Reminder that withholding sex is a characteristic of domestic abuse.
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Seriously though how can this been seen as anything other than a form of psychological abuse?
Welcome to radical feminism.
Advertisement
by Ostroeuropa » Mon May 13, 2019 8:21 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Seriously though how can this been seen as anything other than a form of psychological abuse?
by The Blaatschapen » Mon May 13, 2019 8:24 am
by Ifreann » Mon May 13, 2019 8:25 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:In which Liberal women encourage other liberal women not to sleep with liberal partners with the goal of apparently changing the mind of conservative men and women who will be sleeping with eachother anyway, because of an oppressor-oppressed perspective on gender relations that views these events as an attack by men on women, rather than the reality; a coalition composed of 50% men and 50% women imposing their view on 50% of men and 50% of women.
Reminder that withholding sex is a characteristic of domestic abuse.
by Ostroeuropa » Mon May 13, 2019 8:26 am
Ifreann wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:In which Liberal women encourage other liberal women not to sleep with liberal partners with the goal of apparently changing the mind of conservative men and women who will be sleeping with eachother anyway, because of an oppressor-oppressed perspective on gender relations that views these events as an attack by men on women, rather than the reality; a coalition composed of 50% men and 50% women imposing their view on 50% of men and 50% of women.
Reminder that withholding sex is a characteristic of domestic abuse.
Seems to be just one woman telling other women to stop having sex to own the pro-lifers.
by The Free Joy State » Mon May 13, 2019 8:27 am
The blAAtschApen wrote:How does a sex strike by Alyssa Milano affect me? I doubt I'd be able to get with her regardless.
by Ifreann » Mon May 13, 2019 8:28 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Ifreann wrote:Seems to be just one woman telling other women to stop having sex to own the pro-lifers.
It's not just one woman though. It's been picked up by quite a few outlets and celebrities. Womens communities that have swallowed the feminist kool-aid are supporting the move, such as Two-x, with some 20 million subscribers.
by Hirota » Mon May 13, 2019 8:37 am
You joke, but they tried it.
by Ostroeuropa » Mon May 13, 2019 8:40 am
by Purpelia » Mon May 13, 2019 8:40 am
by Caracasus » Mon May 13, 2019 8:40 am
by Ostroeuropa » Mon May 13, 2019 8:44 am
Caracasus wrote:Pretty messed up to equate sex within a relationship to labour and collective bargianing. Probably says more about this woman's unconscious views of sex and relationships than anything else.
by Caracasus » Mon May 13, 2019 8:48 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Caracasus wrote:Pretty messed up to equate sex within a relationship to labour and collective bargianing. Probably says more about this woman's unconscious views of sex and relationships than anything else.
It's not unconscious, it's an explicit part of feminist theory from the likes of Dworkin et al that sex is exploitative action from men against women in the same way labor relations are because something something patriarchy.
by Ostroeuropa » Mon May 13, 2019 8:49 am
Caracasus wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
It's not unconscious, it's an explicit part of feminist theory from the likes of Dworkin et al that sex is exploitative action from men against women in the same way labor relations are because something something patriarchy.
Nah. For my money it's more likely to be someone who vaguely remembered that Greek play they read completely uncritically at some very posh private college and thought 'oooh, that'll work!'
by Caracasus » Mon May 13, 2019 8:52 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Caracasus wrote:
Nah. For my money it's more likely to be someone who vaguely remembered that Greek play they read completely uncritically at some very posh private college and thought 'oooh, that'll work!'
That in itself is an example of feminist academia causing a rot. Prior to feminist academics throwing a fit about it, that play was widely regarded as a joke about how ridiculous it would be for women to gain political power through a sex strike. Then it got recast as an empowering story about the wimminz.
by Ifreann » Mon May 13, 2019 8:52 am
Purpelia wrote:Shanhwa wrote:
“You voted for HIM? Sorry hon, no sex tonight.”
Funny thing being it's not even about the sex. It's about her putting politics before the relationship. If the relationship really means that little to her that politics come first than that is a relationship that should just end.
Caracasus wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
It's not unconscious, it's an explicit part of feminist theory from the likes of Dworkin et al that sex is exploitative action from men against women in the same way labor relations are because something something patriarchy.
Nah. For my money it's more likely to be someone who vaguely remembered that Greek play they read completely uncritically at some very posh private college and thought 'oooh, that'll work!'
by Gormwood » Mon May 13, 2019 8:54 am
by Galloism » Mon May 13, 2019 8:59 am
Gormwood wrote:Getting a tone here that women should stop trying to fight the heartbeat bill and put out on demand like pay-per-view cable.
by Caracasus » Mon May 13, 2019 9:01 am
Gormwood wrote:Getting a tone here that women should stop trying to fight the heartbeat bill and put out on demand like pay-per-view cable.
by Gormwood » Mon May 13, 2019 9:10 am
Caracasus wrote:Gormwood wrote:Getting a tone here that women should stop trying to fight the heartbeat bill and put out on demand like pay-per-view cable.
Really? Cos I count people who I know are ardent feminists saying this is a very silly idea.
And in case you are struggling, the bill absolutely needs to be fought. This is simply a bit of a tone deaf and useless way of going about it.
by Ostroeuropa » Mon May 13, 2019 9:12 am
Gormwood wrote:Galloism wrote:You do indeed have an inexhaustible supply of straw.Caracasus wrote:
Really? Cos I count people who I know are ardent feminists saying this is a very silly idea.
And in case you are struggling, the bill absolutely needs to be fought. This is simply a bit of a tone deaf and useless way of going about it.
So what's supposed to be discussed here other than celebrating and laughing at Alyssa Milano being a Stupid Cunt?
by Major-Tom » Mon May 13, 2019 9:14 am
by Ifreann » Mon May 13, 2019 9:15 am
Gormwood wrote:Galloism wrote:You do indeed have an inexhaustible supply of straw.Caracasus wrote:
Really? Cos I count people who I know are ardent feminists saying this is a very silly idea.
And in case you are struggling, the bill absolutely needs to be fought. This is simply a bit of a tone deaf and useless way of going about it.
So what's supposed to be discussed here other than celebrating and laughing at Alyssa Milano Being a Stupid Cunt?
by Purpelia » Mon May 13, 2019 9:15 am
Ifreann wrote:Purpelia wrote:Funny thing being it's not even about the sex. It's about her putting politics before the relationship. If the relationship really means that little to her that politics come first than that is a relationship that should just end.
Putting politics before a relationship only means that the relationship means little to the person in question if you assume that politics means little to them. Which is silly, politics is obviously very important.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ancientania, El Lazaro, Hidrandia, Ineva, Keltionialang, Luziyca, Maximum Imperium Rex, New Temecula, Sarolandia, Shearoa, Statesburg, Tiami
Advertisement