Dumb Ideologies wrote:While a lot of people are apathetic about the monarchy, I'd wager that when push comes to shove they'd be pretty antipathetic towards Another Fucking Politician taking their place.
Who said anyone had to take their place?
Advertisement
by Valrifell » Mon May 06, 2019 9:25 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:While a lot of people are apathetic about the monarchy, I'd wager that when push comes to shove they'd be pretty antipathetic towards Another Fucking Politician taking their place.
by Bear Stearns » Mon May 06, 2019 9:26 am
by East Azadistan » Mon May 06, 2019 9:28 am
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon May 06, 2019 9:30 am
by Bear Stearns » Mon May 06, 2019 9:32 am
by First American Empire » Mon May 06, 2019 9:32 am
by Grenartia » Mon May 06, 2019 9:33 am
Bear Stearns wrote:I'd be partial to an American monarchy, but our oligarchic families (Bush, Clinton, DuPont, Pritzker, etc.) are such trash that they'd be worthy of the guillotine. Giving these psychotic narcissists landed titles would just make them even worse.
We would need to track down some descendants of the Founding Fathers and pick one who is a good person who has accomplished something. I believe that there are still descendants of John Adams running around.
by East Azadistan » Mon May 06, 2019 9:33 am
Bear Stearns wrote:East Azadistan wrote:
Well if monarchs are abolished and no politicians take their place there is no head of state whatsoever.
You could have the head of state be someone else who has been historically prominent in British society, such as First Sea Lord or Fleet Commander of the Royal Navy.
by Bear Stearns » Mon May 06, 2019 9:33 am
Grenartia wrote:Bear Stearns wrote:I'd be partial to an American monarchy, but our oligarchic families (Bush, Clinton, DuPont, Pritzker, etc.) are such trash that they'd be worthy of the guillotine. Giving these psychotic narcissists landed titles would just make them even worse.
We would need to track down some descendants of the Founding Fathers and pick one who is a good person who has accomplished something. I believe that there are still descendants of John Adams running around.
"You know those guys who kicked the shittiness of monarchy off our half of the continent almost a quarter of a millenia ago?"
"Yeah, what about them?"
"Lets track down their descendants and unironically make one of them a monarch."
Logic: 100
by First American Empire » Mon May 06, 2019 9:36 am
Grenartia wrote:Bear Stearns wrote:I'd be partial to an American monarchy, but our oligarchic families (Bush, Clinton, DuPont, Pritzker, etc.) are such trash that they'd be worthy of the guillotine. Giving these psychotic narcissists landed titles would just make them even worse.
We would need to track down some descendants of the Founding Fathers and pick one who is a good person who has accomplished something. I believe that there are still descendants of John Adams running around.
"You know those guys who kicked the shittiness of monarchy off our half of the continent almost a quarter of a millenia ago?"
"Yeah, what about them?"
"Lets track down their descendants and unironically make one of them a monarch."
Logic: 100
by Ifreann » Mon May 06, 2019 9:37 am
Saranidia wrote:Ifreann wrote:More common, I believe.
The idea of noblesse olige obviously does not invalidate all complaints against hereditary nobility.
You already have in all but name.
It does invalidate all complaints but see my specific post and think of a complaint it does not invalidate please.
by Kelleyland456 » Mon May 06, 2019 9:39 am
Lanorth wrote:Source: Source
Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has gone into labour.
It follows weeks of speculation about when Meghan, 37, might give birth - but no details have been given about where she is having her baby.
Rhiannon Mills, Sky's Royal correspondent said: "It was in the early hours of this morning when the Duchess went into labour and the Duke was by her side."
The pregnancy was announced in October, as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex began their first major overseas tour of Australia and New Zealand, and they were expecting the baby to arrive in the spring.
Your thoughts on the amazing event about to strike the Royal Family, the Commonwealth and the United Kingdom?
by Bear Stearns » Mon May 06, 2019 9:41 am
by Christian Confederation » Mon May 06, 2019 9:42 am
by Saiwania » Mon May 06, 2019 9:44 am
by The Alma Mater » Mon May 06, 2019 9:45 am
Saiwania wrote:37 years of age is a bit old for a woman to be having children. This is probably her one if not second to last chance, to ever reproduce. She's not British however, so her marriage to British royalty is a mistake in my view.
by Ifreann » Mon May 06, 2019 9:46 am
Saiwania wrote:37 years of age is a bit old for a woman to be having children. This is probably her one if not second to last chance, to ever reproduce. She's not British however, so her marriage to British royalty is a mistake in my view. Prince Harry chose poorly, that is always going to be my opinion.
by Saranidia » Mon May 06, 2019 9:47 am
Kelleyland456 wrote:Lanorth wrote:Source: Source
Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has gone into labour.
It follows weeks of speculation about when Meghan, 37, might give birth - but no details have been given about where she is having her baby.
Rhiannon Mills, Sky's Royal correspondent said: "It was in the early hours of this morning when the Duchess went into labour and the Duke was by her side."
The pregnancy was announced in October, as the Duke and Duchess of Sussex began their first major overseas tour of Australia and New Zealand, and they were expecting the baby to arrive in the spring.
Your thoughts on the amazing event about to strike the Royal Family, the Commonwealth and the United Kingdom?
FInally maybe facebook will stop posting endless adds about what Megan Breathed about, thought of, Dared to dream about it. I am surprised how poorly the press treats Megan after what happened to Diana. They Caused Diana's death in 97 If they aren't careful they will cause a repeat. Why can't people just leave them alone its not like being 7th or 8th to the throne Baby sussex don't even get an HRH not saying its unimportant its just not that big of a deal that ever other thing on facebook needs to start with Megan Markle did......
by The Alma Mater » Mon May 06, 2019 9:50 am
Saranidia wrote:Kelleyland456 wrote:
FInally maybe facebook will stop posting endless adds about what Megan Breathed about, thought of, Dared to dream about it. I am surprised how poorly the press treats Megan after what happened to Diana. They Caused Diana's death in 97 If they aren't careful they will cause a repeat. Why can't people just leave them alone its not like being 7th or 8th to the throne Baby sussex don't even get an HRH not saying its unimportant its just not that big of a deal that ever other thing on facebook needs to start with Megan Markle did......
I thought a car accident caused Lady Diana's death.
by Saranidia » Mon May 06, 2019 9:51 am
by The Alma Mater » Mon May 06, 2019 9:55 am
by Saranidia » Mon May 06, 2019 9:57 am
by Vassenor » Mon May 06, 2019 9:59 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: 0rganization, Aadhiris, Based Illinois, Godular, Hidrandia, HISPIDA, ImSaLiA, Kerwa, Maximum Imperium Rex, Pale Dawn, Pasong Tirad, Port Carverton, Shrillland, Statesburg, Tarsonis, Trump Almighty, Tungstan, Uiiop, Valrifall, Verkhoyanska, Yasuragi, Zancostan
Advertisement