Tarsonis wrote:Thuzbekistan wrote:I do. The purpose is to elect a representative of that party to try and win a seat. However, given that states like TN exist where the primary is essentially the election since there is no democratic chance, it gives the entire state a say. If we had more than just two viable parties, I would say they should be closed. However, our current system is undemocratic and robs a lot of people of their say since FTP is the voting system we have. To me, open primaries allows for the minority to have a say in what is essentially a one party state.
That’s not how it works. The democrats do have a say for their candidate. While the GE will most likely go Red, TN Democrats still get to cast their votes for their prospective candidates.
You’re conflating the GE and the primary, and that is not the case.
No, I'm not. In Tennessee, democrats have no chance. instead, they get nothing but hard right leaning governors and senators. Yes, they have their state reps and senators, but in state wide elections, they do not have a chance. The only way they can have a say in what way the state goes is by helping choose the representative. That minority would then have a say because the democrat will lose and the republican they helped pick will win. That is the reality here in Tennessee. Unless we change the voting system to a proportional one where there aren't just one or two viable parties, then the only way minorities have a say is in the primaries.