Because when someone goes out of there way to pretend they're not homophobic while at the same time calling for the death of LGBT people, what ever "evidence" they bring to the argument has become irrelevant.
Advertisement
by Heloin » Tue May 21, 2019 12:51 pm
by Cekoviu » Tue May 21, 2019 12:51 pm
by Othelos » Tue May 21, 2019 12:51 pm
Califghanistan wrote:Othelos wrote:Gay marriage is good for society. More potential parents for those unwanted children forced to be born by pro-lifers. Plus, it de-stigmatizes homosexuality, which is good for the roughly 5% of people who would otherwise suffer from minority stress and higher rates of suicide.
Yeah, no, because it would encourage homosex, which is a crime.
by Llalta » Tue May 21, 2019 12:51 pm
Califghanistan wrote:Othelos wrote:Gay marriage is good for society. More potential parents for those unwanted children forced to be born by pro-lifers. Plus, it de-stigmatizes homosexuality, which is good for the roughly 5% of people who would otherwise suffer from minority stress and higher rates of suicide.
Yeah, no, because it would encourage homosex, which is a crime.
by Farnhamia » Tue May 21, 2019 12:52 pm
Califghanistan wrote:The Rich Port wrote:
Considering that the man you are using as an authority on the matter also advocated for the execution of gay people (and you didn't make that fact immediately clear), I would say he doubts the sincerity of that saying.
Which, yeah. Unless you're also going to argue that murder is somehow loving.
Homosexuality is indeed a sin that warrants the death penalty.
by The Black Forrest » Tue May 21, 2019 12:53 pm
Califghanistan wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
That's a rather ignorant comment.
Again, how is the Qur'an accepting of science and yet your "genius" says belief in evolution is by people who are against Religion? Never mind Darwin was very religious. Then again your "genius" would like to see Darwin excluded since he wasn't a Muslim.
So what is your point? Because remember, the evolution is the theory that animals evolved on their own, which is against religion. Islam states that everything follows the laws of God. Animals evolved, but why? Because of the laws of nature. And who created the laws of nature? God. Also, the first person to write about the idea of natural selection wasn't Darwin, but rather Al-Jahiz, an Islamic scientist.
by Othelos » Tue May 21, 2019 12:56 pm
Llalta wrote:Califghanistan wrote:Yeah, no, because it would encourage homosex, which is a crime.
My problem with your argument against homosexuality is that, of what I can see, you say it is bad because, "God says so". I respect your religion and that you have a different opinion and all, but as someone who doesn't believe in a God of any kind, this argument means virtually nothing to me. Why exactly should I, as an atheist, believe that it is wrong because someone, who I don't believe in, said so? And for what reason does he hate homosexuality so much?
by The Capitalist Era » Tue May 21, 2019 1:00 pm
by The Capitalist Era » Tue May 21, 2019 1:01 pm
by Cekoviu » Tue May 21, 2019 1:02 pm
by The Capitalist Era » Tue May 21, 2019 1:04 pm
Cekoviu wrote:The Capitalist Era wrote:
That's not advocating death. That's freedom of religion, expression, and speech.
Okay, one: NS is Australian, so your American constitution doesn't count
Two: it's still advocating death even if that's true
Three: since NS is a private company, they don't have free speech, nor are they legally required to
by Farnhamia » Tue May 21, 2019 1:06 pm
The Capitalist Era wrote:Cekoviu wrote:Okay, one: NS is Australian, so your American constitution doesn't count
Two: it's still advocating death even if that's true
Three: since NS is a private company, they don't have free speech, nor are they legally required to
Rather, it is not advocating death. I disagree with her religion too(die-hard Protestant myself), but that is STILL not advocating death. She is merely saying what her religion entitles is the punishment for something(which should have no punishment). But that is not advocating death.
by Highever » Tue May 21, 2019 1:12 pm
Totaler Krieg Division wrote:It was a mistake.
Jolthig wrote:Use Soresu and not Juyo.
Charlie Chaplin wrote:Nothing is permanent in this wicked world, not even our troubles.
by West Leas Oros 2 » Tue May 21, 2019 1:18 pm
Cekoviu wrote:The Capitalist Era wrote:
That's not advocating death. That's freedom of religion, expression, and speech.
Okay, one: NS is Australian, so your American constitution doesn't count
Two: it's still advocating death even if that's true
Three: since NS is a private company, they don't have free speech, nor are they legally required to
WLO Public News: Outdated Factbooks and other documents in process of major redesign! ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: <error:not found>
by Heloin » Tue May 21, 2019 1:21 pm
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:Cekoviu wrote:Okay, one: NS is Australian, so your American constitution doesn't count
Two: it's still advocating death even if that's true
Three: since NS is a private company, they don't have free speech, nor are they legally required to
One: I'm pretty sure that the Australian Constitution has similar protections.
Two: That I can agree with. This is intolerable behavior.
Three: Just because they aren't legally obligated too doesn't mean it's right for them to do so. Why should corporations be allowed to censor and suppress speech any more than the government?
by New Legland » Tue May 21, 2019 1:24 pm
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:Cekoviu wrote:Okay, one: NS is Australian, so your American constitution doesn't count
Two: it's still advocating death even if that's true
Three: since NS is a private company, they don't have free speech, nor are they legally required to
Three: Just because they aren't legally obligated too doesn't mean it's right for them to do so. Why should corporations be allowed to censor and suppress speech any more than the government?
by The Black Forrest » Tue May 21, 2019 1:25 pm
West Leas Oros 2 wrote:Cekoviu wrote:Okay, one: NS is Australian, so your American constitution doesn't count
Two: it's still advocating death even if that's true
Three: since NS is a private company, they don't have free speech, nor are they legally required to
One: I'm pretty sure that the Australian Constitution has similar protections.
Two: That I can agree with. This is intolerable behavior.
Three: Just because they aren't legally obligated too doesn't mean it's right for them to do so. Why should corporations be allowed to censor and suppress speech any more than the government?
by Totaler Krieg Division » Tue May 21, 2019 1:29 pm
by Cekoviu » Tue May 21, 2019 1:31 pm
Totaler Krieg Division wrote:Highever wrote:How? Why?
It furthered a long running moralistic decline in western society. I'm also old enough to remember how gay marriage advocates in the early-mid 2000's insisted all they wanted was gay marriage and how they would never go further than that and how they would proudly exclaim "No! I'll never support those trannies and how dare you think I would!" if you brought up the prospect of it not ending there. If only more of us had the foresight to shut down the slippery slope before it started.
by The Rich Port » Tue May 21, 2019 1:31 pm
Totaler Krieg Division wrote:Highever wrote:How? Why?
It furthered a long running moralistic decline in western society. I'm also old enough to remember how gay marriage advocates in the early-mid 2000's insisted all they wanted was gay marriage and how they would never go further than that and how they would proudly exclaim "No! I'll never support those trannies and how dare you think I would!" if you brought up the prospect of it not ending there. If only more of us had the foresight to shut down the slippery slope before it started.
by Cekoviu » Tue May 21, 2019 1:32 pm
The Rich Port wrote:Totaler Krieg Division wrote:
It furthered a long running moralistic decline in western society. I'm also old enough to remember how gay marriage advocates in the early-mid 2000's insisted all they wanted was gay marriage and how they would never go further than that and how they would proudly exclaim "No! I'll never support those trannies and how dare you think I would!" if you brought up the prospect of it not ending there. If only more of us had the foresight to shut down the slippery slope before it started.
Yeah not old enough because that was never a thing.
You do know what the T in LGBT stands for, right. It's not tuna, ffs.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Hidrandia, Philjia, Quincy, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement