muslim isn't the job of muslims. If you're not muslim you're not muslim, and we have instructions on how to deal with you.
by Kowani » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:24 am
Cappuccina wrote:Kowani wrote:Since Allah isn’t about to send down an army of Angels, and no Muslim State has an army worth shit, if you want to spread to other countries, you have to convince people. You can’t do that if you admit from the start that you wish to eradicate every other religion.
When did I say anything about "spreading to other countries"?!?
Convincing people to become muslim isn't the job of muslims. If you're not muslim you're not muslim, and we have instructions on how to deal with you.
by Al Mumtahanah » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:27 am
North German Realm wrote:Nakena wrote:
Which really makes me think why some people choose Islam. Literally the worst option there as we have learned in the past weeks.
Few become Muslim through studying Islam. People get enticed into it. Money from proselytizing countries planning on using them as poster boys helps, for example.
by Cappuccina » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:28 am
Hanafuridake wrote:Cappuccina wrote:I disagree with Al Mumtahanah, "religious freedom" is a western secular (aka atheist) concept which is alien to and non-existent in Islam (as it should be).
A Muslim state has no need for 'religious freedom" and Muslim relationships with unbelievers is governed by scripture. God (swt) had already layed out for us how to govern and how to behave, musings of unbelievers are irrelevant.
Charming, but considering you've stated in the past that you're LGBTQ+, I can look forward to seeing you headless in the afterlife like me in the event that your ideal state is achieved.
by North German Realm » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:28 am
5 Nov, 2020
Die Morgenpost: "We will reconsider our relationship with Poland" Reichskanzler Lagenmauer says after Polish president protested North German ultimatum that made them restore reproductive freedom. | European Society votes not to persecute Hungary for atrocities committed against Serbs, "Giving a rogue state leave to commit genocide as it sees fit." North German delegate bemoans. | Negotiations still underway in Rome, delegates arguing over the extent of indemnities Turkey might be made to pay, lawful status of Turkish collaborators during occupation of Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Syria.
by Washington Resistance Army » Thu Jul 18, 2019 10:29 am
Cappuccina wrote:Hanafuridake wrote:
Charming, but considering you've stated in the past that you're LGBTQ+, I can look forward to seeing you headless in the afterlife like me in the event that your ideal state is achieved.
If I were to be executed by a future Caliphate, it'd be God's (swt) will. People often only support an idealized regime in which they themselves would be
validated and accepted, I have no such expectations.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Lysset, Naui Tu, Republics of the Solar Union, The Huskar Social Union, Uiiop
Advertisement