HE WAS AN ARAB! lol
Advertisement
by Thuzbekistan » Sun May 19, 2019 4:26 am
by Thuzbekistan » Sun May 19, 2019 4:26 am
by Ngelmish » Sun May 19, 2019 6:59 am
Page wrote:
Biden doesn't stand for anything. He's going to run on 'everything was good before Trump and we'll go back to those days', but it wasn't good for all the people financially crushed by student loan debt, and it wasn't good for the people who relied on a GoFundMe to be able to afford medicine they would literally die without, and it wasn't good for the people in Flint who watched Obama do nothing about their water crisis and lie to them, and it wasn't good for the Native Americans who didn't want their water poisoned by an illegal pipeline through their land, and it wasn't good for the homeless, and it wasn't good for the long term unemployed, and it wasn't good for the people who had to work 70 or 80 hours a week just to keep their lights on until they finally snapped from all the stress but couldn't afford treatment because we still don't have single payer.
Well off middle class liberals, the ones who have never experienced real poverty, they love Biden. Everyone who can focus on Russiagate because they have health care and a living wage, they will vote for Biden, but how is Biden going to win over the disenfranchised and disempowered when he offers them nothing?
by Zurkerx » Sun May 19, 2019 8:14 am
by Thuzbekistan » Sun May 19, 2019 8:15 am
Page wrote:
Biden doesn't stand for anything. He's going to run on 'everything was good before Trump and we'll go back to those days', but it wasn't good for all the people financially crushed by student loan debt, and it wasn't good for the people who relied on a GoFundMe to be able to afford medicine they would literally die without, and it wasn't good for the people in Flint who watched Obama do nothing about their water crisis and lie to them, and it wasn't good for the Native Americans who didn't want their water poisoned by an illegal pipeline through their land, and it wasn't good for the homeless, and it wasn't good for the long term unemployed, and it wasn't good for the people who had to work 70 or 80 hours a week just to keep their lights on until they finally snapped from all the stress but couldn't afford treatment because we still don't have single payer.
Well off middle class liberals, the ones who have never experienced real poverty, they love Biden. Everyone who can focus on Russiagate because they have health care and a living wage, they will vote for Biden, but how is Biden going to win over the disenfranchised and disempowered when he offers them nothing?
by LiberNovusAmericae » Sun May 19, 2019 8:17 am
Zurkerx wrote:Possible and potential Libertarian Candidate and Republican Representative Justin Amash says Trump committed "impeachable conduct".
by Zurkerx » Sun May 19, 2019 8:42 am
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Zurkerx wrote:Possible and potential Libertarian Candidate and Republican Representative Justin Amash says Trump committed "impeachable conduct".
And because he went against Trump, the GOP will make sure he has no shot at winning.
by Ngelmish » Sun May 19, 2019 9:01 am
Thuzbekistan wrote:Page wrote:
Biden doesn't stand for anything. He's going to run on 'everything was good before Trump and we'll go back to those days', but it wasn't good for all the people financially crushed by student loan debt, and it wasn't good for the people who relied on a GoFundMe to be able to afford medicine they would literally die without, and it wasn't good for the people in Flint who watched Obama do nothing about their water crisis and lie to them, and it wasn't good for the Native Americans who didn't want their water poisoned by an illegal pipeline through their land, and it wasn't good for the homeless, and it wasn't good for the long term unemployed, and it wasn't good for the people who had to work 70 or 80 hours a week just to keep their lights on until they finally snapped from all the stress but couldn't afford treatment because we still don't have single payer.
Well off middle class liberals, the ones who have never experienced real poverty, they love Biden. Everyone who can focus on Russiagate because they have health care and a living wage, they will vote for Biden, but how is Biden going to win over the disenfranchised and disempowered when he offers them nothing?
Hillary didn't offer anything either. We need a good Democrat who is willing to make necessary reforms to actually help people, stop starting wars like literally every president since roosevelt has.
by Thuzbekistan » Sun May 19, 2019 9:19 am
Ngelmish wrote:Thuzbekistan wrote:Hillary didn't offer anything either. We need a good Democrat who is willing to make necessary reforms to actually help people, stop starting wars like literally every president since roosevelt has.
She offered reams of policy . Whether or not you approved of any of those policies doesn't alter the fact that she offered a lot more than nothing. This meme that she didn't needs to die.
by Ngelmish » Sun May 19, 2019 9:31 am
Thuzbekistan wrote:Ngelmish wrote:
She offered reams of policy . Whether or not you approved of any of those policies doesn't alter the fact that she offered a lot more than nothing. This meme that she didn't needs to die.
What she offered was to be Obama 2.0 with nothing new or anything that actually fixed a problem. She was wishy-washy on all her views and her doggedly moderate stances promised only a warm body in the office instead of a woman leading the nation. On top of all that, she was surrounded by so much corruption and elitism that she acted and sounded more like a robot when talking to the masses. She was not a good candidate, not a good person, and not a good secretary of state. She was a damned good politician, though. Which is why she lost to the guy with a clear, albeit racist and inflammatory, message, energy, goals, and fiery personality. If they had stood on policy alone, she would have beaten him in a landslide. But because he was good at using division, simple catchphrases, and had a total lack of care about what he was saying so long as the crowd was chanting, she lost. And even now, I think she was the worse of the two for the job because Trump may be a corrupt, incompetent fool, but Hillary was a corrupt, competent, politician.
by Sidesh0w B0b » Sun May 19, 2019 9:36 am
by San Lumen » Sun May 19, 2019 2:05 pm
by Thuzbekistan » Sun May 19, 2019 4:17 pm
San Lumen wrote:https://twitter.com/mcpli/status/1130147714618908672
In a very interesting and unexpected ruling the Supreme Court has denied a stay on a lower court ruling that state legislative lines In Michigan were unconstitutionally gerrymandered. Democrats chances of taking one or both chambers of the state legislature just went up drastically
The court will rule later this year on congressional gerrymandering cases from North Carolina and Maryland.
by Telconi » Sun May 19, 2019 4:54 pm
San Lumen wrote:https://twitter.com/mcpli/status/1130147714618908672
In a very interesting and unexpected ruling the Supreme Court has denied a stay on a lower court ruling that state legislative lines In Michigan were unconstitutionally gerrymandered. Democrats chances of taking one or both chambers of the state legislature just went up drastically
The court will rule later this year on congressional gerrymandering cases from North Carolina and Maryland.
by Tarsonis » Sun May 19, 2019 5:19 pm
Thuzbekistan wrote:San Lumen wrote:https://twitter.com/mcpli/status/1130147714618908672
In a very interesting and unexpected ruling the Supreme Court has denied a stay on a lower court ruling that state legislative lines In Michigan were unconstitutionally gerrymandered. Democrats chances of taking one or both chambers of the state legislature just went up drastically
The court will rule later this year on congressional gerrymandering cases from North Carolina and Maryland.
Can we get a source other than the bluecheckmarked fella
by San Lumen » Sun May 19, 2019 5:38 pm
Telconi wrote:San Lumen wrote:https://twitter.com/mcpli/status/1130147714618908672
In a very interesting and unexpected ruling the Supreme Court has denied a stay on a lower court ruling that state legislative lines In Michigan were unconstitutionally gerrymandered. Democrats chances of taking one or both chambers of the state legislature just went up drastically
The court will rule later this year on congressional gerrymandering cases from North Carolina and Maryland.
Well shit...
by Thuzbekistan » Sun May 19, 2019 5:54 pm
San Lumen wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
As of this post, nothing on google suggests a ruling has been made. So unless the media gives zero fucks, we haven’t got an official ruling yet.
It was denying a stay. that nots something the media reports on often.Telconi wrote:
Well shit...
Yeah having election districts drawn fairly is a terrible thing right? Getting the popular vote but not the majority is totally fair.
by Telconi » Sun May 19, 2019 6:12 pm
San Lumen wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
As of this post, nothing on google suggests a ruling has been made. So unless the media gives zero fucks, we haven’t got an official ruling yet.
It was denying a stay. that nots something the media reports on often.Telconi wrote:
Well shit...
Yeah having election districts drawn fairly is a terrible thing right? Getting the popular vote but not the majority is totally fair.
by Valrifell » Sun May 19, 2019 6:16 pm
San Lumen wrote:Tarsonis wrote:
As of this post, nothing on google suggests a ruling has been made. So unless the media gives zero fucks, we haven’t got an official ruling yet.
It was denying a stay. that nots something the media reports on often.Telconi wrote:
Well shit...
Yeah having election districts drawn fairly is a terrible thing right? Getting the popular vote but not the majority is totally fair.
by Telconi » Sun May 19, 2019 6:23 pm
Valrifell wrote:San Lumen wrote:It was denying a stay. that nots something the media reports on often.
Yeah having election districts drawn fairly is a terrible thing right? Getting the popular vote but not the majority is totally fair.
Lumen you fool, you ought to know by now that Tel has no consistency beyond getting what he wants. Which is usually the one thing.
by United States of Devonta » Sun May 19, 2019 7:15 pm
Ask Devonta a Question/Embassy ProgramUS Air Force E-4Twenty-Five, Male, Lightskin, Social Democrat, Proud Kansan
Proud member of the IFC, SA, IHAPC, IDS, PEDC, IBE, ISA nation!
by Telconi » Sun May 19, 2019 7:24 pm
United States of Devonta wrote:Did anyone watch the Pete Buttigieg Fox Townhall?
I'm no blue-dog democrat, but I would happily cast my ballot for him after that. He brought down the house, even better then Bernie.
by Telconi » Sun May 19, 2019 7:41 pm
by San Lumen » Sun May 19, 2019 7:48 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Himmelland, Kostane, M-x B-rry, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Soviet Haaregrad, Statesburg, The Two Jerseys, Verkhoyanska, Xind
Advertisement