Quaeg wrote:"Men can't raise their children because they will subconsciously see these children as a threat to their dominance and feel the implacable need to destroy them. Thus it falls to the woman, whose mercurial emotions prevent her from ever hating the children, unlike the cold, logical man."
Its not that men can't look after children, just that chances are- a woman can perform this task better, and its not a task most men would find enjoyment in like might be the case for women. A woman's perspective and touch is more useful for that sort of situation.
The prevailing view of society is that a man should be Police/Military if not in a more dangerous but masculine and in demand role, such as something like a firefighter or automobile mechanic. The woman should be something like a Nurse, Maid, or School teacher, something truly feminine but safe but perhaps less well paid statistically speaking.
I don't think its controversial to observe that most people would find a male firefighter to be more common and accepted than a woman trying to be a firefighter. This applies across many different roles. Our civilizations have their hidden norms and expectations that people allow to play out subconsciously for the most part. It is because it is simply what works. Men and women are built differently to be more suited for different tasks than the other.
