Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor

[Libertas Omnium Maximus]

It is good in my eyes, because it means only the strong kids survived. Now the trend is for only older people to be having children, which means that for a substantial portion of the world, a lot of the next generation is going to be defective innately. Genetic engineering or technologies might well need to increasingly be used to artificially make the gene pool be in better shape than it otherwise would be in.

what? physical strength is not the only measure of strength.

If this world worked off of pure immune system strength, you would notice we wouldn't have a lot of the brilliant people we have today. Survival of the fittest doesn't mean "Survival of the most strong, ripped, buff guy."

[Minachia]

Make the United Kingdom the United Republic.

I just want to know what's the purpose of the royal family now. It seems they're just glorified Kardashians across the sea

They bring in a metric shittonne of tax revenue from tourism, that's what they do.

[Ifreann]

I just want to know what's the purpose of the royal family now. It seems they're just glorified Kardashians across the sea

They bring in a metric shittonne of tax revenue from tourism, that's what they do.

Or is it.

[Aureumterra]

Britain, your waifu is trash.

I don't see why leftists are so opposed to royalty. It's basically like US celebrities, but nationalized.

Not just leftists bud, I am a hardcore republican (ideology, and to some extent the US party as well), while being a right winger.

[Saranidia]

Britain, your waifu is trash.

I don't see why leftists are so opposed to royalty. It's basically like US celebrities, but nationalized.

Which arguably makes it from a left wing perspective better.

Reminds me of how hard it is to distinguish between a statement in favour of stereotypical champagne socialists and noblesse oblige advocates except directly on the issue of hereditary titles.

[Nova Cyberia]

They bring in a metric shittonne of tax revenue from tourism, that's what they do.

Or is it.

the battle of the YouTube videos.

which one is the most shit?

[Vassenor]

They bring in a metric shittonne of tax revenue from tourism, that's what they do.

Or is it.

Still waiting for the evidence in support of their assertions.

[Heloin]

Or is it.

Still waiting for the evidence in support of their assertions.

God save the queen
'Cause tourists are money
And our figurehead
Is not what she seems

Oh God save history
God save your mad parade
Oh Lord God have mercy
All crimes are paid

Oh when there's no future
How can there be sin
We're the flowers
In the dustbin
We're the poison
In your human machine
We're the future
Your future

God save the queen
We mean it man
We love our queen
God saves

[Ifreann]

Or is it.

Still waiting for the evidence in support of their assertions.

Maybe the evidence is in the video. You'd have to watch to find out.

[The New California Republic]

They bring in a metric shittonne of tax revenue from tourism, that's what they do.

Or is it.

Looks like some socialist jiggery-pokery to me.

[Aureumterra]

I don't see why leftists are so opposed to royalty. It's basically like US celebrities, but nationalized.

Which arguably makes it from a left wing perspective better.

Reminds me of how hard it is to distinguish between a statement in favour of stereotypical champagne socialists and noblesse oblige advocates except directly on the issue of hereditary titles.

It’s not a left wing perspective, it’s a republican perspective.

I think I have made my opposition to modern European monarchies pretty clear, but no way in hell am I a leftist

[Scomagia]

In the good old days the infant death rate was even worse than today's American infant death rate, a good chunk of kids did not survive the first ten years of life, and there was no such thing as free healthcare. So, quite frankly, screw the days of yore.

It is good in my eyes, because it means only the strong kids survived. Now the trend is for only older people to be having children because it is taking people so much more time to be able to afford to start families, which means that for a substantial portion of the world, a lot of the next generation is going to be defective innately. Genetic engineering or technologies might well need to increasingly be used to artificially make the gene pool be in better shape than it otherwise would be in.

Not really. It meant that the lucky kids survived. Diphtheria doesn't really care how strong your kid is, neither does measles or mumps or any other childhood disease. An otherwise healthy and strong baby can die swiftly from illness and an otherwise sickly and weak baby can survive the same illness. You haven't got the faintest idea what you're talking about.

Epigenetics might prove the rest of your post to be bullshit, too, but I'm no expert. A five year old child in the modern US likely has multiple generations of well-nourished forebears and will be well nourished themselves. That bodes well for future generations.

[Vojelneit]

Lol. A mixed-race child within a European royal family. Very symbolic.

The UK has reached the point of no return if even the deepest-rooted elements of the state are becoming less and less British.

[Vassenor]

Still waiting for the evidence in support of their assertions.

Maybe the evidence is in the video. You'd have to watch to find out.

So there is no evidence. Got it.

[Vassenor]

Lol. A mixed-race child within a European royal family. Very symbolic.

The UK has reached the point of no return if even the deepest-rooted elements of the state are becoming less and less British.

So British they're all German.

Unless Saxe-Coburg Gotha magically became part of Great Britain while I was asleep.

[First American Empire]

Lol. A mixed-race child within a European royal family. Very symbolic.

The UK has reached the point of no return if even the deepest-rooted elements of the state are becoming less and less British.

That's fine. It isn't actually a problem to most people.

[North German Realm]

Lol. A mixed-race child within a European royal family. Very symbolic.

The UK has reached the point of no return if even the deepest-rooted elements of the state are becoming less and less British.

Most people don't really care about how the Royal Family looks, but more about what they represent. For most of recent history, the British Monarch has been ethnically German after all, despite what they all represented, why shouldn't a minor, almost irrelevant member of the royal house be half-and-half?

[Vojelneit]

Lol. A mixed-race child within a European royal family. Very symbolic.

The UK has reached the point of no return if even the deepest-rooted elements of the state are becoming less and less British.

So British they're all German.

Unless Saxe-Coburg Gotha magically became part of Great Britain while I was asleep.

Most White British citizens have Germanic or Celtic roots. That's still European. A partially African child is a completely different business.

Lol. A mixed-race child within a European royal family. Very symbolic.

The UK has reached the point of no return if even the deepest-rooted elements of the state are becoming less and less British.

That's fine. It isn't actually a problem to most people.

Well, that's too bad. If my country had a centuries-old royal family, I would sure find it problematic that its descent becomes extra-European.

[Vassenor]

So British they're all German.

Unless Saxe-Coburg Gotha magically became part of Great Britain while I was asleep.

Most White British citizens have Germanic or Celtic roots. That's still European. A partially African child is a completely different business.

That's fine. It isn't actually a problem to most people.

Well, that's too bad. If my country had a centuries-old royal family, I would sure find it problematic that its descent becomes extra-European.

Neo-Naziism is a hell of a drug, it seems.

[North German Realm]

So British they're all German.

Unless Saxe-Coburg Gotha magically became part of Great Britain while I was asleep.

Most White British citizens have Germanic or Celtic roots. That's still European. A partially African child is a completely different business.

That's fine. It isn't actually a problem to most people.

Well, that's too bad. If my country had a centuries-old royal family, I would sure find it problematic that its descent becomes extra-European.

In the particular case of the Brits, they should be fucking glad a "non-European" (and isn't that a wonderful can of worms, using ethnicity for the remnants of an Empire spanning multiple continents that essentially used integration and assimilation to "British"-ize people of said places for the larger part of the last two centuries) isn't on the fucking throne, given how the last relevant British Monarchs fucking crowned themselves as Emperors of places they'd seldom -if ever- visit.

[Vojelneit]

Most White British citizens have Germanic or Celtic roots. That's still European. A partially African child is a completely different business.



Well, that's too bad. If my country had a centuries-old royal family, I would sure find it problematic that its descent becomes extra-European.

Neo-Naziism is a hell of a drug, it seems.

"NAZI!"

That was quick.

[Vassenor]

Neo-Naziism is a hell of a drug, it seems.

"NAZI!"

That was quick.

So clearly the modified Kriegsmarine ensign flag, blatant racism and general far-right ideation are just a front.

[Revolutionary Atlantica]

The only reason I clicked this topic is because you capitalised "Labour". Now THAT would have been a news story!

Also, Nazi dude, it literally says 'third positionist' in your sig, boy shut your sensitive ass up.

[The Grims]

So British they're all German.

Unless Saxe-Coburg Gotha magically became part of Great Britain while I was asleep.

Most White British citizens have Germanic or Celtic roots. That's still European. A partially African child is a completely different business.

That's fine. It isn't actually a problem to most people.

Well, that's too bad. If my country had a centuries-old royal family, I would sure find it problematic that its descent becomes extra-European.

Why ? It has beem worshipping a Palestinian Jew for many centuries.

[Vojelneit]

"NAZI!"

That was quick.

So clearly the modified Kriegsmarine ensign flag and blatant racism are just a front.

Even if I were a nazi sympathiser, what exactly would it achieve that you openly call me one with no further information? Seems to me that you're just pulling the good old "culpability by association" card. Way more convenient to associate me with a largely reviled ideology than to properly answer my point of view, isn't it?

My country's flag or theme isn't relevant at all. This is an OOC board. I have several other countries including an anarcho-capitalist country, a totalitarian theocracy and a civil rights-based kingdom. Does this make me an anarcho-capitalist, a totalitarian religious fanatic and a monarchist hippie all at once?

Lastly, I have no idea where you see blatant racism in my statements. I didn't insult anyone based on their race. My opinion is simply that a White European country should be led by White European monarchs and that this White European monarchy deserves to remain exclusively White European. There's no hostility towards other races here, just preference towards my own in my own continent, just like I'm pretty sure most Black Africans want to be represented and led by Black Africans. What's so hard to get about that?