What is your opinion on LGBT+ marriage?

[Bezkoshtovnya]

Logic and facts aren't bourgeois, fucking hell.

The Logic and Facts of a liberal are simply Subjective. You can't smell, taste or feel them. they are ideals of a natural right. I metaphysical godhead like figure that insures abstract laws.

What the FUCK?

[Bezkoshtovnya]

Kudos there! I’ve been married close to a decade and haven’t reproduced. Sex should be enjoyed. Even the Bible calls for people who are married to rejoice in the pleasures of their spouse. It’s an amazing act, independent of reproduction.

1. I don't care if a religion says so.

2. I hope that any concept of Free love will eventually be purge out of existence.

Oh okay so free will is only a thing for you. Now who is perceiving themselves as superior?

[Bienenhalde]

Protip: sex is not solely for reproduction. Banning non-reproductive sex means you would ban sterile people from at least enjoying the act. I don’t think that’s fair.

It would seem fair if you think sex is solely for reproduction. And asserting that sex is not solely for reproduction does not automatically prove it to be true.

[Communal concils]

Perhaps this argument would have been useful against an conservative, but you are dealing with a completely different breed of thought.

You're the one who brought up free will. Are you turning about to say free will isn't a valid argument - because then I have bad news about your previous argument.

On the other hand, debating with a conservative would be easier than debating with you. They'd be more understanding of reality.

1. I'm not saying that . free will is about choice. Does a dictator choose a police of his choice. doesn't he heave the choice to coerce opposition. People have autonomy for many things, however some desires go against others.

2. The would most likely call anyone of a deviant orientation a bundle of sticks. Be happy that I have limits.

[Communal concils]

Puritanism is a virtue. It's that simple. Those with self-control will live better than those that choose dirtiness. Puritan societies had a tendency of being communal. There was a sense of unity and family for the people involve. You see this with Utopian Socialist, and also with countless examples of ancient societies. I don't care if the sexual lustful are angry, what I care about is individuals that gather themselves under a morality. A morality that forms a better construct.

Do you support alcohol prohibition, then?

Yes. Why do I want violent and drunk people slamming cars into pedestrians. Alcohol has also contributed to child abuse and a harsh economy.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Protip: sex is not solely for reproduction. Banning non-reproductive sex means you would ban sterile people from at least enjoying the act. I don’t think that’s fair.

It would seem fair if you think sex is solely for reproduction. And asserting that sex is not solely for reproduction does not automatically prove it to be true.

I’ll let psychology explain this one: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psycho ... -sex%3famp

[Communal concils]

1. I don't care if a religion says so.

2. I hope that any concept of Free love will eventually be purge out of existence.

Oh okay so free will is only a thing for you. Now who is perceiving themselves as superior?

Everyone has freewill. however, interest of people can contradict. I don't see myself as superior, I am only stating my thoughts.

[The Rich Port]

Protip: sex is not solely for reproduction. Banning non-reproductive sex means you would ban sterile people from at least enjoying the act. I don’t think that’s fair.

It would seem fair if you think sex is solely for reproduction. And asserting that sex is not solely for reproduction does not automatically prove it to be true.

Yes it would SEEM fair, it wouldn't actually BE fair.

Except it's patently not, though. Sex doesn't stop feeling good if you're not reproducing, nor does it become impossible if you can't reproduce. Recreational sex is a vital part of healthy human psychology, unless you're asexual, I guess.

[The New California Republic]

The Logic and Facts of a liberal are simply Subjective. You can't smell, taste or feel them. they are ideals of a natural right. I metaphysical godhead like figure that insures abstract laws.

What the FUCK?

Fuck knows. It was complete gobbledegook.

[Kannap]

You're the one who brought up free will. Are you turning about to say free will isn't a valid argument - because then I have bad news about your previous argument.

On the other hand, debating with a conservative would be easier than debating with you. They'd be more understanding of reality.

1. I'm not saying that . free will is about choice. Does a dictator choose a police of his choice. doesn't he heave the choice to coerce opposition. People have autonomy for many things, however some desires go against others.

2. The would most likely call anyone of a deviant orientation a bundle of sticks. Be happy that I have limits.

1. Dunno what you're trying to say here, really. It's all nonsensical rambling.

2. Imagine thinking all conservatives are homophobic bigots. Wow.

[Kannap]

Do you support alcohol prohibition, then?

Yes. Why do I want violent and drunk people slamming cars into pedestrians. Alcohol has also contributed to child abuse and a harsh economy.

Just exterminate all life, really, because you're concerned with harm caused by them.

[Kannap]

Oh okay so free will is only a thing for you. Now who is perceiving themselves as superior?

Everyone has freewill. however, interest of people can contradict. I don't see myself as superior, I am only stating my thoughts.

Though facts tend not to contradict, friend.

[Bezkoshtovnya]

Oh okay so free will is only a thing for you. Now who is perceiving themselves as superior?

Everyone has freewill. however, interest of people can contradict. I don't see myself as superior, I am only stating my thoughts.

Yeah that's why you said you can do what you want because of free will but those who have sex and loving relationships due to free will are inferior.

[Telconi]

Why is the right to marry subject to the 14th but the right to bear (certain) arms is not? What is the distinguishing characteristic to determine what rights the states can regulate and what ones they cannot?

The Equal Protection Clause assures that all citizens have equal rights. Prohibiting marriage on the basis of sexuality, or race (prior to Loving v. Virginia, 1967), is unconstitutional because other citizens aren't prohibited from marriage.

Guns, contrary to popular belief, aren't people nor are they American citizens.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

Neither are marriage licenses...

[Communal concils]

It would seem fair if you think sex is solely for reproduction. And asserting that sex is not solely for reproduction does not automatically prove it to be true.

I’ll let psychology explain this one: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psycho ... -sex%3famp

So what, Sex encourages "connections". This connections would have to evolve into some desire to mate. Nature forces these connections, and these connects lead to reproduction.

[Kannap]

The Equal Protection Clause assures that all citizens have equal rights. Prohibiting marriage on the basis of sexuality, or race (prior to Loving v. Virginia, 1967), is unconstitutional because other citizens aren't prohibited from marriage.

Guns, contrary to popular belief, aren't people nor are they American citizens.

Neither are marriage licenses...

Feel free to read the next post I made in that line of conversation.

[Huanguo]

No, it should be banned for obvious reasons.

So, smart dude, what are those "obvious reasons"?

[Kannap]

I’ll let psychology explain this one: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psycho ... -sex%3famp

So what, Sex encourages "connections". This connections would have to evolve into some desire to mate. Nature forces these connections, and these connects lead to reproduction.

Somebody didn't read past the subtitle of the article.

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

I’ll let psychology explain this one: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psycho ... -sex%3famp

So what, Sex encourages "connections". This connections would have to evolve into some desire to mate. Nature forces these connections, and these connects lead to reproduction.

You didn’t read the article if that’s what you have to say. Of course, after reading the things you’ve said here, I didn’t expect you to. No worries.

What the article does states is that sex is not solely about reproduction. It’s about a whole host of other things.

Complexity. Learn it.

[Communal concils]

1. I'm not saying that . free will is about choice. Does a dictator choose a police of his choice. doesn't he heave the choice to coerce opposition. People have autonomy for many things, however some desires go against others.

2. The would most likely call anyone of a deviant orientation a bundle of sticks. Be happy that I have limits.

1. Dunno what you're trying to say here, really. It's all nonsensical rambling.

2. Imagine thinking all conservatives are homophobic bigots. Wow.

1. I simply said that people have contradiction interest.

2. I have no problems with discriminating against conservatives. They are stuck to a fake God. A sense of never wanting to adapt, they want o stay with a perceived status quo.

[Korhal IVV]

Just abolish marriage. It's such a useless institution in western civilization. It's original role as a agreement to reproduce is gone, so marriage it's self its a useless institution. Also , Love is not simply love, it's role is for reproduction.

Ah. So it is little more than a chemical reaction?

I guess I can hit your head right now, as pain is also a chemical reaction.

[Telconi]

Neither are marriage licenses...

Feel free to read the next post I made in that line of conversation.

Curiously, laws against homosexual marriage never specifically targeted homosexuals. They targeted marriages to other people of the same sex. By your account that's fine, since "You can't marry other people of your same sex" was applied equally to all.

[The New California Republic]

I simply said that people have contradiction interest.

nonsensical rambling.

[Korhal IVV]

1. Dunno what you're trying to say here, really. It's all nonsensical rambling.

2. Imagine thinking all conservatives are homophobic bigots. Wow.

1. I simply said that people have contradiction interest.

2. I have no problems with discriminating against conservatives. They are stuck to a fake God. A sense of never wanting to adapt, they want o stay with a perceived status quo.

Lol.

What exactly do you us to adapt to?

[Communal concils]

So what, Sex encourages "connections". This connections would have to evolve into some desire to mate. Nature forces these connections, and these connects lead to reproduction.

You didn’t read the article if that’s what you have to say. Of course, after reading the things you’ve said here, I didn’t expect you to. No worries.

What the article does states is that sex is not solely about reproduction. It’s about a whole host of other things.

Complexity. Learn it.

I did read it. The summary is that humans have sex because nature wants cooperation.To me, this cooperation exist because of a desire to reproduce. People have a tendency to not have reproductive sex, I think that people that do this have an unaware desire to attempt reproduction.