NationStates

Heloin wrote:The royals hate Trump, but I don't think that's news.

The Royals hate other stuff, like bans on fox hunts, paying taxes and Mr. George Tomlinson, First Milkman to the Royal Palaces, leaving the milk bottles on the left side of the Doors to the Royal Cottage.
I think that what they feel for nouveaux riches like Trump is more like a veiled disdain for upstart plebeians, seasoned with a sprinkle from an oak barrel of 80-year-old sneer.

Farnhamia wrote:

Heloin wrote:I mean, the Irish have a lot to say about those few years.

The Irish have a lot to say about a lot of things. Get an Irishman talking and good luck trying to shut him up.

Easy.
Buy him a pint of stout and run while he's busy drinking.

Petrolheadia wrote:

The Rich Port wrote:
RULE COLUMBIA, COLUMBIA RULES THE WAVES

YANKEES NEVER NEVER NEVER SHALL BE SLAVES

Also, on topic:

Donald Trump confirmed to be a baby hater

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/11 ... en-Windsor

"she found him ‘divisive’ and ‘misogynistic’."

“Harry thinks the president is a serious threat to human rights.”

"Author Christopher Anderson told The Daily Beast: “The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Prince Harry have all privately expressed their distaste for Trump.”

Who hates whom?

So they disagree with him. Big deal. That's not a reason to snub them.

Makes you look immature. You take it on the chin and make jokes about them over-reacting while they're eating McDonald's in the White House, not pout and whine about it.

Petrolheadia wrote:

The Rich Port wrote:
RULE COLUMBIA, COLUMBIA RULES THE WAVES

YANKEES NEVER NEVER NEVER SHALL BE SLAVES

Also, on topic:

Donald Trump confirmed to be a baby hater

https://www.express.co.uk/news/world/11 ... en-Windsor

"she found him ‘divisive’ and ‘misogynistic’."

“Harry thinks the president is a serious threat to human rights.”

"Author Christopher Anderson told The Daily Beast: “The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge and Prince Harry have all privately expressed their distaste for Trump.”

Who hates whom?

Hello? He is supposed to be the President and not a part of the cast of 90210.

Not surprised at all. He is a petty little man.

North German Realm wrote:

Aureumterra wrote:End the monarchy already, republicanism is where it’s at

Britain doesn't have a good history with Republicanism. Specifically, it has one of the worst histories with republicanism. There's a reason why so many Brits are still monarchists (or at least, supportive of the Royal Family). To be fair, neither do I (or my people).

Cromwell was one of the best Anglo-Saxons to ever live and breathe. Catholic tyrants should not be tolerated.

Bear Stearns wrote:

North German Realm wrote:Britain doesn't have a good history with Republicanism. Specifically, it has one of the worst histories with republicanism. There's a reason why so many Brits are still monarchists (or at least, supportive of the Royal Family). To be fair, neither do I (or my people).

Cromwell was one of the best Anglo-Saxons to ever live and breathe. Catholic tyrants should not be tolerated.

*drags the thread back on topic* Master Archie is cuter.

Fuck I hate this website, why do I bother, this thread makes me want to fucking jump out a window.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Fuck I hate this website, why do I bother, this thread makes me want to fucking jump out a window.

So go play somewhere else. Sheesh.

Farnhamia wrote:

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Fuck I hate this website, why do I bother, this thread makes me want to fucking jump out a window.

So go play somewhere else. Sheesh.

Nah, I may hate this website, but it is, despite that, still amusing to watch the people on here spew retarded shit.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Fuck I hate this website, why do I bother, this thread makes me want to fucking jump out a window.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:

Farnhamia wrote:So go play somewhere else. Sheesh.

Nah, I may hate this website, but it is, despite that, still amusing to watch the people on here spew retarded shit.

As opposed to inane, aimless complaining?

Why don't you contribute if you're so much smarter, then.

Let's see Paul Allen's royal baby.

The Rich Port wrote:

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Fuck I hate this website, why do I bother, this thread makes me want to fucking jump out a window.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:
Nah, I may hate this website, but it is, despite that, still amusing to watch the people on here spew retarded shit.

As opposed to inane, aimless complaining?

Why don't you contribute if you're so much smarter, then.

No thanks, already had conversations like this a hundred times, and I don’t have the time nor motivation to bother. The image doesn’t work btw.

North German Realm wrote:

Petrolheadia wrote:No less than the royalty.

The Royalty is much more popular in the United Kingdom than Donald Trump is in The United States though.

The Royalty is more popular in the United States than Trump is. Queen Elizabeth's approval rating here is around 68%, whereas Trump's approval rating has consistently hovered around the high 30s and low 40s since the beginning of his presidential campaign.

First American Empire wrote:

North German Realm wrote:The Royalty is much more popular in the United Kingdom than Donald Trump is in The United States though.

The Royalty is more popular in the United States than Trump is. Queen Elizabeth's approval rating here is around 68%, whereas Trump's approval rating has consistently hovered around the high 30s and low 40s since the beginning of his presidential campaign.

I'll give the Royals some credit, they aren't some Ferengi-looking peeps.

Prince Charles kinda looks like Odo but that's a good thing.

The Rich Port wrote:

First American Empire wrote:
The Royalty is more popular in the United States than Trump is. Queen Elizabeth's approval rating here is around 68%, whereas Trump's approval rating has consistently hovered around the high 30s and low 40s since the beginning of his presidential campaign.

I'll give the Royals some credit, they aren't some Ferengi-looking peeps.

Prince Charles kinda looks like Odo but that's a good thing.

DS9 references, good man!

I, for one, am happy for Meghan Markle and the royals across the pond, but please Brits keep the news about you're useless monarchy on your side.

Risottia wrote:

Heloin wrote:The royals hate Trump, but I don't think that's news.

The Royals hate other stuff, like bans on fox hunts, paying taxes and Mr. George Tomlinson, First Milkman to the Royal Palaces, leaving the milk bottles on the left side of the Doors to the Royal Cottage.
I think that what they feel for nouveaux riches like Trump is more like a veiled disdain for upstart plebeians, seasoned with a sprinkle from an oak barrel of 80-year-old sneer.

Or maybe it's because he's an ass, and behaved like an ass when he met the Queen.

Cappuccina wrote:

The Rich Port wrote:
I'll give the Royals some credit, they aren't some Ferengi-looking peeps.

Prince Charles kinda looks like Odo but that's a good thing.

DS9 references, good man!

I, for one, am happy for Meghan Markle and the royals across the pond, but please Brits keep the news about you're useless monarchy on your side.

*Your. And if there weren't a market for the news then it wouldn't be here.

Guess Americans are feeling a bit of regret for the separation.

Salus Maior wrote:

Cappuccina wrote:DS9 references, good man!

I, for one, am happy for Meghan Markle and the royals across the pond, but please Brits keep the news about you're useless monarchy on your side.

*Your. And if there weren't a market for the news then it wouldn't be here.

Guess Americans are feeling a bit of regret for the separation.

Not really.

North German Realm wrote:

Petrolheadia wrote:No less than the royalty.

The Royalty is much more popular in the United Kingdom than Donald Trump is in The United States though.

They're a tourist attraction, not actual politicians.

Petrolheadia wrote:

North German Realm wrote:The Royalty is much more popular in the United Kingdom than Donald Trump is in The United States though.

They're a tourist attraction, not actual politicians.

True as that might be, it is completely irrelevant to the point you were trying to make, or what I (and many others) corrected you on.

Salus Maior wrote:

Risottia wrote:The Royals hate other stuff, like bans on fox hunts, paying taxes and Mr. George Tomlinson, First Milkman to the Royal Palaces, leaving the milk bottles on the left side of the Doors to the Royal Cottage.
I think that what they feel for nouveaux riches like Trump is more like a veiled disdain for upstart plebeians, seasoned with a sprinkle from an oak barrel of 80-year-old sneer.

Or maybe it's because he's an ass, and behaved like an ass when he met the Queen.

Not unlike Berlusconi. Remember "Meeester Obamaaaaah!"

Risottia wrote:

Salus Maior wrote:
Or maybe it's because he's an ass, and behaved like an ass when he met the Queen.

Not unlike Berlusconi. Remember "Meeester Obamaaaaah!"

NGL.

I kinda wish Super Mario was the ambassador to the U.S.

Or maybe Pizza Pasta from Punch-Out.

Salus Maior wrote:

Cappuccina wrote:DS9 references, good man!

I, for one, am happy for Meghan Markle and the royals across the pond, but please Brits keep the news about you're useless monarchy on your side.

*Your. And if there weren't a market for the news then it wouldn't be here.

Guess Americans are feeling a bit of regret for the separation.

Let's not act like multinational media conglomerates that are often state-funded and have considerable sway over public opinion are entirely the result of rational market forces acting independently.

FelrikTheDeleted wrote:Fuck I hate this website, why do I bother, this thread makes me want to fucking jump out a window.

The interesting thing is that you are playing on the very website that you are complaining about.

Farnhamia wrote:

Bear Stearns wrote:
Cromwell was one of the best Anglo-Saxons to ever live and breathe. Catholic tyrants should not be tolerated.

*drags the thread back on topic* Master Archie is cuter.

And equally as useless inheriting state positions on the basis of birth with no actual power

Just end the monarchy