NATION

PASSWORD

Right-Wing Discussion Thread XVI: Making Things Right Again

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do you consider nationalism and patriotism synoymous?

Yes- I am a nationalist and a patriot
115
26%
No- I am a nationalist and a patriot
52
12%
No- I am a nationalist, not a patriot
43
10%
No- I am a patriot, not a nationalist
147
33%
Yes- I am neither a nationalist nor a patriot
18
4%
No- I am neither a nationalist nor a patriot
68
15%
 
Total votes : 443

User avatar
Bienenhalde
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6387
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Bienenhalde » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:18 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
But what will I do when I cause offense, or do something morally wrong? Should I pay penance via mortification of the flesh? :unsure:


Pro tip: don't give a shit if you offend anybody, it's what I do[/quote]

Nope. Better to be courteous and considerate towards other people. Of course it should not be necessary to apologize for opposing evil or speaking up for what is right.

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:18 pm

This actually brings up an interesting point of discussion, namely at what point is an evil act able to “slide” so to speak. Where is the ethical line drawn between “insignificant” acts of malice and harm and “significant” acts of malice and harm that warrant apology and/or atonement? As you may have guessed, I take a hardline approach in my dealings with others.
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

User avatar
Nova Cyberia
Senator
 
Posts: 4456
Founded: May 06, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Cyberia » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:27 pm

Totally Not OEP wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Pro tip: don't give a shit if you offend anybody, it's what I do


Exactly this.

It's the only way one survives on NSG.
Yes, yes, I get it. I'm racist and fascist because I disagree with you. Can we skip that part? I've heard it a million times before and I guarantee it won't be any different when you do it
##############
American Nationalist
Third Positionist Gang

User avatar
Bienenhalde
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6387
Founded: Mar 11, 2017
Authoritarian Democracy

Postby Bienenhalde » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:30 pm

Nova Cyberia wrote:
Totally Not OEP wrote:
Exactly this.

It's the only way one survives on NSG.


I am pretty sure you are wrong. People who are gratuitously offensive get DEAT'ed or DOS'ed. That does not happen to those who are polite and civil.

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:36 pm

Bienenhalde wrote:
Nova Cyberia wrote:It's the only way one survives on NSG.


I am pretty sure you are wrong. People who are gratuitously offensive get DEAT'ed or DOS'ed. That does not happen to those who are polite and civil.


But apparently, given the reactions to some of my posts here, there’s a thing as “too much” civility; personally, I find this to be somewhat confusing of a concept, I must admit.
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

User avatar
Cappuccina
Minister
 
Posts: 2905
Founded: Jun 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cappuccina » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:42 pm

The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
Bienenhalde wrote:
I am pretty sure you are wrong. People who are gratuitously offensive get DEAT'ed or DOS'ed. That does not happen to those who are polite and civil.


But apparently, given the reactions to some of my posts here, there’s a thing as “too much” civility; personally, I find this to be somewhat confusing of a concept, I must admit.

Being too eager to please makes you seem a bit.... submissive.
Muslim, Female, Trans, Not white..... oppression points x4!!!!
"Latinx" isn't a real word. :^)
Automobile & Music fan!!! ^_^
Also, an everything 1980s fan!!!
Left/Right: -5.25
SocLib/Auth: 2.46

Apparently, I'm an INFP

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:44 pm

Cappuccina wrote:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
But apparently, given the reactions to some of my posts here, there’s a thing as “too much” civility; personally, I find this to be somewhat confusing of a concept, I must admit.

Being too eager to please makes you seem a bit.... submissive.


I might be a bit of a “doormat” so to speak...
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

User avatar
Diopolis
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17734
Founded: May 15, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Diopolis » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:53 pm

The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
Cappuccina wrote:Being too eager to please makes you seem a bit.... submissive.


I might be a bit of a “doormat” so to speak...

Although obedience to authority is important for social stability, that kind of extreme submissiveness is inappropriate from a man, at least towards social equals. A certain level of deference towards elders, officers of the law, and other such things is all right and good, but doormat-like submissiveness isn't.
Texas nationalist, right-wing technocrat, radical social conservative, post-liberal.

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Wed Jun 12, 2019 4:59 pm

Diopolis wrote:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
I might be a bit of a “doormat” so to speak...

Although obedience to authority is important for social stability, that kind of extreme submissiveness is inappropriate from a man, at least towards social equals. A certain level of deference towards elders, officers of the law, and other such things is all right and good, but doormat-like submissiveness isn't.


But you are all my superiors, right? My duty is to be of use for my fellow persons so as to ensure that the great clockwork of civilization runs harmoniously. Does that make sense?
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

User avatar
Cappuccina
Minister
 
Posts: 2905
Founded: Jun 05, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Cappuccina » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:01 pm

Diopolis wrote:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
I might be a bit of a “doormat” so to speak...

Although obedience to authority is important for social stability, that kind of extreme submissiveness is inappropriate from a man, at least towards social equals. A certain level of deference towards elders, officers of the law, and other such things is all right and good, but doormat-like submissiveness isn't.

It's inappropriate for anyone, tbh. Only God (swt) deserves that level of submission.
Muslim, Female, Trans, Not white..... oppression points x4!!!!
"Latinx" isn't a real word. :^)
Automobile & Music fan!!! ^_^
Also, an everything 1980s fan!!!
Left/Right: -5.25
SocLib/Auth: 2.46

Apparently, I'm an INFP

User avatar
Jack Thomas Lang
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1856
Founded: Apr 18, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Jack Thomas Lang » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:18 pm

Being overly polite is obnoxious. Politeness involves respectful behavior, nobody feels respected if someone apologies for every damn thing.

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:32 pm

Jack Thomas Lang wrote:Being overly polite is obnoxious. Politeness involves respectful behavior, nobody feels respected if someone apologies for every damn thing.


But why? Is it not right to show deference to those who one views as better than oneself? Again, I’m still confused. You are all better than me.
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44956
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:37 pm

The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
Jack Thomas Lang wrote:Being overly polite is obnoxious. Politeness involves respectful behavior, nobody feels respected if someone apologies for every damn thing.


But why? Is it not right to show deference to those who one views as better than oneself? Again, I’m still confused. You are all better than me.

There is deference, and then there is whatever you’re doing.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.



Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Nova Cyberia
Senator
 
Posts: 4456
Founded: May 06, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Nova Cyberia » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:39 pm

The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
Jack Thomas Lang wrote:Being overly polite is obnoxious. Politeness involves respectful behavior, nobody feels respected if someone apologies for every damn thing.


But why? Is it not right to show deference to those who one views as better than oneself? Again, I’m still confused. You are all better than me.

This is not deference. This is submission. Have some respect for yourself.
Yes, yes, I get it. I'm racist and fascist because I disagree with you. Can we skip that part? I've heard it a million times before and I guarantee it won't be any different when you do it
##############
American Nationalist
Third Positionist Gang

User avatar
Hammer Britannia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5381
Founded: Oct 08, 2016
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Hammer Britannia » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:41 pm

Jack Thomas Lang wrote:Being overly polite is obnoxious. Politeness involves respectful behavior, nobody feels respected if someone apologies for every damn thing.

So this is how Canadians truly feel
Last edited by Hammer Britannia on Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
All shall tremble before me

User avatar
Hanafuridake
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5532
Founded: Sep 09, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Hanafuridake » Wed Jun 12, 2019 5:50 pm

Bienenhalde wrote:Nope. Better to be courteous and considerate towards other people. Of course it should not be necessary to apologize for opposing evil or speaking up for what is right.


Banning sex isn't opposing evil or advocating what's right. Your own religion sees sex as a good thing within marriage.
Nation name in proper language: 花降岳|पुष्पद्वीप
Theravada Buddhist
李贽 wrote:There is nothing difficult about becoming a sage, and nothing false about transcending the world of appearances.
Suriyanakhon's alt, finally found my old account's password

User avatar
Napkizemlja
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1837
Founded: Apr 13, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkizemlja » Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:01 pm

Banning sex makes absolutely no sense at all. Extreme Gnosticism please exit out the backdoor, thank you.
Don't cry because it's coming to an end, smile because it happened.

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:07 pm

I honestly don’t understand; I show deference (or is it submission?) in an attempt to be as righteous as I can be, I strive to forsake the wickedness of egoism, but apparently showing deference is evil? So no matter what I do, it’s as if I’m damned. :(

I just... I don’t know what to do, really.

Nova Cyberia wrote:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
But why? Is it not right to show deference to those who one views as better than oneself? Again, I’m still confused. You are all better than me.

This is not deference. This is submission. Have some respect for yourself.


But I just... can’t, I guess.
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

User avatar
Soviet Tankistan
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 435
Founded: Mar 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Soviet Tankistan » Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:15 pm

The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:I honestly don’t understand; I show deference (or is it submission?) in an attempt to be as righteous as I can be, I strive to forsake the wickedness of egoism, but apparently showing deference is evil? So no matter what I do, it’s as if I’m damned. :(

I just... I don’t know what to do, really.

Nova Cyberia wrote:This is not deference. This is submission. Have some respect for yourself.


But I just... can’t, I guess.

Practice not acting stuck up (no offense intended). Try not to take the extreme high ground on such insignificant issues. Use casual words and speak like anyone with knowledge of slang does. Say words including fuck and shit and don't act like those ultra-clean fundemantalists who dare not say a simple word but support harm of innocents.
☭Welcome to Soviet Tankistan!☭
In Soviet Tankistan, everyone is considered a worker if they contribute. Fascists and terrorists are not welcome.


Humanity, Socialism, Order Political Compass: 8 left and 1 upwards.

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:18 pm

Soviet Tankistan wrote:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:I honestly don’t understand; I show deference (or is it submission?) in an attempt to be as righteous as I can be, I strive to forsake the wickedness of egoism, but apparently showing deference is evil? So no matter what I do, it’s as if I’m damned. :(

I just... I don’t know what to do, really.



But I just... can’t, I guess.

Practice not acting stuck up (no offense intended). Try not to take the extreme high ground on such insignificant issues. Use casual words and speak like anyone with knowledge of slang does. Say words including fuck and shit and don't act like those ultra-clean fundemantalists who dare not say a simple word but support harm of innocents.


I... I need to rethink my life. I’ll see you all later, maybe.
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

User avatar
Jack Thomas Lang
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1856
Founded: Apr 18, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Jack Thomas Lang » Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:23 pm

The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:But why? Is it not right to show deference to those who one views as better than oneself? Again, I’m still confused. You are all better than me.

That's the problem. I do not consider myself better than you. I'm averse to false Pride, which is one of the Seven Sins. So when you act as if I'm better than you, it is for the want of a better term, disrespectful.

Christ said that one must love oneself as one loves others. Consider that.

User avatar
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6282
Founded: Jul 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord » Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:33 pm

Jack Thomas Lang wrote:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:But why? Is it not right to show deference to those who one views as better than oneself? Again, I’m still confused. You are all better than me.

That's the problem. I do not consider myself better than you. I'm averse to false Pride, which is one of the Seven Sins. So when you act as if I'm better than you, it is for the want of a better term, disrespectful.

Christ said that one must love oneself as one loves others. Consider that.


Well then the problem, then, is that I love others and seek the common good, while simultaneously intensely loathing myself to the point of self-destruction. (I’ve even termed my personal philosophy “obliteration of the self”) Hence why I have doormat levels of submissiveness. Does that make sense? Perhaps I should bring this up to my therapist?

Anyway, I’ve detailed the thread too much; perhaps a question will help us get back to discussing the political right, but sadly, I’ve got nothing at the moment. Any suggestions for a new (and more cheerful) topic?
Last edited by The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord on Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
< THE HIGH SWAGLORD | 8VALUES | POLITISCALES >
My NS stats are not indicative of my OOC views. NS stats are meant to be rather silly. My OOC political and ideological inspirations are as such:
The Republic, by Plato | Leviathan, by Thomas Hobbes | The Confucian civil service system of imperial China | The "Golden Liberty" elective
monarchy system of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth | The corporatist/technocratic philosophy of Henri de Saint-Simon | The communitarian
ideological framework of the Singaporean People's Action Party | "New Deal"-style societal regimentation | Kantian/Mohist/Stoic philosophy

User avatar
El-Amin Caliphate
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15282
Founded: Apr 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby El-Amin Caliphate » Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:50 pm

Soviet Tankistan wrote:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:I honestly don’t understand; I show deference (or is it submission?) in an attempt to be as righteous as I can be, I strive to forsake the wickedness of egoism, but apparently showing deference is evil? So no matter what I do, it’s as if I’m damned. :(

I just... I don’t know what to do, really.



But I just... can’t, I guess.

Practice not acting stuck up (no offense intended). Try not to take the extreme high ground on such insignificant issues. Use casual words and speak like anyone with knowledge of slang does. Say words including f*ck and *hit and don't act like those ultra-clean fundemantalists who dare not say a simple word but support harm of innocents.

Cussing has nothing to do with this. Swaglord, don't cuss. It's better for you.
Kubumba Tribe's sister nation. NOT A PUPPET! >w< In fact, this one came 1st.
Proud Full Member of the Council of Islamic Cooperation!^u^
I'm a (Pan) Islamist ;)
CLICK THIS
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people

Democracy and Freedom Index
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

User avatar
El-Amin Caliphate
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15282
Founded: Apr 05, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby El-Amin Caliphate » Wed Jun 12, 2019 6:52 pm

The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:
Jack Thomas Lang wrote:That's the problem. I do not consider myself better than you. I'm averse to false Pride, which is one of the Seven Sins. So when you act as if I'm better than you, it is for the want of a better term, disrespectful.

Christ said that one must love oneself as one loves others. Consider that.


Well then the problem, then, is that I love others and seek the common good, while simultaneously intensely loathing myself to the point of self-destruction. (I’ve even termed my personal philosophy “obliteration of the self”) Hence why I have doormat levels of submissiveness. Does that make sense? Perhaps I should bring this up to my therapist?

Um.....yes, you should :unsure:
The Supreme Magnificent High Swaglord wrote:Anyway, I’ve detailed the thread too much; perhaps a question will help us get back to discussing the political right, but sadly, I’ve got nothing at the moment. Any suggestions for a new (and more cheerful) topic?

I never know the answer to this. What's a good right-wing topic to re-visit or something we haven't discussed before?
Kubumba Tribe's sister nation. NOT A PUPPET! >w< In fact, this one came 1st.
Proud Full Member of the Council of Islamic Cooperation!^u^
I'm a (Pan) Islamist ;)
CLICK THIS
https://americanvision.org/948/theonomy-vs-theocracy/ wrote:God’s law cannot govern a nation where God’s law does not rule in the hearts of the people

Democracy and Freedom Index
Plaetopia wrote:Partly Free / Hybrid regime (score 4-6) El-Amin Caliphate (5.33)

User avatar
Duhon
Senator
 
Posts: 4421
Founded: Nov 21, 2018
Ex-Nation

Postby Duhon » Wed Jun 12, 2019 7:01 pm

Would any of you guys want to impose any or all of the hallmarks of the present Chinese state into any of your ideal societies?

There. Cheerio.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ferelith, General TN, Kannap, Maximum Imperium Rex, Mergold-Aurlia, The Apollonian Systems, Three Galaxies, Tungstan, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads