The mixture of European Identitarian (Almost universal polite equivalent for White Supremacist), and "Third Positionist" (traditionally a polite word for Fascist) were also a red herring.
Advertisement
by North German Realm » Wed May 08, 2019 9:37 am
5 Nov, 2020
Die Morgenpost: "We will reconsider our relationship with Poland" Reichskanzler Lagenmauer says after Polish president protested North German ultimatum that made them restore reproductive freedom. | European Society votes not to persecute Hungary for atrocities committed against Serbs, "Giving a rogue state leave to commit genocide as it sees fit." North German delegate bemoans. | Negotiations still underway in Rome, delegates arguing over the extent of indemnities Turkey might be made to pay, lawful status of Turkish collaborators during occupation of Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Syria.
by Vassenor » Wed May 08, 2019 9:38 am
Vojelneit wrote:Vassenor wrote:
So clearly the modified Kriegsmarine ensign flag and blatant racism are just a front.
Even if I were a nazi sympathiser, what exactly would it achieve that you openly call me one with no further information? Seems to me that you're just pulling the good old "culpability by association" card. Way more convenient to associate me with a largely reviled ideology than to properly answer my point of view, isn't it?
My country's flag or theme isn't relevant at all. This is an OOC board. I have several other countries including an anarcho-capitalist country, a totalitarian theocracy and a civil rights-based kingdom. Does this make me an anarcho-capitalist, a totalitarian religious fanatic and a monarchist hippie all at once?
Lastly, I have no idea where you see blatant racism in my statements. I didn't insult anyone based on their race. My opinion is simply that a White European country should be led by White European monarchs and that this White European monarchy deserves to remain exclusively White European. There's no hostility towards other races here, just preference towards my own in my own continent, just like I'm pretty sure most Black Africans want to be represented and led by Black Africans. What's so hard to get about that?
by Vojelneit » Wed May 08, 2019 9:41 am
Revolutionary Atlantica wrote:Also, Nazi dude, it literally says 'third positionist' in your sig, boy shut your sensitive ass up.
by Vojelneit » Wed May 08, 2019 9:43 am
Vassenor wrote:Vojelneit wrote:
Even if I were a nazi sympathiser, what exactly would it achieve that you openly call me one with no further information? Seems to me that you're just pulling the good old "culpability by association" card. Way more convenient to associate me with a largely reviled ideology than to properly answer my point of view, isn't it?
My country's flag or theme isn't relevant at all. This is an OOC board. I have several other countries including an anarcho-capitalist country, a totalitarian theocracy and a civil rights-based kingdom. Does this make me an anarcho-capitalist, a totalitarian religious fanatic and a monarchist hippie all at once?
Lastly, I have no idea where you see blatant racism in my statements. I didn't insult anyone based on their race. My opinion is simply that a White European country should be led by White European monarchs and that this White European monarchy deserves to remain exclusively White European. There's no hostility towards other races here, just preference towards my own in my own continent, just like I'm pretty sure most Black Africans want to be represented and led by Black Africans. What's so hard to get about that?
>no blatant racism
>White European monarchy deserves to remain exclusively White European
[thonkingface]
by Vassenor » Wed May 08, 2019 9:44 am
Vojelneit wrote:Revolutionary Atlantica wrote:Also, Nazi dude, it literally says 'third positionist' in your sig, boy shut your sensitive ass up.
You're the only one getting butthurt about the political labels you blindly plaster on me. 'Third positionist' isn't synonymous with 'neo-nazi' whether you like it or not. They belong to the same political family (far-right-wing), but they're different ideologies, just like 'maoist', 'stalinist' or 'marxist-leninist' aren't the same thing, sorry.
by Vojelneit » Wed May 08, 2019 9:46 am
Vassenor wrote:Vojelneit wrote:
You're the only one getting butthurt about the political labels you blindly plaster on me. 'Third positionist' isn't synonymous with 'neo-nazi' whether you like it or not. They belong to the same political family (far-right-wing), but they're different ideologies, just like 'maoist', 'stalinist' or 'marxist-leninist' aren't the same thing, sorry.
Meanwhile you're getting butthurt over the fact that the person seventh in line for the British Throne and thus pretty much guaranteed to not inherit is a little bit brown.
by Vassenor » Wed May 08, 2019 9:48 am
Vojelneit wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Meanwhile you're getting butthurt over the fact that the person seventh in line for the British Throne and thus pretty much guaranteed to not inherit is a little bit brown.
Under that flawed logic, disagreeing is being butthurt in any and all circumstances. That's not how it works. I'm simply concerned about the future of Britain's identity.
by Vojelneit » Wed May 08, 2019 9:48 am
Vassenor wrote:And it doesn't matter how many semantic hoops you try to jump through, complaining about a loss of racial purity is pretty fucking racist.
by North German Realm » Wed May 08, 2019 9:49 am
It's the seventh in line. He's probably never even going to see the throne outside of in particular ceremonies. What is it with you people and the segregation?Vojelneit wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Meanwhile you're getting butthurt over the fact that the person seventh in line for the British Throne and thus pretty much guaranteed to not inherit is a little bit brown.
Under that flawed logic, disagreeing is being butthurt in any and all circumstances. That's not how it works. I'm simply concerned about the future of Britain's identity.
5 Nov, 2020
Die Morgenpost: "We will reconsider our relationship with Poland" Reichskanzler Lagenmauer says after Polish president protested North German ultimatum that made them restore reproductive freedom. | European Society votes not to persecute Hungary for atrocities committed against Serbs, "Giving a rogue state leave to commit genocide as it sees fit." North German delegate bemoans. | Negotiations still underway in Rome, delegates arguing over the extent of indemnities Turkey might be made to pay, lawful status of Turkish collaborators during occupation of Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Syria.
by Vojelneit » Wed May 08, 2019 9:49 am
Revolutionary Atlantica wrote:You're not even British m80.
by Vassenor » Wed May 08, 2019 9:49 am
by Ifreann » Wed May 08, 2019 9:50 am
by Revolutionary Atlantica » Wed May 08, 2019 9:54 am
by Vassenor » Wed May 08, 2019 9:55 am
Ifreann wrote:The New California Republic wrote:Looks like some socialist jiggery-pokery to me.
It's sure not capitalist.Vassenor wrote:
So there is no evidence. Got it.
Do you even hear yourself? You're acting like evidence only counts if it's communicated by way of a list of URLs. Videos can have evidence in them, Vass. The human voice can communicate information. Text can be displayed in a video file, not just a HTML file.
And what would you even do if I did give you a source for every fact Shaun cites to support his arguments? What use would that be to you? You'd have to watch the video to know what arguments those facts were supporting. Here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Estate
There's a citation. Can you address the argument? I don't see how.
by Bears Armed » Wed May 08, 2019 10:03 am
by Ifreann » Wed May 08, 2019 10:34 am
Vojelneit wrote:Vassenor wrote:
So clearly the modified Kriegsmarine ensign flag and blatant racism are just a front.
Even if I were a nazi sympathiser, what exactly would it achieve that you openly call me one with no further information? Seems to me that you're just pulling the good old "culpability by association" card. Way more convenient to associate me with a largely reviled ideology than to properly answer my point of view, isn't it?
My country's flag or theme isn't relevant at all. This is an OOC board. I have several other countries including an anarcho-capitalist country, a totalitarian theocracy and a civil rights-based kingdom. Does this make me an anarcho-capitalist, a totalitarian religious fanatic and a monarchist hippie all at once?
Lastly, I have no idea where you see blatant racism in my statements. I didn't insult anyone based on their race. My opinion is simply that a White European country should be led by White European monarchs and that this White European monarchy deserves to remain exclusively White European. There's no hostility towards other races here, just preference towards my own in my own continent, just like I'm pretty sure most Black Africans want to be represented and led by Black Africans. What's so hard to get about that?
Vassenor wrote:Ifreann wrote:It's sure not capitalist.
Do you even hear yourself? You're acting like evidence only counts if it's communicated by way of a list of URLs. Videos can have evidence in them, Vass. The human voice can communicate information. Text can be displayed in a video file, not just a HTML file.
And what would you even do if I did give you a source for every fact Shaun cites to support his arguments? What use would that be to you? You'd have to watch the video to know what arguments those facts were supporting. Here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Estate
There's a citation. Can you address the argument? I don't see how.
You mean like you keep claiming that the actual profit generated for the taxpayer by the royal family doesn't count because they didn't earn it all personally?
by Vassenor » Wed May 08, 2019 11:10 am
Ifreann wrote:Vojelneit wrote:
Even if I were a nazi sympathiser, what exactly would it achieve that you openly call me one with no further information? Seems to me that you're just pulling the good old "culpability by association" card. Way more convenient to associate me with a largely reviled ideology than to properly answer my point of view, isn't it?
My country's flag or theme isn't relevant at all. This is an OOC board. I have several other countries including an anarcho-capitalist country, a totalitarian theocracy and a civil rights-based kingdom. Does this make me an anarcho-capitalist, a totalitarian religious fanatic and a monarchist hippie all at once?
Lastly, I have no idea where you see blatant racism in my statements. I didn't insult anyone based on their race. My opinion is simply that a White European country should be led by White European monarchs and that this White European monarchy deserves to remain exclusively White European. There's no hostility towards other races here, just preference towards my own in my own continent, just like I'm pretty sure most Black Africans want to be represented and led by Black Africans. What's so hard to get about that?
Here's a puzzle for you friendo: What is the race and ethnicity of the monarchs of:
Antigua and Barbuda?
The Bahamas?
Barbados?
Belize?
Canada?
Grenada?
Jamaica?
Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Lucia?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Australia?
New Zealand?
Papua New Guinea?
Solomon Islands?
Tuvalu?Vassenor wrote:
You mean like you keep claiming that the actual profit generated for the taxpayer by the royal family doesn't count because they didn't earn it all personally?
Maybe I got that argument from Shaun's video. Maybe I came up with it myself. You can watch the video and find out. Or you can pretend that videos aren't real and only text is evidence.
by Ifreann » Wed May 08, 2019 11:45 am
Vassenor wrote:Ifreann wrote:Here's a puzzle for you friendo: What is the race and ethnicity of the monarchs of:
Antigua and Barbuda?
The Bahamas?
Barbados?
Belize?
Canada?
Grenada?
Jamaica?
Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Lucia?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Australia?
New Zealand?
Papua New Guinea?
Solomon Islands?
Tuvalu?
Maybe I got that argument from Shaun's video. Maybe I came up with it myself. You can watch the video and find out. Or you can pretend that videos aren't real and only text is evidence.
Or maybe I shouldn't have to click off the site to see your arguments.
by Lanorth » Wed May 08, 2019 3:11 pm
by Libertas Omnium Maximus » Wed May 08, 2019 3:16 pm
Lanorth wrote:Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, behold Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor; the new member to the Royal Family of The United Kingdom. God Save The Queen! It is at moments such as today that I am proud to be British.
by Lanorth » Wed May 08, 2019 3:26 pm
Libertas Omnium Maximus wrote:Why are you proud again?
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Wed May 08, 2019 3:27 pm
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Libertas Omnium Maximus » Wed May 08, 2019 3:29 pm
Lanorth wrote:Libertas Omnium Maximus wrote:Why are you proud again?
I am proud to be British al of the time. I do not know why I put 'It is at moments such as today that I am proud to be British'. Let me edit that. In response to your question, I am proud to be British for a number of things. I am proud to reside in a country which still has a monarchy, I am proud to be born to a nation with such a long and rather amazing history and finally I am proud to have been in a British family of numerous people who have served their country in wars around the globe with valour and distinction. I hope that answers your question.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Eahland, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, IKV Nemesis, Ineva, Shrillland, The Black Forrest, Tiami, Uiiop
Advertisement