Christenmark wrote:Munkcestrian Republic wrote:Pretty sure the words of the constitution mean whatever the fuck the Supreme Court wants them to mean, actually
taht is because previosu administrations have used the supreme court to subvert our checks and balances to pass whatever they want without regards to the constitution. their job is to make sure that decisions adhere to the document! not the document to the decision
The Supreme Court did their job, decided their decisions adhered to the document, explicitly laid out the reasons why it adhered to the document. You just don't like the decision or the reasons so you're saying they're wrong.