NATION

PASSWORD

What is your opinion on LGBT+ marriage?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Lgbt marriage: good or bad?

Yes, love is love.
408
58%
No, it's a sin.
86
12%
No, love is for reproducing.
50
7%
No, civil unions are better.
23
3%
Maybe
13
2%
Praise David Hasselhoff (Requested by Some random cat dude)
88
13%
No opinion/neutral
30
4%
 
Total votes : 698

User avatar
Risastorstein
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 401
Founded: Oct 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Risastorstein » Sun May 12, 2019 3:57 pm

Vassenor wrote:So how do you treat it then if it's an illness?

By not validating their delusional idealization for starters. No woman has ever had a penis and no man can bear a child. And I don't know, sport is a good way to own your body. But no, we shouldn't prescribe hormones and surgery for a mental issue.
Last edited by Risastorstein on Sun May 12, 2019 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42338
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Sun May 12, 2019 4:30 pm

Risastorstein wrote:
Vassenor wrote:So how do you treat it then if it's an illness?

By not validating their delusional idealization for starters. No woman has ever had a penis and no man can bear a child. And I don't know, sport is a good way to own your body. But no, we shouldn't prescribe hormones and surgery for a mental issue.

seems to me this talk about trans stuff belongs in a different thread since it has nothing to do with lgbt marriage.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 36971
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sun May 12, 2019 4:31 pm

Risastorstein wrote:Changing your name isn't a basic right.

Actually, it is. Don't make pronouncements when you don't know what you're talking about; it makes you look very foolish.

Risastorstein wrote:Messing with a otherwise healthy body isn't a basic right.

Actually, it is. You have the right to obtain a tattoo, pierce your ears, have cosmetic surgery, pierce anything else you want pierced, have weight loss surgery, etc. if you are of age. Again: don't make pronouncements when you don't know what you are talking about.

Risastorstein wrote:Wanting your hormonal cocktail to be free isn't a basic right.
It is, if covered under health insurance.

Risastorstein wrote:Changing the definition of gender to accommodate 0.5% of annoyed people because they aren't born the way they want isn't a basic right.

Neither is refusing to believe that science has known for a LONG time that gender is complex (XXY babies, for example, XYY babies, trisomy X babies, intersex babies...

And the American Psychological Association disagrees with your opinion that there are only two genders and people with genders differing from their sex at birth are something new.

So please educate yourself rather than stick stubbornly to the 'it's all those damned liberals and SJWs forcing this down our throats! I Know Better!" script. Science knows best, and it doesn't support your opinion.
Last edited by Katganistan on Sun May 12, 2019 5:23 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Reason: changed quote tag to URL tag

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163895
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Sun May 12, 2019 4:33 pm

Kannap wrote:
Cekoviu wrote:The best Christian is a self-hating Christian.


I mean, I do hate myself as much as the next guy, but... there is no but, I just hate myself.

Big mood.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 36971
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sun May 12, 2019 6:21 pm

Te Netherlands wrote:
The Free Joy State wrote:Ah... so this is the LGBT+ marriage thread? I was starting to wonder.

My opinion now is the same as it was one hundred pages ago: there should be no legal prohibitions against two freely consenting adults getting married.



I actually think that there should be a traditional marriage between a man and a woman, and that civil unions/relationships between gays/lesbians should be allowed

Why should gays only get marriage light/the Vouie Litton knock-off?
Last edited by Katganistan on Sun May 12, 2019 6:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Cekoviu
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16954
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Cekoviu » Sun May 12, 2019 6:25 pm

Te Netherlands wrote:
The Free Joy State wrote:Ah... so this is the LGBT+ marriage thread? I was starting to wonder.

My opinion now is the same as it was one hundred pages ago: there should be no legal prohibitions against two freely consenting adults getting married.



I actually think that there should be a traditional marriage between a man and a woman, and that civil unions/relationships between gays/lesbians should be allowed

Kind of an odd position to take as a gay person.
pro: women's rights
anti: men's rights

User avatar
Elwher
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9238
Founded: May 24, 2012
Capitalizt

Postby Elwher » Sun May 12, 2019 9:30 pm

Katganistan wrote:
Risastorstein wrote:Wanting your hormonal cocktail to be free isn't a basic right.
It is, if covered under health insurance.


No, it is not free, you and other people are paying for it via their premiums.
CYNIC, n. A blackguard whose faulty vision sees things as they are, not as they ought to be. Hence the custom among the Scythians of plucking out a cynic's eyes to improve his vision.
Ambrose Bierce

User avatar
The Free Joy State
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 16402
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Joy State » Sun May 12, 2019 9:48 pm

Elwher wrote:
Katganistan wrote: It is, if covered under health insurance.


No, it is not free, you and other people are paying for it via their premiums.

That's more to do with an insurance-based healthcare system, though, isn't it (although, I thought insurance -- correct me if I'm wrong -- in most cases didn't cover things not considered necessary, so it being paid through premiums doesn't diminish the point about rights)?

For comparison, in my country, the national healthcare service covers the hormone therapy and surgery of individuals with gender dysphoria.

EDIT: Though this is probably way off-topic.
Last edited by The Free Joy State on Sun May 12, 2019 9:59 pm, edited 3 times in total.
"If there's a book that you want to read, but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it." - Toni Morrison

My nation does not represent my beliefs or politics.

User avatar
Te Netherlands
Envoy
 
Posts: 230
Founded: Jul 31, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Te Netherlands » Sun May 12, 2019 10:29 pm

Katganistan wrote:
Te Netherlands wrote:

I actually think that there should be a traditional marriage between a man and a woman, and that civil unions/relationships between gays/lesbians should be allowed

Why should gays only get marriage light/the Vouie Litton knock-off?


I don't get the question
Official name: the Netherlands
After some disputes within the PVV and the CDP about the new political party (National Party of the Netherlands) PM Legtenberg announced that the name will be the Conservative Party. Because the initial NPN became associated with far-right parties NSB and NSDAP in the '30s and '40s. PM Legtenberg further announced that the Netherlands wil also be a Federal Republic from 1 January 2024. And that he will become the first President of the Netherlands. How this will affect the elections will be decided by him and the House

User avatar
The Grims
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1843
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grims » Sun May 12, 2019 10:33 pm

Te Netherlands wrote:
Katganistan wrote:Why should gays only get marriage light/the Vouie Litton knock-off?


I don't get the question


They are asking why gay marriage should get a special name , like civil union, while it is the same thing.

User avatar
Te Netherlands
Envoy
 
Posts: 230
Founded: Jul 31, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Te Netherlands » Sun May 12, 2019 11:20 pm

The Grims wrote:
Te Netherlands wrote:
I don't get the question


They are asking why gay marriage should get a special name , like civil union, while it is the same thing.

Oh that, I meant to say that I only believe in a traditional marriage between a man and a woman, and that gay people should have the freedom to have a relationship and live together, more like a registered partnership
Official name: the Netherlands
After some disputes within the PVV and the CDP about the new political party (National Party of the Netherlands) PM Legtenberg announced that the name will be the Conservative Party. Because the initial NPN became associated with far-right parties NSB and NSDAP in the '30s and '40s. PM Legtenberg further announced that the Netherlands wil also be a Federal Republic from 1 January 2024. And that he will become the first President of the Netherlands. How this will affect the elections will be decided by him and the House

User avatar
Juristonia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6443
Founded: Oct 30, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Juristonia » Sun May 12, 2019 11:23 pm

Te Netherlands wrote:
The Grims wrote:
They are asking why gay marriage should get a special name , like civil union, while it is the same thing.

Oh that, I meant to say that I only believe in a traditional marriage between a man and a woman, and that gay people should have the freedom to have a relationship and live together, more like a registered partnership

They get that that's what you believe. They're asking why.
From the river to the sea

Liriena wrote:Say what you will about fascists: they are remarkably consistent even after several decades of failing spectacularly elsewhere.

Ifreann wrote:Indeed, as far as I can recall only one poster has ever supported legalising bestiality, and he was fucking his cat and isn't welcome here any more, in no small part, I imagine, because he kept going on about how he was fucking his cat.

Cannot think of a name wrote:Anyway, I'm from gold country, we grow up knowing that when people jump up and down shouting "GOLD GOLD GOLD" the gold is gone and the only money to be made is in selling shovels.

And it seems to me that cryptocurrency and NFTs and such suddenly have a whooooole lot of shovel salespeople.

User avatar
Te Netherlands
Envoy
 
Posts: 230
Founded: Jul 31, 2018
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Te Netherlands » Sun May 12, 2019 11:32 pm

Juristonia wrote:
Te Netherlands wrote: Oh that, I meant to say that I only believe in a traditional marriage between a man and a woman, and that gay people should have the freedom to have a relationship and live together, more like a registered partnership

They get that that's what you believe. They're asking why.


I believe in that because it was always been that only a man and a woman can marry each other, and two men and two women can't produce children, and I believe that you only can have children after marriage. And I believe we should live in a stronger Christian society. I am not judging anyone who have children and are not married, it's their choice, but I actually don't know any more reasons than this why I believe that
Official name: the Netherlands
After some disputes within the PVV and the CDP about the new political party (National Party of the Netherlands) PM Legtenberg announced that the name will be the Conservative Party. Because the initial NPN became associated with far-right parties NSB and NSDAP in the '30s and '40s. PM Legtenberg further announced that the Netherlands wil also be a Federal Republic from 1 January 2024. And that he will become the first President of the Netherlands. How this will affect the elections will be decided by him and the House

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Sun May 12, 2019 11:33 pm

Te Netherlands wrote:
Juristonia wrote:They get that that's what you believe. They're asking why.


I believe in that because it was always been that only a man and a woman can marry each other, and two men and two women can't produce children, and I believe that you only can have children after marriage. And I believe we should live in a stronger Christian society. I am not judging anyone who have children and are not married, it's their choice, but I actually don't know any more reasons than this why I believe that


So when do you ban heterosexual couples where one or both of the participants is infertile from marrying?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44088
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sun May 12, 2019 11:36 pm

Te Netherlands wrote:
Juristonia wrote:They get that that's what you believe. They're asking why.


I believe in that because it was always been that only a man and a woman can marry each other, and two men and two women can't produce children, and I believe that you only can have children after marriage. And I believe we should live in a stronger Christian society. I am not judging anyone who have children and are not married, it's their choice, but I actually don't know any more reasons than this why I believe that

What about infertile couples or non-Christians?
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44957
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sun May 12, 2019 11:36 pm

Te Netherlands wrote:
Juristonia wrote:They get that that's what you believe. They're asking why.


I believe in that because it was always been that only a man and a woman can marry each other,
Yes, this isn’t true at all.
Te Netherlands wrote:and two men and two women can't produce children,
I wasn’t aware kids were the only point of marriage. Also, you should look up in-vitro fertilization.
Te Netherlands wrote:and I believe that you only can have children after marriage.
Biology doesn’t agree with you.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.


Historian, of sorts.

Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
The Grims
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1843
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grims » Sun May 12, 2019 11:41 pm

Te Netherlands wrote:
Juristonia wrote:They get that that's what you believe. They're asking why.


I believe in that because it was always been that only a man and a woman can marry each other, and two men and two women can't produce children, and I believe that you only can have children after marriage. And I believe we should live in a stronger Christian society. I am not judging anyone who have children and are not married, it's their choice, but I actually don't know any more reasons than this why I believe that


It has not always been that way. Solomon for instance had many wives.
And marriage is not a christian invention, so the opinion of christians on it does not matter more or less than everybody elses ;)

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Sun May 12, 2019 11:44 pm

Kowani wrote:
Te Netherlands wrote:and I believe that you only can have children after marriage.
Biology doesn’t agree with you.

I think he has just phrased it incorrectly. I think that it should read "you should only have children" rather than "you only can have children"; i.e. it is a moral statement rather than a statement of biological fact.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44957
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Sun May 12, 2019 11:45 pm

The New California Republic wrote:
Kowani wrote: Biology doesn’t agree with you.

I think he has just phrased it incorrectly. I think that it should read "you should only have children" rather than "you only can have children"; i.e. it is a moral statement rather than a statement of biological fact.

Ah. Well, that’s a different thing, in which case I don’t care because fuck moral arguments.
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.


Historian, of sorts.

Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
Abarri
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 497
Founded: Aug 10, 2017
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Abarri » Mon May 13, 2019 12:23 am

Te Netherlands wrote:
Juristonia wrote:They get that that's what you believe. They're asking why.


I believe in that because it was always been that only a man and a woman can marry each other, and two men and two women can't produce children, and I believe that you only can have children after marriage. And I believe we should live in a stronger Christian society. I am not judging anyone who have children and are not married, it's their choice, but I actually don't know any more reasons than this why I believe that

Unfortunately (for you?), Christianity is not for everyone. Also, tradition or past custom is not always a definite prescription on how society should work.
Last edited by Abarri on Mon May 13, 2019 12:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Click to see factbook entries. Please ignore the income tax rate provided by NS. Timeline is frozen at 2021.

Prefers The South Pacific. Spanish is not my native language. I often take things for granted. Green is my favorite color. Collects music CDs. A male who's an almost-libertarian. Nominal non-practicing Protestant. Eh, to heck with it, I'm unaffiliated. Poetaster.
How I found NS. Try not guessing where I reside.
We need to accept that there are things beyond our control.
Also, if having a letter in a flag is a sin, I'm your vexillographical sinner.

User avatar
Bezkoshtovnya
Senator
 
Posts: 4699
Founded: Sep 06, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Bezkoshtovnya » Mon May 13, 2019 12:26 am

Te Netherlands wrote:
Juristonia wrote:They get that that's what you believe. They're asking why.


I believe in that because it was always been that only a man and a woman can marry each other, and two men and two women can't produce children, and I believe that you only can have children after marriage. And I believe we should live in a stronger Christian society. I am not judging anyone who have children and are not married, it's their choice, but I actually don't know any more reasons than this why I believe that

Not true. There is evidence that points to same sex marital practices as far back as Mesopotamia.
Last edited by Bezkoshtovnya on Mon May 13, 2019 12:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dante Alighieri wrote:There is no greater sorrow than to recall happiness in times of misery
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
ΦΣK
------------------

User avatar
Nakena
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15010
Founded: May 06, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nakena » Mon May 13, 2019 12:36 am

New haven america wrote:
Te Netherlands wrote:
I believe in that because it was always been that only a man and a woman can marry each other, and two men and two women can't produce children, and I believe that you only can have children after marriage. And I believe we should live in a stronger Christian society. I am not judging anyone who have children and are not married, it's their choice, but I actually don't know any more reasons than this why I believe that

What about infertile couples or non-Christians?


I guess non-christians wouldn really have to be affected.

User avatar
Mettaton-EX
Diplomat
 
Posts: 731
Founded: Sep 24, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Mettaton-EX » Mon May 13, 2019 3:26 am

Bezkoshtovnya wrote:
Te Netherlands wrote:
I believe in that because it was always been that only a man and a woman can marry each other, and two men and two women can't produce children, and I believe that you only can have children after marriage. And I believe we should live in a stronger Christian society. I am not judging anyone who have children and are not married, it's their choice, but I actually don't know any more reasons than this why I believe that

Not true. There is evidence that points to same sex marital practices as far back as Mesopotamia.

trans and/or nonbinary people too, for that matter
THIS ROBOT IS TRANS | AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT | هٰذه الآلة تقتل الفاشيين
(prefer it/its but any pronouns are acceptable)

User avatar
Stagnant Axon Terminal
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16621
Founded: Feb 24, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Stagnant Axon Terminal » Mon May 13, 2019 3:32 am

Nakena wrote:
New haven america wrote:What about infertile couples or non-Christians?


I guess non-christians wouldn really have to be affected.

so basically
"Idk do whatever if you aren't Christian"
Is your stance
TET's resident state assessment exam
My sworn enemy is the Toyota 4Runner
I scream a lot.
Also, I'm gonna fuck your girlfriend.
Nanatsu No Tsuki wrote:the fetus will never eat cake if you abort it

Cu Math wrote:Axon is like a bear with a PH.D. She debates at first, then eats your face.
The Empire of Pretantia wrote:THE MAN'S PENIS HAS LEFT THE VAGINA. IT'S THE UTERUS'S TURN TO SHINE.

User avatar
The Grims
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1843
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby The Grims » Mon May 13, 2019 3:38 am

Stagnant Axon Terminal wrote:
Nakena wrote:
I guess non-christians wouldn really have to be affected.

so basically
"Idk do whatever if you aren't Christian"
Is your stance


Seems reasonable. If you are a christian, act like it. If not, your choice.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Celritannia, Cerula, Dimetrodon Empire, Dogmeat, Elejamie, Enormous Gentiles, Kreushia, Zadanar

Advertisement

Remove ads